Skip to content
1981
Volume 1, Issue 1
  • ISSN: 2397-7140
  • E-ISSN: 2397-7159

Abstract

Abstract

From the early 2000s onwards, labour migrants from China with technical work skills but low educational attainment arrived in Australia with fixed-term, temporary plans. Yet, to their surprise, many have been thwarted in their plans to return, and have instead experienced an unexpected transition to permanent residency (PR). Reasons include rapid economic growth in China and the rising cost of housing; the challenges of re-entering the competitive Chinese education system for children accustomed to Australian schools; and the realization that time spent overseas has limited work opportunities upon return. They describe their experiences in terms that closely resemble classical labour migrations of colonial and postcolonial eras. Return and discourses of return must be understood within contemporary migration models that emphasize circular, transient and open-ended mobility. Yet individual migrants still articulate migration trajectories and return plans that are grounded in simpler conceptions of ‘here’ and ‘there’. While recognizing the contemporary shift towards mobile and transnational lives among elites and non-elites alike, it is important not to overlook the very real and material barriers to return that some temporary migrants claim to experience.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1386/tjtm.1.1.65_1
2017-03-01
2025-05-14
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/content/journals/10.1386/tjtm.1.1.65_1
Loading
  • Article Type: Article
Keyword(s): Australia; China; return migration; skilled migration
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a success
Invalid data
An error occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error
Please enter a valid_number test