Skip to content
1981
Volume 22, Issue 1
  • ISSN: 1477-965X
  • E-ISSN: 1758-9533

Abstract

This issue of () encompasses eight articles by artists and scholars from around the globe who engage with methodologies of art practice within research that reflects on technological and ecological change, contributing to the discourse on the inclusion of subjective experience in research. The articles by authors Dulmini Perera, Kate Doyle, Nora S. Vaage, Merete Lie, Nikita Peresin Meden, Kristina Pranjić, Peter Purg, Nicolaas H. Jacobs, Marth Munro, Chris Broodryk, Semi Ryu, Rahul Mahata, Doreswamy, Sana Altaf and Aqib Javid Parry form a collection that crosses disciplines and genres to engage in fundamental critique of existing modes of enquiry and conclusion. The texts situate art and design methodologies in particular cultural contexts and in relation to frameworks defined by research methodologies of the sciences and humanities to gain agency for critique and to counter a sense of inevitability that has come to mark the most recent crises.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1386/tear_00118_2
2024-06-06
2025-12-16
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/ta/22/1/ta.22.1.3_Westermann.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1386/tear_00118_2&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Altaf, Sana and Parry, Aqib J. (2024), ‘Nalo Hopkinson’s Midnight Robber: Blending technology and fantasy in a dystopian narrative’, Technoetic Arts: A Journal of Speculative Research, 22:1, https://doi.org/10.1386/tear_00126_1.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Ascott, Roy and Shanken, Edward A. (2003), Telematic Embrace: Visionary Theories of Art, Technology, and Consciousness, Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Doyle, Kate (2024), ‘Paradox, cybernetics and infinite poetry’, Technoetic Arts: A Journal of Speculative Research, 22:1, https://doi.org/10.1386/tear_00120_1.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Frank, Adam, Gleiser, Marcelo and Thompson, Evan (2024), The Blind Spot, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Gomez-Marin, Alex (2024), ‘Experiencing science: Embracing our role as active participants in the universe should be a vital part of science, contend a trio of authors’, Science, 383:6686, p. 955, https://doi.org/10.1126/science.adn6303.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Hui, Yuk (ed.) (2024), Cybernetics for the 21st Century: Volume 1: Epistemological Reconstruction, Hong Kong: Hanart Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Jacobs, Nicolaas H., Munro, Marth and Broodryk, Chris (2024), ‘Embodied performance with digital visual effects technology: Empirical results of a digital acting programme’, Technoetic Arts: A Journal of Speculative Research, 22:1, https://doi.org/10.1386/tear_00123_1.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Mahata, Rahul and Doreswamy (2024), ‘The digital turn in Chhau dance of Purulia: Reconfiguring authenticity in a post-pandemic scenario’, Technoetic Arts: A Journal of Speculative Research, 22:1, https://doi.org/10.1386/tear_00125_1.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Meden, Nikita P., Pranjić, Kristina and Purg, Peter (2024), ‘Taming the Forest: Embracing the complexity of art-sci research through microhistory, bioeconomics and intermedia art’, Technoetic Arts: A Journal of Speculative Research, 22:1, https://doi.org/10.1386/tear_00122_1.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Perera, Dulmini (2024), ‘Orders of change: Mary Catherine Bateson on ecological thinking, narrative practices and attending to worlds in transformation’, Technoetic Arts: A Journal of Speculative Research, 22:1, https://doi.org/10.1386/tear_00119_1.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Ryu, Semi (2024), ‘Facing, mirroring and echoing in human–avatar symbiosis’, Technoetic Arts: A Journal of Speculative Research, 22:1, https://doi.org/10.1386/tear_00124_1.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Sloan, Kate (2019), Art, Cybernetics and Pedagogy in Post-War Britain: Roy Ascott’s Groundcourse, London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Vaage, Nora S. and Lie, Merete (2024), ‘Blood, sweat and tears: Kinning otherwise through art’, Technoetic Arts: A Journal of Speculative Research, 22:1, https://doi.org/10.1386/tear_00121_1.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Westermann, Claudia and Gupta, Tanu (2023), ‘Editorial: Turning queries into questions: For a plurality of perspectives in the age of AI and other frameworks with limited (mind)sets’, Technoetic Arts: A Journal of Speculative Research, 21:1, pp. 313, https://doi.org/10.1386/tear_00106_2.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Wiener, Norbert (1936), ‘The role of the observer’, Philosophy of Science, 3:3, pp. 30719, http://www.jstor.org/stable/184668. Accessed 26 March 2024.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Wolfram, Stephen (2023), ‘Observer theory’, Stephen Wolfram Writings, 11 December, https://writings.stephenwolfram.com/2023/12/observer-theory. Accessed 26 March 2024.
  17. Wolfram, Stephen and Jaimungal, Curt (2024), ‘Solving the problem of observers & ENTROPY | Stephen Wolfram’, YouTube, 21 February, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0YRlQQw0d-4. Accessed 26 March 2024.
/content/journals/10.1386/tear_00118_2
Loading
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a success
Invalid data
An error occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error
Please enter a valid_number test