Performing geopower: Eile and border-fictioning | Intellect Skip to content
1981
Performance and Ireland
  • ISSN: 2044-3714
  • E-ISSN: 2044-3722

Abstract

Since 2016 we have developed the Eile Project, a transdisciplinary investigation of the border in Ireland that centres around site-responsive performance and audio-visual films in a process and praxis that we call border-fictioning. Through this practice, we ask how the border might be differently understood, experienced, critiqued and altered through affective encounters in the artworks produced between bodies, the earth and sovereign power. In this article, we explore (somewhat experimentally) our notion of border-fictioning in the Eile Project, specifically through one of the piece’s ‘experiments’ (#3 ). We draw on a specific concept, that of geopower, and a specific diffractive method. Geopower, or the forces of the earth itself, allows us to comprehend and conceptualize the geo (earthly, material, affect, power) and the human (bio, anthropic, biopolitics, body, power) together in specific ways. A ‘diffractive’ methodology sees the production of knowledge and meaning as inextricably connected to (entangled with) the social and material practices of the world. The article offers a discussion of that which emerges from a ‘diffractive’ approach to border-fictioning in light of the concept of geopower. We show that geopower enables us to see the ways in which the Eile Project border-fictioning through performance and audio-visual film constitutes a particular kind of capitalization of the earth’s forces – radically different from those of capitalism and sovereign power, and potentially resistant to colonial histories, and suggests new alliances and imaginaries that allow us to work through the complex conditions of the border and partition in Ireland through the entanglement of human (anthropic) and earthly (non-human) concerns within the tensions of the Anthropocene.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1386/scene_00032_1
2020-12-01
2024-04-23
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Barad, K.. ( 2007), Meeting the Universe Halfway: Quantum Physics and the Entanglement of Matter and Meaning, Durham, NC:: Duke University Press;.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Burrows, D., and O’Sullivan, S.. ( 2019), Fictioning: The Myth-Functions of Contemporary Art and Philosophy, Edinburgh:: Edinburgh University Press;.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Cowling, M.. ( 2004), Political Issues for the Twenty-First Century, , 1st ed.., Aldershot and Burlington, VT:: Routledge;.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Deleuze, G., and Guattari, F.. ( 1994), What is Philosophy? (trans. G. Birchill, and H. Tomlinson.), London:: Verso Books;.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Deleuze, G., and Guattari, F.. ( 2008), A Thousand Plateaus: Capitalism and Schizophrenia, London and New York:: Continuum;.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Foucault, M.. ( 1998), The History of Sexuality: 1: The Will to Knowledge (trans. R. Hurley.), vol. 1, , New ed.., London:: Penguin;.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Foucault, M.. ( 2004), Society Must Be Defended: Lectures at the Collège de France, 1975–76 (trans. D. Macey.), London:: Penguin;.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Gregg, M., and Seigworth, G. J.. ( 2010), The Affect Theory Reader, Durham, NC:: Duke University Press;.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Grosz, E.. ( 1999), Becomings: Explorations in Time, Memory, and Futures, Ithaca, NY:: Cornell University Press;.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Grosz, E.. ( 2008), Chaos, Territory, Art Deleuze and the Framing of the Earth: Deleuze and the Framing of the Earth, New York:: Columbia University Press;.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Grosz, E.,, Yusoff, K., and Clark, N.. ( 2017;), ‘ An interview with Elizabeth Grosz: Geopower, inhumanism and the biopolitical. ’, Theory, Culture & Society, 34:2-3, pp. 12946.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Grosz, E. A.. ( 2011), Becoming Undone: Darwinian Reflections on Life, Politics, and Art, Durham, NC:: Duke University Press;.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Haraway, D.. ( 1988;), ‘ Situated knowledges: The science question in feminism and the privilege of partial perspective. ’, Feminist Studies Inc, 14:3, pp. 57599.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Haraway, D.. (ed.) ( 1992;), ‘ The promises of monsters: A regenerative politics for inappropriate/d others. ’, in Cultural Studies, , 1st ed.., New York:: Routledge;, pp. 295336.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Haraway, D. J.. ( 2016), Staying with the Trouble: Making Kin in the Chthulucene, Durham, NC:: Duke University Press;.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Hellenier, J.. ( 2000), Irish Travellers: Racism and the Politics of Culture, Toronto:: University of Toronto Press;.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Ingram, A.,, Forsyth, I., and Gauld, N.. ( 2016;), ‘ Beyond geopower: Earthly and anthropic geopolitics in The Great Game by War Boutique. ’, Cultural Geographies, 23:4, pp. 63552.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Joseph, E.. ( 2019;), ‘ Ebun: On how to have constructive conversations about race with Irish people. ’, Dublin Inquirer, 27 February, https://www.dublininquirer.com/2019/02/27/ebun-on-how-to-have-constructive-conversations-about-race-with-irish-people. Accessed 5 June 2020.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Lentin, R., and McVeigh, R.. ( 2008), After Optimism? Ireland, Racism, and Globalization, Dublin:: Metro Eireann Publications;.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Luibhéid, E.. ( 2013), Pregnant on Arrival: Making the Illegal Immigrant, Minneapolis, MN:: University of Minnesota Press;.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. McVeigh, R.. ( 2008;), ‘ “The balance of cruelty”: Ireland, Britain and the logic of genocide. ’, Journal of Genocide Research, 10:4, pp. 54161.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Michael, L.. ( 2015), Afrophobia in Ireland: Racism against People of African Descent, Dublin:: ENAR Ireland;, p. 44, http://enarireland.org/afrophobia-in-ireland-racism-against-people-of-african-descent/. Accessed 5 June 2020.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Morgensen, S. L.. ( 2011;), ‘ The biopolitics of settler colonialism: Right here, right now. ’, Settler Colonial Studies, 1:1, pp. 5276.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Mulhall, A.. ( 2020;), ‘ The ends of Irish studies? On whiteness, academia, and activism. ’, Irish University Review, 50:1, pp. 94111.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Nally, D.. ( 2008;), ‘ “That coming storm”: The Irish poor law, colonial biopolitics, and the Great Famine. ’, Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 98:3, pp. 71441.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Nanni, G.. ( 2013), The Colonisation of Time: Ritual, Routine and Resistance in the British Empire, , Rpt. ed.., Manchester and New York:: Manchester University Press;.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Northern Ireland Affairs Committee, House of Commons ( 2018), The Land Border between Northern Ireland and Ireland, Second Report of Session 2017–19 House of Commons , https://publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm201719/cmselect/cmniaf/329/329.pdf. Accessed 5 June 2020.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. O’Sullivan, S.. ( 2016;), ‘ Myth-science and the fictioning of reality. ’, Paragrana, 25:2, pp. 8093.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Phillips, A.. (ed.) ( 2015), Performance Art in Ireland: A History, London:: Intellect;.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Phillips, R.. ( 2018;), ‘ Placing time, timing space: Dismantling the master’s map and clock. ’, The Funambulist, 18, pp. 4445.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Smyth, J.. ( 2011;), ‘ The Act of Union and “public opinion”. ’, in Revolution, Counter-Revolution and Union: Ireland in the 1790s, , Reissue ed.., Cambridge:: Cambridge University Press;, pp. 14660.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Stratton, J.. ( 2004;), ‘ Borderline anxieties: What whitening the Irish has to do with keeping out asylum seekers. ’, in Whitening Race: Essays in Social and Cultural Criticism, Canberra:: Aboriginal Studies Press;.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Sweeney, F.,, Dillane, F., and Stuart, M.. ( 2019), Ireland, Slavery, Anti-Slavery and Empire, Abingdon:: Routledge;.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Trinh, T. M.. ( 1986), She, the Inappropriate/d Other, Milwaukee, WI:: University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee;.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Tuathail, G. Ó.. ( 1996), Critical Geopolitics: The Politics of Writing Global Space, Minneapolis, MN:: University of Minnesota Press;.
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Walia, H.. ( 2014), Undoing Border Imperialism, Oakland, CA and Washington, DC:: AK Press;.
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Yoshida, K.,, Schuenemann, V. J.,, Cano, L. M.,, Pais, M.,, Mishra, B.,, Sharma, R.,, Lanz, C.,, Martin, F. N.,, Kamoun, S.,, Krause, J.,, Thines, M.,, Weigel, D., and Burbano, H. A.. ( 2013;), ‘ The rise and fall of the Phytophthora infestans lineage that triggered the Irish potato famine. ’, eLife, 2, p. e00731.
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Yusoff, K.. ( 2018;), ‘ The anthropocene and geographies of geopower. ’, in Handbook on the Geographies of Power, Northampton, MA:: Edward Elgar Publishing Ltd;, pp. 20316.
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Yusoff, K.,, Grosz, E.,, Clark, N.,, Saldanha, A., and Nash, C.. ( 2012;), ‘ Geopower: A panel on Elizabeth Grosz’s Chaos, Territory, Art: Deleuze and the Framing of the Earth. ’, Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 30:6, pp. 97188.
    [Google Scholar]
  40. Mccloskey, Paula, and Vardy, Sam. ( 2020;), ‘ Performing geopower: Eile and border-fictioning. ’, Scene, 8:1-2, pp. 195212, doi: https://doi.org/10.1386/scene_00032_1
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1386/scene_00032_1
Loading
/content/journals/10.1386/scene_00032_1
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a success
Invalid data
An error occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error