Skip to content
1981
Volume 23, Issue 2
  • ISSN: 1477-965X
  • E-ISSN: 1758-9533

Abstract

This editorial introduces issue 23.2 of (), exploring the relationship between scripts and life through six articles examining instruction manuals, genetic codes, algorithmic systems and AI-generated imagery. Beginning with Joseph Beuys’s lithographs, whose titles activate static forms into perceived movement, the editorial establishes scripts as requiring interpretive performance rather than mechanical execution. Drawing on Erwin Schrödinger’s 1944 concept of biological ‘code-script’, the editorial traces how informational metaphors transformed understandings of life from mathematical patterns to readable, executable programmes. The contributions to issue 23.2 examine this productive tension across domains: Lindsay Polly Crisp analyses Michael Landy’s instruction manual for dismantling possessions; G. Douglas Barrett investigates cerebral organoids producing music; Vasia I. Hatzi surveys biomedical imaging art; Vasily Betin proposes ‘Designed Emergence’ for algorithmic creativity; Joshua Wodak examines David Rokeby’s interactive installations; and Sarah-Jane Field interrogates AI aesthetics through Vilém Flusser’s philosophy. Together, these articles map territories where determination meets indeterminacy, revealing how life exceeds the scripts that partially structure it.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1386/tear_00151_2
2026-02-14
2026-04-22

Metrics

Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/ta/23/2/ta.23.2.133_Westermann.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1386/tear_00151_2&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Barrett, G Douglas (2025), ‘Automaticity and endings: The revivification of Alvin Lucier’, Technoetic Arts: A Journal of Speculative Research, 23:2, https://doi.org/10.1386/tear_00148_1.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Bateson, William and Bateson, Beatrice (2010), William Bateson, Naturalist: His Essays and Addresses Together with a Short Account of His Life, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Bateson, William and Mendel, Gregor ([1902] 2009), Mendel’s Principles of Heredity: A Defence, with a Translation of Mendel’s Original Papers on Hybridisation, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Betin, Vasily (2025), ‘The art of controlled chaos: Towards designed emergence’, Technoetic Arts: A Journal of Speculative Research, 23:2, https://doi.org/10.1386/tear_00149_1.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Crisp, Lindsay Polly (2025), ‘Manual/manual: Working hands and instructional text in Michael Landy’s Break Down’, Technoetic Arts: A Journal of Speculative Research, 23:2, https://doi.org/10.1386/tear_00146_1.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Field, Sarah-Jane (2025), ‘Kitsch, the apparatus and a dead theorist’, Technoetic Arts: A Journal of Speculative Research, 23:2, https://doi.org/10.1386/tear_00150_1.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Hatzi, Vasia I. (2025), ‘Exploring the transformative power of art inspired by biomedical imaging through MEDinART: Bridging science, society and the human experience’, Technoetic Arts, 23:2, https://doi.org/10.1386/tear_00147_1.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Schrödinger, Ernst ([1944] 1992), What Is Life? With Mind and Matter and Autobiographical Sketches, Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Walsby, Anthony E. and Hodge, M. Jonathan S. (2017), ‘Schrödinger’s code-script: Not a genetic cipher but a code of development’, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences, 63, June, pp. 4554, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.shpsc.2016.12.002.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Witzany, Günther and Baluška, František (2012), ‘Life’s code script does not code itself: The machine metaphor for living organisms is outdated’, EMBO Reports, 13:12, pp. 10546, https://doi.org/10.1038/embor.2012.166.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Wodak, Joshua (2025), ‘I interact, therefore we are: Mediating relations between self and other in David Rokeby’s interactive art’, Technoetic Arts: A Journal of Speculative Research, 23:2, https://doi.org/10.1386/tear_00137_1.
    [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1386/tear_00151_2
Loading
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a success
Invalid data
An error occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error
Please enter a valid_number test