Skip to content
1981
Volume 22, Issue 2
  • ISSN: 1474-2748
  • E-ISSN: 2040-0551

Abstract

Building on strategic framing and sustainability communication research, this article finds that trust in firms’ sustainability commitment varies with differing evaluative mental models across stakeholders, such as investors, customers and the general public. Stakeholders’ perceived trust depends on their level of expertise and firms’ ways of framing their sustainability narratives. Using publicly available data of firms’ sustainability communications and experimental survey data of 300 participants, this study shows that firms benefit from deploying sustainability narrative framing strategies congruent with audiences’ mental models. Experts, such as sustainability or industry experts, appreciate sustainability narratives framed in concrete terms, while non-experts, i.e., laypeople, are more receptive to abstract terms. The study offers insights into and a framework based on the fieldwork on how managers may use framing tactics to improve the odds of achieving the desired perception of their sustainability narratives towards different stakeholders.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1386/tmsd_00073_1
2023-08-02
2026-04-19

Metrics

Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Amui, L. B. L., Jabbour, C. J. C., de Sousa Jabbour, A. B. L. and Kannan, D. (2017), ‘Sustainability as a dynamic organizational capability: A systematic review and a future agenda toward a sustainable transition’, Journal of Cleaner Production, 142, pp. 30822.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Anastasiou, D., Ballis, A. and Drakos, K. (2022), ‘Constructing a positive sentiment index for COVID-19: Evidence from G20 stock markets’, International Review of Financial Analysis, 81:102111, pp. 113.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Atanasova, D. (2019), ‘Moving society to a sustainable future: The framing of sustainability in a constructive media outlet’, Environmental Communication, 13:5, pp. 70011.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Beak, Y., Kim, K., Maeng, K. and Cho, Y. (2020), ‘Is the environment-friendly factor attractive to customers when purchasing electric vehicles? Evidence from South Korea’, Business Strategy and the Environment, 29:3, pp. 9961006.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Brown, J. S. and Duguid, P. (2001), ‘Knowledge and organization: A social-practice perspective’, Organization Science, 12:2, pp. 19813.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Carlile, P. R. (2002), ‘A pragmatic view of knowledge and boundaries: Boundary objects in new product development’, Organization Science, 13:4, pp. 44255.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Carpenter, G. S. (1989), ‘Perceptual position and competitive brand strategy in a two-dimensional, two-brand market’, Management Science, 35:9, pp. 102944.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Choi, S. and Mokhtarian, P. L. (2020), ‘How attractive is it to use the internet while commuting? A work-attitude-based segmentation of Northern California commuters’, Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 138, pp. 3750.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Cornelissen, J. P. and Werner, M. D. (2014), ‘Putting framing in perspective: A review of framing and frame analysis across the management and organizational literature’, The Academy of Management Annals, 8:1, pp. 181235.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Crilly, D., Hansen, M. and Zollo, M. (2016), ‘The grammar of decoupling: A cognitive-linguistic perspective on firmssustainability claims and stakeholders’ interpretation’, Academy of Management Journal, 59:2, pp. 70529.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Duan, Y., Aloysius, J. A. and Mollenkopf, D. A. (2021), ‘Communicating supply chain sustainability: Transparency and framing effects’, International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 52:1, pp. 6887.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Falchetti, D., Cattani, G. and Ferriani, S. (2022), ‘Start with “Why”, but only if you have to: The strategic framing of novel ideas across different audiences’, Strategic Management Journal, 43:1, pp. 13059.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Gleasure, R. (2015), ‘Resistance to crowdfunding among entrepreneurs: An impression management perspective’, Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 24:4, pp. 21933.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Grant, A. M. (2016), Originals: How Non-conformists Move the World, New York: Viking.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Grebelsky-Lichtman, T. and Avnimelech, G. I. L. (2018), ‘Immediacy communication and success in crowdfunding campaigns: A multimodal communication approach’, International Journal of Communication, 12, pp. 4178204.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Hoeft, F. (2021), ‘Assessing dynamic capabilities of incumbents in the face of unprecedented industry transformation: The case of the automotive industry’, Journal of Strategy and Management, 14:2, pp. 25983.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Huang, L., Joshi, P., Wakslak, C. and Wu, A. (2021), ‘Sizing up entrepreneurial potential: Gender differences in communication and investor perceptions of long-term growth and scalability’, Academy of Management Journal, 64:3, pp. 71640.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Lee, D. and Hess, D. J. (2019), ‘Incumbent resistance and the solar transition: Changing opportunity structures and framing strategies’, Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 33, pp. 18395.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Lee, E. and Weder, F. (2021), ‘Framing sustainable fashion concepts on social media: An analysis of #SlowFashionAustralia Instagram posts and post-COVID visions of the future’, Sustainability, 13:9976, pp. 117.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Likert, R. (1932), ‘A technique for the measurement of attitudes’, Archives of Psychology, 22:140, pp. 555.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Llopis-Albert, C., Rubio, F. and Valero, F. (2021), ‘Impact of digital transformation on the automotive industry’, Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 162:120343, pp. 19.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Menegatti, M. and Rubini, M. (2013), ‘Convincing similar and dissimilar others: The power of language abstraction in political communication’, Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 39:5, pp. 596607.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Mollick, E. R. and Nanda, R. (2016), ‘Wisdom or madness? Comparing crowds with expert evaluation in funding the arts’, Management Science, 62:6, pp. 153353.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Mount, M. P., Baer, M. and Lupoli, M. J. (2021), ‘Quantum leaps or baby steps? Expertise distance, construal level, and the propensity to invest in novel technological ideas’, Strategic Management Journal, 42:8, pp. 1490515.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Pan, L., Li, X., Chen, J. and Chen, T. (2020), ‘Sounds novel or familiar? Entrepreneurs’ framing strategy in the venture capital market’, Journal of Business Venturing, 35:105930, pp. 116.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Pan, L., McNamara, G., Lee, J. J., Haleblian, J. and Devers, C. E. (2018), ‘Give it to us straight (most of the time): Top managers’ use of concrete language and its effect on investor reactions’, Strategic Management Journal, 39:8, pp. 220425.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Rengarajan, S., Moser, R. and Narayanamurthy, G. (2021), ‘Strategy tools in dynamic environments: An expert-panel study’, Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 165:120560, pp. 114.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Schaufeli, W. B., Salanova, M., González-Romá, V. and Bakker, A. B. (2002), ‘The measurement of engagement and burnout: A two sample confirmatory factor analytic approach’, Journal of Happiness Studies, 3:1, pp. 7192.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Sinek, S. (2011), Start with Why: How Great Leaders Inspire Everyone to Take Action, 2nd ed., New York: Portfolio.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Vaara, E. and Langley, A. (2021), ‘Communicative perspectives on strategic organization’, Strategic Organization, 19:4, pp. 54152.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. van Riel, A. C. R., Andreassen, T. W., Lervik-Olsen, L., Zhang, L., Mithas, S. and Heinonen, K. (2021), ‘A customer-centric five actor model for sustainability and service innovation’, Journal of Business Research, 136, pp. 389401.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Weder, F., Koinig, I. and Voci, D. (2019), ‘Antagonistic framing of sustainability by energy suppliers: Dissecting corporate CSR messages in a cross-cultural comparison’, Corporate Communications: An International Journal, 24:2, pp. 36890.
    [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1386/tmsd_00073_1
Loading
/content/journals/10.1386/tmsd_00073_1
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a success
Invalid data
An error occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error
Please enter a valid_number test