Skip to content
1981
  1. Home
  2. A-Z Publications
  3. Scene
  4. Volume 12, Issue 1
  5. Article
Volume 12, Issue 1-2
  • ISSN: 2044-3714
  • E-ISSN: 2044-3722

Abstract

While change is to be expected, current trends such as the climate crisis, rising resource scarcity and increasingly volatile international economic systems have the potential to move our global society into new system states. Additionally, the scale of impact is expected to become more pronounced as urban and regional areas continue to grow. Because of this, there are growing movements which aim to increase resilience in our cities. This article builds on current explorations in using creativity within sustainable city planning and growing connections between the arts and well-being, to act as an exploratory pilot study probing the relationship between theatre and city resilience within regional Australia. To explore the proposed relationship between theatre and resilience, three lenses were used to understand features of city resilience. This investigation was then applied in the context of Geelong, a regional Australian city in the state of Victoria. Geelong was chosen as the case study site as it was the first regional Australian city to be part of the UNESCO Creative Cities Network, a global network of cities recognizing creativity as a strategic factor of sustainable development. Through this exploration, a preliminary relationship between theatre and the three lenses for understanding city resilience was established. The lenses being: theatre as a tool for sensemaking, theatre as a tool for placemaking and theatre as a tool for social connection. This relationship suggests the potential of theatre to enhance city resilience in regional Australian cities in times of transition. This has implications for how theatre can be positioned to contribute to cultural policy, resilient urban planning and improving community health and well-being.

© 2024 Intellect Ltd
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1386/scene_00072_1
2025-01-23
2026-02-07
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Aitchison, B. M. (2000), ‘Theatre: Art or action’, Education Links, 61, pp. 48–50.
     [Google Scholar]
  2. All-Party Parliamentary Group on Arts, Health and Wellbeing (2017), Creative Health: The Arts for Health and Wellbeing, London: All-Party Parliamentary Group on Arts, Health and Wellbeing, https://www.culturehealthandwellbeing.org.uk/appg-inquiry/Publications/Creative_Health_Inquiry_Report_2017_-_Second_Edition.pdf. Accessed 11 July 2019.
     [Google Scholar]
  3. Andrews, S. and Duggan, P. (2019), ‘Situation rooms: Performing city resilience in New Orleans’, Liminalities: A Journal of Performance Studies, 15:1, pp. 1–23.
     [Google Scholar]
  4. Arts Hub (2019), ‘What the arts got from the budget 2019’, Arts Hub, 3 April, https://www.artshub.com.au/news-article/news/grants-and-funding/richard-watts/what-the-arts-got-from-budget-2019-257671. Accessed 14 December 2019.
  5. Arup International Development (2015), City Resilience Framework, London: Arup.
     [Google Scholar]
  6. Australia Council for the Arts (2017), Connecting Australians: Results of the National Arts Participation Survey, Sydney: Australia Council for the Arts, http://www.australiacouncil.gov.au/workspace/uploads/files/connecting-australians-natio-59520692c614a.pdf. Accessed 5 October 2019.
     [Google Scholar]
  7. Australia Council for the Arts (2019), ‘Electorate profiles: Corio – VIC’, Australia Council for the Arts, https://www.australiacouncil.gov.au/research/electorate-profiles/corio/#!Corio. Accessed 5 October 2019.
  8. Australian Bureau of Statistics (2019), ‘Quick stats’, Australian Bureau of Statistics, https://www.abs.gov.au/websitedbs/censushome.nsf/home/quickstats. Accessed 24 September 2019.
  9. Baker, N. (2019), ‘Arts community mobilises against Scott Morrison after federal arts department axed’, SBS News, 6 December, https://www.sbs.com.au/news/arts-community-mobilises-against-scott-morrison-after-federal-arts-department-axed. Accessed 14 December 2019.
  10. Beatley, T. and Newman, P. (2013), ‘Biophilic cities are sustainable, resilient cities’, Sustainability, 5:8, pp. 3328–45, https://doi.org/10.3390/su5083328.
     [Google Scholar]
  11. Bleeker, M., Kear, A., Kelleher, J., Roms, H. (eds) (2019), Thinking through Theatre and Performance, London: Methuen Drama.
     [Google Scholar]
  12. Brown, V. (2010), ‘Collective inquiry and its wicked problems’, in V. Brown, J. Harris and J. Russell (eds), Tackling Wicked Problems, London: Routledge.
     [Google Scholar]
  13. Carpenter, S., Walker, B., Anderies, J. M. and Abel, N. (2001), ‘From metaphor to measurement: Resilience of what to what?’, Ecosystems, 4:8, pp. 765–81, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10021-001-0045-9.
     [Google Scholar]
  14. Cassidy, L. and Barnes, G. D. (2019), ‘Understanding household connectivity and resilience in marginal rural communities through social network analysis in the village of Habu’, Ecology and Society, 17:4, p. 11, http://dx.doi.org/10.5751/ES-04963-170411.
     [Google Scholar]
  15. Che, D. (2007), ‘Connecting the dots to urban revitalization with the Heidelberg project’, Material Culture, 39:1, pp. 33–49.
     [Google Scholar]
  16. City of Greater Geelong (2019), ‘Design city, Geelong city of Design’, https://www.geelongcityofdesign.com.au/design-city/. Accessed 22 September 2019.
  17. City of Greater Geelong Council (2020), ‘Geelong UNESCO City of Design’, https://www.geelongaustralia.com.au/cityofdesign/article/item/8d531b5add016db.aspx. Accessed 21 September 2020.
  18. Croggon, A. (2020), ‘Arts funding: A survey of destruction’, Witness Performance, 23 April, https://witnessperformance.com/arts-funding-a-survey-of-destruction/. Accessed 27 August 2020.
  19. Crossick, G. and Kaszynska, P. (2016), Understanding the Value of Arts & Culture: The AHRC Cultural Value Project, London: Arts & Humanities Research Council.
     [Google Scholar]
  20. Daniel, R. (2017), ‘Arts and culture in an era of austerity: Key stakeholder views on the current and future Australian context’, International Journal of Cultural Policy, 1, pp. 1–12, https://doi.org/10.1080/10286632.2017.1361943.
     [Google Scholar]
  21. Deakin University (2017), Geelong Economic Futures, Geelong: Deakin University.
     [Google Scholar]
  22. Development Victoria (2019), ‘Geelong Arts Centre, Development Victoria’, https://www.development.vic.gov.au/projects/geelong-arts-centre. Accessed 23 October 2019.
  23. Figueiredo, L., Honiden, T. and Schumann, A. (2018), ‘Indicators for resilient cities’, OECD Regional Development Working Papers 2018/02, 2, pp. 1–66, https://doi.org/10.1787/6f1f6065-en.
     [Google Scholar]
  24. Florance, L. and Best, C. (2018), ‘Ford Australia ceases production: Timeline of the company’s decades-long history in the country’, ABC News, 6 October, https://www.abc.net.au/news/2016-10-07/timeline-ford-australia-ceases-production/7911742. Accessed 4 September 2019.
     [Google Scholar]
  25. Florida, R. (2002), ‘The economic geography of talent’, Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 92:4, pp. 743–55, https://doi.org/10.2307/635220.
     [Google Scholar]
  26. Furze, A. (2019), ‘“Open Letter” urging states to reject arts funding framework gets strong backing’, Daily Review, https://dailyreview.com.au/open-letter-urging-states-to-reject-arts-funding-framework-gets-strong-backing/. Accessed 14 December 2019.
     [Google Scholar]
  27. Geelong Arts Centre (2019), ‘About us’, Geelong Arts Centre, https://geelongartscentre.org.au/about-us/. Accessed 22 September 2019.
  28. Geelong Arts Centre (2020), ‘Grants & support initiatives’, Geelong Arts Centre, https://geelongartscentre.org.au/creative-engine/grants-support-initiatives/. Accessed 28 August 2020.
  29. Geelong Performing Arts Centre (2017), Geelong Performing Arts Centre Annual Report 2016–2017, Geelong: Geelong Arts Centre.
     [Google Scholar]
  30. Geelong Performing Arts Centre (2018), Geelong Performing Arts Centre Annual Report 2017–2018, Geelong: Geelong Arts Centre.
     [Google Scholar]
  31. Geelong Performing Arts Centre Trust (2007), Geelong Cultural Precinct Master Plan Vision, Geelong: Geelong Performing Arts Centre Trust.
     [Google Scholar]
  32. Georgeson, C. and Harrison, A. W. (2015), ‘Regional impacts of the accelerated decline of the manufacturing sector in Australia’, research paper 1/2015, Canberra: Australian Government Department of Industry and Science.
     [Google Scholar]
  33. Gilfillan, E. and Morrow, G. (2018), ‘Sustaining artistic practices post George Brandis’s controversial Australia Council arts funding changes: Cultural policy and visual artists’ careers in Australia’, International Journal of Cultural Policy, 24:2, pp. 186–204, https://doi.org/10.1080/10286632.2016.1153083.
     [Google Scholar]
  34. Glenn, J. K. (1999), ‘Competing challengers and contested outcomes to state breakdown: The velvet revolution in Czechoslovakia author’, Social Forces, 78:1, pp. 187–211.
     [Google Scholar]
  35. Grodach, C., Foster, N. and Murdoch, J. III (2014), ‘Gentrification and the artistic divident: The role of the arts in neighborhood change’, Journal of the American Planning Association, 80:1, pp. 21–35, https://doi.org/10.1080/01944363.2014.928584.
     [Google Scholar]
  36. Hadley, B. (2017), Theatre, Social Media and Meaning Making, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
     [Google Scholar]
  37. Halpern, R. (2011), ‘Theater and democratic thought: Arendt to Rancière’, Critical Inquiry, 37:3, pp. 545–72.
     [Google Scholar]
  38. Hoyman, M. and Faricy, C. (2009), ‘It takes a village: A test of the creative class, social capital, and human capital theories’, Urban Affairs Review, 44:2, pp. 331–33.
     [Google Scholar]
  39. Hughes, L., Rickards, L., Steffen, W., Stock, P. and Rice, M. (2016), On The Frontline: Climate Change & Rural Communities, Sydney: The Climate Council, https://www.climatecouncil.org.au/uploads/564abfd96ebac5cbc6cf45de2f17e12d.pdf. Accessed 12 November 2024.
     [Google Scholar]
  40. Jahn, T., Bergmann, M. and Keil, F. (2012), ‘Transdisciplinarity: Between mainstreaming and marginalization’, Ecological Economics, 79, pp. 1–10, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2012.04.017.
     [Google Scholar]
  41. Kelkar, N. P. and Spinelli, G. (2016), ‘Building social capital through creative placemaking’, Strategic Design Research Journal, 9:2, pp. 54–66, https://doi.org/10.4013/sdrj.2016.92.01.
     [Google Scholar]
  42. Kelly, J.-F., Breadon, P., Davis, C., Hunter, A., Mares, P., Mullerworth, D. and Weidmann, B. (2012), Social Cities, Melbourne: Grattan Institute.
     [Google Scholar]
  43. Keneley, M., Dimovski, B. and Stevenson, S. (2014), An Assessment of Structural Change in the Geelong Labour Market, https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004.
     [Google Scholar]
  44. Klein, J. T. (2016), ‘Transdisciplinarity and sustainability: Patterns of definition’, in D. Fam, J. Palmer, C. Riedy and C. Mitchell (eds), Transdisciplinary Research and Practice for Sustainability Outcomes, New York: Routledge, pp. 7–22.
     [Google Scholar]
  45. Lapadat, J. C. (2017), ‘Ethics in autoethnography and collaborative autoethnography’, Qualitative Inquiry, 23:8, pp. 589–603.
     [Google Scholar]
  46. Ley, D. (2003), ‘Artists, aestheticisation and the field of gentrification’, Urban Studies, 40:12, pp. 2527–44, https://doi.org/10.1080/0042098032000136192.
     [Google Scholar]
  47. McKenna, J. (2014), ‘Creating community theatre for social change’, Studies in Theatre and Performance, 34:1, pp. 84–89, https://doi.org/10.1080/14682761.2013.875721.
     [Google Scholar]
  48. Mitchell, C., Cordell, D. and Fam, D. (2015), ‘Beginning at the end: The outcome spaces framework to guide purposive transdisciplinary research’, Futures, 65:October, pp. 86–96, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2014.10.007.
     [Google Scholar]
  49. Murdoch, J., Grodach, C. and Foster, N. (2016), ‘The importance of neighborhood context in arts-led development: Community anchor or creative class magnet?’, Journal of Planning Education and Research, 36:1, pp. 32–48, https://doi.org/10.1177/0739456X15599040.
     [Google Scholar]
  50. National Geographic (2020), ‘Concept of place’, https://www.nationalgeographic.org/topics/resource-library-concept-place/. Accessed 27 August 2020.
  51. Nelson, D. R., Adger, W. N. and Brown, K. (2007), ‘Adaptation to environmental change: Contributions of a resilience framework’, 32:1, pp. 395–419, https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.energy.32.051807.090348.
     [Google Scholar]
  52. Oslzý, P. (1990), ‘On stage with the velvet revolution’, TDR (1988-), 34:3, p. 97, https://doi.org/10.2307/1146074.
     [Google Scholar]
  53. Prentki, T. and Preston, S. (2009), ‘Applied theatre: An introduction’, in T. Prentki and S. Preston (eds), The Applied Theatre Reader, Abingdon: Routledge, pp. 9–14.
     [Google Scholar]
  54. Rae, P. (2020), ‘How will the arts recover from COVID-19?’, University of Melbourne Pursuit, 22 May, https://pursuit.unimelb.edu.au/articles/how-will-the-arts-recover-from-covid-19. Accessed 14 December 2019.
  55. Rentschler, R., Bridson, K. and Evans, J. (2017), The Impact of the Arts in Regional Australia, Melbourne: Deakin University.
     [Google Scholar]
  56. Revitalising Central Geelong (2017), Arts and Cultural Precinct Masterplan Arts and Cultural, Geelong: Revitalising Central Geelong Partnership, https://www.revitalisingcentralgeelong.vic.gov.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0034/459565/1700831_A-and-C-Precinct-Masterplan.pdf. Accessed 17 October 2024.
     [Google Scholar]
  57. Rogers, A. (2012), ‘Geographies of the performing arts: Landscapes, places and cities’, Geography Compass, 6:2, pp. 60–75.
     [Google Scholar]
  58. Rogers, M. (2016), The Mill: Experiments in Theatre and Community, Melbourne: Australian Scholarly Publishing.
     [Google Scholar]
  59. Roose-Evans, J. (2008), Experimental Theatre: From Stanislavsky to Peter Brook, 4th ed., Abingdon: Routledge.
     [Google Scholar]
  60. Schultz, T. (2018), Australia Council for the Arts Design Futures Workshop, Sydney: Relative Creative.
     [Google Scholar]
  61. SGS Economics and Planning (2018), Economic Performance of Australia’s Cities and Regions, Melbourne: SGS Economics and Planning, https://sgsep.com.au/assets/main/Publications/SGS-Economics-and-Planning_Economic-Performance-of-Australian-Cities-and-Regions.pdf. Accessed 17 October 2024.
     [Google Scholar]
  62. Throsby, D. (2003), ‘Determining the value of cultural goods: How much (or how little) does contingent valuation tell us?’, Journal of Cultural Economics, 27, pp. 275–85.
     [Google Scholar]
  63. Throsby, D. (2006), ‘Does Australia need a cultural policy?’, Platform Papers, 7, pp. 1–54.
     [Google Scholar]
  64. UNESCO (2004), Creative Cities Network Mission Statement, Paris: UNESCO.
     [Google Scholar]
  65. UNESCO (2019), Voices of the City: UNESCO Creative Cities Moving towards the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development, Fabriano: UNESCO.
     [Google Scholar]
  66. Ungar, M. (ed.) (2012), The Social Ecology of Resilience, New York: Springer.
     [Google Scholar]
  67. Vale, L. J. (2014), ‘The politics of resilient cities: Whose resilience and whose city?’, Building Research and Information, 42:2, pp. 191–201, https://doi.org/10.1080/09613218.2014.850602.
     [Google Scholar]
  68. Walker, B. (2019), Finding Resilience: Change and Uncertainty in Nature and Society, Canberra: CSIRO Publishing.
     [Google Scholar]
  69. Walker, B. and Salt, D. (2006), Resilience Thinking: Sustaining Ecosystems and People in a Changing World, Washington, DC: Island Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  70. Walmsley, B. (2013), ‘“A big part of my life”: A qualitative study of the impact of theatre’, Arts Marketing: An International Journal, 3:1, pp. 73–87, https://doi.org/10.1108/20442081311327174.
     [Google Scholar]
  71. World Health Organisation (2020), ‘WHOQOL: Measuring quality of life’, World Health Organisation, https://www.who.int/healthinfo/survey/whoqol-qualityoflife/en/. Accessed 23 January 2020.
  72. Houghton, N. (2003), Geelong: A Short History, Geelong: Geelong Heritage Centre.
     [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1386/scene_00072_1
Loading
Enhancing city resilience through theatre
Scene 12, 19 (2024); https://doi.org/10.1386/scene_00072_1
/content/journals/10.1386/scene_00072_1
/content/journals/10.1386/scene_00072_1
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Article
Keyword(s): community health; cultural policy; placemaking; sensemaking; social connection; urban planning; well-being

Most Cited Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a success
Invalid data
An error occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error
Please enter a valid_number test