Taming the Forest: Embracing the complexity of art-sci research through microhistory, bioeconomics and intermedia art

References

1. Bal, Mieke and van Boheemen Christine (1984), ‘The rhetoric of subjectivity’, Poetics Today, 5:2, pp. 337–76.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Boeck, Angelika and Tepe, Peter (2021), ‘What is artistic research?’, Between Science & Art, 25 February, https://between-science-and-art.com/what-is-artistic-research/. Accessed 6 August 2023.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Ehn, Billy (2012), ‘Between contemporary art and cultural analysis: Alternative methods for knowledge production’, InFormation: Nordic Journal of Art and Research, 1:1, pp. 4–18.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Gewin, Virginia (2021), ‘How to shape a productive scientist-artist collaboration’, Nature, article first, https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-021-00397-1.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Haraway, Donna J. (2016), Staying with the Trouble: Making Kin in the Chthulucene, Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Jacobs, Jessica (2018), ‘Intersections in design thinking and art thinking: Towards interdisciplinary innovation’, Creativity: Theories – Research – Applications, 5:1, pp. 4–25.
   [Google Scholar]
7. JRC (2021), ‘Brief on the role of the forest-based bioeconomy in mitigating climate change through carbon storage and material substitution’, 5 May, https://publications.jrc.ec.europa.eu/repository/bitstream/JRC124374/brief_on_role_of_forest-based_bioeconomy_in_mitigating_cc_online.pdf. Accessed 6 August 2023.
8. Khadka, Abiral, Meden, Nikita, Mijušković, Tijana, Pranjić, Kristina and Purg, Peter (2022), ‘Taming the Forest’, 29 June, https://vimeo.com/725233829. Accessed 6 August 2023.
9. Kohn, Eduardo (2013), How Forests Think: Toward an Anthropology beyond the Human, Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Levi, Goivanni (1988), Inheriting Power: The Story of an Exorcist, Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Loveless, Natalie (2019), How to Make Art at the End of the World: A Manifesto for Research-Creation, Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Peresin Meden, Nikita (2023), ‘Pogozdovanje na Krasu: Kršenje gozdne postave’, in Gozd in ljudje: razmerja in zgodovina, Ljubljana: Inštitut za novejšo zgodovino, pp. 101–32.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Purg, Peter (2005), Körper im elektronischen Raum: Modelle für Menschen und interaktive Systeme, Bonn: VDM.
    [Google Scholar]
14. Purg, Peter, Cacciatore, Silvia and Gerbec, Jernej Č. (2021), ‘Establishing ecosystems for disruptive innovation by cross-fertilizing entrepreneurship and the arts’, Creative Industries Journal, 16:2, pp. 115–45, https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/17510694.2021.1969804. Accessed 6 August 2023.
    [Google Scholar]
15. Ricoeur, Paul (1984), Time and Narrative, Part IV: Narrated Time, Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
    [Google Scholar]
16. Rimmon-Kenan, Shlomith (2002), ‘The story of “I”: Illness and narrative identity’, Narrative, 10:1, pp. 9–27.
    [Google Scholar]
17. Sloterdijk, Peter (2017), The Aesthetic Imperative: Writings on Art, Cambridge, MA: Polity.
    [Google Scholar]
18. Tatarkiewicz, Władysław (1980), A History of Six Ideas: An Essay in Aesthetics, The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.
    [Google Scholar]
19. Thomka, Beáta (2007), ‘Dekonstrukcija zgodovine in narativna identiteta: Dekonstruierung der Geschichte und narrative Identität’, Primerjalna književnost, 30:3, pp. 55–60.
    [Google Scholar]
20. Varela, Francisco J., Rosch, Eleanor and Thompson, Evan (1992), The Embodied Mind: Cognitive Science and Human Experience, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
21. Vörös, S. (2013), Podobe neupodobljivega: (Nevro)znanost, fenomenologija, mistika, Ljubljana: KUD Logos and UL Faculty of Philosophy Press.
    [Google Scholar]
22. White, Hayden (1982), ‘The politics of historical interpretation: Discipline and de-sublimination’, Critical Inquiry, 9:1, pp. 113–37.
    [Google Scholar]