Fireworks and Scorpio Rising in the courtroom: The struggle between part and whole in the obscenity trials of Kenneth Anger’s short films

References

1. Achter, Erik Van (2012), ‘Revising theory: Poe’s legacy in short story criticism’, in V. Patea (ed.), Short Story Theories: A Twenty-First-Century Perspective, Amsterdam and New York: Rodopi, pp. 75–88.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Anger, Kenneth (1947), Fireworks, USA: Kenneth Anger.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Anger, Kenneth (1951), ‘Modesty and the art of film’, in A. Hutchison (ed.), Kenneth Anger: A Demonic Visionary, London: Black Dog Publishing, pp. 60–64.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Anger, Kenneth (1963), Scorpio Rising, USA: Puck Film Productions.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Betz, Mark (2003), ‘Art, exploitation, underground’, in M. Jancovich, A. Lázaro Reboll, J. Stringer and A. Willis (eds), Defining Cult Movies: The Cultural Politics of Oppositional Taste, Manchester and New York: Manchester University Press, pp. 202–22.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Carmen, Ira H. (1966), Movies, Censorship, and the Law, Ann Arbor, MI: The University of Michigan Press.
   [Google Scholar]
7. De Grazia, Edward and Newman, Roger K. (1982), Banned Films: Moves, Censors, and the First Amendment, New York and London: R. R. Bowker Company.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Felando, Cynthia (2015), Discovering Short Films, New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Gorfinkel, Elena (2017), Lewd Looks: American Sexploitation Cinema in the 1960s, Minneapolis, MN and London: University of Minnesota Press.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Hixson, Richard F. (1996), Pornography and the Justices: The Supreme Court and the Intractable Obscenity Problem, Carbondale, IL and Edwardsville, IL: Southern Illinois University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Hutchison, Alice L. (2011), Kenneth Anger: A Demonic Visionary, London: Black Dog Publishing.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Lawrence, James Cooper (1917), ‘A theory of the short story’, in C. May (ed.), Short Story Theories, Athens, OH: Ohio University Press, pp. 60–71.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Matthews, Brander (1901), ‘The philosophy of the short-story’, in C. May (ed.), Short Story Theories, Athens, OH: Ohio University Press, pp. 52–59.
    [Google Scholar]
14. People v. Getz (1964), Reporter’s Transcript, Los Angeles, CA: UCLA Library Special Collections.
    [Google Scholar]
15. People v. Rohauer (1957), Reporter’s Transcript, Los Angeles, CA: UCLA Library Special Collections.
    [Google Scholar]
16. Poe, Edgar Allan (1842), ‘Review of twice-told tales’, in C. May (ed.), Short Story Theories, Athens, OH: Ohio University Press, pp. 45–51.
    [Google Scholar]
17. Roth v. United States (1957), 354 U.S. 476.
    [Google Scholar]
18. Poe, G. Thomas (1991), ‘Censorship as textual ellipsis: A post-structuralist reading of the censored film’, Journal of Dramatic Theory and Criticism, 6:1, pp. 187–208.
    [Google Scholar]
19. Strub, Whitney (2008), ‘The clearly obscene and the queerly obscene: Heteronormativity and obscenity in Cold War Los Angeles’, American Quarterly, 60:2, pp. 373–98.
    [Google Scholar]
20. Strub, Whitney (2013), Obscenity Rules: Roth v. United States and the Long Struggle over Sexual Expression, Lawrence, KS: University Press of Kansas.
    [Google Scholar]
21. Wittern-Keller, Laura (2008), Freedom of the Screen: Legal Challenges to State Film Censorship 1915–1981, Lexington, KT: The University Press of Kentucky.
    [Google Scholar]