Skip to content
1981
Global Conversation
  • ISSN: 1477-965X
  • E-ISSN: 1758-9533

Abstract

This article presents and discusses alchemy and cybernetics as fields in interaction through a conversation model. The starting point for establishing this relationship is the distinction between communication and conversation as pointed out by authors such as Gordon Pask, Ranulph Glanville and Vilém Flusser. Alchemy was the field of knowledge that best managed to unify Europe’s technological, philosophical and mystical world-view in the late Middle Ages. From an experimental basis, alchemy dealt with the transformation processes mirrored both in a particular understanding of the dynamics of nature as in the connection between man and universe. Cybernetics, like alchemy, was a field developed from an interdisciplinary view of knowledge associated with a particular historical context, being, since its origin, the field that relates and operationalizes complexity and unpredictability in mechanical, biological and social systems. Cybernetics and alchemy are, from a constructivist perspective, models for structuring the world and collective systems of communication within cultural processes. Both are taken here as co-participants in an elliptical dialogue based on three main concepts: distinction, dialogue and emergence. The elliptical conversation model can be understood as a map of the complexity of the interactive field that is established between alchemy and cybernetics, generating a new entity while encapsulating two others, it is the distinction that accommodates two others, a dialogue between black boxes.

Funding
This study was supported by the:
  • The National Council for Scientific and Technological Development (CNPq) (Award 142082/2016-3)
© 2021 Intellect Ltd
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1386/tear_00054_1
2021-06-01
2026-04-12

Metrics

Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Beck, Ulrich. ( 1992), Risk Society: Towards a New Modernity (trans. M Ritter), London and Newbury Park, CA:: Sage Publications Ltd;.
     [Google Scholar]
  2. Dubberly, Hugh, and Pangaro, Paul. ( 2015;), ‘ How cybernetics connects computing, counterculture, and design. ’, in A. Blauvelt, and R. Elfline. (eds), Hippie Modernism: The Struggle for Utopia, Minneapolis, MN:: Walker Art Center;, http://staging.dubberly.com/cybernetics/article-inside-text/. Accessed 27 October 2015.
     [Google Scholar]
  3. Flusser, Vilém. ( 2012), Towards a Philosophy of Photography, London:: Reaktion Books;.
     [Google Scholar]
  4. Flusser, Vilém. ( 2015), Comunicologia: Reflexões Sobre o Futuro, Selo Martins:: Martins Fontes;.
     [Google Scholar]
  5. Giddens, Anthony. ( 2013), The Consequences of Modernity, Cambridge:: Polity;.
     [Google Scholar]
  6. Glanville, Ranulph. ( 1997), Behind the Curtain, Radical Constructivism Paper Collection;, https://www.univie.ac.at/constructivism/papers/glanville/glanville97-curtain.pdf. Accessed 8 October 2018.
     [Google Scholar]
  7. Holland, John H.. ( 1997;), ‘ Emergence. ’, Philosophica, 59:1, pp. 11–40.
     [Google Scholar]
  8. Jung, Carl Gustav. ( [1944] 1970), Collected Works of C.G. Jung, Volume 12: Psychology and Alchemy (trans. R. F. C. Hull), , 2nd ed.., Princeton, NJ:: Princeton University Press;.
     [Google Scholar]
  9. Maier, Michael. ( 1618), Atalanta Fugiens, Oppenheim, Germany:: Johann-Theodor de Bry;, https://digital.sciencehistory.org/works/pc289j53n. Accessed 8 October 2018.
     [Google Scholar]
  10. Mead, Margaret. ( 1968;), ‘ Cybernetics of cybernetics. ’, in H. von Foerster,, J. D. White,, L. J. Peterson, and J. K. Russel. (eds), Purposive Systems, New York:: Spartan Books;, pp. 1–11.
     [Google Scholar]
  11. Pask, Gordon. ( 1980;), ‘ The limits of togetherness. ’, in S. Lavington. (ed.), Proceedings, Invited Keynote Address to IFIP, World Congress in Tokyo and Melbourne, Amsterdam, New York and Oxford:: North Holland Pub. Co.;, pp. 999–1012.
     [Google Scholar]
  12. Pias, Claus. ( 2005;), ‘ Analog, digital, and the cybernetic illusion. ’, Kybernetes, 34:3&4, pp. 543–50, https://doi.org/10.1108/03684920510581710. Accessed 4 October 2018.
     [Google Scholar]
  13. Robertson, Robin, and Allan, Allan. ( 2014), Indra’s Net: Alchemy and Chaos Theory as Models for Transformation, Wheaton, IL:: Quest Books;.
     [Google Scholar]
  14. Spencer-Brown, George. ( 1972a), Laws of Form, New York:: Dutton;.
     [Google Scholar]
  15. Spencer-Brown, George. ( 1972b), Only Two Can Play This Game, New York:: Julian Press;.
     [Google Scholar]
  16. von Foerster, Heinz. ( 2004;), ‘ At each and every moment, I can decide who I am. ’, in B. Poerksen. (ed.), The Certainty of Uncertainty: Dialogues Introducing Constructivism, Exeter:: Imprint Academic;, pp. 1–23.
     [Google Scholar]
  17. Wiener, Norbert. ( 1966), God and Golem, Inc.: A Comment on Certain Points Where Cybernetics Impinges on Religion, , 7th ed.., Cambridge, MA:: The MIT Press;.
     [Google Scholar]
  18. Silva, Diego Fagundes da. ( 2021;), ‘ Elliptical conversation: Alchemy and cybernetics. ’, Technoetic Arts: A Journal of Speculative Research, 19:1&2, pp. 87–96, https://doi.org/10.1386/tear_00054_1
     [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1386/tear_00054_1
Loading
Elliptical conversation: Alchemy and cybernetics
Technoetic Arts 19, 87 (2021); https://doi.org/10.1386/tear_00054_1
/content/journals/10.1386/tear_00054_1
/content/journals/10.1386/tear_00054_1
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Article
Keyword(s): alchemy; conversation; cybernetics; dialogue; distinction; emergence

Most Cited Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a success
Invalid data
An error occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error
Please enter a valid_number test