The edge of life-as-we-know-it: Aesthetics of decay within artificial life and art | Intellect Skip to content
1981
  1. Home
  2. A-Z Publications
  3. Technoetic Arts
  4. Volume 19, Issue 1
  5. Article
Global Conversation
  • ISSN: 1477-965X
  • E-ISSN: 1758-9533

Abstract

This article advocates further examination of the role decay aesthetics can play in artificial life (ALife or AL) and art. Opening with the poetics of decay and the shadow that decay taboo has cast in western culture, firstly, we reframe decay as a constructive process of transformation. Secondly, we perform a brief historical survey of early artistic developments in the field of ALife, assessing how these early works addressed decay. We follow with a deeper analysis of contemporary artists through a lens of decay and decomposition, identifying new tendencies of ALife art (deep time simulation, slime intelligence, molecular agents, techno resurrection and ecohybridized computation). Finally, we look to the peripheries of ALife to see how decay is rendered in current technical research and examine these projects with an eye for turbulent production in the form of ‘decaying’ matter. We conclude with a number of open questions on decomposition and decay aesthetics, both within the artistic and technical realms of ALife.

© 2021 Intellect Ltd
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1386/tear_00062_1
2021-06-01
2024-04-24
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Adamatzky, Andrew. ( 2010), Physarum Machines: Computers from Slime Mould, Singapore:: World Scientific;.
     [Google Scholar]
  2. Adamatzky, Andrew. ( 2018;), ‘ Towards fungal computer. ’, Interface Focus, 8:6, 19 October, p. 20180029, https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/10.1098/rsfs.2018.0029. Accessed 31 December 2020.
     [Google Scholar]
  3. Adamatzky, Andrew. ( 2019;), ‘ A brief history of liquid computers. ’, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, 374:1774, 22 April, p. 20180372, https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/10.1098/rstb.2018.0372. Accessed 31 December 2020.
     [Google Scholar]
  4. Ascott, Roy. ( 1994;), ‘ Homo telematicus in the garden of a-life. ’, Tightrope, http://www.geelhaar.de/TR/artikel/text/asc/index.html. Accessed 31 December 2020.
     [Google Scholar]
  5. Bagri Foundation ( 2019), Anicka Yi at 58th International Art Exhibition – La Biennale di Venezia, London:: Bagri Foundation;, https://bagrifoundation.org/anicka-yi-la-biennale-di-venezia/. Accessed 31 December 2020.
     [Google Scholar]
  6. Bailey, Stephanie. ( 2013;), ‘ Ian Cheng: Entropy WranglerNGLER. ’, LEAP, 30 July, http://www.leapleapleap.com/2013/07/ian-cheng-entropy-wrangler. Accessed 31 December 2020.
     [Google Scholar]
  7. Banzhaf, Wolfgang, and Yamamoto, Lidia. ( 2015), Artificial Chemistries, Cambridge, MA:: MIT Press;.
     [Google Scholar]
  8. Barge, Laura M.,, Cardoso, Silvana S. S.,, Cartwright, Julyan H. E.,, Cooper, Geoffrey J. T.,, Cronin, Leroy,, De Witt, Anne,, Doloboff, Ivria J.,, Escribiano, Bruno,, Goldstein, Raymond E.,, Haudin, Florence,, Jones, David E. H.,, Mackay, Alan L.,, Maselko, Jerzy,, Pagano, Jason J.,, Pantaleone, J.,, Russell, Michael J.,, Sainz-Diaz, C. Ignacio,, Steinbock, Oliver,, Stone, David A.,, Tanimoto, Yoshifumi, and Thomas, Noreen L.. ( 2015;), ‘ From chemical gardens to chemobrionics. ’, Chemical Reviews, 115:16, pp. 8652–703.
     [Google Scholar]
  9. Bartlem, Edwina. ( 2005;), ‘ Immersive artificial life (A-life) art. ’, Journal of Australian Studies, 28:84, pp. 95–107.
     [Google Scholar]
  10. Boden, Margaret A.. ( 1999;), ‘ Is metabolism necessary?. ’, The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 50:2, pp. 231–48.
     [Google Scholar]
  11. Bonabeau, Eric, and Théraulaz, Guy. ( 1994;), ‘ Why do we need artificial life?. ’, Artificial Life, 1:3, pp. 303–25.
     [Google Scholar]
  12. Bonabeau, Eric, and Théraulaz, Guy. ( 2000;), ‘ Swarm smarts. ’, Scientific American, 282:3, pp. 72–79.
     [Google Scholar]
  13. Castillo, Fran. ( 2011;), ‘ Augmented Ecologies (English Version). ’, Vimeo, 7 March, https://vimeo.com/20739954. Accessed 31 December 2020.
     [Google Scholar]
  14. Chen, Mel Y.. ( 2012), Animacies: Biopolitics, Racial Mattering, and Queer Affect, Durham, NC:: Duke University Press;.
     [Google Scholar]
  15. Cheng, Ian,, Jansen, Gregor,, Evers, Elodie,, Raskin, Irina,, Jaskey, Jenny,, Kelsey, John,, Parisi, Luciana, and Simler, Kevin. ( 2015), Ian Cheng: Live Simulations, Leipzig:: Spector Books;.
     [Google Scholar]
  16. Ch’ng, Eugene,, Harrison, Dew, and Moore, Samantha. ( 2017;), ‘ Shift-life interactive art: Mixed-reality artificial ecosystem simulation. ’, Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, 26:2, pp. 157–81.
     [Google Scholar]
  17. Ch’ng, Eugene, and Stone, Robert J.. ( 2006;), ‘ 3D archaeological reconstruction and visualisation: An artificial life model for determining vegetation dispersal patterns in ancient landscapes. ’, International Conference on Computer Graphics, Imaging and Visualisation, CGIV’06, Sydney, Australia, 26–28 June, New Jersey:: IEEE; pp. 112–18.
     [Google Scholar]
  18. Dorin, Alan. ( 2005;), ‘ Beyond Morphogenesis: Enhancing synthetic trees through death, decay and the Weasel Test. ’, in I. Brown,, and M. McCormack. (eds), Third Iteration: Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Generative Systems in the Electronic Arts, Melbourne, Australia, December, Melbourne:: CEMA;, pp. 119–28.
     [Google Scholar]
  19. Draves, Scott. ( 1998), ‘Inside the Bomb’, Draves.org, 30 September, https://draves.org/bomb/inside_the_bomb.html. Accessed 31 December 2020.
     [Google Scholar]
  20. De Grey, Aubrey. ( 1999), The Mitochondrial Free Radical Theory of Aging, Austin, TX:: RG Landes;.
     [Google Scholar]
  21. Gregory, Alice. ( 2017;), ‘ Anicka Yi is inventing a new kind of conceptual art. ’, T Magazine, 14 February, https://www.nytimes.com/2017/02/14/t-magazine/art/anicka-yi.html. Accessed 31 December 2020.
     [Google Scholar]
  22. Hamada, Shogo,, Yancey, Kenneth G.,, Pardo, Yehudah,, Gan, Mingzhe,, Vanatta, Max,, An, Duo,, Hu, Yue,, Derrien, Thomas L.,, Ruiz, Roanna,, Liu, Peifeng,, Sabin, Jenny, and Luo, Dan. ( 2019;), ‘ Dynamic DNA material with emergent locomotion behavior powered by artificial metabolism. ’, Science Robotics, 4:29, 10 April, https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/scirobotics.aaw3512. Accessed 31 December 2020.
     [Google Scholar]
  23. Hauser, Jens. ( 2017;), ‘ Art and agency in times of wetware. ’, The Paradoxes of the Living, Paris:: PCA éditions;, pp. 263–69.
     [Google Scholar]
  24. Helmreich, Stefan. ( 2000), Silicon Second Nature: Culturing Artificial Life in a Digital World, Berkeley, CA:: University of California Press;.
     [Google Scholar]
  25. Hesse, Mary. ( 1988;), ‘ The cognitive claims of metaphor. ’, The Journal of Speculative Philosophy, 2:1, pp. 1–16.
     [Google Scholar]
  26. Hutton, Tim J.. ( 2002;), ‘ Evolvable self-replicating molecules in an artificial chemistry. ’, Artificial Life, 8:4, pp. 341–56.
     [Google Scholar]
  27. Ian Cheng: BOB ( 2018), Serpentine Galleries, London, 6 March–22 April, https://www.serpentinegalleries.org/whats-on/ian-cheng-bob. Accessed 23 March 2022.
     [Google Scholar]
  28. Johnston, John. ( 2008), The Allure of Machinic Life: Cybernetics, Artificial Life, and the New AI, Cambridge, MA:: MIT Press;.
     [Google Scholar]
  29. Kaku, Michio. ( 2018), The Future of Humanity: Terraforming Mars, Interstellar Travel, Immortality, and Our Destiny Beyond Earth, New York:: Doubleday;.
     [Google Scholar]
  30. Kider, Joseph T. Jr,, Raja, Samantha, and Badler, Norman I.. ( 2011;), ‘ Fruit senescence and decay simulation. ’, Computer Graphics Forum, 30:2, pp. 257–66.
     [Google Scholar]
  31. Kriegman, Sam,, Blackiston, Douglas,, Levin, Michael, and Bongard, Josh. ( 2020;), ‘ A scalable pipeline for designing reconfigurable organisms. ’, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 117:4, pp. 1853–59.
     [Google Scholar]
  32. Kristeva, Julia. ( 1982), Powers of Horror, New York:: Columbia University Press;.
     [Google Scholar]
  33. Kurzweil, Ray. ( 2013;), ‘ Global Future 2045: Immortality by 2045. ’, Kurzweil:: Tracking the Acceleration of Intelligence;, 21 June, https://www.kurzweilai.net/global-futures-2045-ray-kurzweil-immortality-by-2045. Accessed 31 December 2020.
     [Google Scholar]
  34. Lee, Rachel. ( 2019;), ‘ Metabolic aesthetics: On the feminist scentscapes of Anicka Yi. ’, Food, Culture & Society, 22:5, pp. 692–712.
     [Google Scholar]
  35. Negarestani, Reza. ( 2010;), ‘ Undercover softness: An introduction to the architecture and politics of decay. ’, Collapse, 6:1, pp. 379–430.
     [Google Scholar]
  36. Negri, Antonio. ( 1998), Spinoza, Rome:: DeriveApprodi;.
     [Google Scholar]
  37. New World Notes ( 2017;), ‘ Play clusters: Artificial life simulator for IOS modeled on Gaia hypothesis theories, created by MMO Pioneer Jeffrey Ventrella. ’, New World Notes, 21 June, https://nwn.blogs.com/nwn/2017/06/clusters-artificial-life-game-ios.html. Accessed 31 December 2020.
     [Google Scholar]
  38. Parisi, Luciana, and Terranova, Tiziana. ( 2000;), ‘ Heat-death: Emergence and control in genetic engineering and artificial life. ’, CTheory, 10 May, https://journals.uvic.ca/index.php/ctheory/article/view/14604/5455. Accessed 31 December 2020.
     [Google Scholar]
  39. Pattee, Howard H.. ( 1989;), ‘ Simulations, realizations, and theories of life. ’, in C. G. Langton. (ed.), Artificial Life, Boston, MA:: Addison-Wesley;, pp. 63–77.
     [Google Scholar]
  40. Paul, Christiane. ( 2015;), ‘ From immateriality to neomateriality: Art and the conditions of digital materiality. ’, in Proceedings of the 21st International Symposium on Electronic Art, Vancouver, Canada, 14–19 August, Vancouver:: ISEA;.
     [Google Scholar]
  41. Philipkoski, Kristen. ( 2002;), ‘ RIP: Alba, the glowing bunny. ’, Wired, 12 August, https://www.wired.com/2002/08/rip-alba-the-glowing-bunny. Accessed 31 December 2020.
     [Google Scholar]
  42. Ray, Thomas S.. ( 1993;), ‘ An evolutionary approach to synthetic biology: Zen and the art of creating life. ’, Artificial Life, 1:1&2, pp. 179–209.
     [Google Scholar]
  43. Sayama, Hiroki. ( 2009;), ‘ Swarm chemistry. ’, Artificial Life, 15:1, pp. 105–14.
     [Google Scholar]
  44. Sutela, Jenna. ( 2017), Orgs: From Slime Mold to Silicon Valley and Beyond, Helsinki:: Garret Publications;.
     [Google Scholar]
  45. Thacker, Eugene. ( 2016;), ‘ Biophilosophy for the 21st century. ’, in S. E. Wilmer, and A. Žukauskaite. (eds), Resisting Biopolitics, New York:: Routledge;, pp. 123–34.
     [Google Scholar]
  46. Todd, Peter M.. ( 1993;), ‘ Artificial death. ’, Proceedings of the Second European Conference on Artificial Life, Brussels, Belgium, 24–26 May, Portland:: ISAL;, pp. 1048–59.
     [Google Scholar]
  47. Veenstra, Frank,, De Prado Salas, Pablo G.,, Stoy, Kasper,, Bongard, Josh, and Risi, Sebastian. ( 2020;), ‘ Death and progress: How evolvability is influenced by intrinsic mortality. ’, Artificial Life, 26:1, pp. 90–111.
     [Google Scholar]
  48. Whitelaw, Mitchell. ( 2004), Metacreation: Art and Artificial Life, Camrbidge, MA:: MIT Press;.
     [Google Scholar]
  49. Wolfram, Stephen. ( 2011;), ‘ Imagining the future with a new kind of science. ’, Stephen Wolfram Writings, 18 October, https://writings.stephenwolfram.com/2011/10/imagining-the-future-with-a-new-kind-of-science. Accessed 31 December 2020.
     [Google Scholar]
  50. Yi, Anicka, and Berggruen, Oliver. ( 2020;), ‘ Anicka Yi with Olivier Berggruen. ’, Brooklyn Rail, July, https://brooklynrail.org/2020/07/criticspage/Anicka-Yi-with-Olivier-Berggruen. Accessed 31 December 2020.
     [Google Scholar]
  51. Greenfield, Remina, and Cao, Shuyi. ( 2021;), ‘ The edge of life-as-we-know-it: Aesthetics of decay within artificial life and art. ’, Technoetic Arts: A Journal of Speculative Research, 19:1&2, pp. 185–201, https://doi.org/10.1386/tear_00062_1
     [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1386/tear_00062_1
Loading
The edge of life-as-we-know-it: Aesthetics of decay within artificial life and art
Technoetic Arts 19, 185 (2021); https://doi.org/10.1386/tear_00062_1
/content/journals/10.1386/tear_00062_1
/content/journals/10.1386/tear_00062_1
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Article
Keyword(s): aesthetics; artificial life; contemporary art; decay; decomposition; simulation

Most Cited Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a success
Invalid data
An error occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error