Projected interiorities or the production of subjectivity through spatial and performative means | Intellect Skip to content
1981
  1. Home
  2. A-Z Publications
  3. Technoetic Arts
  4. Volume 20, Issue 3
  5. Article
Themed Issue: Projected Interiorities
  • ISSN: 1477-965X
  • E-ISSN: 1758-9533
file format pdf download PDF

Abstract

Even those who consider themselves lucky to have escaped trauma, long-term illness and death, have experienced radical changes to their conception of life in its relation to public and private domains due to the COVID-19 pandemic. When public space turned into a dangerous realm, private interiors were assigned a new role and with these shifts, also new questions about the relation of interiority to any type of exteriority emerged. The first four contributions in this ‘Projected Interiorities’ issue of () reflect from an architectural and urban point of view on the conception of the public and private, their past, present and future. Yet, the pandemic contributed more widely to a re-evaluation of interiority, not least because the public and private realms seemingly coalesced via digital processes. While this journal issue cannot cover all these questions, it indicates the range of the pandemic turn in thought, collecting contributions from theory and practice, including architecture, art, philosophy and literary studies. With authors of a variety of disciplinary backgrounds based in China, India, Norway, France, the United Kingdom and the United States, this issue of covers not only a multiplicity of methodological approaches but also diverse regional and cultural perspectives on the idea of ‘Projected Interiorities’.

© 2022 Intellect Ltd
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1386/tear_00088_2
2023-04-27
2024-04-19
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/ta/20/3/ta.20.3.159_Djalali.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1386/tear_00088_2&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Arendt, Hannah. ( [1958] 1998), The Human Condition, Chicago, IL:: University of Chicago Press;.
     [Google Scholar]
  2. Barron, Lee. ( 2022;), ‘ Smart cities, connected cars, and autonomous vehicles: Design fiction and visions of smarter future urban mobility. ’, Technoetic Arts, 20:3, pp. 225–40, https://doi.org/10.1386/tear_00092_1.
     [Google Scholar]
  3. Berstrand, Tordis. ( 2022;), ‘ Inflecting the house: Upside down and ungrounded between walls, windows, mirrors and screens. ’, Technoetic Arts, pp. 167–82, https://doi.org/10.1386/tear_00089_1.
     [Google Scholar]
  4. Deleuze, Gilles. ( [1985] 2022;), ‘ Foucault 04: November 12, 1985. ’, The Deleuze Seminars, April, https://deleuze.cla.purdue.edu/seminars/foucault/lecture-04. Accessed 8 January 2023.
     [Google Scholar]
  5. DeLillo, Don. ( [1985] 2009), White Noise, New York:: Penguin Random House;.
     [Google Scholar]
  6. Gillespie, Zane. ( 2022;), ‘ Toward a new aesthetic: Noumenism and Noumenist poetics. ’, Technoetic Arts, 20:3, pp. 253–71, https://doi.org/10.1386/tear_00094_1.
     [Google Scholar]
  7. Giudici, Maria S.. ( 2018;), ‘ Counter-planning from the kitchen: For a feminist critique of type. ’, The Journal of Architecture, 23:7&8, pp. 1203–29, https://doi.org/10.1080/13602365.2018.1513417.
     [Google Scholar]
  8. Han, Jiawen. ( 2022;), ‘ Everyday life and spatial transformation: The construction of a community’s interiority in the void deck. ’, Technoetic Arts, 20:3, pp. 183–201, https://doi.org/10.1386/tear_00090_1.
     [Google Scholar]
  9. Hayden, Dolores. ( 1981), The Grand Domestic Revolution a History of Feminist Designs for American Homes, Neighborhoods, and Cities, Cambridge, MA:: MIT Press;.
     [Google Scholar]
  10. Hayden, Dolores. ( 1984), Redesigning the American Dream: The Future of Housing, Work, and Family Life, New York:: W. W. Norton;.
     [Google Scholar]
  11. Hoskyns, Teresa,, Roslan, Siti Balkish, and Westermann, Claudia. ( 2022;), ‘ Practising collectivity: Performing public space in everyday China. ’, Technoetic Arts, 20:3, pp. 203–24, https://doi.org/10.1386/tear_00091_1.
     [Google Scholar]
  12. Ionescu, Vlad. ( 2018;), ‘ The interior as interiority. ’, Palgrave Communications, 4:1, pp. 33–38.
     [Google Scholar]
  13. Lu, Duanfang. ( 2006), Remaking Chinese Urban Form: Modernity, Scarcity and Space, 1949–2005, Abingdon:: Routledge;.
     [Google Scholar]
  14. Malik, Irfan Mohammad. ( 2022;), ‘ Subjectivity in flux: Contextualising Don DeLillo’s White Noise. ’, Technoetic Arts, 20:3, pp. 241–52, https://doi.org/10.1386/tear_00093_1.
     [Google Scholar]
  15. Veiel, Andres. ( 2017), Beuys, Germany:: Zero one film;, https://vimeo.com/ondemand/beuys. Accessed 8 January 2023.
     [Google Scholar]
  16. Veyrat, Marc. ( 2022;), ‘ Confined with a coyote: The question of the Face BORD. Ⓡ’, Technoetic Arts, 20:3, pp. 273–90, https://doi.org/10.1386/tear_00095_1.
     [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1386/tear_00088_2
Loading
  • Article Type: Editorial
Keyword(s): architecture; art; COVID-19; interiority; philosophy; space

Most Cited Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a success
Invalid data
An error occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error