Learning from the social lives of shoes: A cultural approach to sustainability

References

1. APICCAPS (2024), World Footwear Yearbook 2024, Porto: APICCAPS.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Appadurai, A. (ed.) (1986), The Social Life of Things: Commodities in Cultural Perspective, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Benjamin, W. ([1936] 1999), ‘The work of art in the age of mechanical reproduction’, in H. Arendt (ed.), Illuminations: Walter Benjamin, London: Pimlico, pp. 211–44.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Beverland, M. (2009), Branding Authenticity: 7 Habits of Iconic Brands, Basingstoke and New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Birkeland, I., Burton, R., Parra, C. and Siivonen, K. (2018), Cultural Sustainability and the Nature-Culture Interface: Livelihoods, Policies, and Methodologies, Oxford: Taylor & Francis Group.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Bourdieu, P. (1984), Distinction: A Social Critique of the Judgement of Taste, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Bourdieu, P. ([1986] 2002), ‘The forms of capital’, in N. W. Biggart (ed.), Readings in Economic Sociology, Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 280–91.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Boyle, D. (2004), Authenticity: Brands, Fakes, Spin and the Lust for Real Life, London: Harper Perennial.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Chapman, J. (2015), Emotionally Durable Design: Objects, Experiences & Empathy, London and New York: Routledge.
   [Google Scholar]
10. ‘culture, n.’ (2016), A Dictionary of Media & Communication, 2nd ed., Oxford University Press, https://www.oxfordreference.com/view/10.1093/acref/9780191800986.001.0001/acref-9780191800986-e-602, Accessed 20 March 2025.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Dale, K. and Burrell, G. (2008), The Spaces of Organisation and the Organisation of Space: Power, Identity & Materiality at Work, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Dilley, R., Hockey, J., Robinson, V. and Sherlock, A. (2015), ‘Occasions and non-occasions: Identity, femininity and high-heeled shoes’, European Journal of Women’s Studies, 22:2, pp. 143–58, https://doi.org/10.1177/1350506814533952.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Drazin, A. (2021), ‘The object biography’, in T. Carroll, A. Walford and S. Walton (eds), Lineages and Advancements in Material Culture Studies: Perspectives from UCL Anthropology, London and New York: Routledge, pp. 61–74.
    [Google Scholar]
14. Engelke, M. (2005), ‘Sticky subjects, sticky objects: The substance of African Christian healing’, in D. Miller (ed.), Materiality, Durham, NC: Duke University Press, pp. 118–39.
    [Google Scholar]
15. de Fine Licht, K. and Folland, A. (2024), ‘Redefining “sustainability”: A systematic approach for defining and assessing “sustainability” and “social sustainability”’, Theoria, 91:1, pp. 45–59, https://doi.org/10.1111/theo.12568.
    [Google Scholar]
16. Galpin, T., Whittington, J. L. and Bell, G. (2015), ‘Is your sustainability strategy sustainable? Creating a culture of sustainability’, Corporate Governance, 15:1, pp. 1–17, https://doi.org/10.1108/CG-01-2013-0004.
    [Google Scholar]
17. Gell, A. (1998), Art and Agency: An Anthropological Theory, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
18. Gemma (2012), semi-structured interview with A. Sherlock, Clarks International Headquarters, Street, Somerset, 17 April.
19. Gibson, J. J. (1979), The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception, London: Lawrence Erlbaum.
    [Google Scholar]
20. Griswold, W. (1987), ‘A methodological framework for the sociology of culture’, Sociological Methodology, 17, pp. 1–35, https://doi.org/10.2307/271027.
    [Google Scholar]
21. Hammersley, M. and Atkinson, P. (2007), Ethnography: Principles in Practice, 3rd ed., Abingdon: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
22. Hawkes, J. (2001), The Fourth Pillar of Sustainability: Culture’s Essential Role in Public Planning, Sydney: Common Ground Publishing Pty Ltd.
    [Google Scholar]
23. Hockey, J., Dilley, R., Robinson, V. and Sherlock, A. (2013), ‘Worn shoes: Identity, memory and footwear’, Sociological Research Online, 18:1, pp. 128–42, https://doi.org/10.5153/sro.2897.
    [Google Scholar]
24. Hockey, J., Dilley, R., Robinson, V. and Sherlock, A. (2014), ‘The temporal landscape of shoes: A life course perspective’, The Sociological Review, 62:2, pp. 255–75, https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-954x.12154.
    [Google Scholar]
25. Hockey, J., Dilley, R., Robinson, V. and Sherlock, A. (2015), ‘“There’s not just trainers or non-trainers, there's like degrees of trainers”: Commoditisation, Singularisation and Identity’, Journal of Material Culture Studies, 20:1, pp. 21–42, https://doi.org/10.1177/1359183514560665.
    [Google Scholar]
26. Hoskins, T. E. (2020), Foot Work: What Your Shoes Are Doing to the World, London: Weidenfeld & Nicolson.
    [Google Scholar]
27. Ingold, T. (2010), ‘Bringing things to life: Creative entanglements in a world of materials’, working paper, Manchester: ESRC National Centre for Research Methods.
    [Google Scholar]
28. Ingold, T. (2011), Being Alive: Essays on Movement, Knowledge and Description, Abingdon: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
29. Kagan, S. (2011), Art and Sustainability: Connecting Patterns for a Culture of Complexity, Bielefeld: Transcript Verlag.
    [Google Scholar]
30. Kagan, S. (2018), ‘Culture and the arts in sustainable development’, in T. Meireis and G. Rippl (eds), Cultural Sustainability: Perspectives from the Humanities and Social Sciences, Oxford: Taylor & Francis Group, pp. 127–39.
    [Google Scholar]
31. Kagan, S. (2023), Culture and Sustainable Development in the City: Urban Spaces of Possibilities, New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
32. Karina (2015), e-mail correspondence, 9 January.
33. Keane, W. (2005), ‘Signs are not the garb of meaning: Social analysis of material things’, in D. Miller (ed.), Materiality, London: Duke University Press, pp. 182–205.
    [Google Scholar]
34. Kopytoff, I. (1986), ‘The cultural biography of things: Commoditization as process’, in A. Appadurai (ed.), The Social Life of Things: Commodities in Cultural Perspective, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
35. Malinowski, B. ([1922] 1950), Argonauts of the Western Pacific: An Account of Native Enterprise and Adventure in the Archipelagoes of Melanesian New Guinea, London: Routledge & Kegan Paul Ltd.
    [Google Scholar]
36. Mauss, M. (1973), ‘Techniques of the body’, Economy and Society, 2:1, pp. 70–88, https://doi.org/10.1080/03085147300000003.
    [Google Scholar]
37. Mauss, M. ([1954] 1990), The Gift: The Form and Reason for Exchange in Archaic Societies, London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
38. Meireis, T. and Rippl, G. (2018), Cultural Sustainability: Perspectives from the Humanities and Social Sciences, Milton: Taylor and Francis Group.
    [Google Scholar]
39. Munn, N. (1986), The Fame of Gawa, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
40. Newman, A. (2012), Clarks in Jamaica, One Love Books.
    [Google Scholar]
41. Niinimäki, K. and Durrani, M. (2020), ‘Repairing fashion cultures: From disposable to repairable’ in L. McNeill (ed.), Transitioning to Responsible Consumption and Production, Basel: MDPI, pp. 153–67.
    [Google Scholar]
42. Palmer, M. (2013), Clarks: Made to Last. The Story of Britain’s Best-Known Shoe Firm, London: Profile Books Ltd.
    [Google Scholar]
43. Pels, P. (1998), ‘The spirit of matter: On fetish, rarity, fact, and fancy’, in P. Spyer (ed.), Border Fetishisms: Material Objects in Unstable Places, London: Routledge, pp. 91–121.
    [Google Scholar]
44. Pine, J. (2006), ‘Sole representation: Shoe imagery and twentieth-century art’, in G. Riello and P. McNeil (eds), Shoes: A History from Sandals to Sneakers, Oxford: Berg, pp. 352–71.
    [Google Scholar]
45. Richardson, S. F. (2025), Clarks 200: Somerset to the World, Compound 7/Noledge Productions.
    [Google Scholar]
46. Rinaldi, F. R., Di Bernardino, C., Cram-Martos, V. and Pisani, M. T. (2022), ‘Traceability and transparency: Enhancing sustainability and circularity in garment and footwear’, Sustainability: Science, Practice and Policy, 18:1, pp. 132–41, https://doi.org/10.1080/15487733.2022.2028454.
    [Google Scholar]
47. Robinson, V. (2014), ‘Risky footwear practices: Masculinity, identity and crisis’, NORMA: International Journal for Masculinity Studies, 9:3, pp. 151–65, https://doi.org/10.1080/18902138.2014.950501.
    [Google Scholar]
48. Rose, G. and Tolia-Kelly, D. P. (2012), ‘Visuality/materiality: Introducing a manifesto for practice’, in G. Rose and D. P. Tolia-Kelly (eds), Visuality/Materiality: Images, Objects and Practices, Farnham: Ashgate, pp. 1–11.
    [Google Scholar]
49. Rosie (2012), semi-structured interview with A. Sherlock, Clarks International Headquarters, Street, Somerset, 22 March.
50. Sampson, E. (2020), Worn: Footwear, Attachment and the Affects of Wear, London: Bloomsbury.
    [Google Scholar]
51. Semmelhack, E. (2019), Collab: Sneaker x Culture, New York: Rizzoli.
    [Google Scholar]
52. Sherlock, A. (2014), ‘“It’s kind of where the shoe gets you to I suppose”: Materializing identity with footwear’, Critical Studies in Fashion & Beauty, 5:1, pp. 25–51, https://doi.org/10.1386/csfb.5.1.25_1.
    [Google Scholar]
53. Sherlock, A. (2017), This is Not a Shoe: An Exploration of the Co-Constitutive Relationship Between Representations and Embodied Experiences of Shoes, Ph.D. thesis, Sheffield: University of Sheffield.
    [Google Scholar]
54. Sherlock, A. and Crumplin, T. E. (2013), ‘“Everybody haffi ask weh mi get mi Clarks”: Clarks originals and cross-cultural appropriation’, The World at Your Feet Conference, University of Northampton, Northampton, 20–21 March.
    [Google Scholar]
55. Soini, K. and Dessein, J. (2016), ‘Culture-sustainability relation: Towards a conceptual framework’, Sustainability, 8:2, p. 167, https://doi.org/10.3390/su8020167.
    [Google Scholar]
56. Stenou, K. (ed.) (2002), Universal Declaration on Cultural Diversity, Paris: United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization.
    [Google Scholar]
57. Strathern, M. (1988), The Gender of the Gift: Problems with Women and Problems with Society in Melanesia, Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
    [Google Scholar]
58. Throsby, D. and Petetskaya, E. (2016), ‘Sustainability concepts in indigenous and non-indigenous cultures’, International Journal of Cultural Property, 23:2, pp. 119–40, https://doi.org/10.1017/s0940739116000084.
    [Google Scholar]
59. Vänskä, A. and Gurova, O. (2024), Understanding Fashion Scandals: Social Media, Identity, and Globalization, London: Bloomsbury Visual Arts.
    [Google Scholar]
60. Watene, K. and Yap, M. (2015), ‘Culture and sustainable development: Indigenous contributions’, Journal of Global Ethics, 11:1, pp. 51–55, https://doi.org/10.1080/17449626.2015.1010099.
    [Google Scholar]
61. Weiner, A. B. (1992), Inalienable Possessions: The Paradox of Keeping-while-Giving, Oxford: University of California Press.
    [Google Scholar]
62. Woodward, S. (2015), ‘Accidentally sustainable? Ethnographic approaches to clothing practices’, in K. Fletcher and M. Tham (eds), Routledge Handbook of Sustainability and Fashion, London: Routledge, pp. 131–38.
    [Google Scholar]
63. Yunkaporta, T. (2019), Sand Talk: How Indigenous Thinking Can Save the World, Melbourne and London: The Text Publishing Company.
    [Google Scholar]