Skip to content
1981
Volume 2, Issue 1
  • ISSN: 2040-3232
  • E-ISSN: 2040-3240

Abstract

Alan Moore and the Hughes brothers shared a common goal to depict nineteenth-century English slum life in a credible manner in their versions of . The documentary style created by Moore and Eddie Campbell in their graphic novel is not replicated in the film with correspondent solutions specific to cinema. Instead, the Hughes brothers veered away from the source text thematically and aesthetically, creating something quite different. These choices, although inventive, ultimately alienated fans and were a factor in the film's moderate critical reception. Pascal Lefevre posits in his essay 'Incompatible Visual Ontologies?' that the unique conflicts facing a film-making team that choose to adapt a comic book can be broken down into four main divisions: 'first, to what extent the screenwriter has to rewrite the story, second, how to go from page layout to a single, unchangeable screen frame, third, how to translate the static drawings into moving and photographic images, and fourth, how to give the "silent world" an audible sound?'. These distinctions will frame my theoretical, thematic and aesthetic analysis of Alan Moore's graphic novel to the resultant film of the same name.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1386/stic.2.1.207_1
2011-07-08
2024-09-12
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/content/journals/10.1386/stic.2.1.207_1
Loading
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a success
Invalid data
An error occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error