Skip to content
1981
Volume 4, Issue 2
  • ISSN: 2754-026X
  • E-ISSN: 2754-0278

Abstract

This is a sustainable design-based article reviewing traditional scouring within the processing of Irish sheep wool, identifying obstacles and proposing a conceptual solution, titled ‘Glan Wool Scouring Equipment’, also referred to as Glan throughout this article. Glan is a conceptual design solution aimed at addressing these specific industry challenges by providing a more efficient manual scouring process. This design is informed by extensive research conducted as part of this study, which explores the current landscape of wool processing, the role of tradition in scouring and the broader environmental and economic implications of the practice. Wool is biodegradable and, through localization, we can support rural economies while reducing transport-related emissions. However, wool is often treated as a secondary or waste by-product of the agricultural industry, creating weak financial incentives for farmers to collect and sell it. Recent reports in Ireland note prices low enough to harm farm incomes. ‘Scouring’ is the removal of impurities from the fleece after the animal is sheared and before further processing, a labour- and resource-intensive practice. The impact of scouring on the productivity and environmental footprint of the industry was analysed during this research, along with the contemporary challenges faced. Promoting traditional scouring helps preserve cultural heritage and support environmentally and ethically responsible textile production. Designing for low waste and prioritizing low-impact materials are widely recognized as core circular design strategies. In this article, a novel concept which was developed in response to these industry needs is presented. This equipment, Glan (meaning ‘clean’ in the Irish language), is designed to improve the efficiency, sustainability and user experience of the traditional scouring process to boost productivity, profitability and inclusivity, increasing awareness and broader adoption. By integrating innovative solutions into traditional frameworks, this research demonstrates how heritage is balanced with progress to support global movements towards sustainable fashion and textiles. By using resources derived from tradition to drive innovation we can progress towards an economically and sustainably successful future.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1386/sft_00062_1
2025-12-23
2026-04-13

Metrics

Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. The Agile Executive (2022), ‘Department of Agriculture, Food and Marine: Review of market opportunities for Irish-grown wool-based products’, The Agile Executive, 1 July, https://assets.gov.ie/228775/bfd187ee-8ea3-40a0-9e6b-d99da3b57147.pdf. Accessed 3 June 2024.
  2. Bhavsar, P., Zoccola, M., Patrucco, A., Montarsolo, A., Rovero, G. and Tonin, C. (2017), ‘Comparative study on the effects of superheated water and high temperature alkaline hydrolysis on wool keratin’, Textile Research Journal, 87:14, pp. 1696705, https://doi.org/10.1177/0040517516658512.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Borthwick, M., Tomitsch, M. and Gaughwin, M. (2022), ‘From human-centred to life-centred design: Considering environmental and ethical concerns in the design of interactive products’, Journal of Responsible Technology, 10, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrt.2022.100032.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Das, D. and Das, S. (2022), ‘Wool structure and morphology’, in S. Thomas and S. Jose (eds), Wool Fiber Reinforced Polymer Composites, Cambridge: Woodhead Publishing, pp. 1332.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Design Council (2004), Eleven Lessons: Managing Design in Eleven Global Brands: A Study of the Design Process, London: Design Council, https://www.idi-design.ie/content/files/ElevenLessons_Design_Council_2.pdf. Accessed 21 June 2024.
  6. El-Sayed, H. (2024), ‘Antishrink finishing of woolens: Shrink-resist treatment on woolens using various physical and chemical methods’, in S. Jose, S. Thomas and G. Basu (eds), The Wool Handbook, Cambridge: Woodhead Publishing, pp. 38199.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. International Wool Textile Organisation (2021), ‘UV protection’, IWTO, https://iwto.org/wellness/uv-protection/. Accessed 5 June 2024.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. International Wool Textile Organisation (2022), ‘Market information sample edition 17’, IWTO, https://iwto.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/04/IWTO-Market-Information-Sample-Edition-17.pdf. Accessed 5 June 2024.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Jayalakshmi, I. (2014), ‘Environmental issues in scouring of wool’, Nanotechnol, 3:2, pp. 17381, https://doi.org/10.13074/jent.2014.03.143082.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Laurel, B. (2003), Design Research: Methods and Perspectives, Cambridge, MA: The MIT press.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Li, Q., Hurren, C. J. and Wang, X. (2017), ‘Ultrasonic assisted industrial wool scouring’, Procedia Engineering, 200, pp. 3944, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2017.07.007.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Palinkas, L. A., Horwitz, S. M., Green, C. A., Wisdom, J. P, Duan, N. and Hoagwood, K. (2015), ‘Purposeful sampling for qualitative data collection and analysis in mixed method implementation research’, Administration and Policy in Mental Health, 42:5, pp. 53344, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10488-013-0528-y.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Rippon, J. A. (2008), ‘Friction, felting and shrink-proofing of wool’, in B. S. Gupta (ed.), Friction in Textile Materials, Cambridge: Woodhead Publishing, pp. 25391.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Rungruangkitkrai, N., Mongkholrattanasit, R., Wongphakdee, W. and Studničková, J. (2013), ‘Eco-friendly dyeing and UV protection properties of wool fabric using natural dye from Eucalyptus’, Research Journal of Textile and Apparel, 17:3, pp. 2937, https://doi.org/10.1108/rjta-17-03-2013-b004.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Ryder, M. L. (1995), ‘Fleece grading and wool sorting: The historical perspective’, Textile History, 26:1, pp. 322, https://doi.org/10.1179/004049695793711852.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Saldaña, J. (2016), The Coding Manual for Qualitative Researchers, 3rd ed., London: Sage Publications.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Slater, K. (2003), Environmental Impact of Textiles: Production, Processes and Protection, Cambridge: Woodhead Publishing Ltd.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Dicken, P. (2007), Global Shift: Mapping the Changing Contours of the World Economy, London: Sage Publications Ltd.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. O’Sullivan, K. (2022), ‘Irish wool prices “ridiculously low”’, The Irish Examiner, 9 June, https://www.irishexaminer.com/farming/arid-40891529.html. Accessed 3 June 2024.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Palmi, P. and Lezzi, G. E. (2020), ‘How authenticity and tradition shift into sustainability and innovation: Evidence from Italian agritourism’, International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17:15, pp. 120, https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17155389.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Radclyffe-Thomas, N. (2022), ‘Rescuing textile waste: Q&A with Dr. Christina Dean, founder and board chair, redress’, International Journal of Sustainable Fashion & Textiles, 1:1, pp. 14958, https://doi.org/10.1386/sft/0007_7.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Russell, I. M. (2009), ‘Sustainable wool production and processing’, in R. S. Blackburn (ed.), Sustainable Textiles, Cambridge: Woodhead Publishing, pp. 6387, https://doi.org/10.1533/9781845696948.1.63.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Wood, G. F. (1982), ‘Wool-scouring’, Textile Progress, 12:1, pp. 115, https://doi.org/10.1080/00405168208688892.
    [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1386/sft_00062_1
Loading
/content/journals/10.1386/sft_00062_1
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a success
Invalid data
An error occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error
Please enter a valid_number test