Skip to content
1981
Volume 22, Issue 1
  • ISSN: 1477-965X
  • E-ISSN: 1758-9533

Abstract

How can absence make presence ? The question turns a usual notion of form inside out; it subverts normative habits in drawing distinctions. If we adapt the models of time by which we might consider such things (and not-things), the relational terms of form can shift. Two lines of inquiry are pursued in this article. The first is an investigation of form and its relation to time. The second is an exploration of paradox in describing forms of art. Both are cybernetic in their framework and approach. The ‘Hastig’ (‘Hastily’) movement of Robert Schumann’s 1839 piano work is the form that serves as site for the two inquiries to intertwine. Its construction presents a paradox through which form and time may be called into question. In considering Schumann’s composition as a re-conceiving of form and time, an idea emerges; art can make us aware of the constraints and possibilities of our models and our experiences of paradox in living with them.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1386/tear_00120_1
2024-06-06
2025-03-17
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Ashby, W. Ross (1957), An Introduction to Cybernetics, Eastford, CT: Martino Publishing.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Beer, Stafford (1981), I Said, You Are Gods: The Second Annual Teilhard Lecture, London: The Teilhard Centre for the Future of Man.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Carson, Anne (1999), Economy of the Unlost (Reading Simonides of Keos with Paul Celan), Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Chernaik, Judith (2011), ‘Schumann’s doppelgängers: Florestan and Eusebius revisited’, The Musical Times, 152:1917, pp. 4555.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Chernaik, Judith (2018), ‘Schumann and Clara: A musical intertwining’, The Musical Times, 159:1944, pp. 89105.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Daverio, John (2002), Crossing Paths: Schubert, Schumann, and Brahms, New York: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Davies, James Q. (2014), Romantic Anatomies of Performance, Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Fischer, Thomas and Richards, Laurence (2017), ‘From goal-oriented to constraint-oriented design: The cybernetic intersection of design theory and systems theory’, Leonardo, 50:1, pp. 3641.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Glanville, Ranulph (2009), ‘Second-order cybernetics’, in F. Parra-Luna (ed.), Systems Science and Cybernetics, vol. 3, Oxford: Eolss Publishers, pp. 5986.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Kauffman, Louis (2001), ‘Cybermath and {K}nots’, http://homepages.math.uic.edu/~kauffman/Cyber.html. Accessed 15 June 2023.
  11. Kauffman, Louis (2017), ‘Foreword: Laws of form’, Cybernetics and Human Knowing, 24:3–4, pp. 515.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Klassen, Janina (1990), Clara Wieck-Schumann: Die Virtuosin als Komponisten: Studien zu ihrem Werk: Kieler Studien zur Musikwissenschaft, vol. 37, Kassel: Bärenreiter.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Litzmann, Berthold (1913), Clara Schumann: An Artist’s Life, Leipzig: Breitkopf and Härtel.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Maturana, Humberto and Varela, Francisco (1980), Autopoiesis and Cognition: The Realization of the Living, London: Reidel.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Maturana, Humberto and Verden-Zöller, Pille Bunnell (2008), The Origin of Humanness in the Biology of Love (ed. P. Bunnell), Charlottesville, VA: Imprint Academic.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. McClary, Susan (2012), Desire and Pleasure in Seventeenth-Century Music, Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Murphy, Gregory (2004), The Big Book of Concepts, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Pangaro, Paul (2013), ‘Cybernetics: A definition’, https://pangaro.com/definition-cybernetics.html. Accessed 20 August 2023.
  19. Paul, Jean ([1804] 1984), ‘On humorous poetry’, in K. Wheeler (ed.), German Aesthetic and Literary Criticism: The Romantic Ironists and Goethe, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 17475.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Richards, Larry (2010), ‘The anticommunication imperative: A tribute to Herbert Brün’, Cybernetics and Human Knowing, 17:1–2, pp. 1124.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Rosen, Charles (1995), The Romantic Generation, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Schumann, Clara W. and Schumann, Robert (1984a), Briefwechsel: Kritische Gesamtausgabe, vol. 1, Frankfurt: Stroemfeld/Roter Stern.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Schumann, Clara W. and Schumann, Robert (1984b), Briefwechsel: Kritische Gesamtausgabe, vol. 2, Frankfurt: Stroemfeld/Roter Stern.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Schumann, Robert ([1839] 1896), Complete Piano Works IV (ed. C. Schumann), Leipzig: Breitkopf & Härtel.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Spencer-Brown, George (1969), Laws of Form, London: Allen & Unwin.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Storck, Karl (ed.) (1907), The Letters of Robert Schumann, London: John Murray Publishers.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Taylor, Benedict (2022), Music, Subjectivity, and Schumann, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Tunbridge, Laura (2007), ‘Piano works II: Afterimages’, in B. Perrey (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Schumann, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 86101.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Varela, Francisco (1975), ‘A calculus for self-reference’, International Journal of General Systems, 2:1, pp. 524.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Von Foerster, Heinz ([1976] 2003), ‘On constructing a reality’, in H. Von Foerster (ed.), Understanding Understanding: Essays on Cybernetics and Cognition, New York: Springer, pp. 21127.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Weissweiler, Eva (ed.) (1994), The Complete Correspondence of Clara and Robert Schumann, New York: Peter Lang.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Westermann, Claudia (2019), ‘A poetics of designing’, in T. Fischer and C. M. Herr (eds), Design Cybernetics: Navigating the New, Basel: Springer, pp. 23345.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Westermann, Claudia (2021), ‘On globes, the earth and the cybernetics of grace’, Technoetic Arts: A Journal of Speculative Research, 19:1, pp. 2947.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Wheeler, Kathleen (1984), ‘Introduction to Jean Paul’, in K. Wheeler (ed.), German Aesthetic and Literary Criticism: The Romantic Ironists and Goethe, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 128.
    [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1386/tear_00120_1
Loading
/content/journals/10.1386/tear_00120_1
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a success
Invalid data
An error occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error
Please enter a valid_number test