Skip to content
1981
Volume 16, Issue 1
  • ISSN: 1750-3159
  • E-ISSN: 1750-3167

Abstract

The widespread use of audio technology in musical theatre – and, in particular, how the use of this audio technology interfaces with the presence of live musicians – complicates the sonic notion of in the theatrical setting. This article will delve into the more complex details of what we call liveness in mainstream musical theatre, with special attention paid to live musicians in this highly mediated environment. The first half of the article explores the roots of contemporary audio technology norms for musical theatre and argues that they have developed in part to maximize the sonic similarity of the live performance to its mediatized forms (primarily cast recordings). The second section explores the impact of audio mediation norms on pit musicians and features comments drawn from interviews with a number of Broadway musicians. The use of audio technology in contemporary musical theatre performance, while perhaps making it easier to align mediatized and live performance forms for audience consumption, results in complex notions of quasi-liveness with respect to the live musicians.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1386/smt_00083_1
2022-04-01
2024-09-07
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Auslander, Philip. ( 1999), Liveness: Performance in a Mediatized Culture, London:: Routledge;.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Banfield, Stephen. ( 1993), Sondheim’s Broadway Musicals, Ann Arbor, MI:: University of Michigan Press;.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Burston, Jonathan. ( 1998;), ‘ Theatre space as virtual place: Audio technology, the reconfigured singing body, and the megamusical. ’, Popular Music, 17:1, pp. 20518.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Canby, Vincent. ( 1995;), ‘ Look who’s talking on Broadway: Microphones. ’, New York Times, 22 January, p. 2001.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Chase, David. ( 2018), telephone interview with the author, 11 November .
  6. Croft, John. ( 2007;), ‘ Theses on liveness. ’, Organized Sound, 12:1, pp. 5966.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Cuevas, Steven. ( 2018), telephone interview with the author, 22 October .
  8. Danielsen, Anne, and Helseth, Inger. ( 2016;), ‘ Mediated intimacy: The relationship between auditory and visual dimensions of live performance in contemporary technology-based popular music. ’, Rock Music Studies, 3:1, pp. 2440.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Engel, Lehman. ( 1967), The American Musical Theater: A Consideration, New York:: MacMillan;.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Gallagher, Matt. ( 2013;), ‘ Kinky Boots on Broadway: Tony Award-winning sound design for the best musical of 2013. ’, Mix, 37:10, p. 24.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Gardos, David. ( 2018), telephone interview with the author, 30 October .
  12. Grant, Mark N.. ( 2004), The Rise and Fall of the Broadway Musical, Boston:: Northeastern University Press;.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Kane, Brian. ( 2014), Sound Unseen: Acousmatic Sound in Theory and Practice, New York:: Oxford University Press;.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Kirle, Bruce. ( 2005), Unfinished Show Business: Broadway Musicals as Works-in-Progress, Carbondale, IL:: Southern Illinois University Press;.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. McMillin, Scott., ( 2006), The Musical as Drama, Princeton, NJ:: Princeton University Press;.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Meffe, Robert. ( 2011;), ‘ How many musicians does it take? A history and analysis of the shrinking Broadway pit orchestra. ’, Studies in Musical Theatre, 5:1, pp. 99115.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Pardo, Dan. ( 2018), e-mail correspondence with the author, 24 October .
  18. Rodosthenous, George., ( 2016;), ‘ Sound design in theatre: Interruptions, counterpoints, and punctuations: An interview with Mic Pool. ’, Studies in Musical Theatre, 10:2, pp. 24351.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Sanden, Paul. ( 2013), Liveness in Modern Music: Musicians, Technology, and the Perception of Performance, New York:: Routledge;.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Slaten, Whitney. ( 2018;), ‘ Doing sound: An ethnography of fidelity, temporality, and labor among live sound engineers. ’, Ph.D. dissertation, New York:: Columbia University;.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Slaton, Shannon. ( 2011), Mixing a Musical: Broadway Theatrical Sound Techniques, Boston:: Focal Press;.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Sterne, Jonathan. ( 2003), The Audible Past: Cultural Origins of Sound Reproduction, Durham, NC:: Duke University Press;.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Symonds, Dominic. ( 2020;), ‘ Starlight expression and phantom operatics: Technology, performance, and the megamusical’s aesthetic of the voice. ’, in J. Sternfeld, and E. L. Wollman. (eds), The Routledge Companion to the Contemporary Musical, New York:: Routledge;, pp. 87-96.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Taylor, Millie. ( 2012), Musical Theatre, Realism, and Entertainment, London:: Routledge;.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Tommasini, Anthony. ( 2006;), ‘ Pipe down! We can hardly hear you. ’, New York Times, 1 January, p. 2001.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Valencia, Brian D.. ( 2016;), ‘ What a crescendo – not to be missed: Loudness on the musical stage. ’, Studies in Musical Theatre, 10:1, pp. 717.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Whitaker, Emily. ( 2018), telephone interview with the author, 23 October .
  28. Wolf, Stacy E.. ( 2002), A Problem Like Maria: Gender and Sexuality in the American Musical, Ann Arbor, MI:: University of Michigan Press;.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Alexander-Hills, Makulumy. ( 2022;), ‘ Audio mediation technology and liveness in modern musical theatre performance. ’, Studies in Musical Theatre, 16:1, pp. 520, https://doi.org/10.1386/smt_00083_1
    [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1386/smt_00083_1
Loading
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a success
Invalid data
An error occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error