Skip to content
1981
Volume 11, Issue 2
  • ISSN: 2040-3232
  • E-ISSN: 2040-3240

Abstract

Conceptual metaphor theory proposes that metaphor is a mental function, rather than solely a literary device. As such, metaphors may be present in any by-product of human cognition, including pictorial art. Crawford and Juricevic previously proposed two heuristic frameworks for the identification and interpretation of metaphor in pictures, which have been shown to be capable of describing how pictorial metaphors are identified and interpreted in the comic book medium. The present study tested artists’ preference for combinations of contextual and structural pictorial information in comic book cover images. We analysed usages of exaggerated size in comic book cover art, as exaggerated size is a pictorial device, which may be used both literally and metaphorically. The goal was to assess how contextual and structural information is combined, and how literal and metaphorical information interacts, both when it is congruent and incongruent. This analysis of the use of exaggerated size in comic book art indicates that artists prefer to produce images that have congruent combinations of literal and metaphoric pictorial information, or the incongruent combination of metaphoric contextual information and literal structural information. Artists do not, however, prefer to produce images that have the incongruent combination of metaphorical structural information and literal contextual information. Taken together with the (CART) argument, this pattern suggests that when processing information, our cognitive systems prefer metaphorical interpretations over literal interpretations and contextual information over structural information.

© 2020 Intellect Ltd
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1386/stic_00034_1
2020-11-01
2026-04-19

Metrics

Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Cohn, Neil. ( 2013), The Visual Language of Comics: Introduction to the Structure and Cognition of Sequential Images, London:: Bloomsbury;.
     [Google Scholar]
  2. Crawford, Christopher A., and Juricevic, Igor. ( 2016;), ‘ Two frameworks for the interpretation of metaphoric and literal size depictions in comicbooks. ’, International Journal of Comic Art, 18:1, pp. 561–84.
     [Google Scholar]
  3. Crawford, Christopher A., and Juricevic, Igor. ( 2018;), ‘ Structural and contextual frameworks: Distinguishing literal from metaphoric depictions of exaggerated size. ’, Journal of the Indiana Academy of Social Sciences, 21:1, pp. 64–79.
     [Google Scholar]
  4. El Refaie, Elisabeth. ( 2003;), ‘ Understanding visual metaphor: The example of newspaper cartoons. ’, Visual Communication, 2:1, pp. 45–75.
     [Google Scholar]
  5. Feinstein, Hermine. ( 1982;), ‘ Meaning and visual metaphor. ’, Studies in Art Education, 23:2, pp. 45–55.
     [Google Scholar]
  6. Feng, Dezheng, and O’Halloran, Kay L.. ( 2013;), ‘ The visual representation of metaphor: A social semiotic approach. ’, Review of Cognitive Linguistics, 11:2, pp. 320–35.
     [Google Scholar]
  7. Fleisher, Michael,, Carley, Russell,, and Aparo, Jim. ( 1974;), ‘ The Wrath of… the Spectre. ’, Adventure Comics #431, New York:: DC Comics;.
     [Google Scholar]
  8. Forceville, Charles. ( 2008;), ‘ Metaphor in pictures and multimodal representations. ’, in R. W. Gibbs, Jr.. (ed.), The Cambridge Handbook of Metaphor and Thought, New York:: Cambridge University Press;, pp. 462–82.
     [Google Scholar]
  9. Forceville, Charles. ( 2016;), ‘ Conceptual metaphor theory, blending theory and other cognitivist perspectives on comics. ’, in N. Cohn. (ed.), The Visual Narrative Reader, New York:: Bloomsbury Academic;, pp. 89–114.
     [Google Scholar]
  10. Haight, Frank A.. ( 1967), Handbook of the Poisson Distribution, New York:: John Wiley & Sons;.
     [Google Scholar]
  11. Jackson, Charles, and Juricevic, Igor. ( 2016;), ‘ Metaphorical devices in pictures: LA-MOAD theory predicts depictions of superhuman speed. ’, Annual Meeting of the Association for Psychological Science, Chicago, Illinois, 26–29 May.
     [Google Scholar]
  12. Juricevic, Igor. ( 2017;), ‘ Aladdin Sane and close-up eye asymmetry: David Bowie’s contribution to comic book visual language. ’, The Comics Grid: Journal of Comics Scholarship, 7:1, p. 4.
     [Google Scholar]
  13. Juricevic, Igor. ( 2018;), ‘ Analysis of pictorial metaphors in comicbook art: Test of the LA-MOAD theory. ’, Journal of Graphic Novels and Comics, 9:4, pp. 329–49.
     [Google Scholar]
  14. Juricevic, Igor, and Horvath, Alicia J.. ( 2016;), ‘ Analysis of motions in comic book cover art: Using pictorial metaphors. ’, The Comics Grid: Journal of Comics Scholarship, 6:1, p. 6.
     [Google Scholar]
  15. Juricevic, Igor, and Jackson, Charles. ( 2016;), ‘ Two metaphorical pictures: LA-MOAD theory predicts static depictions but not motion in pictures. ’, Annual Meeting of the Indiana Academy of the Social Sciences, Westville, Indiana, 7 October.
     [Google Scholar]
  16. Kennedy, John M.. ( 1982;), ‘ Metaphor in pictures. ’, Perception, 11:5, pp. 589–605.
     [Google Scholar]
  17. Lakoff, George, and Johnson, Mark. ( 1980), Metaphors We Live By, Chicago:: University of Chicago Press;.
     [Google Scholar]
  18. Lee, Stan,, Romita, John, and Demeo, Mickey. ( 1967;), ‘ Spider-Man No More!. ’, Amazing Spider-Man #50, New York:: Marvel Comics;.
     [Google Scholar]
  19. Leiber, Lieber,, Kirby, Jack,, Ditko, Steve, and Ayers, Dick. ( 1961;), ‘ Torr. ’, Amazing Adventures #1, New York:: Marvel Comics;.
     [Google Scholar]
  20. Sperber, Dan, and Wilson, Deirdre. ( 1995), Relevance: Communication and Cognition, , 2nd ed.., Oxford:: Blackwell;.
     [Google Scholar]
  21. Thomas, Roy,, Buscema, John,, and Klein, George. ( 1968;), ‘ Behold… The Vision!. ’, Avengers #57, New York:: Marvel Comics;.
     [Google Scholar]
  22. Wilson, Dierdre, and Sperber, Dan. ( 2008;), ‘ Relevance theory. ’, in L. Horn, and G. Ward. (eds), The Handbook of Pragmatics, Hoboken, NJ:: Blackwell Publishing;, pp. 607–32.
     [Google Scholar]
  23. Crawford, Christopher A., and Juricevic, Igor. ( 2020;), ‘ Understanding pictorial metaphor in comic book covers: A test of the contextual and structural frameworks. ’, Studies in Comics, 11:2, pp. 341–59, https://doi.org/10.1386/stic_00034_1
     [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1386/stic_00034_1
Loading
Understanding pictorial metaphor in comic book covers: A test of the contextual and structural frameworks
Studies in Comics 11, 341 (2020); https://doi.org/10.1386/stic_00034_1
/content/journals/10.1386/stic_00034_1
/content/journals/10.1386/stic_00034_1
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Article
Keyword(s): CART; comic books; corpus analysis; exaggerated size; metaphor; pictorial metaphor

Most Cited Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a success
Invalid data
An error occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error
Please enter a valid_number test