Skip to content
1981
  1. Home
  2. A-Z Publications
  3. International Journal of Sustainable Fashion & Textiles
  4. Volume 4, Issue 2
  5. Article
Volume 4, Issue 2
  • ISSN: 2754-026X
  • E-ISSN: 2754-0278

Abstract

Clothing and textiles are increasingly made of synthetic (fossils-based) fibres, enabling rapid growth in overall production volumes in this sector, with significant environmental impact. This research aims at understanding the strategies of companies that are actively working to confront this trend by trying to avoid or reduce synthetic content in their products. Fifteen companies are interviewed to gather their strategies in resisting synthetic fibres. These include four companies born with a plastic-free mindset, five companies that define themselves as a wool or cotton company despite using other materials, and six companies that aim at reducing synthetic use as part of a broader approach to sustainability and the quality of the products offered. The study analyses the barriers and enablers that affect their endeavours and proposes a series of policy recommendations to counter current developments. Barriers experienced by companies include synthetics’ low price, their physical characteristics enabling elasticity, durability and impermeability, the narrative of plastic recycling as a questionable sustainable solution, the bias of sustainability indicators and production technologies, and specific fashion trends calling for the material characteristics mentioned above. Some enablers mentioned are concerns from the company leadership about the growth of synthetics and associated microplastic release, the role of public policy and procurement in driving the change, resistance to synthetics by users in specific products (e.g. childrenswear), efforts to produce with the company’s own recycled materials, and to achieve a more intensive use of their products. The study concludes with policy recommendations such as stopping subsidizing petrochemicals, sanctioning overproduction practices, promoting true pricing and discriminating tax rates, improving sustainability metrics, targeted R&D support for natural and local materials and a fibre-to-fibre focus for recycling policy, so that the overall volume of textile production and the content of synthetics in it can be reduced.

Funding
This study was supported by the:
  • Norwegian Retailers’ Environmental Fund
© 2025 Intellect Ltd
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1386/sft_00061_1
2025-12-23
2026-03-10
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Bates Kassatly, Veronica and Townsend, Terry (2025), ‘The treatment of microfibers in life cycle analysis and Product Environmental Footprint applications’, https://baumwollboerse.de/wp-content/uploads/2025/01/BWB_Studie_2025_P4.pdf. Accessed 13 October 2025.
  2. Changing Markets Foundation (2021), Fossil Fashion: The Hidden Reliance of Fast Fashion on Fossil Fuels, Utrecht: Changing Markets Foundation, https://changingmarkets.org/report/fossil-fashion-the-hidden-reliance-of-fast-fashion-on-fossil-fuels/. Accessed 13 October 2025.
  3. Changing Markets Foundation (2022), Synthetics Anonimous 2.0: Fashion’s Persistent Plastic Problem, Utrecht: Changing Markets Foundation, https://changingmarkets.org/report/fossil-fashion-todays-fashion-industry-has-become-synonymous-with-overconsumption-a-snowballing-waste-crisis-widespread-pollution-and-the-exploitation-of-workers-in-global-supply-chains-w/. Accessed 13 October 2025.
  4. Changing Markets Foundation (2024), Fashion’s Plastic Paralysis: How Brands Resist Change and Fuel Microplastic, Utrecht: Changing Markets Foundation, https://changingmarkets.org/report/fashions-plastic-paralysis/. Accessed 13 October 2025.
  5. Ecobalyse (2024), ‘Exemples: Page introduisant la notion d’exemples proposés au début du simulateur’, https://fabrique-numerique.gitbook.io/ecobalyse/textile/exemples. Accessed 1 November 2024.
  6. European Commission (2022), ‘EU strategy for sustainable and circular textiles’, 30 March, https://eur-lex.europa.eu/resource.html?uri=cellar:9d2e47d1-b0f3-11ec-83e1-01aa75ed71a1.0001.02/DOC_1&format=PDF. Accessed 13 October 2025.
  7. European Environmental Agency (2024), ‘The role of plastics in Europe’s circular economy’, 18 June, https://www.eea.europa.eu/publications/the-role-of-plastics-in-europe. Accessed 13 October 2025.
  8. Granum, Charlotte Ruud and Bjerkestrand, Mia (2024), Moteindustriens Plastproblem: En Kartlegging Av Kleskjedenes Bruk Av Syntetiske Fibre, Oslo: Framtiden i våre hender, https://www.framtiden.no/filer/dokumenter/Rapporter/2024/fivh-moteindustriens-plastproblem-2024-rev13.pdf. Accessed 13 October 2025.
  9. Henry, Beverley, Laitala, Kirsi and Klepp, Ingun Grimstad (2019), ‘Microfibres from apparel and home textiles: Prospects for including microplastics in environmental sustainability assessment’, The Science of the Total Environment, 652, pp. 483–94, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.10.166.
     [Google Scholar]
  10. Islam, Shariful, Ahmed, Shaharia, Arifuzzaman, Md, Akm, Saiful Islam and Akter, Shilpi (2019), ‘Relationship between strength and polyester content percentage of cotton polyester blended woven fabrics’, International Journal of Clothing Science, 6:1, pp. 1–16, https://doi.org/10.5923/j.clothing.20190601.01.
     [Google Scholar]
  11. Klepp, Ingun Grimstad, Laitala, Kirsi, Berg, Lisbeth Løvbak, Måge, Jens, Hvass, Kerli Kant and Tobiasson, Tone (2023a), ‘Critical review of Product Environmental Footprint (PEF): Why PEF currently favors synthetic textiles (plastics) and therefore also fast fashion’, Clothing Research, OsloMet, 3 February, https://clothingresearch.oslomet.no/wp-content/uploads/sites/1026/2023/02/Background-paper-on-PEF.pdf. Accessed 13 October 2025.
  12. Klepp, Ingun Grimstad, Berg, Lisbeth Løvbak, Sigaard, Anna Schytte, Tobiasson, Skårdal and Gleisberg, Lea (2023b), ‘The plastic elephant: Overproduction and synthetic fibres in sustainable textile strategies’, report, Oslo: OsloMet, https://oda.oslomet.no/oda-xmlui/handle/11250/3086387. Accessed 13 October 2025.
  13. Kounina, Anna, Daystar, Jesse, Chalumeau, Sophie, Devine, Jon, Geyer, Roland, Pires, Steven T., Sonar, Shreya Uday, Venditti, Richard A. and Boucher, Julien (2024), ‘The global apparel industry is a significant yet overlooked source of plastic leakage’, Nature Communications, 15:1, pp. 6–13, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-024-49441-4.
     [Google Scholar]
  14. Laitala, Kirsi and Klepp, Ingun Grimstad (2024), ‘Waste audit interviews: A method for understanding the link between intrinsic quality and apparel lifespans’, Clothing Research, OsloMet, 16 April, https://clothingresearch.oslomet.no/wp-content/uploads/sites/1026/2024/04/NewMethod.pdf. Accessed 13 October 2025.
  15. Manshoven, S., Smeets, A., Malarciuc, C., Tenhunen, A. and Mortensen, L. F. (2022), Microplastic Pollution from Textile Consumption in Europe, Mol: European Topic Centre on Circular Economy and Resource Use, https://www.cscp.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/03/ETC_Microplastics-and-Textiles.pdf. Accessed 13 October 2025.
  16. Manshoven, Saskia, Vercalsteren, A. N., Christis, Maarten, De Jong, Annelise, Schmidt, Imke, Grossi, Francesca and Mortensen, Lars (2023), Consumption and the Environment in Europe’s Circular Economy, Mol: European Topic Centre on Circular Economy and Resource Use, https://www.eionet.europa.eu/etcs/etc-ce/products/etc-ce-report-2023-8-consumption-and-the-environment-in-europe2019s-circular-economy/@@download/file/Consumption_final_2023.pdf. Accessed 13 October 2025.
  17. Ministerie van Infrastructuur en Waterstaat (2024), Beleidsprogramma Circulair Textiel 2025–30, The Hague: Ministerie van Infrastructuur en Waterstaat, https://open.overheid.nl/documenten/dpc-697735d15cdf032cbd6e13340c7d6d9b7f93f875/pdf. Accessed 13 October 2025.
  18. Nayak, Rajkishore, Jajpura, Lalit and Khandual, Asimanda (2023), ‘Traditional fibres for fashion and textiles: Associated problems and future sustainable fibres’, in R. Nayek (ed.), Sustainable Fibres for Fashion and Textile Manufacturing, Cambridge, MA: Elsevier, pp. 3–25.
     [Google Scholar]
  19. Niinimäki, Kirsi, Peters, Greg, Dahlbo, Helena, Perry, Patsy, Rissanen, Timo and Gwilt, Alison (2020), ‘The environmental price of fast fashion’, Nature Reviews Earth & Environment, 1:4, pp. 189–200, https://doi.org/10.1038/s43017-020-0039-9.
     [Google Scholar]
  20. Sigaard, Anna Schytte (2023), ‘Want not, waste not: Preliminary findings, SIFO project report’, report, Oslo: OsloMet, https://oda.oslomet.no/oda-xmlui/bitstream/handle/11250/3064950/SIFONote2-2023WastedTextilespreliminaryfindings.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y. Accessed 13 October 2025.
  21. Sigaard, Anna Schytte and Laitala, Kirsi (2023), ‘Natural and sustainable? Consumers’ textile fiber preferences’, Fibers, Special Issue: ‘Natural Fiber Competitiveness and Sustainability’, 11:2, https://doi.org/10.3390/fib11020012.
     [Google Scholar]
  22. Syversen, Frode, Klepp, Ingun Grimstad, Skogesal, Olav, Rabben, Kristiane, Sigaard, Anna Schytte, Berg, Lisbeth Løvbak and Laitala, Kirsi (2023), Dypdykk i Materialstrømmene for Tekstiler Fra Husholdninger i Norge, Oslo: Mepex, https://mepex.no/wp-content/uploads/2024/01/05.01.24_Mepex_Dypdykk-i-materialstrommene-for-tekstiler-fra-husholdninger-i-Norge-1.pdf.
     [Google Scholar]
  23. Textile Exchange (2023), Materials Market Report 2023, Burbank, CA: Textile Exchange, https://textileexchange.org/knowledge-center/reports/materials-market-report-2023/. Accessed 13 October 2025.
  24. Valle, Camila Cordeiro, Palomo-Lovinski, Noël and Krifa, Mourad (2024), ‘Cotton and polyester in athleisure: A designer perspective’, International Journal of Design Management and Professional Practice, 18:2, pp. 1–17, https://doi.org/10.18848/2325-162X/CGP/v18i02/1-17.
     [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1386/sft_00061_1
Loading
Avoiding synthetic fibres by choice: Strategies employed by businesses and their policy recommendations
International Journal of Sustainable Fashion & Textiles 4, 299 (2025); https://doi.org/10.1386/sft_00061_1
/content/journals/10.1386/sft_00061_1
/content/journals/10.1386/sft_00061_1
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Article
Keyword(s): clothing companies; environmental policy; microplastics; natural fibres; production volumes; synthetic fibres; textile recycling

Most Cited Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a success
Invalid data
An error occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error
Please enter a valid_number test