Skip to content
1981
Taboo-Transgression-Transcendence in Art & Science
  • ISSN: 1477-965X
  • E-ISSN: 1758-9533

Abstract

This Special Issue of () journal is dedicated to the explorations and provocations emerging from the latest edition of the conference (). These seven articles, initially selected, presented and discussed on the island of Malta (2023), show the international and interdisciplinary range of a community which started to take shape almost a decade ago. At the time of the release of this publication, practically two years after , we stand on a particular moment in between post-pandemic exhaustion and inability to conceive the practicality of bellic conflict. How distasteful, the lack of better narrative still based on dubious nationalist ideas, hideously hiding economic interests of an elite who seems to care less, and blame more, the anonymous citizen as scapegoat to induce self-blame on ecological precarity and the loss of vision for possible grassroots – the themes of taboo, transgression and transcendence have never been more relevant. As Goya perceived wonders in the collaboration between reason and imagination Machiavelli (2004) too saw hope along unmapped roads which were the sole reason why giving up was not the wisest choice and why those who embrace the unexplored should not despair. In this line of thought, the authors included in this issue demonstrate how art and humanities are responding to these post-truth conditions by questioning assumptions about citizen vs. technology power relations and the ethics of life and death research practices.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1386/tear_00145_2
2025-06-30
2026-04-12

Metrics

Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/ta/23/1/ta.23.1.3_Honorato.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1386/tear_00145_2&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Bardakos, Ioannis (John), Honorato, Dalila, Jacques, Claudia, Westermann, Claudia and de Filippi, Primavera (2021), ‘On modes of participation’, Technoetic Arts, 19:3, pp. 22125, https://doi.org/10.1386/tear_00064_2.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Fitzpatrick, Kathleen (2011), Planned Obsolescence: Publishing, Technology, and the Future of the Academia, New York and London: New York University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Hagan, Lyn (2025), ‘Containment’, Technoetic Arts: A Journal of Speculative Research, 23:1, pp. 6380, https://doi.org/10.1386/tear_00139_1.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Honorato, Dalila (2017), ‘Technoetic Arts: A Journal of Speculative Research’, 15:2, https://intellectdiscover.com/content/journals/ta/15/2. Accessed 27 February 2025.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Honorato, Dalila (2018), ‘Taboo, transgression, transcendence in art and science’, Technoetic Arts, 16:3, pp. 23536, https://doi.org/10.1386/tear.16.3.235_2.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Honorato, Dalila (2020), ‘Editorial’, Technoetic Arts, 18:2, pp. 9596, https://doi.org/10.1386/tear_00028_2.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Honorato, Dalila (2025), ‘On the importance of transgression in academic outcomes’, Technoetic Arts: A Journal of Speculative Research, 23:1, pp. 37, https://doi.org/10.1386/tear_00145_2.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Kokot, Jordan (2025), ‘Overcoming life: Neuralink, cyborgs, and the (an)aesthetics of cure’, Technoetic Arts: A Journal of Speculative Research, 23:1, pp. 2945, https://doi.org/10.1386/tear_00140_1.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Machiavelli, Niccolo (2004), ‘That Fortune obscures the minds of Men when she would not have them hinder her designs’, Discourses on the First Decade of Titus Livius, Project Gutenberg eBook (n.pag.), https://www.gutenberg.org/cache/epub/10827/pg10827-images.html. Accessed 27 February 2025.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Mackenzie, Louise, Turkmendag, Ilke, Burr-Raty, Isabel, Hunter, WhiteFeather, Jarvis, Charlotte, Simun, Miriam, Tapio, Hege and Zaretsky, Adam (2020), ‘Body shopping: Challenging convention in the donation and use of bodily materials through art practice’, Technoetic Arts, 18:2, pp. 27997, https://doi.org/10.1386/tear_00045_1.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Matsutani, Yosaku (2025), ‘Art as decomposition: Soichiro Mihara’s making soil’, Technoetic Arts: A Journal of Speculative Research, 23:1, pp. 93107, https://doi.org/10.1386/tear_00141_1.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. de Melo Filho, Claudio (2025), ‘Decentralizing hegemonic knowledge in art practices’, Technoetic Arts: A Journal of Speculative Research, 23:1, pp. 4761, https://doi.org/10.1386/tear_00138_1.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Tapio, Hege (2018), ‘Human oil: From magic and medicine to art’, Technoetic Arts, 16:3, pp. 25965, https://doi.org/10.1386/tear.16.3.259_1.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Tapio, Hege (2025), ‘How does one synthetically produce love?’, Technoetic Arts: A Journal of Speculative Research, 23:1, pp. 927, https://doi.org/10.1386/tear_00142_1.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Tenti, Gregorio (2025), ‘Art and mutation on a postnatural planet’, Technoetic Arts: A Journal of Speculative Research, 23:1, pp. 8191, https://doi.org/10.1386/tear_00143_1.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Yetiskin, Ebru (2017), ‘Invisible motion: Paratactical curation of bio art and performative political imaginaries’, Technoetic Arts, 15:2, pp. 20313, https://doi.org/10.1386/tear.15.2.203_1.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Yetiskin, Ebru (2018), ‘Paratactical use of algorithmic agencies in artistic practice’, Technoetic Arts, 16:3, pp. 35362, https://doi.org/10.1386/tear.16.3.353_1.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Yetiskin, Ebru (2025), ‘Political ecology imaginaries and possible futures in Turkey’, Technoetic Arts: A Journal of Speculative Research, 23:1, pp. 10925, https://doi.org/10.1386/tear_00144_1.
    [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1386/tear_00145_2
Loading
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a success
Invalid data
An error occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error
Please enter a valid_number test