Skip to content
1981
Media Studies and the Contemporary
  • ISSN: 1756-4921
  • E-ISSN: 1756-493X

Abstract

This article traces two interrelated strands of documentary film aesthetics in India that have steadily developed since the early 2000s. One concerns the presiding influence of personal narratives and subjectivity, manifesting in diverse thematic interrogations. The other relates to the increased tendencies of working with the cinematographic tropes and idioms of fictional storytelling. These directions, evolving over distinctive historical circumstances, have significantly revised the generic assumptions of the documentary. Two films feature centrally in this discussion, Payal Kapadia’s and Shaunak Sen’s . Both uniquely explore the personal and fictional registers of working with the genre. While Kapadia intimately thinks through the reigning political crises in India, Sen devises inventive means to visualize the graded, interrelated layers of ecological catastrophe in the world’s most polluted capital city. A critical review of these films seeks to understand the emerging narratorial, formal and technical logic informing the hybrid nature of contemporary documentaries and their intersecting issues.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1386/safm_00069_1
2023-07-11
2026-04-18

Metrics

Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Avikunthak, Ashish. ( 1999), Kalighat Fetish, India:: Ashish Avikunthak;.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Bal, Mieke. ( 2021;), ‘ Aesthetic for documentaries. ’, Academia Letters, https://doi.org/10.20935/AL4283.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Bandi, Swati. ( 2016;), ‘ “Sober encounters”: The neoliberal logics of human rights documentary and Indian feminist documentary filmmakers. ’, Feminist Media Studies, 16:2, pp. 22338.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Baumbach, Nico. ( 2010;), ‘ Jacques Ranciere and the fictional capacity of documentary. ’, New Review of Film and Television Studies, 8:1, pp. 5772.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Briski, Zana. ( 2004), Born into Brothels, USA:: HBO Documentary Films;.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Chowdhry, Kabir Singh. ( 2018), Mehsampur, India:: Kabir Singh Chowdhry and Akshay Singh;.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Dahr, Julia. ( 2017), Thank You For The Rain, UK:: Banyak Films;.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Deal, Carl, and Lessin, Tia. ( 2008), Trouble the Water, USA:: Zeitgeist Films;.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Dutta, Amit. ( 2010), Nainsukh, Switzerland:: Museum Reitberg;.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Gopalan, Lalitha. ( 2020), Cinemas Dark and Slow in Digital India, London:: Palgrave Macmillan;.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Haksar, Anamika. ( 2019), Ghode Ko Jalebi Khilane Le Ja Riya Hoon, India:: Gutterati Productions;.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Hamblin, Sarah, and Watson, Ryan. ( 2019;), ‘ Introduction: Radical documentary today. ’, Studies in Documentary Film, 13:3, pp. 18795.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Hariharan, Veena. ( 2021;), ‘ Documentary in contemporary India. ’, BioScope, 12:1&2, pp. 6870.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Hogarth, David. ( 2006), Realer than Reel: Global Directions in Documentary, Austin, TX:: University of Texas Press;.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Hughes, Helen. ( 2014), Green Documentary: Environmental Documentary in the Twenty-First Century, Bristol:: Intellect Books;.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. James, Alison. ( 2022;), ‘ The fictional in autofiction. ’, in A. Effe, and H. Lawlor. (eds), The Autofictional: Approaches, Affordances, Forms, London:: Palgrave Macmillian;, pp. 4160.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Kanwar, Amar. ( 1997), A Season Outside, India:: Independent;.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Kapadia, Payal. ( 2021), A Night of Not Knowing, France:: Petit Chaos;.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Kapur, Geeta. ( 2008;), ‘ A cultural conjecture in India: Art into documentary. ’, in S. Terry,, E. Okwui, and C. Nancy. (eds), Antinomies of Art and Culture: Modernity, Postmodernity, Contemporaneity, Durham, NC and London:: Duke University Press;, pp. 3059.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Kapur, Jyotsna. ( 2003;), ‘ Why the personal is still political: Some lessons from contemporary Indian documentary. ’, Jump Cut: A Review of Contemporary Media, 36 , http://www.ejumpcut.org/archive/jc46.2003/indiandocs.kapur/. Accessed 25 July 2022.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Kaul, Mani. ( 1983), Dhrupad, India:: Films Division;.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Kaul, Mani. ( 1989), Siddheswari, India:: Films Division;.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Koppel, Gideon. ( 2007), Sleep Furiously, UK:: Bard Entertainments;.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Kumar, Pankaj Rishi. ( 1999), Kumar Talkies, India:: Infliction Films;.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Oppermann, Serpil. ( 2012;), ‘ The rhizomatic trajectory of ecocriticism. ’, Ecozon@, 1:1, pp. 1721.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Patwardhan, Anand. ( 1978), Prisoners of Conscience, India:: Independent;.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Rangan, Pooja. ( 2017), Immediations: The Humanitarian Impulse in Documentary, Durham, NC and London:: Duke University Press;.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Ranka, Khusboo, and Shukla, Vinay. ( 2016), An Insignificant Man, India:: VICE;.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Sen, Shaunak. ( 2015), Cities of Sleep, India:: Independent;.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Sen, Shaunak. ( 2022a), All that Breathes, UK:: Rise Films;.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Sen, Shaunak. ( 2022b;), interviewed by Anupama Chopra. , Film Companion, 10 March, https://www.filmcompanion.in/interviews/cannes-2022-shaunak-sen-on-all-that-breathes-and-his-creative-process/. Accessed 30 April 2023.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Sen, Shaunak. ( 2022c;), interviewed by Jonathon Turnbull. , Anthroposphere: The Oxford Climate Review, 10 July, https://www.anthroposphere.co.uk/post/all-that-breathes. Accessed 30 April 2023.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Shahani, Kumar. ( 1989), Khayal Gatha, India:: National Film Development Corporation;.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Shahani, Kumar. ( 1991), Bhavantarana, India:: Roshan Shahani;.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Sharma, Aparna. ( 2015), Documentary Films in India: Critical Aesthetics at Work, New York:: Palgrave Macmillan;.
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Singh, Pushpendra. ( 2019), Pearl of the Desert, India:: Sanjay Gulati, Heejung Oh and Pushpendra Singh;.
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Story, Brett. ( 2021;), ‘ How does it end? Story and the property form. ’, World Records Journal, 5:11, https://worldrecordsjournal.org/how-does-it-end-story-and-the-property-form/. Accessed 30 April 2023.
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Vijay, Vipin. ( 2005), Video Game, India:: Public Service Broadcasting Trust;.
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Vohra, Paromita, and Rajagopal, Arvind. ( 2012;), ‘ On the aesthetics and ideology of the Indian documentary film: A conversation. ’, BioScope, 3:1, pp. 720.
    [Google Scholar]
  40. Waldron, Dara. ( 2018), New Nonfiction Film: Art, Poetics, and Documentary Theory, New York:: Bloomsbury Academic;.
    [Google Scholar]
  41. Wurzburg, Gerardine. ( 2004), Autism Is a World, Canada:: CNN;.
    [Google Scholar]
  42. Mallik, Santasil. ( 2023;), ‘ The personal and the fictional: Aesthetic mediation in the Indian documentary. ’, Studies in South Asian Film & Media, Special Issue: ‘Media Studies and the Contemporary’ , 15:1, pp. 4356, https://doi.org/10.1386/safm_00069_1
    [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1386/safm_00069_1
Loading
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a success
Invalid data
An error occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error
Please enter a valid_number test