On gods, pixies and humans: Biohacking and the genetic imaginary | Intellect Skip to content
1981
  1. Home
  2. A-Z Publications
  3. Technoetic Arts
  4. Volume 20, Issue 1
  5. Article
Dismantling the Anthropocene: Beyond Binary Categorizations
  • ISSN: 1477-965X
  • E-ISSN: 1758-9533

Abstract

The focal point of my article is the work of biohackers: mainly Josiah Zayner, whose activism as a biohacker, as an artist and a public figure offers an interesting lens through which one can explore the contemporary genetic imaginary and our changing and varied approach to genetic engineering. The framework for this description is set by an analysis of cultural representations of contemporary science and technology, both in documentaries and in works of fiction. In the article, I trace and analyse the ways in which biohackers’ activity is involved with the earlier ideas of cyberculture, most notably with the notion of biological life as information (possible to edit or ‘hack’) and to the image of a ‘hacker’. I recall the popular phrase of ‘playing god’, often quoted in relation to genetic imaginary, mainly as a warning against excessive interventions within nature. The phrase and the warning itself seem to have become insofar more important, as the scale of possible interventions had been raised by the advancement of genetic engineering. Finally, I discuss the relation of art and science in Zayner’s activity, within a broader context of relevant images of artists and scientists and their role within the changing realities of contemporary life. The article does not pretend to fully analyse or even describe the modalities and implication of biohackers’ activity. Its main goal is to shed more light on the current changes in collective imagination related to the rapid development of biotechnology and its cultural understanding. The public presence of biohackers, and especially Zayner’s activity, provides new visions of human agency in nature and of relation between art, science and social practice.

© 2022 Intellect Ltd
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1386/tear_00086_1
2022-07-01
2024-04-19
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Addison, Courtney. ( 2020;), ‘ CRISPR cowboys? Genetic self-experimentation and the limits of the person. ’, in M. de Leeuw, and S. van Wichelen. (eds), Personhood in the Age of Biolegality: Brave New Law, Cham:: Palgrave Macmillan;, pp. 149–66.
     [Google Scholar]
  2. Attene, Clara. ( 2015;), ‘ Stallman: Being a hacker means appreciating playful cleverness. ’, Youris, European Research Media Center, 7 October, https://www.youris.com/society/interviews/stallman---being-a-hacker-means-appreciating-playful-cleverness.kl. Accessed 24 January 2022.
     [Google Scholar]
  3. Biohackers ( 2020–21, Germany:: Netflix;).
     [Google Scholar]
  4. Brown, Kristen V.. ( 2017;), ‘ Genetically engineering yourself sounds like a horrible idea: But this guy is doing it anyway. ’, Gizmodo, 29 November, https://gizmodo.com/genetically-engineering-yourself-sounds-like-a-horrible-1820189351. Accessed 22 January 2022.
     [Google Scholar]
  5. ‘Cut, Paste, Life’ ( 2019), L. Kaufman and J. Egender (dirs.), Unnatural Selection, Season 1 Episode 1 (18 October, USA:: Netflix;).
     [Google Scholar]
  6. Davis, Eric. ( 1998), TechGnosis: Myth, Magic, and Mysticism in the Age of Information, New York:: Harmony Books;.
     [Google Scholar]
  7. Delfanti, Allesandro. ( 2012;), ‘ Tweaking genes in your garage: Biohacking between activism and entrepreneurship. ’ in W. Sütlz, and T. Hug. (eds), Activist Media and Biopolitics: Critical Media Interventions in the Age of Biopower, Innsbruck:: Innsbruck University Press;, pp. 163–77.
     [Google Scholar]
  8. Delfanti, Allesandro. ( 2013), Biohackers: The Politics of Open Science, London:: Pluto Press;.
     [Google Scholar]
  9. Franklin, Sarah. ( 2000;), ‘ Life itself: Global nature and the genetic imaginary. ’, in S. Franklin,, C. Lury, and J. Stacey. (eds), Global Nature, Global Culture, London:: Sage Publications;, pp. 188–227.
     [Google Scholar]
  10. Furloni, Mario, and McLean, Kate. ( 2017), Gut Hack, USA:: Structure Films and Hot Metal Films;.
     [Google Scholar]
  11. Gibson, William. ( 1984), Neuromancer, New York:: Ace;.
     [Google Scholar]
  12. Gombrich, Ernst. ( 1981;), ‘ Czarodziejska moc Pigmaliona. ’, in Sztuka i złudzenie. O psychologii przedstawienia obrazowego (trans. J. Zarański), Warsaw:: Państwowy Instytut Wydawniczy;, pp. 97–118.
     [Google Scholar]
  13. Griffin, Nona, and Grushkin, Daniel. ( 2013;), ‘ Biotech’s first musical instrument plays proteins like piano keys. ’, Scientific American, 3 September, https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/biotechs-first-musical-instrument-plays-proteins-like-piano-keys-slideshow/. Accessed 24 January 2022.
     [Google Scholar]
  14. Isaacson, Walter. ( 2021), The Code Breaker: Jennifer Doudna, Gene Editing, and the Future of the Human Race, New York:: Simon & Schuster;.
     [Google Scholar]
  15. Hayles, N. Katherine. ( 1999), How We Became Posthuman: Virtual Bodies in Cybernetics, Literature, and Informatics, Chicago:: The University of Chicago Press;.
     [Google Scholar]
  16. Hershman Leeson, Lynn. ( 1997), Conceiving Ada, USA and Germany:: Outpost Studios, Hotwire Productions and Complex Corporation;.
     [Google Scholar]
  17. Hershman Leeson, Lynn. ( 2002), Teknolust, UK, Germany and USA:: Blue Turtle, Epiphany Productions and Hotwire Productions;.
     [Google Scholar]
  18. Hershman Leeson, Lynn. ( 2007), Strange Culture, USA:: L5 Productions;.
     [Google Scholar]
  19. Kinder, Marsha. ( 2005;), ‘ A cinema of intelligent agents: Conceiving Ada and Teknolust. ’, in M. Tromble. (ed.), The Art and Films of Lynn Hershman Leeson, Berkeley, CA:: University of California Press;, pp. 168–81.
     [Google Scholar]
  20. Latour, Bruno. ( 2012;), ‘ Love your monsters: Why we must care for our technologies as we do our children. ’, The Breakthrough Institute, 2, 14 February, https://thebreakthrough.org/journal/issue-2/love-your-monsters. Accessed 12 February 2022.
     [Google Scholar]
  21. Lee, Stephanie M.. ( 2017;), ‘ This guy says he’s the first person to attempt editing his DNA with CRISPR. ’, Buzzfeed News, 14 October, https://www.buzzfeednews.com/article/stephaniemlee/this-biohacker-wants-to-edit-his-own-dna. Accessed 23 January 2022.
     [Google Scholar]
  22. Leonard, Brett. ( 1992), The Lawnmower Man, USA:: Allied Vision, Fuji Eight Company Ltd., Lane Pringle Productions and Angel Studios;.
     [Google Scholar]
  23. Levy, Stephen. ( 2010), Hackers: Heroes of the Computer Revolution, Sebastopol, CA:: O’Reilly Media;.
     [Google Scholar]
  24. Niccol, Andrew. ( 1997), Gattaca, USA:: Columbia Pictures and Jersey Films;.
     [Google Scholar]
  25. O’Connell, Mark. ( 2020), Być maszyną. Przygody wśród cyborgów, utopistów, hakerów I futurystów w ich skromnych staraniach, by rozwiązać problem śmierci (trans. A. Małecka), Warsaw:: Wydawnictwo Krytyki Politycznej;.
     [Google Scholar]
  26. ‘Our Next Generation’ ( 2019), L. Kaufman and J. Egender (dirs), Unnatural Selection, Season 1 Episode 1 (18 October, USA:: Netflix;).
     [Google Scholar]
  27. Quartz ( 2019;), ‘ Meet the biohacker using CRISPR to teach everyone gene editing. ’, YouTube, 24 January, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4vmHweDC5SY&t=137s. Accessed 23 January 2022.
     [Google Scholar]
  28. Softley, Ian. ( 1995), Hackers, USA:: United Artists;.
     [Google Scholar]
  29. Spielberg, Steven. ( 1993), Jurassic Park, USA:: Universal Pictures and Amblin Entertainment;.
     [Google Scholar]
  30. Stacey, Jackie. ( 2010), The Cinematic Life of the Gene, Durham, NC:: Duke University Press;.
     [Google Scholar]
  31. Stormer, Nathan. ( 2008;), ‘ Looking in wonder: Prenatal sublimity and the commonplace “life”. ’, Signs, 33:3, pp. 647–73.
     [Google Scholar]
  32. Thacker, Eugene. ( 2003;), ‘ Data made flesh: Biotechnology and the discourse of the posthuman. ’, Cultural Critique, Special Issue: ‘Posthumanism’, 53: Winter, pp. 72–97.
     [Google Scholar]
  33. Unnatural Selection ( 2019, USA:: Netflix;).
     [Google Scholar]
  34. van der Haak, Bregtje. ( 2012), DNA Dreams, the Netherlands:: VPRO;.
     [Google Scholar]
  35. Vesna, Victoria. ( 2016;), ‘ Science labs as artist studios. ’, in R. W. Kluszczyński. (ed.), Towards the Third Culture: The Co-Existence of Art, Science and Technology, Gdańsk:: Laznia Centre for Contemporary Art;, pp. 14–21.
     [Google Scholar]
  36. Yetisen, Ali K.. ( 2018;), ‘ Biohacking. ’, Trends in Biotechnology, 36:8, pp. 744–47.
     [Google Scholar]
  37. Zayner, Josiah. ( 2017;), ‘ How to genetically engineer human in your garage: Part I. ’, Science, Art, Beauty, 25 January, http://www.josiahzayner.com/2017/01/genetic-designer-part-i.html. Accessed 22 January 2022.
     [Google Scholar]
  38. Zayner, Josiah. ( 2020a;), ‘ Scientists can’t save us if there aren’t many scientists. ’, Science, Art, Beauty, 15 April, http://www.josiahzayner.com/2020/04/scientists-cant-save-us-if-there-arent.html. Accessed 22 January 2022.
     [Google Scholar]
  39. Zayner, Josiah. ( 2020b;), ‘ I made a COVID-19 vaccine in my kitchen and it worked: Science still sucks. ’, Science, Art, Beauty, 11 December, http://www.josiahzayner.com/2020/12/i-made-covid-19-vaccine-in-my-kitchen.html. Accessed 22 January 2022.
     [Google Scholar]
  40. Zayner, Josiah. ( 2022;), Zoom interview with the author. , 1 February.
  41. Szewczyk, Matylda. ( 2022;), ‘ On gods, pixies and humans: Biohacking and the genetic imaginary. ’, Technoetic Arts: A Journal of Speculative Research, 20:1&2, pp. 125–39, https://doi.org/10.1386/tear_00086_1
     [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1386/tear_00086_1
Loading
  • Article Type: Article
Keyword(s): art; biohackers; cyberculture; genetic engineering; Josiah Zayner; science

Most Cited Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a success
Invalid data
An error occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error