Materiality and metalepsis in handmade small press alternative comics

References

1. Baetens, J. (2001), ‘Revealing traces: A new theory of graphic enunciation’, in The Language of Comics: Word and Image, Jackson, MS: University Press of Mississippi, pp. 145–55.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Beaty, B. (2007), Unpopular Culture: Transforming the European Comic Book in the 1990s, Toronto and Buffalo, NY: University of Toronto Press.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Benjamin, W. (1999), Illuminations (ed. H. Arendt, trans. H. Zorn), London: Pimlico.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Chute, H. L. (2016), Disaster Drawn: Visual Witness, Comics, and Documentary Form, Cambridge, MA: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Drichel, S. and Diprose, R. (2013), ‘Corporeal interdependence: From vulnerability to dwelling in ethical community’, SubStance, 42:3, pp. 185–204, https://doi.org/10.1353/sub.2013.0035.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Drucker, J. (1994), Theorizing Modernism: Visual Art and the Critical Tradition, New York: Columbia University Press.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Fludernik, M. (2003), ‘Scene shift, metalepsis, and the metaleptic mode’, Style, 37:4, pp. 382–400.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Genette, G. (1990), Narrative Discourse: An Essay in Method, Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Grennan, S. (2017), A Theory of Narrative Drawing, New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Hanebeck, J. (2017), Understanding Metalepsis: The Hermeneutics of Narrative Transgression, Narratologia, vol. 56, Berlin and Boston, MA: De Gruyter.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Hofer, R. (2011), ‘Metalepsis in live performance: Holographic projections of the cartoon band “Gorillaz” as a means of metalepsis’, in K. Kukkonen and S. Klimek (eds), Metalepsis in Popular Culture, Narratologia, vol. 28, New York: De Gruyter, pp. 232–51.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Ingold, T. (2007), Lines: A Brief History, London and New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Johnston, P. (2016), ‘Under the radar: John Porcellino’s King-Cat comics and self-publishing as cultural work’, in C. Brienza and P. Johnston (eds), Cultures of Comics Work, New York: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 145–60.
    [Google Scholar]
14. Kukkonen, K. (2011), ‘Metalepsis in comics and graphic novels’, in K. Kukkonen and S. Klimek (eds), Metalepsis in Popular Culture, Narratologia, vol. 28, New York: De Gruyter, pp. 213–31.
    [Google Scholar]
15. Kukkonen, K. and Klimek, S. (2011), Metalepsis in Popular Culture, Narratologia, vol. 28, New York: De Gruyter.
    [Google Scholar]
16. La Cour, E., Grennan, S. and Spanjers, R. (2022), Key Terms in Comics Studies, New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
    [Google Scholar]
17. Marks, L. U. (2002), Touch: Sensuous Theory and Multisensory Media, Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
    [Google Scholar]
18. Mickwitz, N. (2015), Documentary Comics: Graphic Truth-Telling in a Sceptical Age, Palgrave Studies in Comics and Graphic Novels, New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
    [Google Scholar]
19. Piepmeier, A. (2009), Girl Zines: Making Media, Doing Feminism, New York: New York University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
20. Rice, P. (2015), Soppy, London: Square Peg.
    [Google Scholar]
21. Rice, P. (2017), Our Soppy Love Story Journal, Kansas City, MO: Andrews McMeel Publishing.
    [Google Scholar]
22. Rice, P. (2020), Baby: A Soppy Story, Kansas City, MO: Andrews McMeel Publishing.
    [Google Scholar]
23. Smith, S. J. (2024), Instagram direct message with Scott Jason Smith, 16 February.
24. Szép, E. (2020), Comics and the Body: Drawing, Reading, and Vulnerability, Studies in Comics and Cartoons, Columbus, OH: The Ohio State University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
25. Thoss, J. (2015), When Storyworlds Collide: Metalepsis in Popular Fiction, Film and Comics, Studies in Intermediality, vol. 7, Leiden: Brill Rodopi.
    [Google Scholar]
26. Wolk, D. (2007), Reading Comics: How Graphic Novels Work and What They Mean, Cambridge, MA: Da Capo Press.
    [Google Scholar]