Skip to content
1981
1-2: The End of Migration
  • ISSN: 2397-7140
  • E-ISSN: 2397-7159

Abstract

Investigating the multi-layered mobility of Southeast Asian irregular farm workers in rural Taiwan, this article examines the formation of their mobility in a physical, geographical, occupational and socio-economic sense. Focusing on frequent movement in these four aspects, this article coins the term ‘fettered mobility’ for workers’ constant relocation in the villages’ informal farm labour market. In tandem with the focus of this Special Issue on the ongoing transformations of migration at the crossroad between the legal, social and economic obstacles dictated by nation states and the market, and new patterns of movement, this article shows how ‘fettered mobility’ is an unintentional result of the Taiwanese state’s mobility regime, which regulates foreign nationals’ mobility by categorizing a hierarchical legal status. Fettered mobility is facilitated by the translocal migrant community constituted by the co-ethnic link between migrant workers and migrant spouse farmers, and also by the inter-ethnic link between the migrant community on the one hand and Taiwanese farmers and unlicensed brokers on the other. When migration is reconfiguring at a global, regional and local scale, fettered mobility is an assemblage in which the state, market and individual amalgamate into a networked, mobile, irregular and precarious labour force in which unprotected migrant workers are vulnerable to the state’s power to repatriate. Repatriation is an omnipresent threat, and anyone who knows of a migrant worker’s fettered mobility can put an end to their migration. Presenting fettered mobility as an assemblage, this article enriches the ongoing debate on the relationship between mobility and immobility and underlines its conditionality and instability.

© 2024 Intellect Ltd
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1386/tjtm_00060_1
2024-04-03
2026-04-18

Metrics

Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Al-Ali, N. and Koser, K. (2003), New Approaches to Migration? Transnational Communities and the Transformation of Home, London: Routledge.
     [Google Scholar]
  2. Allen, W. L. and Vollmer, B. A. (2018), ‘Clean skins: Making the e-border security assemblage’, Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 36:1, pp. 23–39.
     [Google Scholar]
  3. Ambrosini, M. (1999), ‘Travailler dans l’ombre: Les immigrés dans l’économie informelle’, Revue européenne des migrations internationales, 15:2, pp. 95–121.
     [Google Scholar]
  4. Andrikopoulos, A. and Duyvendak, J. W. (2020), ‘Migration, mobility and the dynamics of kinship: New barriers, new assemblages’, Ethnography, 21:3, pp. 299–318.
     [Google Scholar]
  5. Azis, A., Ariefiansyah, R. and Utami, N. S. (2020), ‘Precarity, migration and brokerage in Indonesia: Insights from ethnographic research in Indramayu’, in M. Baas (ed.), The Migration Industry in Asia, Singapore: Palgrave Pivot, pp. 11–31, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-9694-6_2.
     [Google Scholar]
  6. Baas, M. and Yeoh, B. S. (2019), ‘Introduction: Migration studies and critical temporalities’, Current Sociology, 67:2, pp. 161–68.
     [Google Scholar]
  7. Baas, M., Karoui, D. P. E. and Yeoh, B. S. (2020), ‘Migrants in global cities in Asia and the Gulf: Cosmopolitan dialectics and non-integration’, City, 24:5–6, pp. 793–804.
     [Google Scholar]
  8. Bakewell, O. (2008), ‘Research beyond the categories: The importance of policy irrelevant research into forced migration’, Journal of Refugee Studies, 21:4, pp. 432–53.
     [Google Scholar]
  9. Barrientos, S., Kothari, U. and Phillips, N. (2013), ‘Dynamics of unfree labour in the contemporary global economy’, Journal of Development Studies, 49:8, pp. 1037–41.
     [Google Scholar]
  10. Basch, L., Glick-Schiller, N. and Blanc, C. S. (1994), Nations Unbound: Transnational Projects, Postcolonial Predicaments, and Deterritorialized Nation-States, London: Gordon and Breach Publishers.
     [Google Scholar]
  11. Bauman, Z. (2007), Liquid Modernity, Oxford: Blackwell.
     [Google Scholar]
  12. Black, L. (2019), ‘Evaluating Taiwan’s new southbound policy’, Asian Survey, 59:2, pp. 246–71.
     [Google Scholar]
  13. Bommes, M. and Sciortino, G. (2011), Foggy Social Structures: Irregular Migration, European Labour Markets and the Welfare State, Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  14. Bradatan, C. E. and Sandu, D. (2012), ‘Before crisis: Gender and economic outcomes of the two largest immigrant communities in Spain’, International Migration Review, 46:1, pp. 221–43.
     [Google Scholar]
  15. Bruzelius, C. and Seeleib-Kaiser, M. (2023), ‘Enforcing outsiders’ rights: Seasonal agricultural workers and institutionalised exploitation in the EU’, Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 49:16, pp. 4188–205, https://doi.org/10.1080/1369183X.2023.2207340.
     [Google Scholar]
  16. Calhoun, C. (2007), Nations Matter: Culture, History and the Cosmopolitan Dream, London: Routledge.
     [Google Scholar]
  17. Cassarino, J. P. (2004), ‘Theorising return migration: The conceptual approach to return migrants revisited’, International Journal on Multicultural Societies, 6:2, pp. 253–79.
     [Google Scholar]
  18. Castells, M. and Portes, A. (1989), ‘World underneath: The origins, dynamics, and effects of the informal economy’, in A. Portes, A. M. Castells and L. Benton (eds), The Informal Economy: Studies in Advanced and Less Developed Countries, Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  19. Castles, S. (2000), ‘International migration at the beginning of the twenty-first century: Global trends and issues’, International Social Science Journal, 52:165, pp. 269–81.
     [Google Scholar]
  20. Castles, S. (2010), ‘Understanding global migration: A social transformation perspective’, Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 36:10, pp. 1565–86.
     [Google Scholar]
  21. Cheng, I. (2020), ‘We want productive workers, not fertile women: The expediency of employing Southeast Asian caregivers in Taiwan’, Asia Pacific Viewpoint, 61:3, pp. 453–65.
     [Google Scholar]
  22. Cheng, I. (2021a), ‘Productivity, cohesion and dignity: The contestation of migration policy under the first Tsai Ing-wen administration’, in G. Shubert and C.-Y. Lee (eds), Navigating in Stormy Waters: Taiwan during the First Administration of Tsai Ing-wen, Abingdon and New York: Routledge, pp. 254–82.
     [Google Scholar]
  23. Cheng, I. (2021b), ‘Motherhood, empowerment and contestation: The act of citizenship of Vietnamese immigrant activists in the realm of the new southbound policy’, Citizenship Studies, 25:7, pp. 975–92.
     [Google Scholar]
  24. Cheng, I. (2022), ‘Infection, temporality and inequality: Sanitizing foreign bodies and protecting public health in Taiwan’, Asian and Pacific Migration Journal, 31:3, pp. 292–311.
     [Google Scholar]
  25. Cheng, I., Zani, B. and Parhusip, J. (2023), ‘‘There will be no law, or people to protect us’: Irregular Southeast Asian seasonal workers in Taiwan before and during the pandemic’, Journal of Agrarian Change, 23:3, pp. 634–44.
     [Google Scholar]
  26. Chuang, H. L., Hsieh, N. and Lin, E. S. (2010), ‘Labour market activity of foreign spouses in Taiwan: Employment status and choice of employment sector’, Pacific Economic Review, 15:4, pp. 505–31.
     [Google Scholar]
  27. Cockel, I. (forthcoming 2024), ‘“They will shoot you to a pulp!”: The racialisation of migrant workers in the emotive cyberspace of PTT’, International Journal of Taiwan Studies.
     [Google Scholar]
  28. Cockel, I., Zani, B. and Parhusip, J. (2023), ‘“There will be no law, or people to protect us”: Irregular Southeast Asian seasonal workers in Taiwan before and during the pandemic’, Journal of Agrarian Change, 23:3, pp. 634–44, https://doi.org/10.1111/joac.12550.
     [Google Scholar]
  29. Collins, F. L. (2013), ‘Regional pathways: Transnational imaginaries, infrastructures and implications of student mobility within Asia’, Asian and Pacific Migration Journal, 22:4, pp. 475–500.
     [Google Scholar]
  30. Crane, A., Soundararajan, V. and Bloomfield, M. (2022), ‘Hybrid (un)freedom in worker hostels in garment supply chain’, Human Relations, https://doi.org/10.1177/00187267221081296.
     [Google Scholar]
  31. Cresswell, T. (2010), ‘Towards a politics of mobility’, Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 28:1, pp. 17–31.
     [Google Scholar]
  32. De Genova, N. (2005), Working the Boundaries: Race, Space, and ‘Illegality’ in Mexican Chicago, Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  33. De Genova, N. and Peutz, N. (2010), The Deportation Regime: Sovereignty, Space, and the Freedom of Movement, Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  34. Durand, J., Massey, D. S. and Zenteno, R. M. (2001), ‘Mexican immigration to the United States: Continuities and changes’, Latin American Research Review, 36:1, pp. 107–27.
     [Google Scholar]
  35. Faist, T. (2013), ‘The mobility turn: A new paradigm for the social sciences?’, Ethnic and Racial Studies, 36:11, pp. 1637–46.
     [Google Scholar]
  36. Fullin, G. and Reyneri, E. (2011), ‘Low unemployment and bad jobs for new immigrants in Italy’, International Migration, 49:1, pp. 118–47.
     [Google Scholar]
  37. Geist, H. J., Chang, K. T., Etges, V. and Abdallah, J. M. (2009), ‘Tobacco growers at the crossroads: Towards a comparison of diversification and ecosystem impacts’, Land Use Policy, 26:4, pp. 1066–79.
     [Google Scholar]
  38. Glick Schiller, N. and Salazar, N. B. (2013), ‘Regimes of mobility across the globe’, Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 39:2, pp. 183–200.
     [Google Scholar]
  39. Glick Schiller, N., Basch, L. and Blanc-Szanton, C. (1992), ‘Transnationalism: A new analytic framework for understanding migration’, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 645:1, pp. 1–24.
     [Google Scholar]
  40. Goldring, L. and Landolt, P. (2013), ‘The conditionality of legal status and rights: Conceptualizing precarious non-citizenship in Canada’, in L. Goldring and P. Landolt (eds), Producing and Negotiating Non-Citizenship: Precarious Legal Status in Canada, Toronto: University of Toronto Press, pp. 3–27.
     [Google Scholar]
  41. Hoang, L. A. (2016), ‘Vietnamese migrant networks in Taiwan: The curse and boon of social capital’, Ethnic and Racial Studies, 39:4, pp. 690–707.
     [Google Scholar]
  42. Hoang, L. A. (2017), ‘Governmentality in Asian migration regimes: The case of labour migration from Vietnam to Taiwan’, Population, Space and Place, 23:3, https://doi.org/10.1002/psp.2019.
     [Google Scholar]
  43. Hoang, L. A. (2020), ‘Debt and (un)freedoms: The case of transnational labour migration from Vietnam’, Geoforum, 116, pp. 33–41.
     [Google Scholar]
  44. Hollifield, J. F. (2004), ‘The emerging migration state’, International Migration Review, 38:3, pp. 885–912.
     [Google Scholar]
  45. Kloosterman, R., Van der Leun, J. and Rath, J. (1998), ‘Across the border: Immigrants’ economic opportunities, social capital and informal business activities’, Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 24:2, pp. 249–68.
     [Google Scholar]
  46. Kyle, D. (2000), Transnational Peasants: Migrations, Networks, and Ethnicity in Andean Ecuador, Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  47. Kyle, D., Dale, J. and Koslowski, R. (2011), ‘Smuggling the state back’, in Agents of Human Smuggling Reconsidered. Global Human Smuggling: Comparative Perspectives, Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press, pp. 33–59.
     [Google Scholar]
  48. Lan, P. (2007), ‘Legal servitude and free illegality: Migrant “guest workers” in Taiwan’, in R. Parrenas and L. Siu (eds), Asian Diasporas, Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  49. Lerche, J. (2007), ‘A global alliance against forced labour? Unfree labour, neo-liberal globalization and the International Labour Organization’, Journal of Agrarian Change, 7:4, pp. 425–52.
     [Google Scholar]
  50. Levitt, P. (2001), The Transnational Villagers, Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  51. Lin, W., Lindquist, J., Xiang, B. and Yeoh, B. S. (2017), ‘Migration infrastructures and the production of migrant mobilities’, Mobilities, 12:2, pp. 167–74.
     [Google Scholar]
  52. Martin, P. (2002), ‘Mexican workers and US agriculture: The revolving door’, International Migration Review, 36:4, pp. 1124–42.
     [Google Scholar]
  53. Massey, D. S. (1988), ‘Economic development and international migration in comparative perspective’, Population and Development Review, 14:3, pp. 383–414.
     [Google Scholar]
  54. Massey, D. S. (1990), ‘The social and economic origins of immigration’, The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 510:1, pp. 60–72.
     [Google Scholar]
  55. Massey, D. (1995), Physical Divisions of Labour: Social Structures and the Geography of Production, London: Bloomsbury Publishing.
     [Google Scholar]
  56. Massey, D. S. and Parrado, E. A. (1998), ‘International migration and business formation in Mexico’, Social Science Quarterly, 79:1, pp. 1–20.
     [Google Scholar]
  57. Massey, D. S., Arango, J., Hugo, G., Kouaouci, A., Pellegrino, A. and Taylor, J. E. (1993), ‘Theories of international migration: A review and appraisal’, Population and Development Review, 19:3, pp. 431–66.
     [Google Scholar]
  58. McDowell, L., Batnitzky, A. and Dyer, S. (2007), ‘Division, segmentation, and interpellation: The embodied labours of migrant workers in a Greater London hotel’, Economic Geography, 83:1, pp. 1–25.
     [Google Scholar]
  59. McFarlane, C. (2011), Learning the City: Knowledge and Translocal Assemblage, Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.
     [Google Scholar]
  60. Mezzadra, S. and Neilson, B. (2013), Border as Method, or, the Multiplication of Labor, Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  61. Ministry of Labour (MoL) (2015), Minutes of the 23rd Meeting of Transnational Labour Policy Coordination and Consultation (in Chinese), https://www.wda.gov.tw/News_Content.aspx?n=CA60F31A88AF3736&sms=80616FEAF60EE1E7&s=A983DE578541A465. Accessed 10 December 2023.
  62. Ministry of Labour (MoL) (2019), Minutes of the 28th Meeting of Transnational Labour Policy Coordination and Consultation (in Chinese), https://www.wda.gov.tw/News_Content.aspx?n=CA60F31A88AF3736&sms=80616FEAF60EE1E7&s=4522600F7233F262. Accessed 10 December 2023.
  63. Ministry of Labour (MoL) (2022), Minutes of the 34th Meeting of Transnational Labour Policy Coordination and Consultation Meeting, https://www.wda.gov.tw/News_Content.aspx?n=CA60F31A88AF3736&sms=80616FEAF60EE1E7&s=4769AD8643424E9D. Accessed 10 December 2023.
  64. National Immigration Agency (NIA) (n.d.), ‘Statistics of foreign spouses and mainland spouses (including those from Hong Kong and Macao) by status (in Chinese)’, https://www.immigration.gov.tw/5385/7344/7350/8887/. Accessed 10 December 2023.
  65. Ong, A. (1999), Flexible Citizenship: The Cultural Logics of Transnationality, Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  66. Papademetriou, D. G., Sumption, M., Terrazas, A., Burkert, C, Loyal, S. and Ferrero-Turrión, R. (2010), Migration and Immigrants Two Years after the Financial Collapse: Where Do We Stand? Migration Policy Institute Report, Washington, DC: Migration Policy Institute, http://www.migrationpolicy.org/pubs/MPI-BBCreport-2010.pdf. Accessed July 2023.
     [Google Scholar]
  67. Parhusip, J. S. (2021), ‘The making of freedom and common forms of struggle of runaways in Taiwan’, South Atlantic Quarterly, 120:3, pp. 663–69.
     [Google Scholar]
  68. Perrotta, D. C. and Sacchetto, D. (2014), ‘Migrant farmworkers in Southern Italy: Ghettoes, caporalato and collective action’, Workers of the World, 1:5, pp. 75–98.
     [Google Scholar]
  69. Piore, M. J. (1980), ‘Economic fluctuation, job security, and labor-market duality in Italy, France, and the United States’, Politics & Society, 9:4, pp. 379–407.
     [Google Scholar]
  70. Portes, A. and Zhou, M. (1993), ‘The new second generation: Segmented assimilation and its variants’, The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 530:1, pp. 74–96.
     [Google Scholar]
  71. Portes, A., Guarnizo, L. E. and Landolt, P. (1999), ‘The study of transnationalism: Pitfalls and promise of an emergent research field’, Ethnic and Racial Studies, 22:2, pp. 217–37.
     [Google Scholar]
  72. Preibisch, K. (2010), ‘Pick-your-own labor: Migrant workers and flexibility in Canadian agriculture’, International Migration Review, 44:2, pp. 404–41.
     [Google Scholar]
  73. Rogaly, B. (2009), ‘Spaces of work and everyday life: Labour geographies and the agency of unorganised temporary migrant workers’, Geography Compass, 3:6, pp. 1975–87.
     [Google Scholar]
  74. Salazar, N. B. (2017), ‘Key figures of mobility: An introduction’, Social Anthropology, 25:1, pp. 5–12.
     [Google Scholar]
  75. Sassen, S. (1998), Globalization and Its Discontents: Essays on the New Mobility of People and Money, New York: The New Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  76. Schewel, K. (2020), ‘Understanding immobility: Moving beyond the mobility bias in migration studies’, International Migration Review, 54:2, pp. 328–55.
     [Google Scholar]
  77. Shamir, R. (2005), ‘Without borders? Notes on globalization as a mobility regime’, Sociological Theory, 23:2, pp. 197–217.
     [Google Scholar]
  78. Sheller, M. and Urry, J. (2006), ‘The new mobilities paradigm’, Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 38:2, pp. 207–26.
     [Google Scholar]
  79. Smith, M. P. and Guarnizo, L. E. (eds) (1998), Transnationalism from Below, vol. 6, New Brunswick: Transaction.
     [Google Scholar]
  80. Stalker, P. (2001), The No-Nonsense Guide to International Migration, London: Verso.
     [Google Scholar]
  81. Tierney, R. (2011), ‘The class context of temporary immigration, racism and civic nationalism in Taiwan’, Journal of Contemporary Asia, 41:2, pp. 289–314.
     [Google Scholar]
  82. Triandafyllidou, A. and Ambrosini, M. (2011), ‘Irregular immigration control in Italy and Greece: Strong fencing and weak gate-keeping serving the labour market’, European Journal of Migration and Law, 13:3, pp. 251–73.
     [Google Scholar]
  83. Triandafyllidou, A. and Bartolini, L. (2020), ‘Irregular migration and irregular work: A chicken and egg dilemma’, in S. Spencer and A. Triandafyllidou (eds), Migrants with Irregular Status in Europe, Cham: Springer, pp. 139–63.
     [Google Scholar]
  84. Tseng, Y. F. and Wang, H. Z. (2013), ‘Governing migrant workers at a distance: Managing the temporary status of guestworkers in Taiwan’, International Migration, 51:4, pp. 1–19.
     [Google Scholar]
  85. Turner, B. S. (2007), ‘The enclave society: Towards a sociology of immobility’, European Journal of Social Theory, 10:2, pp. 287–304.
     [Google Scholar]
  86. Urry, J. (2007), Mobilities, Cambridge: Polity Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  87. Vertovec, S. (2009), Transnationalism, London: Routledge.
     [Google Scholar]
  88. Waldinger, R. and Lichter, M. (2003), How the Other Half Works: Immigration and the Social Organization of Labour, Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  89. Wang, H. Z. (2011), ‘Immigration trends and policy changes in Taiwan’, Asian and Pacific Migration Journal, 20:2, pp. 169–94.
     [Google Scholar]
  90. Wang, H. Z. and Bélanger, D. (2011), ‘Exploitative recruitment processes and working conditions of Vietnamese migrant workers in Taiwan’, in A. Chan (ed.), Labour in Vietnam, Singapore: ISEAS Publishing, pp. 309–34.
     [Google Scholar]
  91. Williams, C. C. and Windebank, J. (1998), Informal Employment in the Advanced Economies: Implications for Work and Welfare, London: Routledge.
     [Google Scholar]
  92. Williams, C. C. and Windebank, J. (2002), ‘The uneven geographies of informal economic activities: A case study of two British cities’, Work, Employment and Society, 16:2, pp. 231–50.
     [Google Scholar]
  93. Wilson, K. L. and Portes, A. (1980), ‘Immigrant enclaves: An analysis of the labor market experiences of Cubans in Miami’, American Journal of Sociology, 86:2, pp. 295–319.
     [Google Scholar]
  94. Xiang, B. and Lindquist, J. (2014), ‘Migration infrastructure’, International Migration Review, 48:1 (suppl.), pp. 122–48.
     [Google Scholar]
  95. Xiang, B. and Ma, Q. (2019), ‘Mobility assemblage and the return of Islam in Southeast China’, in E. Tagliacozzo, H. F. Siu and P. C Perdue (eds), Asia Inside Out: Itinerant People, Cambridge, MA and London: Harvard University Press, pp. 52–74.
     [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1386/tjtm_00060_1
Loading
  • Article Type: Article
Keyword(s): categorization; farmwork; immobility; informality; migrant labour; mobility; mobility regime; work regimes

Most Cited Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a success
Invalid data
An error occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error
Please enter a valid_number test