Understanding feminism on online platforms: Exploration and analysis of two online platforms

References

1. Ayyar, V.. ( 2017;), ‘ Caste gender matrix and the promise and practice in academia. ’, Economic and Political Weekly, 52:50, pp. 2–10.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Butler, J.. ( [1990] 1999), Gender Trouble: Feminism and the Subversion of Identity, New York:: Routledge;.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Butler, J.. ( 2004), Undoing Gender, New York:: Routledge;.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Butler, J.,, Gambetti, Z., and Sabsay, L.. ( 2016), Vulnerability in Resistance, Durham, NC:: Duke University Press;.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Calcutt, A., and Hammond, P.. ( 2011), Journalism Studies: A Critical Introduction, London:: Routledge;.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Chakravarty, U.. ( 1995;), ‘ Gender caste and labour-ideological and material structure of widowhood. ’, Economic and Political Weekly, 30:36, pp. 2248–56.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Chakravarty, U.. ( 2006), Gendering Caste: Through a Feminist Lens, Calcutta:: Stree;.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Chattopadhayay, S.. ( 2011;), ‘ The online activism for a heterogeneous time: The Pink Chaddi campaign and the social media in India. ’, Proteus: A Journal of Ideas, 27:1, pp. 63–69.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Crenshaw, K.. ( 1989;), ‘ Demarginalizing the intersection of race and sex: A black feminist critique of antidiscrimination doctrine, feminist theory and antiracist politics. ’, University of Chicago Legal Forum, 8:1, pp. 138–67.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Crenshaw, K.. ( 1991;), ‘ Mapping the margins: Intersectionality, identity politics and violence against women of colour. ’, Stanford Law Review, 43:6, pp. 1241–99.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Daniels, J.. ( 2016;), ‘ The trouble with white feminism: Whiteness, digital feminism and the intersectional internet. ’, in A. Brock,, S. Noble, and B. Tynes. (eds), Intersectional Internet: Race, Sex and Culture Online, New York:: CUNY Academic Works;, pp. 1–38.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Finneman, T., and Yong, V.. ( 2019;), ‘ Leading the second wave into the third wave: U.S. women journalists and discursive continuity of feminism. ’, Feminist Media Studies, 20:6, pp. 863–78.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Fraser, N.. ( 1990;), ‘ Rethinking the public sphere: A contribution to the critique of actually existing democracy. ’, Social Text, 25:26, pp. 56–80.
    [Google Scholar]
14. Fuchs, C.. ( 2011;), ‘ Towards an alternative concept of privacy. ’, Journal of Information, Communication and Ethics in Society, 9:4, pp. 220–37.
    [Google Scholar]
15. Fuchs, C.. ( 2012;), ‘ The political economy of privacy on Facebook. ’, Television and New Media, 9:4, pp. 220–37.
    [Google Scholar]
16. Gajjala, R.. ( 2004), Cyber Selves: Feminist Ethnographies of South Asian Women, New York:: AltaMira;.
    [Google Scholar]
17. Guha, P.. ( 2014;), ‘ Hash tagging but not trending: The success and failure of the news media to engage with online feminist activities in India. ’, Feminist Media Studies, 15:1, pp. 155–57.
    [Google Scholar]
18. Guru, G.. ( 1995;), ‘ Dalit women talk differently. ’, Economic and Political Weekly, 30:42, pp. 2548–50.
    [Google Scholar]
19. Han, X.. ( 2018;), ‘ Searching for an online space for feminism? The Chinese feminist group gender watch women’s voice and its changing approaches to online misogyny. ’, Feminist Media Studies, 18:4, pp. 734–49.
    [Google Scholar]
20. Harraway, D.. ( 1991), A Cyborg Manifesto: Science, Technology and Social Feminism in the Late Twentieth Century, New York:: Routledge;.
    [Google Scholar]
21. Hindman, M. D.. ( 2011;), ‘ Rethinking intersectionality: Towards an understanding of discursive marginalisation. ’, New Political Science, 33:2, pp. 189–210.
    [Google Scholar]
22. Jenkins, H., and Thorburn, D.. ( 2003;), ‘ Introduction. ’, Democarcy and New Media, Cambridge, MA:: The MIT Press;, pp. 1–17.
    [Google Scholar]
23. Kanagasabai, N.. ( 2016;), ‘ In the silence of the newsroom: Age, generation and sexism in the Indian television newsroom. ’, Feminist Media Studies, 16:4, pp. 1–15.
    [Google Scholar]
24. Kumar, V.. and Sharmishta ( 2019;), ‘ If “untouchability” at Sabarimala makes you angry, then welcome to the world of Dalit women. ’, News18, 7 January, https://www.news18.com/news/buzz/if-untouchability-at-sabarimala-makes-you-angry-then-welcome-to-the-world-of-dalit-women-1991425.html. Accessed 4 November 2021.
    [Google Scholar]
25. Laboria, C.. ( 2015;), ‘ Xenophobia: A politics of alienation. ’, https://www.laboriacuboniks.net/qx8bq.txt. Accessed 4 October 2020.
26. Losh, E.. ( 2014;), ‘ Hashtag feminism and Twitter activism in India. ’, Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective, 3:12, pp. 10–22.
    [Google Scholar]
27. Lykke, N.. ( 2010), Feminist Studies: A Guide to Intersectional Theory, Methodology and Writing, New York:: Routledge;.
    [Google Scholar]
28. Mantri, G.. ( 2021;), ‘ 67 journalists arrested, detained, questioned in India in 2020 for their work. ’, 6 January, https://www.thenewsminute.com/article/67-journalists-arrested-detained-questioned-india-2020-their-work-140963. Accessed 17 November 2021.
29. Matich, M.,, Ashman, R., and Parsons, E.. ( 2019;), ‘ #freethenipple – digital activism and embodiment in the contemporary feminist movement. ’, Consumption Markets & Culture, 22:4, pp. 1–26.
    [Google Scholar]
30. Mines, D. P.. ( 2009), Caste in India, Ann Arbor, MI:: Association for Asian Studies;.
    [Google Scholar]
31. Mitra-Kahn, T.. ( 2012;), ‘ Offline issues, online lives? The emerging cyberlife of feminist politics in urban India. ’, in S. Roy. (ed.), New South Asian Feminisms: Paradoxes and Possibilities, London:: Zed Books;, pp. 108–30.
    [Google Scholar]
32. Mohan, S., and Aswin, P.. ( 2017;), ‘ Localizing YouTube: Language, cultural regions, and digital platforms. ’, International Journal of Cultural Studies, 22:3, pp. 1–17.
    [Google Scholar]
33. Niranjana, T.. ( 2010;), ‘ Why culture matters: Rethinking the language of feminist politics. ’, Inter-Asia Cultural Studies, 11:2, pp. 229–35.
    [Google Scholar]
34. Ortner, S.. ( 1972;), ‘ Is female to male as nature is to culture?. ’, Feminist Studies, 1:2, pp. 5–31.
    [Google Scholar]
35. Oxfam India and Newslaundry ( 2019;), ‘ Who tells our stories matters: Representation of marginalised caste groups in Indian newsroom. ’, Oxfam India and Newslaundry, 2 August, https://d1ns4ht6ytuzzo.cloudfront.net/oxfamdata/oxfamdatapublic/2019-08/Oxfam%20NewsLaundry%20Report_For%20Media%20use.pdf. Accessed 22 November 2021.
    [Google Scholar]
36. Plant, S.. ( 1995;), ‘ The future looms: Weaving women and cybernetics. ’, Body and Society, 1:1, pp. 45–64.
    [Google Scholar]
37. Plant, S.. ( 1997), Zeros and Ones: Digital Women and the New Technoculture, London:: Fourth Estate;.
    [Google Scholar]
38. Poster, M.. ( 2006), Information Please: Culture and Politics in the Age of Digital Machine, Durham, NC and London:: Duke University Press;.
    [Google Scholar]
39. Press Trust of India ( 2019;) ‘ Women journalists denied fair share in Indian media: UN report. ’, Press Trust of India, 2 August, https://www.business-standard.com/article/pti-stories/women-journalists-denied-fair-share-in-indian-media-un-report-119080201682_1.html. Accessed 28 September 2021.
    [Google Scholar]
40. Rao, S.. ( 2014;), ‘ Covering rape in shame culture: Studying journalism ethics in India’s new television news. ’, Journal of Mass Media Ethics: Exploring Questions of Media Morality, 29:3, pp. 153–67.
    [Google Scholar]
41. Rege, S.. ( 1998;), ‘ Dalit women talk differently: A critique of difference and towards a Dalit feminist standpoint position. ’, Economic and Political Weekly, 33:44, pp. 39–46.
    [Google Scholar]
42. Singh, P.. ( 2019;), ‘ Sarla Thakral: India’s first woman to fly an aircraft #IndianWomenInHistory. ’, Feminism in India, 23 September, https://feminisminindia.com/2019/09/23/sarla-thakral-indias-first-woman-fly-aircraft/. Accessed 22 November 2019.
    [Google Scholar]
43. Singhal, A., and Rogers, E. M.. ( 2000), India’s Communication Revolution: From Bullock Carts to Cyber Marts, New Delhi:: Sage;.
    [Google Scholar]
44. Soloman, D.. ( 2009;), ‘ Fourth wave feminism. ’, New York Times, 15 November, https://www.nytimes.com/2009/11/15/magazine/15fob-q4-t.html. Accessed 4 October 2020.
    [Google Scholar]
45. Tuchman, G.. ( 1972;), ‘ Objectivity as strategic ritual: An examination of newsmen’s notions of objectivity. ’, American Journal of Sociology, 77:4, pp. 660–79.
    [Google Scholar]
46. Wajcman, J.. ( 2000;), ‘ Reflections on gender and technology studies in what state is the art?. ’, Social Studies of Science, 30:3, pp. 447–64.
    [Google Scholar]
47. Williams, R.. ( 1977), Marxism and Literature, Oxford:: Oxford University Press;.
    [Google Scholar]
48. Van Zoonen, L.. ( 2002;), ‘ Gendering the internet: Claims, controversies and cultures. ’, European Journal of Communication, 17:1, pp. 5–25.
    [Google Scholar]
49. Zelliot, E.. ( 1996), From Untouchable to Dalit: Essays on the Ambedkar Movement, New Delhi:: Manohar;.
    [Google Scholar]
50. Chatterjee, Ankita. ( 2022;), ‘ Understanding feminism on online platforms: Exploration and analysis of two online platforms. ’, Studies in South Asian Film & Media, 14:1, pp. 53–65, https://doi.org/10.1386/safm_00056_1
    [Google Scholar]