Skip to content
1981
1-2: The End of Migration
  • ISSN: 2397-7140
  • E-ISSN: 2397-7159

Abstract

In this article, I combine my observation of Indonesia’s desire to end labour outmigration with scholarly reflections on the end of migration studies. Challenging the orthodoxy that takes for granted sending countries’ support of migration as presumed in current optimism of the migration-development paradigm, I trace Indonesia’s successive development plans to demonstrate the treatment of migration as a less-preferred option for job creation, exploring how postcolonial trajectories entail the desire to keep development and lead to persisting view of migration as deeply undesirable. The recent shift to governance works as a way to both discipline workers through required documentation and to allow the government to eschew accountability by advancing a discourse on protection. As the state sets out a future anticipation where those defined as unskilled no longer migrate, a question arises as to how we build a meaningful scholarship around migration as a non-priority and the process towards making a certain migrant category disappear? My critique of development planning turns the analytical lens back to the state, which I see as a way to go on with the study of migration in a more ethical, pro-migrant manner. Rejecting the trap of methodological nationalism, I offer an approach that seizes of the ‘postcolonial moment’ of migration.

© 2024 Intellect Ltd
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1386/tjtm_00059_1
2024-04-03
2026-04-17

Metrics

Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Anderson, B. (2019a), ‘New directions in migration studies: Towards methodological de-nationalism’, Comparative Migration Studies, 7:36, pp. 1–13, https://doi.org/10.1186/s40878-019-0140-8.
     [Google Scholar]
  2. Anderson, J. T. (2019b), ‘The migration industry in managed migration: Authority, control and guestworkers in the United States’, doctoral dissertation, Gothenburg; University of Gothenburg and Göteborgs Universitet.
     [Google Scholar]
  3. Badan Perencanaan Pembangunan Nasional ([1974] 1975), Rancangan Rencana Pembangunan Lima Tahun Kedua 1974/75–1978/79, Jakarta: BAPPENAS.
     [Google Scholar]
  4. Bakewell, O. (2008), ‘“Keeping them in their place”: The ambivalent relationship between development and migration in Africa’, Third World Quarterly, 29:7, pp. 1341–58, https://doi.org/10.1080/01436590802386492.
     [Google Scholar]
  5. Barkawi, T. and Laffey, M. (2006), ‘The postcolonial moment in security studies’, Review of International Studies, 32:2, pp. 329–52, https://doi.org/10.1017/S0260210506007054.
     [Google Scholar]
  6. Barker, J. (2008), ‘Beyond Bandung: Developmental nationalism and (multi)cultural nationalism in Indonesia’, Third World Quarterly, 29:3, pp. 521–40, https://doi.org/10.1080/01436590801931496.
     [Google Scholar]
  7. Bauböck, R., Mourão Permoser, J. and Ruhs, M. (2022), ‘The ethics of migration policy dilemmas’, Migration Studies, 10:3, pp. 427–41.
     [Google Scholar]
  8. Castles, S. (2010), ‘Understanding global migration: A social transformation perspective’, Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 36:10, pp. 1565–86.
     [Google Scholar]
  9. Chan, C. (2018), In Sickness and in Wealth: Migration, Gendered Morality, and Central Java, Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  10. Chernilo, D. (2011), ‘The critique of methodological nationalism: Theory and history’, Thesis Eleven, 106:1, pp. 98–117, https://doi.org/10.1177/0725513611415789.
     [Google Scholar]
  11. Chimhowu, A. O., Hulme, D. and Munro, L. T. (2019), ‘The “new” national development planning and global development goals: Processes and partnerships’, World Development, 120, pp. 76–89, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2019.03.013.
     [Google Scholar]
  12. Cowen, M. P. and Shenton, R. W. (1996), Doctrines of Development, London: Routledge.
     [Google Scholar]
  13. De Haas, H. (2010), ‘Migration and development: A theoretical perspective’, The International Migration Review, 44:1, pp. 227–64, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-7379.2009.00804.x.
     [Google Scholar]
  14. Dewanto, P. A. (2020), ‘The domestication of protection: The state and civil society in Indonesia’s overseas labour migration’, Bijdragen tot de taal-, land- en volkenkunde (Journal of the Humanities and Social Sciences of Southeast Asia), 176:4, pp. 504–31.
     [Google Scholar]
  15. Elias, J. (2013), ‘Foreign policy and the domestic worker: The Malaysia–Indonesia domestic worker dispute’, International Feminist Journal of Politics, 15:3, pp. 391–410, https://doi.org/10.1080/14616742.2012.755835.
     [Google Scholar]
  16. Elmhirst, R. (1999), ‘Space, identity politics and resource control in Indonesia’s transmigration programme’, Political Geography, 18:7, pp. 813–35, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0962-6298(99)00029-3.
     [Google Scholar]
  17. Geiger, M. and Pécoud, A. (2013), ‘Migration, development and the “migration and development nexus”’, Population, Space and Place, 19:4, pp. 369–74, https://doi.org/10.1002/psp.1778.
     [Google Scholar]
  18. Glick Schiller, N. (2009a), ‘A global perspective on transnational migration: Theorizing migration without methodological nationalism’, Centre on Migration, Policy and Society, working Paper No. 67, Oxford: University of Oxford.
     [Google Scholar]
  19. Glick Schiller, N. (2009b), ‘A global perspective on migration and development’, Social Analysis, 53:3, pp. 14–37.
     [Google Scholar]
  20. Glick Schiller, N. (2012), ‘Unraveling the migration and development web: Research and policy implications’, International Migration, 50:3, pp. 92–97.
     [Google Scholar]
  21. Glick Schiller, N. (2020), ‘Migration and development: Theorising changing conditions and ongoing silences’, in T. Bastia and R. Skelton (eds), Routledge Handbook of Migration and Development, Abingdon and New York: Routledge, pp. 32–42.
     [Google Scholar]
  22. Hariyadi, A. R. (2021), ‘Dinamika kebijakan perencanaan pembangunan nasional Indonesia’, Jurnal Desentralisasi dan Kebijakan Publik, 2:2, pp. 259–76, https://doi.org/10.30656/jdkp.v2i2.3887.
     [Google Scholar]
  23. Hellman, J. (2003), Performing the Nation: Cultural Politics in New Order Indonesia, vol. 89, Copenhagen: Nias Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  24. Heryanto, A. and Lutz, Nancy (1988), ‘The development of “Development”’ (trans. N. Lutz), Indonesia, 46, pp. 1–24.
     [Google Scholar]
  25. Hollifield, J. F. and Foley, N. (eds) (2022), Understanding Global Migration, Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  26. Hudalah, D., Talitha, T. and Fauzia, S. (2022), ‘Pragmatic state rescaling: The dynamics and diversity of state space in Indonesian megaproject planning and governance’, Environment and Planning C: Politics and Space, 40:2, pp. 481–501, https://doi.org/10.1177/23996544211030935.
     [Google Scholar]
  27. Kansil, C. S. T. (1970), Inti pengetahuan Repelita, Penerbit Erlangga.
     [Google Scholar]
  28. Kapur, D. (2004), ‘Remittances: The New Development Mantra?’, G-24 Discussion Paper Series No. 29, United Nations Conference on Trade and Development & the Intergovernmental Group of Twenty-Four on International Monetary Affairs, New York and Geneva: United Nations.
     [Google Scholar]
  29. Killias, O. (2018), Follow the Maid: Domestic Worker Migration in and from Indonesia, Copenhagen: NIAS Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  30. Koh, S. Y. (2015a), ‘State-led talent return migration programme and the doubly neglected “Malaysian diaspora”: Whose diaspora, what citizenship, whose development?’, Singapore Journal of Tropical Geography, 36:2, pp. 183–200.
     [Google Scholar]
  31. Koh, S. Y. (2015b), ‘Postcolonial approaches to migration in Asia: Reflections and projections’, Geography Compass, 9:8, pp. 432–44, https://doi.org/10.1111/sjtg.12107.
     [Google Scholar]
  32. Kusno, A. (2004), Behind the Postcolonial: Architecture, Urban Space and Political Cultures in Indonesia, Abingdon and New York: Routledge.
     [Google Scholar]
  33. Lin, W., Lindquist, J., Xiang, B. and Yeoh, B. S. (2017), ‘Migration infrastructures and the production of migrant mobilities’, Mobilities, 12:2, pp. 167–74, https://doi.org/10.1080/17450101.2017.1292770.
     [Google Scholar]
  34. Lindquist, J., Xiang, B. and Yeoh, B. S. (2012), ‘Opening the black box of migration: Brokers, the organization of transnational mobility and the changing political economy in Asia’, Pacific Affairs, 85:1, pp. 7–19, https://doi.org/10.5509/20128517.
     [Google Scholar]
  35. Mongia, R. (2012), ‘Interrogating critiques of methodological nationalism’, in A. Amelina, D. D. Nergiz, T. Faist and N. Glick Schiller (eds), Beyond Methodological Nationalism: Research Methodologies for Cross-Border Studies, vol. 198, New York and Abingdon: Routledge, pp. 198–215.
     [Google Scholar]
  36. Mongia, R. (2018), Indian Migration and Empire: A Colonial Genealogy of the Modern State, Durham, NC and London: Duke University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  37. Nyberg-Sørensen, N., Van Hear, N. and Engberg-Pedersen, P. (2002), ‘The migration-development nexus evidence and policy options state-of-the-art overview’, International Migration, 40:5, pp. 3–47, https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2435.00210.
     [Google Scholar]
  38. Palmer, W. (2016), Indonesia’s Overseas Labour Migration Programme, 1969–2010, vol. 307, Leiden: Brill.
     [Google Scholar]
  39. Piper, N., Rother, S. and Rüland, J. (2018), ‘Challenging state sovereignty in the age of migration: Concluding remarks’, European Journal of East Asian Studies, 17:1, pp. 118–33, https://doi.org/10.1163/15700615-01701007.
     [Google Scholar]
  40. Platt, M. (2018), ‘Migration, moralities and moratoriums: Female labour migrants and the tensions of protectionism in Indonesia’, Asian Studies Review, 42:1, pp. 89–106, https://doi.org/10.1080/10357823.2017.1408571.
     [Google Scholar]
  41. Rosenberg, A. S. (2022), Undesirable Migrants: Why Racism Persists in International Migration, Princeton, NJ and Woodstock: Princeton University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  42. Silvey, R. (2004), ‘Transnational domestication: State power and Indonesian migrant women in Saudi Arabia’, Political Geography, 23:3, pp. 245–64, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polgeo.2003.12.015.
     [Google Scholar]
  43. Simabura, C. (2019), ‘Bagaimana rencana menghidupkan GBHN mengancam demokrasi dan berujung tidak efektif’, The Conversation, 12 November, https://theconversation.com/bagaimana-rencana-menghidupkan-gbhn-mengancam-demokrasi-dan-berujung-tidak-efektif-125788. Accessed 19 February 2024.
  44. Subkhan, I. (2014), ‘GBHN dan perubahan perencanaan pembangunan di Indonesia’, Aspirasi: Jurnal Masalah-masalah Sosial, 5:2, pp. 131–43.
     [Google Scholar]
  45. Surak, K. (2013), ‘The migration industry and developmental states in East Asia’, in T. Gammeltoft-Hansen and N. Nyberg Sørensen (eds), The Migration Industry and the Commercialization of International Migration, London and New York: Routledge pp. 105–25.
     [Google Scholar]
  46. Syamsuddin, M. D. (1993), ‘Political stability and leadership succession in Indonesia’, Contemporary Southeast Asia, 15:1, pp. 12–23.
     [Google Scholar]
  47. Thee, K. W. (2002), ‘The Soeharto era and after: Stability, development and crisis, 1966–2000’, in H. Dick, V. J. H. Houben, J. T. Lindblad and K. W. Thee (eds), Emergence of a National Economy: An Economic History of Indonesia, 1800–2000, Honolulu, HI: Brill, pp. 194–243.
     [Google Scholar]
  48. Tirtosudarmo, R. (2001), ‘Demography and security: Transmigrasi policy in Indonesia’, in M. Weiner and S. S. Russell (eds), Demography and National Security, New York and Oxford: Berghahn Books, pp. 199–227.
     [Google Scholar]
  49. Utomo, I. D., Arsyad, S. S. and Hasmi, E. N. (2006), ‘Village family planning volunteers in Indonesia: Their role in the family planning programme’, Reproductive Health Matters, 14:27, pp. 73–82, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0968-8080(06)27230-6.
     [Google Scholar]
  50. Varnava, A., Marmo, M. and Smith, E. (2022), ‘Border control and undesirables in Britain and Australia’, Immigrants & Minorities, Special Issue: ‘“Undesirables”: Monitoring Migrants in Britain and Australia (1905–1972) and Its Contemporary Significance’, 40:1–2, pp. 1–12, https://doi.org/10.1080/02619288.2022.2057687.
     [Google Scholar]
  51. Vigneswaran, D. V. (2021), ‘Unsettling migration studies’, YouTube, 7 November, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4RzPYEO8VJU. Accessed 25 February 2024.
  52. Warburton, E. (2016), ‘Jokowi and the new developmentalism’, Bulletin of Indonesian Economic Studies, 52:3, pp. 297–320, https://doi.org/10.1080/00074918.2016.1249262.
     [Google Scholar]
  53. Wimmer, A. and Glick Schiller, N. (2002), ‘Methodological nationalism and beyond: Nation–state building, migration and the social sciences’, Global Networks, 2:4, pp. 301–34, https://doi.org/10.1111/1471-0374.00043.
     [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1386/tjtm_00059_1
Loading
  • Article Type: Article
Keyword(s): facilitation of migration; historicizing; methodological nationalism; migrant workers; outmigration; postcolonial state; sending country

Most Cited Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a success
Invalid data
An error occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error
Please enter a valid_number test