Skip to content
1981
Volume 17, Issue 3
  • ISSN: 1477-965X
  • E-ISSN: 1758-9533

Abstract

Abstract

In this article, a semiotic approach is proposed to explain how human agents use and give meaning to art in complex contexts. Inspired by the psycho-historical approach on art appreciation, which attempts to embrace psychological and cognitive aspects of art sense-making, as well as the art-historical context dependence of artworks, an extended theory is suggested: an agent's art use and interpretation can be described using three general categories of meaning grounding: phylogenetic recurrence, ontogenetic recurrence and collective recurrence. These categories explain how a certain meaning of a sign is possible and justifiable, supported by human agents' capabilities and purposes. This article also proposes that it is possible to narrate, using such categories of meaning grounding, how different agents enact art, that is, give meaning and act upon art in different circumstances. Finally, I offer some examples about how the model can be used in real art contexts. The objective of this narrative-enactive approach, even though it offers a limited and edited focus, is to offer an orderly and comprehensible method to explain the dynamic nature of art meaning and how biologic, individual and collective grounding and purposes intertwine.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1386/tear_00021_1
2019-10-01
2026-04-17

Metrics

Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Alpers, S.. (1991);, 'The museum as a way of seeing'. , in I. Karp, and S. D. Lavine. (eds), Exhibiting Cultures: The Poetics and Politics of Museum Display, London:: Smithsonian Institution Press;, pp. 25-32.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Baxandall, M.. (1991);, 'Exhibiting intention: Some preconditions of the visual display of culturally purposeful objects'. , in I. Karp, and S. D. Lavine. (eds), Exhibiting Cultures: The Poetics and Politics of Museum Display, London:: Smithsonian Institution Press;, pp. 33-41.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Becker, H. S.. (1982), Art Worlds, Berkeley:: University of California Press;.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Bourdieu, P.. (1992), The Rules of Art: Genesis and Structure of the Literary Field, Stanford:: Stanford University Press;.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Bullot, N. J.. (2014);, 'The functions of environmental art'. , Leonardo, 47:5, pp. 511-12.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Bullot, N. J., and Reber, R.. (2013);, 'The artful mind meets art history: Toward a psycho-historical framework for the science of art appreciation'. , Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 36:2, pp. 123-80.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Davies, S.. (2002);, 'Definitions of art'. , in B. M. Gaut. (ed.), The Routledge Companion to Aesthetics, London:: Routledge;, pp. 169-79.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Dewey, J.. (1980), Art as Experience, New York:: Wideview and Perigee;.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Dickie, G.. (2001), Art and Value, Oxford:: Blackwell;.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Elgin, C. Z.. (2009);, 'Exemplification, idealization, and understanding'. , in M. Suárez. (ed.), Fictions in Science: Essays on Idealization and Modelling, London:: Routledge;, pp. 77-90.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Fauconnier, G., and Turner, M.. (2003), The Way We Think: Conceptual Blending and the Mind's Hidden Complexities, New York:: Basic Books;.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Froese, T., and Di Paolo, E.. (2009);, 'Sociality and the life-mind continuity thesis'. , Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 8:4, pp. 439-63.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Galanter, P.. (2016);, 'An introduction to complexism'. , Technoetic Arts: A Journal of Especulative Research, 14:1, pp. 9-31.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Johnson, M.. (1987), The Body in the Mind: The Bodily Basis of Meaning, Imagination and Reason, Chicago:: University of Chicago Press;.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. van Maanen, H.. (2009), How to Study Art Worlds, Amsterdam:: Amsterdam University Press;.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Niño, D.. (2015), Elementos de semiótica agentiva, Bogotá:: Universidad de Bogotá Jorge Tadeo Lozano;.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Di Paolo, E.. (2005);, 'Autopoiesis, adaptivity, teleology, agency'. , Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 4:4, pp. 429-52.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Reber, R.. (2008);, 'Art in its experience: Can empricial psychology help assess artistic value?'. , Leonardo, 41:4, pp. 367-72.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Rodríguez, S.. (2016);, 'Recurrences and human agential meaning grounding: Laying a path in walking'. , Biosemiotics, 9:2, pp. 168-84.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Searle, J. R.. (1995), The Construction of Social Reality, New York:: Free Press;.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Searle, J. R.. (2010), Making the Social World, New York:: Oxford University Press;.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Stoller, A.. (2017);, 'Toward an aesthetics of creative practice'. , Journal of Aesthetics and Phenomenology, 47:1, pp. 45-56.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Thompson, E.. (2007), Mind in Life: Biology, Phenomenology and the Sciences of Mind, Cambridge:: Harvard University Press;.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Tomasello, M.. (2014), A Natural History of Human Thinking, Cambridge:: Harvard University Press;.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Tønnessen, M.,, Magnus, R., and Brentari, C.. (2016);, 'The biosemiotic glossary project: Umwelt'. , Biosemiotics, 9:1, pp. 129-49.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Valenzuela, J.,, Ibarretxe-Antuñano, I., and Hilferty, J.. (2012);, 'La semántica cognitiva'. , in J. Valenzuela, and I. Ibarretxe-Antuñano. (eds), Lingüística cognitiva, Barcelona:: Anthropos;, pp. 41-68.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Varela, F. J.,, Palacios, A. G., and Goldsmith, T. H.. (1993);, 'Color vision of birds'. , in H-J. Bischof, and H. P. Zeigler. (eds), Vision, Brain and Behavior in Birds, Cambridge, MA:: MIT Press;, pp. 77-98.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Varela, F. J.,, Thompson, E., and Rosch, E.. (1993), The Embodied Mind, Cambridge:: MIT Press;.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Wu, W.. (2011);, 'Attention as selection for action'. , in C. Mole,, D. Smithies, and W. Wu. (eds), Attention: Philosophical and Psychological Essays, New York:: Oxford University Press;, pp. 97-116.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Yarbus, A. L.. (1967), Eye Movements and Vision, New York:: Plenum Press;.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Zeki, S.. (2000), Inner Vision: An Exploration of Art and the Brain, London:: Oxford University Press;.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Rodríguez Gómez, Sergio. (2019);, 'An agential-narrative approach on art semiosis'. , Technoetic Arts: A Journal of Speculative Research, 17:3, pp. 281-95, doi: https://doi.org/10.1386/tear_00021_1
    [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1386/tear_00021_1
Loading
/content/journals/10.1386/tear_00021_1
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a success
Invalid data
An error occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error
Please enter a valid_number test