Skip to content
1981
Volume 22, Issue 1
  • ISSN: 1476-4504
  • E-ISSN: 2040-1388

Abstract

Speeches to the nation offer presidents the potential to influence people. In the COVID-19 pandemic, the leaders’ discourses on the nation have been followed by many citizens in different modalities. However, are there differences if the audience watches or listens to the politician in a press conference? This research examines how the modality of presentation (audio or video) influences the perception of attractiveness, persuasiveness, credibility, emotional response, attitude and voting intention. A sample of 360 participants evaluated these variables after watching two videos and listening to two audio segments of the former president of the United States (Trump), the ex-prime minister of the United Kingdom (Johnson) and the president of the Government of Spain (Sanchez) in press conferences about coronavirus. The results showed that modality is an important variable in the participants’ perceptions, emotions and attitudes. Audio was the format in which politicians were perceived as more attractive, persuasive, credible, energetic and dominant. The attitude towards them and the voting intention were also higher in response to the audio version. However, some emotions, such as neutrality, anger and sadness, were better perceived in the video presentations.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1386/rjao_00089_1
2024-07-03
2025-01-25
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Ahler, Douglas J., Citrin, Jack, Dougal, Michael C. and Lenz, Gabriel S. (2017), ‘Face value? Experimental evidence that candidate appearance influences electoral choice’, Political Behavior, 39:1, pp. 77102.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Al-Jazeera (2016), ‘What makes Trump attractive to so many Americans?’, YouTube, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eiYqfUIa4ro&ab_channel=AlJazeeraEnglish. Accessed 21 April 2021.
  3. Bar, Moshe, Neta, Maital and Linz, Heather (2006), ‘Very first impressions’, Emotion, 6:2, pp. 26978.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Berggren, Niclas, Jordahl, Henrik and Poutvaara, Panu (2010), ‘The looks of a winner: Beauty and electoral success’, Journal of Public Economics, 94:1–2, pp. 815.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Boersma, Paul and Weenink, Daniel (2023), ‘Praat: Doing phonetics by computer (version 6.1.14)’, http://www.fon.hum.uva.nl/praat. Accessed 9 January 2023.
  6. Bradley, Margaret M. and Lang, Peter J. (1994), ‘Measuring emotion: The self-assessment manikin and the semantic differential’, Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry, 25:1, pp. 4959.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Brian, Kenzie (2018), ‘Is the hot politician evil? A parlor game for our broken era’, Vanity Fair, 1 June, https://www.vanityfair.com/style/2018/06/sanchez-trudeau-macron-hot-prime-ministers-game. Accessed 9 May 2024.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Burgoon, Judee K., Birk, Thomas and Pfau, Michael (1990), ‘Nonverbal behaviors, persuasion, and credibility’, Human Communication Research, 17:1, pp. 14069.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Burgoon, Judee K., Floyd, Kory and Guerrero, Laura K. (2010), ‘Nonverbal communication theories of interpersonal adaptation’, in C. Berger, M. Rologg and D. Ewoldsen (eds), The New SAGE Handbook of Communication Science, Thousand Oaks: Sage, pp. 93110.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Burgoon, Judee K., Manusov, Valerie and Guerrero, Laura K. (2016), Nonverbal Communication, New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Carney, Dana R., Cuddy, Amy J. C. and Yap, Andy J. (2010), ‘Power posing: Brief nonverbal displays affect neuroendocrine levels and risk tolerance’, Psychological Science, 21:10, pp. 136368.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Chaiken, Shelly and Eagly, Alice H. (1983), ‘Communication modality as a determinant of persuasion: The role of communicator salience’, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45:2, pp. 24156.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Clark, Timothy and Greatbatch, David (2011), ‘Audience perceptions of charismatic and non-charismatic oratory: The case of management gurus’, The Leadership Quarterly, 22:1, pp. 2232.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. DeGroot, Timothy, Aime, Federico, Johnson, Scott G. and Kluemper, Donald (2011), ‘Does talking the talk help walking the walk? An examination of the effect of vocal attractiveness in leader effectiveness’, The Leadership Quarterly, 22:4, pp. 68089.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Dion, Karen K. (2002), ‘Cultural perspectives on facial attractiveness’, in C. Rhodes and L. A. Zebrowitz (eds), Facial Attractiveness: Evolutionary, Cognitive, and Social Perspectives, Westport, CT: Ablex, pp. 23959.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Dirks, Kurt T. and Ferrin, Donald L. (2002), ‘Trust in leadership: Meta-analytic findings and implications for research and practice’, The Journal of Applied Psychology, 87:4, pp. 61128.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Druckman, James N. (2003), ‘The power of television images: The first Kennedy–Nixon debate revisited’, The Journal of Politics, 65:2, pp. 55971.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Dumitrescu, Delia (2016), ‘Nonverbal communication in politics: A review of research developments, 2005–2015’, American Behavioral Scientist, 60:14, pp. 165675.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Ekman, Paul (1970), ‘Universal facial expressions of emotions’, California Mental Health Research Digest, 8:4, pp. 15158.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Feinberg, David R., Jones, Ben C., Little, Anthony C., Burt, D. Michael and Perrett, David I. (2005), ‘Manipulations of fundamental and formant frequencies influence the attractiveness of human male voices’, Animal Behaviour, 69:3, pp. 56168.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Friedman, Vanessa (2019), ‘Boris Johnson and the rise of silly style’, The New York Times, 27 July, https://www.nytimes.com/2019/07/23/style/boris-johnson-and-the-rise-of-silly-style.html. Accessed 9 January 2023.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Guyer, Joshua J., Briñol, Pablo, Petty, Richard E. and Horcajo, Javier (2019), ‘Nonverbal behavior of persuasive sources: A multiple process analysis’, Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 43:2, pp. 20331.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Hart, William, Ottati, Victor C. and Krumdick, Nathaniel D. (2011), ‘Physical attractiveness and candidate evaluation: A model of correction’, Political Psychology, 32:2, pp. 181203.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Hellweg, Susan A., Pfau, Michael and Brydon, Steven Robert (1992), Televised Presidential Debates: Advocacy in Contemporary America, New York: Praeger.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Herrmann, Michael and Shikano, Susumu (2016), ‘Attractiveness and facial competence bias face-based inferences of candidate ideology’, Political Psychology, 37:3, pp. 40117.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Hess, Ursula, Blairy, Sylvie and Kleck, Robert E. (2000), ‘The influence of facial emotion displays, gender, and ethnicity on judgments of dominance and affiliation’, Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 24:4, pp. 26583.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Hincks, Rebecca (2004), ‘Processing the prosody of oral presentations’, Proceedings of InSTIL/ICALL 2004, Venice, Italy, 17–19 June, https://www.isca-archive.org/icall_2004/hincks04_icall.pdf. Accessed 9 January 2023.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Horiuchi, Yusaku, Komatsu, Tadashi and Nakaya, Fumio (2012), ‘Should candidates smile to win elections? An application of automated face recognition technology’, Political Psychology, 33:6, pp. 92533.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Keltner, Dacher, Ellsworth, Phoebe C. and Edwards, Kari (1993), ‘Beyond simple pessimism: Effects of sadness and anger on social perception’, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64:5, pp. 74052.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Kimble, Charles E. and Seidel, Steven D. (1991), ‘Vocal signs of confidence’, Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 15:2, pp. 99105.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Kiousis, Spiro (2006), ‘Exploring the impact of modality on perceptions of credibility for online news stories’, Journalism Studies, 7:2, pp. 34859.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Klofstad, Casey A. (2016), ‘Candidate voice pitch influences election outcomes’, Political Psychology, 37:5, pp. 72538.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Klofstad, Casey A., Anderson, Rindy C. and Peters, Susan (2012), ‘Sounds like a winner: Voice pitch influences perception of leadership capacity in both men and women’, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 279:1738, pp. 2698704.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Knapp, Mark L., Hall, Judith A. and Horgan, Terrence G. (2014), Nonverbal Communication in Human Interaction, 8th ed., Boston, MA: Wadsworth.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Kniffin, Kevin M., Wansink, Brian, Griskevicius, Vladas and Wilson, David Sloan (2014), ‘Beauty is in the in-group of the beholded: Intergroup differences in the perceived attractiveness of leaders’, The Leadership Quarterly, 25:6, pp. 114353.
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Laustsen, Lasse (2014), ‘Decomposing the relationship between candidates’ facial appearance and electoral success’, Political Behavior, 36:4, pp. 77791.
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Lenz, Gabriel S. and Lawson, Chappell (2011), ‘Looking the part: Television leads less informed citizens to vote based on candidates’ appearance’, American Journal of Political Science, 55:3, pp. 57489.
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Lerner, Jennifer S. and Keltner, Dacher (2000), ‘Beyond valence: Toward a model of emotion-specific influences on judgement and choice’, Cognition & Emotion, 14:4, pp. 47393.
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Madera, Juan M. and Smith, D. Brent (2009), ‘The effects of leader negative emotions on evaluations of leadership in a crisis situation: The role of anger and sadness’, The Leadership Quarterly, 20:2, pp. 10314.
    [Google Scholar]
  40. Mattes, Kyle, Spezio, Michael, Kim, Hackjin, Todorov, Alexander, Adolphs, Ralph and Alvarez, R. Michael (2010), ‘Predicting election outcomes from positive and negative trait assessments of candidate images’, Political Psychology, 31:1, pp. 4158.
    [Google Scholar]
  41. Mattes, Kyle and Milazzo, Caitlin (2014), ‘Pretty faces, marginal races: Predicting election outcomes using trait assessments of British parliamentary candidates’, Electoral Studies, 34:1, pp. 17789.
    [Google Scholar]
  42. McCroskey, James C. and Teven, Jason J. (1999), ‘Goodwill: A reexamination of the construct and its measurement’, Communications Monographs, 66:1, pp. 90103.
    [Google Scholar]
  43. McGinnies, Elliot (1965), ‘A cross-cultural comparison of printed communications versus spoken communications in persuasion’, Journal of Psychology, 60:1, https://doi.org/10.1080/00223980.1965.10545257.
    [Google Scholar]
  44. Mehu, Marc, Little, Anthony C. and Dunbar, Robin (2007), ‘Duchenne smiles and the perception of generosity and sociability in faces’, Journal of Evolutionary Psychology, 5:5, pp. 13346.
    [Google Scholar]
  45. Miles, Matthew R. (2014), ‘The bully pulpit and media coverage: Power without persuasion’, The International Journal of Press/Politics, 19:1, pp. 6684.
    [Google Scholar]
  46. Mohammadi, Gelareh, Park, Sunghyun, Sagae, Kenji, Vinciarelli, Alessandro and Morency, Louis-Philippe (2013), ‘Who is persuasive? The role of perceived personality and communication modality in social multimedia’, Proceedings of the 15th ACM on International Conference on Multimodal Interaction, Sydney, Australia, 9–13 December, Sydney: College of Science and Engineering, School of Computing Science, pp. 1926.
    [Google Scholar]
  47. Mutz, Diana Carole, Sniderman, Paul M. and Brody, Richard A. (1996), Political Persuasion and Attitude Change, Michigan, MI: University of Michigan Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  48. Newhagen, John E. (1998), ‘TV news images that induce anger, fear, and disgust: Effects on approach-avoidance and memory’, Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 42:2, pp. 26576.
    [Google Scholar]
  49. Nicholson, Stephen P., Coe, Chelsea M., Emory, Jason and Song, Anna V. (2016), ‘The politics of beauty: The effects of partisan bias on physical attractiveness’, Political Behavior, 38:4, pp. 88398.
    [Google Scholar]
  50. O’Keefe, Daniel J. (2015), Persuasion: Theory and Research, Thousand Oaks, London, New Delhi: Sage.
    [Google Scholar]
  51. Olivola, Christopher Y. and Todorov, Alexander (2010), ‘Elected in 100 milliseconds: Appearance-based trait inferences and voting’, Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 34:2, pp. 83110.
    [Google Scholar]
  52. Palanica, Adam and Itier, Roxane J. (2012), ‘Attention capture by direct gaze is robust to context and task demands’, Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 36:2, pp. 12334.
    [Google Scholar]
  53. Park, Sunghyun (2013), ‘Persuasiveness in social multimedia: The role of communication modality and the challenge of crowdsourcing annotations’, Proceedings of the 15th ACM on International Conference on Multimodal Interaction, Sydney, Australia, 9–13 December, New York: ACM Press, pp. 32124.
    [Google Scholar]
  54. Patterson, Miles L., Churchill, Mary E., Burger, Gary K. and Powell, Jack L. (1992), ‘Verbal and nonverbal modality effects on impressions of political candidates: Analysis from the 1984 presidential debates’, Communication Monographs, 59:3, pp. 23142.
    [Google Scholar]
  55. Perloff, Richard M. (2020), The Dynamics of Persuasion: Communication and Attitudes in the Twenty-First Century, New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  56. Pönkänen, Laura M. and Hietanen, Jari K. (2012), ‘Eye contact with neutral and smiling faces: Effects on autonomic responses and frontal EEG asymmetry’, Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 6, https://doi.org/10.3389%2Ffnhum.2012.00122.
    [Google Scholar]
  57. Puts, David Andrew, Gaulin, Steven J. and Verdolini, Katherine (2006), ‘Dominance and the evolution of sexual dimorphism in human voice pitch’, Evolution and Human Behavior, 27:4, pp. 28396.
    [Google Scholar]
  58. Rodero, Emma (2011), ‘Intonation and emotion: Influence of pitch levels and contour type on creating emotions’, Journal of Voice, 25:1, pp. 2534.
    [Google Scholar]
  59. Rodero, Emma (2020), ‘Do your ads talk too fast to your audio audience? How speech rates of audio commercials influence cognitive and physiological outcomes’, Journal of Advertising Research, 60:3, pp. 33749.
    [Google Scholar]
  60. Rodero, Emma, Potter, Robert F. and Prieto, Pilar (2017), ‘Pitch range variations improve cognitive processing of audio messages’, Human Communication Research, 43:3, pp. 397413.
    [Google Scholar]
  61. Rodero, Emma, Mas, Lluís and Blanco, María (2014), ‘The influence of prosody on politicians’ credibility’, Journal of Applied Linguistics & Professional Practice, 11:1, pp. 89111.
    [Google Scholar]
  62. Rosenberg, Andrew and Hirschberg, Julia (2005), ‘Acoustic/prosodic and lexical correlates of charismatic speech’, Proceedings of Interspeech 2005, Lisbon, Portugal, 4–8 September, ISCA, pp. 51316.
    [Google Scholar]
  63. Rosenberg, Andrew and Hirschberg, Julia (2009), ‘Charisma perception from text and speech’, Speech Communication, 51:7, pp. 64055.
    [Google Scholar]
  64. Schaefer, Todd M. (1997), ‘Persuading the persuaders: Presidential speeches and editorial opinion’, Political Communication, 14:1, pp. 97111.
    [Google Scholar]
  65. Scherer, Klaus R., Clark-Polner, Elisabeth and Mortillaro, Marcello (2011), ‘In the eye of the beholder? Universality and cultural specificity in the expression and perception of emotion’, International Journal of Psychology, 46:6, pp. 40135.
    [Google Scholar]
  66. Segrin, Chris (1993), ‘The effect of nonverbal behavior on outcome of compliance gaining attempts’, Communication Studies, 44:3–4, pp. 16987.
    [Google Scholar]
  67. Senju, Atsuchi and Johnson, Mark H. (2009), ‘The eye contact effect: Mechanisms and development’, Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 13:3, pp. 12734.
    [Google Scholar]
  68. Sparks, John R., Areni, Charles S. and Cox, K. Chris (1998), ‘An investigation of the effects of language style and communication modality on persuasion’, Communication Monographs, 65:2, pp. 10825.
    [Google Scholar]
  69. Storbeck, Justin and Clore, Gerald L. (2008), ‘Affective arousal as information: How affective arousal influences judgments, learning, and memory’, Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 2:5, pp. 182443.
    [Google Scholar]
  70. Strach, Patricia, Zuber, Katherine, Fowler, Erika F., Ridout, Travis N. and Searles, Kathleen (2015), ‘In a different voice? Explaining the use of men and women as voice-over announcers in political advertising’, Political Communication, 32:2, pp. 183205.
    [Google Scholar]
  71. Strangert, Eva (2005), ‘Prosody in public speech: Analyses of a news announcement and a political interview’, Proceedings of Interspeech 2005, 4–8 September, Lisbon, Portugal, ISCA, pp. 3401404.
    [Google Scholar]
  72. Surawski, Melissa K. and Ossoff, Elisabeth P. (2006), ‘The effects of physical and vocal attractiveness on impression formation of politicians’, Current Psychology, 25:1, pp. 1527.
    [Google Scholar]
  73. Sy, Thomas, Horton, Calen and Riggio, Ronald (2018), ‘Charismatic leadership: Eliciting and channeling follower emotions’, The Leadership Quarterly, 29:1, pp. 5869.
    [Google Scholar]
  74. Tannenbaum, Percy H. and Kerrick, Jean S. (1954), ‘Effect of newscast item leads upon listener interpretation’, Journalism Quarterly, 31:1, pp. 3337.
    [Google Scholar]
  75. Thomas, Rosemary J., Masthoff, Judith and Oren, Nir (2017), ‘Adapting healthy eating messages to personality’, International Conference on Persuasive Technology, 3–6 April, Toronto.
    [Google Scholar]
  76. Tiedens, Larissa Z. and Linton, Susan (2001), ‘Judgment under emotional certainty and uncertainty: The effects of specific emotions on information processing’, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81:6, pp. 97388.
    [Google Scholar]
  77. Tigue, Cara C., Borak, Diana J., O’Connor, Jilian J., Schandl, Charles and Feinberg, David R. (2012), ‘Voice pitch influences voting behavior’, Evolution and Human Behavior, 33:3, pp. 21016.
    [Google Scholar]
  78. Van Kleef, Gerben A., van den Berg, Helma and Heerdink, Marc W. (2015), ‘The persuasive power of emotions: Effects of emotional expressions on attitude formation and change’, The Journal of Applied Psychology, 100:4, pp. 112442.
    [Google Scholar]
  79. Van’t Riet, Jonathan, Schaap, Gabi, Kleemans, Mariska, Veling, Harm and Lecheler, Sophie (2019), ‘On different sides: Investigating the persuasive effects of anger expression in political news messages’, Political Psychology, 40:4, pp. 83757.
    [Google Scholar]
  80. Verhulst, Brad, Lodge, Milton and Lavine, Howard (2010), ‘The attractiveness halo: Why some candidates are perceived more favorably than others’, Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 34:2, pp. 11117.
    [Google Scholar]
  81. Wasike, Ben (2019), ‘Gender, nonverbal communication, and televised debates: A case study analysis of Clinton and Trump’s nonverbal language during the 2016 Town Hall debate’, International Journal of Communication, 13, pp. 25176.
    [Google Scholar]
  82. Widmann, Tobias (2019), ‘How emotional are populists really? Factors explaining emotional appeals in the communication of political parties’, Political Psychology, 42:1, pp. 16381.
    [Google Scholar]
  83. Wiegman, Oene (1989), ‘Communication modality and attitude change in a realistic experiment’, Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 19:10, pp. 82840.
    [Google Scholar]
  84. Wissmath, Bartholomäus, Weibel, David and Reber, Thomas P. (2010), ‘The impact of communication modality on perceived credibility of panel members’, Electronic News, 4:1, pp. 2338.
    [Google Scholar]
  85. Ziegler, Rene, Friederike, Arnold and Diehl, Michael (2007), ‘Communication modality and biased processing: A study on the occasion of the German 2002 election TV debate’, Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 29:2, pp. 17584.
    [Google Scholar]
  86. Zuckerman, Miron and Driver, Robert E. (1989), ‘What sounds beautiful is good: The vocal attractiveness stereotype’, Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 13:2, pp. 6782.
    [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1386/rjao_00089_1
Loading
/content/journals/10.1386/rjao_00089_1
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Article
Keyword(s): attitude; audio; emotions; modality; perception; politicians; video; voting intention
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a success
Invalid data
An error occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error
Please enter a valid_number test