Beyond markets: The DADA case for NFTs in art

References

1. Abbate, Tindara, Vecco, Marilena, Vermiglio, Carlo, Zarone, Vincenzo and Perano, Mirko (2022), ‘Blockchain and art market: Resistance or adoption?’, Consumption Markets & Culture, 25:2, pp. 105–23.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Abrol, Ayushi (2022), ‘ERC token standards: The ultimate list’, Blockchain Council, 18 May, https://www.blockchain-council.org/ethereum/erc-token-standards/. Accessed 30 May 2022.
3. Bailey, Jason (2018), ‘Rare Pepe wallet and the birth of CryptoArt’, Artnome, 25 January, https://www.artnome.com/news/2018/1/23/rare-pepe-wallet-the-birth-of-cryptoart. Accessed 30 May 2022.
4. Bao, Hong and Roubaud, David (2022), ‘Non-fungible token: A systematic review and research agenda’, Journal of Risk and Financial Management, 15:5, p. 215.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Bowles, Nellie (2017), ‘CryptoKitties, explained... mostly’, New York Times, 28 December, https://www.nytimes.com/2017/12/28/style/cryptokitties-want-a-blockchain-snuggle.html. Accessed 30 May 2022.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Brody, Ann and Couture, Stéphane (2021), ‘Ideologies and imaginaries in blockchain communities: The case of Ethereum’, Canadian Journal of Communication, 46:3, p. 19.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Buterin, Vitalik (2014), ‘A next-generation smart contract and decentralized application platform’, White paper, 3:37, pp. 1–36.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Casey, Michael J. (2018), ‘Crypto Winter is here and we only have ourselves to blame’, Coindesk, 3 December, https://www.coindesk.com/markets/2018/12/03/crypto-winter-is-here-and-we-only-have-ourselves-to-blame/. Accessed 30 May 2022.
9. Castor, Amy (2021), ‘NFTs are perfectly designed to turbo-charge concerns about money laundering and art: And regulators are already taking notice’, Artnet, https://news.artnet.com/news-pro/nfts-money-laundering-1976791.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Chohan, Usman W. (2021), ‘Non-fungible tokens: Blockchains, scarcity, and value’, Critical Blockchain Research Initiative (CBRI), working papers, https://ssrn.com/abstract=3822743, http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3822743.
    [Google Scholar]
11. CNBC (2021), ‘Cryptocurrency investing has a big gender problem’, CNBC, 30 August, https://www.cnbc.com/2021/08/30/cryptocurrency-has-a-big-gender-problem.html. Accessed 30 May 2022.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Creeps & Weirdos (n.d.), ‘Home page’, https://creeps.dada.nyc/. Accessed 29 May 2022.
13. DADA.art (2021a), ‘DADA and the NFT craze’, Medium, 14 April, https://powerdada.medium.com/dada-and-the-nft-craze-cf5ee0b065aa. Accessed 30 May 2022.
    [Google Scholar]
14. DADA.art (2021b), ‘Metapurse acquires a complete set of the 2017 Creeps & Weirdos’, Medium, 30 September, https://powerdada.medium.com/metapurse-acquires-a-complete-set-of-the-2017-creeps-weirdos-6e6948e601ae. Accessed 30 May 2022.
    [Google Scholar]
15. DADA.art (2022a), ‘Introducing the DADA exit to community’, Medium, 17 March, https://powerdada.medium.com/introducing-the-dada-exit-to-community-d4b9874c6c94. Accessed 30 May 2022.
    [Google Scholar]
16. DADA.art (2022b), ‘Meet our new apes’, Medium, 16 March, https://powerdada.medium.com/meet-our-new-apes-c4b024324392. Accessed 30 May 2022.
    [Google Scholar]
17. De Filippi, Primavera (2015), ‘Blockchain-based crowdfunding: What impact on artistic production and art consumption?’, Observatório Itaú Cultural, 19, pp. 1–10.
    [Google Scholar]
18. De Filippi, Primavera, Bovill, David, Roudaut, Vincent and Renaud, Sara (2015), ‘PLANTOID’, stwst, 20 December, https://projects.stwst.at/stwst48/plantoid-by-primavera-de-filippi-david-bovill-vincent-roudaut-and-sara-renaud/index.html. Accessed 30 May 2022.
    [Google Scholar]
19. Entriken, William, Shirley, Dieter, Evans, Jacob and Sachs, Nastassia (2018), ‘EIP-721: Non-fungible token standard’, Ethereum Improvement Proposals, 24 January, https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-721. Accessed 30 May 2022.
    [Google Scholar]
20. Finzer, Devin (2020), ‘The non-fungible token bible: Everything you need to know about NFTs’, Opensea Blog, 10 January, https://opensea.io/blog/guides/non-fungible-tokens/#Blockchain-based_non-fungible_tokens. Accessed 30 May 2022.
    [Google Scholar]
21. Flichy, Patrice (2007), The Internet Imaginaire, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
22. Franceschet, Massimo, Colavizza, Giovanni, Smith, T’ai, Finucane, Blake, Ostachowski, Martin Lukas, Scalet, Sergio, Perkins, Jonathan, Morgan, James and Hernandez, Sebastian (2021), ‘Crypto art: A decentralized view’, Leonardo, 54:4, pp. 402–05.
    [Google Scholar]
23. Frölich, Peter (2013), ‘Will “art” for cash’, Werk/Schau, https://werk-schau.blogspot.com/2013/08/will-art-for-cash.html. Accessed 30 May 2022.
    [Google Scholar]
24. Gerard, David (2021), ‘NFTs: Crypto grifters try to scam artists, again’, Attack of the 50 Foot Blockchain, https://davidgerard.co.uk/blockchain/2021/03/11/nfts-crypto-grifters-try-to-scam-artists-again/. Accessed 30 May 2022.
    [Google Scholar]
25. Hayes, Adam (2019), ‘The socio-technological lives of Bitcoin’, Theory, Culture & Society, 36:4, pp. 49–72, https://doi.org/10.1177/026327641982621.
    [Google Scholar]
26. Hirschmiller, S. (2022), ‘How Paris Hilton and Snoop Dogg animated their Bored Apes, what the technology could mean for brands’, Forbes, 4 May, https://www.forbes.com/sites/stephaniehirschmiller/2022/05/04/immi-animation-app-launches-with-bored-apes-investment-from-paris-hilton/. Accessed 30 May 2022.
27. Huhtamo, E. (2016), ‘Art in the rear view mirror: The media archaeological tradition in art’, in C. Paul (ed.), A Companion to Digital Art, Chichester, West Sussex: John Wiley & Sons Ltd, pp. 69–110.
    [Google Scholar]
28. Huhtamo, E. and Parikka, J. (2011), Media Archaeology: Approaches, Applications, and Implications, Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
    [Google Scholar]
29. Kahan, D. (2021), ‘Sotheby’s NFT auction fires up duel with Christie’s in digital art’, The Defiant, 8 June, https://thedefiant.io/auction-houses-nfts/. Accessed 30 May 2022.
    [Google Scholar]
30. Klein, Jessica (2018), ‘I went to the first live auction for Rare Pepes on the block chain’, Vice, 19 January, https://www.vice.com/en/article/ev57p4/i-went-to-the-first-live-auction-for-rare-pepes-on-the-blockchain. Accessed 30 May 2022.
    [Google Scholar]
31. Kugler, Logan (2021), ‘Non-fungible tokens and the future of art’, Communications of the ACM, 64:9, pp. 19–20.
    [Google Scholar]
32. Lotti, Laura (2019), ‘The art of tokenization: Blockchain affordances and the invention of future milieus’, Media Theory, 3:1, pp. 287–320.
    [Google Scholar]
33. Lyubchenko, Irina (2022), ‘NFTs and digital art: 21st century avant-garde impulse?’, M/C Journal, 25:2.
    [Google Scholar]
34. MacDonald-Korth, D., Lehdonvirta, V. and, Meyer, E. T. (2018), ‘Art market 2.0: Blockchain and financialisation in visual arts’, The Alan Turing Institute: London, 22 May, https://www.oii.ox.ac.uk/publications/blockchain-arts.pdf. Accessed 30 May 2022.
    [Google Scholar]
35. McConaghy, Masha, McMullen, Greg, Parry, Glenn, McConaghy, Trent and Holtzman, David (2017), ‘Visibility and digital art: Blockchain as an ownership layer on the internet’, Strategic Change, 26:5, pp. 461–70.
    [Google Scholar]
36. Messages from the Mines (n.d.), ‘Home page’, https://messagesfromthemines.brangerbriz.com/. Accessed 25 May 2022.
37. Murphy, H. and Oliver, J. (2021), ‘How NFTs became a $40bn market in 2021’, Financial Times, 31 December, https://www.ft.com/content/e95f5ac2-0476-41f4-abd4-8a99faa7737d. Accessed 30 May 2022.
    [Google Scholar]
38. Mustatea, Kat (2018), ‘Can blockchain eliminate the myth of the starving artist?’, Forbes, 15 June, https://www.forbes.com/sites/katmustatea/2018/07/15/can-blockchain-eliminate-the-myth-of-the-starving-artist/. Accessed 30 May 2022.
    [Google Scholar]
39. NonFungible (2022), ‘Yearly report 2021’, NonFungible, 9 March, https://nonfungible.com. Accessed 30 May 2022.
    [Google Scholar]
40. Noy, Chaim (2008), ‘Sampling knowledge: The hermeneutics of snowball sampling in qualitative research’, International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 11:4, pp. 327–44.
    [Google Scholar]
41. Olsen, Dan (2022), ‘Line goes up: The problem with NFTs’, YouTube, 21 January, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YQ_xWvX1n9g. Accessed 30 May 2022.
42. Ostachowski, Martin Lukas (n.d.), ‘History of crypto art’, MLO.art, https://mlo.art/research/history-of-crypto-art/. Accessed 30 May 2022.
    [Google Scholar]
43. Paul, Kari (2021), ‘NFTs are helping artists solve a vital problem: Who owns digital artwork?’, The Guardian, 3 April, https://www.theguardian.com/artanddesign/2021/apr/03/non-fungible-tokens-digital-art-artists. Accessed 30 May 2022.
    [Google Scholar]
44. PixelPlex (2021), ‘Top ten blockchains used in NFT development’, PixelPlex, 25 November, https://pixelplex.io/blog/top-ten-blockchains-for-nft-development/. Accessed 30 May 2022.
45. Ramos, Beatriz and Mam, Yehudit (2021), ‘The invisible economy’, Medium, 14 March, https://powerdada.medium.com/the-invisible-economy-db46897d4f07. Accessed 30 May 2022.
    [Google Scholar]
46. Rennie, Ellie, Potts, Jason and Pochesneva, Ana (2019), Blockchain and the Creative Industries: Provocation Paper, Melbourne, Australia: Blockchain Innovation Hub (RMIT University).
    [Google Scholar]
47. Sharkey, Tom (2014), ‘10 impressive Bitcoin-inspired art pieces’, Coindesk, 19 July, https://www.coindesk.com/markets/2014/07/19/10-impressive-bitcoin-inspired-art-pieces/. Accessed 30 May 2022.
    [Google Scholar]
48. Sharma, Tanusree, Zhou, Zhixuan, Huang, Yun and Wang, Yang (2022), ‘It’s a blessing and a curse: Unpacking creators’ practices with non-fungible tokens (NFTs) and their communities’, online first, https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2201.13233.
    [Google Scholar]
49. Swartz, Lana (2018), ‘What was Bitcoin, what will it be? The techno-economic imaginaries of a new money technology’, Cultural Studies, 32:4, pp. 623–50.
    [Google Scholar]
50. Tepper, Fitz (2017), ‘People have spent over $1M buying virtual cats on the Ethereum blockchain’, TechCrunch, 4 December, https://social.techcrunch.com/2017/12/03/people-have-spent-over-1m-buying-virtual-cats-on-the-ethereum-blockchain/. Accessed 30 May 2022.
    [Google Scholar]
51. Thomas, David R. (2003), ‘A general inductive approach for qualitative data analysis’, American Journal of Evaluation, 27:2, pp. 1–11.
    [Google Scholar]
52. Valeonti, Foteini, Bikakis, Antonis, Terras, Melissa, Speed, Chris, Hudson-Smith, Andrew and Chalkias, Konstantinos (2021), ‘Crypto collectibles, museum funding and OpenGLAM: Challenges, opportunities and the potential of non-fungible tokens (NFTs)’, Applied Sciences, 11:21, pp. 1–19.
    [Google Scholar]
53. Wang, Qin, Li, Rujia, Wang, Qi and Chen, Shiping (2021), ‘Non-fungible token (NFT): Overview, evaluation, opportunities and challenges’, online first, https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2105.07447.
    [Google Scholar]
54. Whitaker, Amy (2019), ‘Art and blockchain: A primer, history, and taxonomy of blockchain use cases in the arts’, Artivate, 8:2, pp. 21–46.
    [Google Scholar]
55. Zeilinger, Martin (2018), ‘Digital art as “monetised graphics”: Enforcing intellectual property on the blockchain’, Philosophy & Technology, 31:1, pp. 15–41.
    [Google Scholar]