Transgressive (un)scripting: Metajournalistic discourse and ‘sonic friendship’ in The Trojan Horse Affair

References

1. Carlson, Matt and Lewis, Seth C. (2020), ‘Boundary work’, in K. Wahl-Jorgensen and T. Hanitzsch (eds), The Handbook of Journalism Studies, New York: Routledge, pp. 123–35.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Deuze, Mark and Witschge, Tamara (2018), ‘Beyond journalism: Theorizing the transformation of journalism’, Journalism, 19:2, pp. 165–81, https://doi.org/10.1177/1464884916688550.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Dowling, David O. and Miller, Kyle J. (2019), ‘Immersive audio storytelling: Podcasting and serial documentary in the digital publishing industry’, Journal of Radio & Audio Media, 26:1, pp. 167–84, https://doi.org/10.1080/19376529.2018.1509218.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Dowling, David O., Johnson, Patrick R. and Ekdale, Brian (2022), ‘Hijacking journalism: Legitimacy and metajournalistic discourse in right-wing podcasts’, Media and Communication, 10:3, pp. 17–27, https://doi.org/10.17645/mac.v10i3.5260.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Engley, Ryan (2017), ‘The impossible ethics of Serial: Sarah Koenig, Foucault, Lacan’, in E. McCracken (ed.), The Serial Podcast and Storytelling in the Digital Age, New York: Routledge, pp. 87–100.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Karim, Karim (2011), ‘Covering Muslims: Journalism as cultural practice’, in B. Zelizer and S. Allan (eds), Journalism After September 11, New York: Routledge, pp. 131–46.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Lindgren, Mia (2016), ‘Personal narrative journalism and podcasting’, Radio Journal: International Studies in Broadcast & Audio Media, 14:1, pp. 23–41, https://doi.org/10.1386/rjao.14.1.23_1.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Lindgren, Mia (2021), ‘Intimacy and emotions in podcast journalism: A study of award-winning Australian and British podcasts’, Journalism Practice, 17:4, pp. 704–19, https://doi.org/10.1080/17512786.2021.1943497.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Malik, Nesrene (2022), ‘Neutrality is born out of laziness’, The New York Review of Books, 1 April, https://www.nybooks.com/online/2022/04/01/neutrality-is-born-out-of-laziness/#:~:text=To%20be%20honest%2C%20neutrality%20for,you%20just%20don’t%20care. Accessed 15 December 2023.
   [Google Scholar]
10. McHugh, Siobhan (2021), ‘The narrative podcast as digital literary journalism: Conceptualizing S-Town’, Literary Journalism Studies, 13:1, pp. 100–29.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Nee, Rebecca C. and Santana, Arthur D. (2022), ‘Podcasting the pandemic: Exploring storytelling formats and shifting journalistic norms in news podcasts related to the coronavirus’, Journalism Practice, 16:8, pp. 1559–77, https://doi.org/10.1080/17512786.2021.1882874.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Perdomo, Gabriela and Rodrigues-Rouleau, Philippe (2022), ‘Transparency as metajournalistic performance: The New York Times’ Caliphate podcast and new ways to claim journalistic authority’, Journalism, 23:11, pp. 2311–27, https://doi.org/10.1177/1464884921997312.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Quah, Nicholas (2022), ‘The Trojan Horse Affair vs. the British press’, Vulture, 3 March, https://www.vulture.com/2022/03/trojan-horse-affair-podcast-british-response-interview.html. Accessed 15 December 2023.
    [Google Scholar]
14. Schudson, Michael (2001), ‘The objectivity norm in American journalism’, Journalism, 2:2, pp. 149–70, https://doi.org/10.1177/146488490100200201.
    [Google Scholar]
15. Spinelli, Martin and Dann, Lance (2019), Podcasting: The Audio Media Revolution, New York: Bloomsbury.
    [Google Scholar]
16. The Trojan Horse Affair (2022), ‘Serial Productions and The New York Times’, 3 February, https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2022/podcasts/trojan-horse-affair.html. Accessed 15 December 2023.
17. Vos, Tim P. and Thomas, Ryan J. (2018), ‘The discursive construction of journalistic authority in a post-truth age’, Journalism Studies, 19:13, pp. 2001–10, https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670x.2018.1492879.
    [Google Scholar]