‘Sumpin wrong inside him’: Exploring the cripistemologies and degenerates in Oklahoma!

References

1. Altschuler, Sari (2020), ‘Touching the scarlet letter : What disability history can teach us about literature’, American Literature, 92:1, pp. 91–122, https://doi.org/10.1215/00029831-8056602.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Anon. (1937), ‘Rebirth of mankind urged to halt “decay”’, New York Times, 13 April, p. 12.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Anon. (1943), ‘Sterilization of the unfit, planned parenthood urged’, Washington Post, 24 March, p. 11.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Baynton, Douglas (2001), ‘Disability and the justification of inequality in American history’, in P. Longmore and L. Umansky (eds), The New Disability History: American Perspectives, New York: New York University Press, pp. 33–57.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Byers, Joseph (1934), The Village of Happiness: The Story of the Training School, Vineland, NJ: Vineland Training School.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Carter, Tim (2007), Oklahoma!: The Making of an American Musical, New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Cassidy, Claudia (1943), ‘What a show is “Oklahoma!”; has everything’, Chicago Daily Tribune, 16 November, p. 14.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Drake, Alfred and da Silva, Howard (1943), ‘Pore Jud Is Daid’, composed by R. Rodgers and O. Hammerstein II, Oklahoma!, 78 RPM, USA: Decca.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Estabrook, Arthur (1913), ‘A two-family apartment’, Survey, 29:25, pp. 853–54.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Gardner, Kara Anne (2016), Agnes de Mille: Telling Stories in Broadway Dance, New York: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Goddard, Henry (1910), ‘Four hundred feeble-minded children classified by the Binet method’, The Journal of Genetic Physiology, 17:3, pp. 387–97, https://doi.org/10.1080/00221325.1991.9914705.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Grinenko, Aleksei (2023), Seriously Mad: Mental Distress and the Broadway Musical, Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Hammerstein, Oscar II (1949), Lyrics by Oscar Hammerstein II, New York: Simon and Schuster.
    [Google Scholar]
14. Howe, Blake (2017), ‘Music and the agents of obsession’, Music Theory Spectrum, 38:2, pp. 218–40, https://doi.org/10.1093/mts/mtw014.
    [Google Scholar]
15. Johnson, Merri Lisa and Robert, McRuer (2014), ‘Cripistemologies: Introductions’, Journal of Literary & Cultural Disability Studies, 8:2, pp. 127–47, https://doi.org/10.3828/jlcds.2014.13.
    [Google Scholar]
16. Kirle, Bruce (2003), ‘Reconciliation, resolution, and the political role of Oklahoma! in American consciousness’, Theatre Journal, 55:2, pp. 251–74, https://doi.org/10.1353/tj.2003.0071.
    [Google Scholar]
17. Kline, Wendy (2001), Building a Better Race: Gender, Sexuality, and Eugenics from the Century to the Baby Boom, Los Angeles, CA: University of California Press.
    [Google Scholar]
18. Little Thunder, Julie (2002), ‘Mixedbloods and bloodlust in Cherokee Night’, The Midwest Quarterly, 43:4, pp. 355–65, https://www.proquest.com/scholarly-journals/mixedbloods-bloodlust-cherokee-night/docview/195704824/se-2. Accessed 18 October 2025.
    [Google Scholar]
19. Mohler, Courtney (2016), ‘The native plays of Lynn Riggs (Cherokee) and the question of “race”-specific casting’, Theatre Topics, 26:1, pp. 63–75, https://doi-org.libproxy.washu.edu/10.1353/tt.2016.0005.
    [Google Scholar]
20. Most, Andrea (2004), Making Americans: Jews and the Broadway Musical, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
21. Rafter, Nicole (1988), White Trash: The Eugenic Family Studies. 1877–1919, Boston, MA: Northeastern University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
22. Riggs, Lynn (1931), Green Grow the Lilacs: A Play, New York: Samuel French.
    [Google Scholar]
23. Riggs, Lynn (2003), The Cherokee Night and Other Plays, Norman: University of Oklahoma Press.
    [Google Scholar]
24. Rodgers, Richard and Hammerstein, Oscar II (1943), Oklahoma!, New York: Concord Theatricals.
    [Google Scholar]
25. Rydell, Robert, Cogdell, Christina and Largent, Mark (2006), ‘The Nazi eugenics exhibit in the United States, 1934–1943’, in S. Currell and C. Cogdell (eds), Popular Eugenics: National Efficacy and American Mass Culture in the 1930s, Athens, OH: Ohio University Press, pp. 359–84.
    [Google Scholar]
26. Schalk, Sami (2017), ‘Critical disability studies as methodology’, Lateral, 6:1, n.pag., https://www.jstor.org/stable/48671697. Accessed 18 October 2025.
    [Google Scholar]
27. Siebers, Tobin (2010), Disability Aesthetics, Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
    [Google Scholar]
28. Smith, Angela (2011), Hideous Progeny: Disability, Eugenics, and Classic Horror Cinema, New York: Columbia University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
29. Trent, James (1994), Inventing the Feeble Mind: A History of Mental Retardation in the United States, Los Angeles, CA: University of California Press.
    [Google Scholar]
30. Weaver, Jace (1997), That the People Might Live: Native American Literatures and Native American Community, New York: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
31. Wilk, Max (2002), Ok! The Story of Oklahoma! A Celebration of America’s Most Loved Musical, New York: Applause.
    [Google Scholar]