Skip to content
1981
Taboo-Transgression-Transcendence in Art & Science
  • ISSN: 1477-965X
  • E-ISSN: 1758-9533

Abstract

Current trends in critical theory often rely on outdated conceptions of what it means to ‘create’. This article contributes to formulate new categories for a theory of creation that maintains a connection with human experience and praxis. To this purpose, it begins by criticizing two of the most influential theories of ontological creation of the past century: the one formulated by Gilbert Simondon in and the one put forward by Gilles Deleuze and Félix Guattari in (1980). These two theories will be identified as symmetrical perspectives based on an opposite kind of relationism, yet connected by a persistent naturalism. An alternative will be searched in two cases from contemporary art, Neri Oxman’s device and Pierre Huyghe’s installation (2021–present), capable of suggesting new conceptual parameters for creation. In the last paragraph, I will focus on three creative principles stemming from the above-mentioned cases that can effectively overcome the ontogenetic conception of creation and address today’s need for political creativity and divergent praxis.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1386/tear_00143_1
2025-06-30
2026-04-13

Metrics

Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Barikin, Amelia (2012), Parallel Presents the Art of Pierre Huyghe, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Berardi, Franco ‘Bifo’ (2012), The Uprising. On Poetry and Finance, Los Angeles, CA: semiotext(e).
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Braidotti, Rosi and Dolphijn, Rick (eds) (2017), Philosophy after Nature, London and New York: Rowman & Littlefield.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Culp, Andrew (2016), Dark Deleuze, Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Delanda, Manuel (2002), Intensive Science and Virtual Philosophy, London: Bloomsbury.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Delanda, Manuel (2016), Assemblage Theory, Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Deleuze, Gilles ([1990] 1992), ‘Postscript on the societies of control’, October, 59, pp. 37.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Deleuze, Gilles and Guattari, Félix ([1980] 1987), A Thousand Plateaus: Capitalism and Schizophrenia, Minneapolis, MN and London: University of Minnesota Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Deleuze, Gilles and Parnet, Claire ([1977] 1987), Dialogues, New York: Columbia University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Fisher, Mark (2009), Capitalist Realism: Is There No Alternative?, London: Zero Books.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Frigerio, Christian (2023), Ricomporre un cosmo in frammenti. Il dibattito sulle relazioni interne ed esterne, Milan: Mimesis.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Hays, Stephanie G., Patrick, William G., Ziesack, Marika, Oxman, Neri and Silver, Pamela A. (2015), ‘Better together: Engineering and application of microbial symbioses’, Current Opinion in Biotechnology, 36, pp. 4049, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copbio.2015.08.008.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Hineline, Philip N. (2001), ‘Beyond the molar–molecular distinction: We need multiscaled analyses’, Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 75:3, pp. 34247, https://doi.org/10.1901/jeab.2001.75-342.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Institute for Postnatural Studies (2024), La condición postnatural. Glosario de ecologías para otros mundos posíbles, Madrid: Chthulu Books.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Lucchese, Filippo Del (2009), ‘Monstruous individuations: Deleuze, Simondon, and relational ontology’, Differences, 20:2–3, pp. 17993, https://doi.org/10.1215/10407391-2009-008.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Luisetti, Federico (2011), Una vita. Pensiero selvaggio e filosofia dell‘intensità, Milano and Udine: Mimesis.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Marks, John (2006), ‘Molecular biology in the work of Deleuze and Guattari’, Paragraph, 29:2, pp. 8197, https://doi.org/10.1353/prg.2006.0016.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Oxman, Neri (2010), ‘Structuring materiality: Design fabrication of heterogeneous materials’, Architectural Design, 80:4, pp. 7885, https://doi.org/10.1002/ad.1110.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Oxman, Neri (2017), ‘Dermi-Domus: A grown wardrobe for bodies and buildings’, Architectural Design, 87:6, pp. 1625, https://doi.org/10.1002/ad.2233.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Oxman, Neri, Ortiz, Christine, Gramazio, Fabio and Kohler, Matthias (2015), ‘Editorial: Material ecology’, Computer-Aided Design, 60, pp. 12, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cad.2014.05.009.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Protevi, John (2013), Life, War, Earth: Deleuze and the Sciences, Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Purdy, Jedediah (2015), After Nature. A Politics for the Anthropocene, Cambridge, MA and London: Harvard University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Rafael, Marie-France (2013), Pierre Huyghe: On Site, Cologne: Walther König.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Rorty, Richard (1967), ‘Relations, internal and external’, in P. Edwards (ed.), Encyclopedia of Philosophy, vol. 7, New York: Macmillan, pp. 12533.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Ruyer, Raymond ([1958] 2020), The Genesis of Living Forms, London: Rowman & Littlefield.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Sarti, Alessandro, Citti, Giovanna and Piotrowski, David (2022), Differential Heterogenesis. Mutant Forms, Sensitive Bodies, Cham: Springer.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Sauvagnargues, Anne (2016), Artmachines: Deleuze, Guattari, Simondon, Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Schäffner, Wolfgang (2023), ‘The design turn revisited: A revolution of design in the spirit of active matter’, in L. Perraudin, C. Winkler, C. Mareis and M. Held (eds), Material Trajectories, Lüneburg: meson press, pp. 3348.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Simondon, Gilbert ([2005] 2020), Individuation in Light of Notions of Form and Information, Minneapolis, MN and London: University of Minnesota Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Ströbele, Ursula (2024), Hans Haacke und Pierre Huyghe: Non-Human Living Sculptures seit den 1960er-Jahren, Berlin and Boston, MA: De Gruyter.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Voss, Daniela (2019), ‘Invention and capture: A critique of Simondon’, Culture, Theory and Critique, 60:3–4, pp. 27999, https://doi.org/10.1080/14735784.2019.1679652.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Voss, Daniela (2020), ‘The problem of method: Deleuze and Simondon’, Deleuze and Guattari Studies, 14:1, pp. 87108, https://doi.org/10.3366/dlgs.2020.0392.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Wark, McKenzie (2004), A Hacker Manifesto, Cambridge, MA and London: Harvard University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Watson, Mike (2021), The Memeing of Mark Fisher: How the Frankfurt School Foresaw Capitalist Realism and What to Do About It, London: Zero Books.
    [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1386/tear_00143_1
Loading
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a success
Invalid data
An error occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error
Please enter a valid_number test