f Women’s agency in art and science

References

1. Aceves Sepúlveda, Gabriela (2023), ‘Re-enacting/mediating/activating: Towards a collaborative feminist approach to research-creation’, Technoetic Arts: A Journal of Speculative Research, 21:2, 175–91, https://doi.org/10.1386/tear_00110_1.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Antonopoulou, Caterina (2023), ‘Algorithmic bias in anthropomorphic artificial intelligence: Critical perspectives through the practice of women media artists and designers’, Technoetic Arts: A Journal of Speculative Research, 21:2, 157–74, https://doi.org/10.1386/tear_00109_1.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Boon, Hussein (2023), ‘Suzanne Ciani: The diva of the diode’, Technoetic Arts: A Journal of Speculative Research, 21:2, 193–209, https://doi.org/10.1386/tear_00116_1.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Czegledy, Nina (2018), ‘Event review’, Virtual Creativity, 8:2, pp. 221–23, https://doi.org/10.1386/vcr.8.2.221_5.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Ketelsen, Lucie (2023), ‘Reinterpreting the pretty picture: A speculative aesthetics of microscopy’, Technoetic Arts: A Journal of Speculative Research, 21:2, 225–41, https://doi.org/10.1386/tear_00112_1.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Klimatsaki, Styliani Anna and Honorato, Dalila (2023), ‘Taboo in world cinema: Female protagonists within incestuous relationships’, Technoetic Arts: A Journal of Speculative Research, 21:2, 211–24, https://doi.org/10.1386/tear_00111_1.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Mackenzie, Louise and Modi, Kaajal (2023), ‘BioDwelling: A participatory approach to living with living material’, Technoetic Arts: A Journal of Speculative Research, 21:2, 243–63, https://doi.org/10.1386/tear_00113_1.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Robles Mateo, Elena (2020), ‘All-women initiatives in art and technology 1986–2020: Atenea: Mentoring and networking project in Steam’, doctoral thesis, València: Universitat Politècnica de València, https://doi.org/10.4995/Thesis/10251/159248.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Schonberg, Lisa, Marinho do Vale, Érica, Sobroza, Tainara and Beggiato Baccaro, Fabricio (2023), ‘Cryptic insect soundscapes: Ecological sound art as a prompt for auralization’, Technoetic Arts: A Journal of Speculative Research, 21:2, 285–300, https://doi.org/10.1386/tear_00115_1.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Wist, Allie E. S. (2023), ‘Anarchiving the Anthropocene: Waste and relationality’, Technoetic Arts, 21:2, 265–83, https://doi.org/10.1386/tear_00114_1.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Yetiskin, Ebru (2022), ‘Biopolitics of “Acquired Immunity”: The war discourse and feminist response-abilities in art, science, and technology during COVID-19’, OMICS: A Journal of Integrative Biology, 26:10, pp. 552–66, https://doi.org/10.1089/omi.2022.0091.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Żyniewicz, Karolina, de Menezes, Marta, Bureaud, Annick, Rapp, Regine, de Lutz, Christian, Rich, Byron, Burleigh, Paula, Baur, Christl, Kiais, Francesco and McDermid-Hokanson, Jill (2022), ‘Staying in touch: Sci-fi experiments for post-coronavirus art curating’, in D. Honorato, M. A. González Valerio, I. Reichle and A. Giannakoulopoulos (eds), Taboo – Transgression – Transcendence in Art & Science, Corfu: Ionian University, pp. 457–78.
    [Google Scholar]