Skip to content
1981
Volume 23, Issue 2
  • ISSN: 1474-2748
  • E-ISSN: 2040-0551

Abstract

In its comprehensive sense, a technology goes beyond the hardware or system to include associated skills and knowledge. Whilst this definition has been acknowledged across the literature, there is a gap in practices reflected during technology transfer processes. This article aims to investigate measures that can be taken by technology providers and recipients to effectively incorporate knowledge and skills sharing during a technology transfer. Conceptual frameworks were developed and used to inform empirical research. The case study of the PEEPOWER technology is carried out to consolidate theory with practice. The PEEPOWER technology is illustrated on a ‘’ showing all elements of the technology beyond the hardware. An insight into the level of effectiveness of the PEEPOWER transfer to Kisoro, Nairobi and Durban is obtained through a qualitative analysis of interview responses, by looking at the extent of knowledge sharing and the absorptive capacity of the technology recipient. The main recommendations are to (1) adopt a knowledge exchange approach as opposed to a unidirectional knowledge transfer from the technology provider to the technology recipient, (2) establish good relationships with local partners and develop a good understanding of the local context and (3) manage expectations about innovations and ensure intellectual property protection during knowledge exchange.

© 2024 Intellect Ltd
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1386/tmsd_00090_1
2024-08-27
2026-04-22

Metrics

Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. African Development Bank Group (2012), ‘Technology transfer for green growth in Africa’, in A. Salami, F. Sperling, A. Simpasa, J. Oduor, R. Kirchner, V. Ancharaz, G. Mohieddine and W. Akpalu (eds), African Development Report 2012: Towards Green Growth in Africa, Tunis: Temporary Relocation Agency, pp. 112–27.
     [Google Scholar]
  2. Aghion, P. and Jaravel, X. (2015), ‘Knowledge spillovers, innovation and growth’, The Economic Journal, 125:583, pp. 533–73, https://doi.org/10.1111/ecoj.12199.
     [Google Scholar]
  3. Ajibo, C. C., Anozie, C. M., Onyeabor, E., Umahi, O. T., Odinkonigbo, J. J. and Agu, H. (2019), ‘Technology transfer for development in Nigeria: Patterns, problems and prospects’, Commonwealth Law Bulletin, 45:1, pp. 70–91, https://doi.org/10.1080/03050718.2019.1689150.
     [Google Scholar]
  4. Barros, M. V., Ferreira, M. B., do Prado, G. F., Piekarski, C. M. and Picinin, C. T. (2020), ‘The interaction between knowledge management and technology transfer: A current literature review between 2013 and 2018’, The Journal of Technology Transfer, 45:5, pp. 1585–606.
     [Google Scholar]
  5. Bell, M. (1984), ‘Learning and the accumulation of technological capacity in developing countries’, in M. Fransman and K. King (eds), Technological Capability in Third World, London: Macmillan, pp. 187–209.
     [Google Scholar]
  6. Borge, L. and Bröring, S. (2020), ‘What affects technology transfer in emerging knowledge areas? A multi-stakeholder concept mapping study in the bioeconomy’, The Journal of Technology Transfer, 45:2, pp. 430–60, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-018-9702-4.
     [Google Scholar]
  7. Boynton, A., Zmud, R. and Jacobs, G. (1994), ‘The influence of IT management practice on IT use in large organizations’, MIS Quarterly, 18:3, pp. 299–318, https://doi.org/10.2307/249620.
     [Google Scholar]
  8. Bozeman, B. (2000), ‘Technology transfer and public policy: A review of research and theory’, Research Policy, 29:4–5, pp. 627–55, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(99)00093-1.
     [Google Scholar]
  9. Bozeman, B., Rimes, H. and Youtie, J. (2016), ‘The evolving state-of-the-art in technology transfer research: Revisiting the contingent effectiveness model’, Research Policy, 44:1, pp. 34–49.
     [Google Scholar]
  10. Burgelman, R. A., Christensen, C. M. and Wheelright, S. C. (2008), Strategic Management of Technology and Innovation, New York: McGraw Hill.
     [Google Scholar]
  11. Chinho, L., Bertram, T. and Shofang, C. (2002), ‘The critical factors for technology absorptive capacity’, Industrial Management & Data Systems, 102:6, pp. 300–08, https://doi.org/10.1108/02635570210431993.
     [Google Scholar]
  12. Cleveland, C. and Morris, C. (2014), Technology Transfer, Dictionary of Energy, 2nd ed., Oxford: Elsevier Science & Technology, https://search-credoreference-com.ezproxy.uwe.ac.uk/content/entry/este/technology_transfer/0. Accessed 1 May 2018.
     [Google Scholar]
  13. Cohen, W. and Levinthal, D. (1990), ‘Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation’, Administrative Science Quarterly, 35:1, pp. 128–52, https://doi.org/10.2307/2393553.
     [Google Scholar]
  14. Contractor, F. J. and Sagafi-Nejad, T. (1981), ‘International technology transfer: Major issues and policy responses’, Journal of International Business Studies, 12:2, pp. 113–35.
     [Google Scholar]
  15. Dean, C. C. and LeMaster, J. (1995), ‘Barriers to international technology transfer’, Business Forum, 20:1, pp. 19–23, http://search.epnet.com.ezproxy.uwe.ac.uk. Accessed 1 May 2018.
     [Google Scholar]
  16. Gibson, D. V. and Smilor, W. (1991), ‘Key variables in technology transfer: A field-study based on empirical analysis’, Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 8:3–4, pp. 287–312, https://doi.org/10.1016/0923-4748(91)90015-J.
     [Google Scholar]
  17. Günsel, A., Dodourova, M., Ergün, A. T. and Gerni, C. (2019), ‘Research on effectiveness of technology transfer in technology alliances: Evidence from Turkish SMEs’, Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 31:3, pp. 279–91, https://doi.org/10.1080/09537325.2018.1495836.
     [Google Scholar]
  18. Hafeez, A., Shamsuddin, A., Saeed, B., Mehmood, A. and Andleeb, N. (2020), ‘Exploring the impact of absorptive capacity on technology transfer effectiveness: A conceptual framework’, International Journal of Scientific & Technology Research, 9:3, pp. 4779–92.
     [Google Scholar]
  19. Hall, G. R. and Johnson, R. E. (1970), The Technology Factors in International Trade, New York: Columbia University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  20. Inkpen, A. C. and Dinur, A. (1998), ‘Knowledge management processes and international joint ventures’, Organization Science, 9:4, pp. 454–68.
     [Google Scholar]
  21. Karatsu, H. (1990), ‘Right technology: Transferring technology that is needed’, Intersect, October, pp. 10–13.
     [Google Scholar]
  22. Keller, W. (1996), ‘Absorptive capacity: On the creation and acquisition of technology in development’, Journal of Development Economics, 49:1, pp. 199–227, http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0304387895000607. Accessed 14 January 2018.
     [Google Scholar]
  23. Kim, L. (1998), ‘Crisis construction and organizational learning: Capability building in catching-up at Hyundai motor’, Organization Science, 9, pp. 506–21, https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.9.4.506.
     [Google Scholar]
  24. Klimczuk, A. and Klimczuk-Kochańska, M. (2015), ‘Technology transfer’, in M. Odekon (ed.), The SAGE Encyclopedia of World Poverty, vol. 4, Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications Ltd, pp. 1529–30, https://doi.org/10.4135/9781483345727.n792.
     [Google Scholar]
  25. Li-Hua, R. (2007), ‘What is technology?’, Journal of Technology Management in China, 2:3, pp. 1–15, https://doi.org/10.1108/jtmc.2007.30202caa.001.
     [Google Scholar]
  26. Li-Hua, R. (2009), ‘Definitions of technology’, in J. K. B. Olsen, S. A. Pedersen and V. E. Hendricks (eds), A Comparison to the Philosophy of Technology, Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell, pp. 18–22, https://doi.org/10.1002/9781444310795.ch2.
     [Google Scholar]
  27. Liu, X. and White, R. S. (1997), ‘The relative contributions of foreign technology and domestic inputs to innovation in Chinese manufacturing industries’, Technovation, 17:3, pp. 119–25, http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0166497296000909. Accessed 14 January 2019.
     [Google Scholar]
  28. López Mendoza, X. P. and Mauricio Sanchez, D. S. (2018), ‘A systematic literature review on technology transfer from university to industry’, International Journal of Business and Systems Research, 12:2, https://doi.org/10.1504/ijbsr.2018.10010090.
     [Google Scholar]
  29. Madeuf, B. (1984), ‘International technology transfers and international technology payments: Definitions, measurements and firms’ behaviour’, Research Policy, 13:3, pp. 125–40.
     [Google Scholar]
  30. Mansfield, E. (1975), ‘International technology transfer: Forms, resource requirement and policies’, American Economic Review, 65:2, pp. 372–76.
     [Google Scholar]
  31. Mansfield, E. (1982), Technology Transfer, Productivity, and Economic Policy, New York: W. W. Norton & Co.
     [Google Scholar]
  32. Maskus, K. E. (2004), Encouraging International Technology Transfer, Issue Paper No. 7, May, International Construction Management Series (ILO), 1020-0142, No. 5, Geneva: International Labour Office, https://unctad.org/system/files/official-document/ictsd2004ipd7_en.pdf. Accessed 3 April 2018.
     [Google Scholar]
  33. Miles, D. (1995), Constructive Change: Managing International Technology Transfer, Geneva: International Labour Office.
     [Google Scholar]
  34. Morris, E. M. (2014), ‘What is technology’, Boston University Journal of Science & Technology Law, 20:24, pp. 1–53, https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2374514. Accessed 18 July 2024.
     [Google Scholar]
  35. Mowery, D. C. and Oxley, J. E. (1995), ‘Inward technology transfer and competitiveness: The role of national innovation system’, Cambridge Journal of Economics, 19:1, pp. 67–93, http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.875.6364&rep=rep1&type=pdf. Accessed 14 January 2018.
     [Google Scholar]
  36. Natarajan, S. and Tan, J. M. (1992), The Impact of MNC Investments in Malaysia, Singapore and Thailand, Singapore: Institute of Southeast Asian Studies.
     [Google Scholar]
  37. Nonaka, I. and Takeuchi, H. (1995), The Knowledge-Creating Company: How Japanese Companies Create the Dynamics of Innovation, New York: Oxford Academic, https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780195092691.001.0001.
     [Google Scholar]
  38. OECD (2012), ‘Innovation for development: A discussion of the issues and an overview of work of the OECD directorate for science, technology and industry’, OECD Reviews of Innovation Policy, https://www.oecd.org/content/dam/oecd/en/publications/reports/2014/11/science-technology-and-innovation-in-viet-nam_g1g42693/9789264213500-en.pdf. Accessed 16 March 2020.
     [Google Scholar]
  39. O’Gorman, K. D. and MacIntosh, R. (2015), ‘Chapter 4: Mapping research methods’, in K. D. O’Gorman and R. MacIntosh (eds), Research Methods for Business and Management, Oxford: Goodfellow Publishers, pp. 50–74, http://dx.doi.org/10.23912/978-1-910158-51-7-2772.
     [Google Scholar]
  40. Orlandi, I., Tyabji, N. and Chase, J. (2016), ‘Off-grid solar market trends’, Lighting Global, https://www.energynet.co.uk/webfm_send/1690. Accessed 1 April 2019.
  41. Ramanathan, K. (2008), ‘An overview of technology transfer and technology transfer models’, International Conference on South–South Cooperation for Technology Transfer and Development of SMEs, 18–22 August, Negombo, Sri Lanka, https://openlibrary.org/authors/OL7006311A/International_Conference_on_South-South_Cooperation_for_Technology_Transfer_and_Development_of_Small. Accessed 16 March 2020.
     [Google Scholar]
  42. Reddy, N. M. and Zhao, L. (1990), ‘International technology transfer: A review’, Research Policy, 19:4, pp. 285–307, https://doi.org/10.1016/0048-7333(90)90015-X.
     [Google Scholar]
  43. Rothwell, R. (1992), ‘Successful industrial innovation: Critical factors for the 1990s’, R&D Management, 22:3, pp. 221–39.
     [Google Scholar]
  44. Saad, M. (2000), ‘Technology transfer and development’, in Development through Technology Transfer: Creating New Organisational and Cultural Understanding, Bristol: Intellect, pp. 25–29.
     [Google Scholar]
  45. Saad, M., Kumar, V. and Bradford, J. (2017), ‘An investigation into the development of the absorptive capacity of manufacturing SMEs’, International Journal of Production Research, 55:23, pp. 6916–31, https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2017.1327728.
     [Google Scholar]
  46. Saadi, M. (2011), ‘Technology transfer, foreign direct investment, licensing and the developing countries’ terms of trade’, Margin: The Journal of Applied Economic Research, 5:4, pp. 381–420, https://doi.org/10.1177/097380101100500401.
     [Google Scholar]
  47. Sahal, D. (1981), ‘Alternative conceptions of technology’, Research Policy, 10:1, pp. 2–24.
     [Google Scholar]
  48. Sahal, D. (1982), ‘The form of technology’, in D. Sahal (ed.), The Ž. Transfer and Utilization of Technical Knowledge, Lexington, MA: Lexington Publishing, pp. 125–39.
     [Google Scholar]
  49. Shaltuper, A. (2018), ‘Two-thirds of Africa’s population still don’t have access to electricity: And it’s threatening the security of the continent’, 21 July, https://www.independent.co.uk/voices/africa-energy-poverty-afdb-kenya-nigeria-lpg-gdp-electricity-europe-global-south-a8449626.html. Accessed 19 August 2018.
  50. SolarAid (2017), ‘SM100 “the world’s most affordable solar light”’, 23 February, https://solar-aid.org/news/sm100-the-worlds-most-affordable-solar-light/. Accessed 17 August 2018.
  51. Solomon, A., Vallejo, B. and Gehl Sampath, P. (2012), ‘Technology and Innovation Report 2012: Innovation, Technology and South–South Collaboration 15’, UNCTAD, Geneva: United Nations Publications.
  52. State Department’s Office of Investment Affairs (SDOIA) (2016), ‘Nigeria’s openness and restriction to foreign investments’, https://www.export.gov/article?id=Nigeria-Openness-to-foreign-investment. Accessed 5 September 2018.
  53. Sung, T. K. and Gibson, D. V. (2005), ‘Knowledge and technology transfer grid: Empirical assessment’, International Journal of Technology Management, 29:3–4, pp. 216–30.
     [Google Scholar]
  54. Szulanski, G. (1996), ‘Exploring internal stickiness: Impediments to the transfer of best practice within the firm’, Strategic Management Journal, 17, pp. 27–43.
     [Google Scholar]
  55. Teece, D. (1976), The Multinational and the Resource Cost of International Technology Transfer, Cambridge, MA: Ballinger.
     [Google Scholar]
  56. Tihanyi, L. and Roath, A. S. (2002), ‘Technology transfer and institutional development in Central and Eastern Europe’, Journal of World Business, 37:3, pp. 188–98, https://doi.org/10.1016/S1090-9516(02)00077-9.
     [Google Scholar]
  57. Tsai, Y., Chen, C. and Tseng, C. (2012), ‘3Rs absorptive capacity: Responsive, realized, and reconfigured’, Management Knowledge and Learning: International Conference, https://www.issbs.si/press/ISBN/978-961-6813-10-5/papers/ML12_137.pdf. Accessed 18 January 2019.
     [Google Scholar]
  58. United Nations Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD) (1985), Draft International Code of Conduct on the Transfer of Technology, as at the Close of the Sixth Session of Conference on 5 June 1985, United Nations document, No. TD/CODE TOT/47, 20 June, Geneva: United Nations.
     [Google Scholar]
  59. University of Kwazulu-Natale (2020), ‘PeePower benefits from UKZN research’, 25 May, https://caes.ukzn.ac.za/news/pee-power-project-benefits-from-ukzn-research/. Accessed 9 May 2022.
  60. University of the West of England (2018), ‘Technology that turns urine into electricity commercialised through spin out company’, 5 November, https://www.uwe.ac.uk/news/technology-turns-urine-into-electricity. Accessed 18 June 2024.
  61. van den Bosch, F. A. J., Volberda, H. W. and Boer, D. E. (1999), ‘Coevolution of firm absorptive capacity and knowledge environment: Organizational forms and combinative capabilities’, Organization Science, 10:5, pp. 551–68, https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.10.5.551.
     [Google Scholar]
  62. Wahab, S. A., Rose, R. C. and Osman, S. I. W. (2012), ‘Defining the concepts of technology and technology transfer: A literature analysis’, International Business Research, 5:1, pp. 61–71, https://doi.org/10.5539/ibr.v5n1p6.
     [Google Scholar]
  63. Walter, X. A., Merino-Jiménez, I., Greenman, J. and Ieropoulos, I. (2018), ‘PEE POWER® urinal II: Urinal scale-up with microbial fuel cell scale-down for improved lighting’, Journal of Power Sources, 392, pp. 150–58, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpowsour.2018.02.047.
     [Google Scholar]
  64. Weyrauch, T. and Herstatt, C. (2017), ‘What is frugal innovation? Three defining criteria’, Journal of Frugal Innovation, 2:1, https://doi.org/10.1186/s40669-016-0005-y.
     [Google Scholar]
  65. You, J., Staddon, C., Cook, A., Walker, J., Boulton, J., Powell, W. and Ieropoulos, I. (2020), ‘Multidimensional benefits of improved sanitation: Evaluating “PEE POWER®” in Kisoro, Uganda’, International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17:7, https://doi.org/10.3390%2Fijerph17072175.
     [Google Scholar]
  66. Zahra, S. A. and George, G. (2002), ‘Absorptive capacity: A review, reconceptualization, and extension’, The Academy of Management Review, 27:2, pp. 185–203, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/215485503. Accessed 9 January 2019.
     [Google Scholar]
  67. Zobel, A.-K. (2017), ‘Benefiting from open innovation: A multidimensional model of absorptive capacity’, Journal of Product Innovation Management, 34:3, pp. 269–88.
     [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1386/tmsd_00090_1
Loading
Framework for mapping absorptive capacity as an enabler of effective technology transfer: A case study of the innovative PEEPOWER technology
International Journal of Technology Management & Sustainable Development 23, 195 (2024); https://doi.org/10.1386/tmsd_00090_1
/content/journals/10.1386/tmsd_00090_1
/content/journals/10.1386/tmsd_00090_1
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Article
Keyword(s): action research; capacity building; conceptual framework; diffusion of innovation; innovation; international technology transfer; knowledge transfer; Techberg

Most Cited Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a success
Invalid data
An error occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error
Please enter a valid_number test