Skip to content
1981
Volume 23, Issue 3
  • ISSN: 1474-2748
  • E-ISSN: 2040-0551

Abstract

The study explores the impact of the platform business model (PBM) on organizational performance, focusing on Industry 5.0 (I5.0). It introduces a conceptual model to assess how PBMs shape organizational outcomes. PBMs are recognized for their role in managing multi-sided markets and leveraging forces such as strategic agility (SA), business model innovation (BMI), strategic operations practice (SOP) and I5.0 technologies to create value. Despite their significance, the systematic integration of PBMs in the organizational value-creation process remains underexplored. To address this, the authors propose a pragmatic conceptual model, which is then converted into a structural equation model to evaluate the effects of PBMs on performance. Structural Equation Model (SEM), combined with confirmatory factor analysis, highlights PBMs’ intangible influence, driven by digital resources and evolving customer value propositions. PBMs face rapid changes influenced by SA, BMI, SOP and I5.0, leading to short-term competitive advantages. The study underscores the importance of SA, BMI and SOP in organizational strategy but notes their limited long-term benefits. It also presents research propositions with implications for leaders and policy-makers, enhancing the understanding of PBMs in the I5.0 context.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1386/tmsd_00094_1
2024-12-31
2025-03-17
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Al-Abdin, A. and Awni, A. (2018), ‘Strategic agility and organizational performance: An empirical study of Jordanian industrial firms’, Journal of Business Research, 89:1, pp. 23244.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Albayraktaroglu, A. (2023), ‘Strategic agility, exaptation, and business model innovation: The case of an SME’, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 71:1, pp. 7195206.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Breque, M., Nul, L. De and Petridis, A. (2021), Industry 5.0: Towards a Sustainable, Human-Centric and Resilient European Industry, Luxembourg: European Commission, Directorate-General for Research and Innovation.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Breuer, H., Schumacher, J. and Lehmann-Ort, L. (2021), ‘The role of market orientation in business model innovation: Insights from a systematic literature review’, Journal of Business Research, 130:1, pp. 61833.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Chang, C. L., McAleer, M. and Wong, W. K. (2020), ‘Risk and financial management of COVID-19 in business, economics and finance’, Journal of Risk and Financial Management, 13:5, https://doi.org/10.3390/jrfm13050102.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Clauss, T., Abebe, M., Tangpong, C. and Hock, M. (2019), ‘Strategic agility, business model innovation, and firm performance: An empirical investigation’, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 68:3, pp. 76784.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Debellis, F., De Massis, A., Messeni Petruzzelli, A., Frattini, F. and Del Giudice, M. (2021), ‘Strategic agility and international joint ventures: The willingness-ability paradox of family firms’, Journal of International Management, 27:1, 100739, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intman.2020.100739.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Dewi, P., Elihami, E., Usman, M. I., Asbar, A. and Saidang, S. (2021), ‘Technology-enhanced learning research in higher education: A recommendation system for creating courses using the management systems in the e-learning 5.0’, Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1933:1, https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1933/1/012125.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Gürdür Broo, D., Kaynak, O. and Sait, S. M. (2022), ‘Rethinking engineering education at the age of Industry 5.0’, Journal of Industrial Information Integration, 25:1, 100311, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jii.2021.100311.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Hagiu, A. and Altman, E. J. (2017), ‘Finding the platform in your product’, Harvard Business Review, 95:4, pp. 94100.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Hommel, K. and Bican, P. M. (2020), ‘Digital entrepreneurship in finance: Fintech and funding decision criteria’, Sustainability, 12:19, https://doi.org/10.3390/su12198035.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Jia, Y., Su, J., Cui, L., Wu, L. and Hua Tan, K. (2023), ‘Platform business model innovation in the digitalization era: A “driver-process-result” perspective’, Journal of Business Research, 160:1, 113818, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2023.113818.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Johnson, M. W., Christensen, C. M. and Kagermann, H. (2018), ‘Reinventing your business model’, Harvard Business Review, 96:1, pp. 5059.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Jun, J. K. and Lee, J. Y. (2019), ‘The effects of strategic agility on firm performance: The mediating role of innovation and market orientation’, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 11:2, p. 433.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Junni, P., Sarala, R. M., Tarba, S. Y. and Weber, Y. (2015), ‘The role of strategic agility in acquisitions’, British Journal of Management, 26:4, pp. 596616.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Kohtamäki, M., Heimonen, J., Sjödin, D. and Heikkilä, V. (2020), ‘Strategic agility in innovation: Unpacking the interaction between entrepreneurial orientation and absorptive capacity by using practice theory’, Journal of Business Research, 118:1, pp. 1225.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Longo, F., Padovano, A. and Umbrello, S. (2020), ‘Value-oriented and ethical technology engineering in Industry 5.0: A human-centric perspective for the design of the factory of the future’, Applied Sciences, 10:12, 4182, https://doi.org/10.3390/app10124182.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Marir, F., Tlemsani, I. and Majdalwieh, M. (2019), ‘A recursive co-occurrence text mining of the Quran to build corpora for Islamic banking business processes’, in W. Karwowski and T. Ahram (eds), Intelligent Human Systems Integration 2019 (IHSI 2019), Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol. 903, Cham: Springer, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-11051-2_47.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Marr, B. (2018), ‘The AI skills crisis and how to close the gap’, Forbes, 25 June, https://www.forbes.com/sites/bernardmarr/2018/06/25/the-ai-skills-crisis-and-how-to-close-the-gap. Accessed 8 November 2024.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Mohamed Hashim, M. A., Tlemsani, I. and Matthews, R. (2021), ‘Higher education strategy in digital transformation’, Education and Information Technologies, 27:3, pp. 317195, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10739-1.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Mohamed Hashim, M. A. (2021), ‘The impact of POS on employees’ work outcomes in Sri Lanka and the United Arab Emirates’, doctoral thesis, Cardiff: Cardiff Metropolitan University, https://figshare.cardiffmet.ac.uk/articles/thesis/The_Impact_of_POS_on_Employees_Work_Outcomes_in_Sri_Lanka_and_the_United_Arab_Emirates/14999178?file=28870290. Accessed 28 November 2024.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Mohamed Hashim, M. A., Tlemsani, I. and Duncan Matthews, R. (2022a), ‘A sustainable university: Digital transformation and beyond’, Education and Information Technologies, 27:7, pp. 896196, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-10968-y.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Mohamed Hashim, M. A., Tlemsani, I., Matthews, R., Mason-Jones, R. and Ndrecaj, V. (2022b), ‘Emergent strategy in higher education: Postmodern digital and the future?’, Administrative Sciences, 12:4, 196, https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci12040196.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Mohamed Hashim, M. A., Mason-Jones, R., Ndrecaj, V., Tlemsani, I. and Matthews, R. (2024a), ‘Higher education via the lens of Industry 5.0: Strategy and perspective’, Social Sciences & Humanities Open, 9:1, 100828, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2024.100828.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Mohamed Hashim, M. A., Tlemsani, I. and Matthews, R. (2024b), ‘The strategy of organizational support perception and work performance of knowledge workers: IT outsourcing in the United Arab Emirates and Sri Lanka’, in B. Alareeni and A. Hamdan (eds), Navigating the Technological Tide: The Evolution and Challenges of Business Model Innovation, ICBT 2024: Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems, vol. 1083, Cham: Springer, pp. 3544, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-67431-0_4.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Mohamed Hashim, M. A., Tlemsani, I., Matthews, R. and El-Temtamy, O. (2024c), ‘Organizational support strategy and software process maturity: CMMI and IT-offshoring in the UAE’, Theoretical Economics Letters, 14:4, pp. 164068, https://doi.org/10.4236/tel.2024.144083.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Pfaff, Y. M. (2023), ‘Agility and digitalization: Why strategic agility is a success factor for mastering digitalization evidence from Industry 4.0 implementations across a supply chain’, International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 53:5–6, pp. 66084.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Ralph, W. A. (2022), Strategic Performance Management, Dunedine: Routledge and Accounting for Organizational Control.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Reed, J. (2021), ‘Strategic agility in the SME: Use it before you lose it’, Journal of Small Business Strategy, 31:3, pp. 3346, https://doi.org/10.53703/001c.29734.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Rohn, D., Bican, P. M., Brem, A., Kraus, S. and Clauss, T. (2021), ‘Digital platform-based business models: An exploration of critical success factors’, Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 60:1, 101625, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jengtecman.2021.101625.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Shams, R., Vrontis, D., Belyaeva, Z., Ferraris, A. and Czinkota, M. R. (2020), ‘Strategic agility in international business: A conceptual framework for “agile” multinationals’, Journal of International Management, 27:1, 100737, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intman.2020.100737.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Shin, H., Lee, J.-N., Kim, D. and Rhim, H. (2015), ‘Strategic agility of Korean small and medium enterprises and its influence on operational and firm performance’, International Journal of Production Economics, 168:1, pp. 18196, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2015.06.015.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Slack, N. and Brandon-Jones, A. (2019), Operations Management, Harlow: Pearson Education Ltd.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Täuscher, K. and Laudien, S. M. (2018), ‘Understanding platform business models: A mixed methods study of marketplaces’, European Management Journal, 36:3, pp. 31929.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Teece, D. J. (2010), ‘Business models, business strategy and innovation’, Long Range Planning, 43:2–3, pp. 17294, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2009.07.003.
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Tlemsani, I. (2010), ‘Co-evolution and reconcilability of Islam and the West: The context of global banking’, Journal of Education, Business and Society: Contemporary Middle Eastern Issues, 3:4, pp. 26276, http://www.emeraldinsight.com/10.1108/17537981011089569. Accessed 8 November 2024.
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Tlemsani, I. (2020), ‘Stock returns indicator: Case of Tadawul’, International Journal of Monetary Economics and Finance, 13:1, pp. 115, https://doi.org/10.1504/IJMEF.2020.105328.
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Tlemsani, I. (2022), ‘Conventional vs Islamic debt-equity portfolio swaps’, International Journal of Managerial and Financial Accounting, 14:1, pp. 134, https://doi.org/10.1504/IJMFA.2022.120938.
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Tlemsani, I. and Matthews, R. (2021), ‘Games theory and strategic alliances: Applications to British Russian partnership’, Higher Education, Skills and Work-Based Learning, 12:4, pp. 689704, https://doi.org/10.1108/HESWBL-02-2021-0036.
    [Google Scholar]
  40. Tlemsani, I., Matthews, R., Hashim, M. A. M., Khan, M. H. and El-Temtamy, O. (2024), ‘Images of organizational evolution’, Theoretical Economics Letters, 14:3, pp. 124166, https://doi.org/10.4236/tel.2024.143063.
    [Google Scholar]
  41. Tlemsani, I., Mohamed Hashim, M. A. and Matthews, R. (2023a), ‘Portfolio replication: Islamic vs conventional’, Journal of Islamic Accounting and Business Research, 14:1, pp. 120, https://doi.org/10.1108/JIABR-09-2021-0261.
    [Google Scholar]
  42. Tlemsani, I., Mohamed Hashim, M. A. and Matthews, R. (2023b), ‘The impact of IFRS adoption on Saudi Arabia’, Journal of Islamic Accounting and Business Research, 15:3, pp. 51933, https://doi.org/10.1108/JIABR-11-2022-0304.
    [Google Scholar]
  43. Togo, M. and Gandidzanwa, C. P. (2021), ‘The role of Education 5.0 in accelerating the implementation of SDGs and challenges encountered at the University of Zimbabwe’, International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 22:7, pp. 152035.
    [Google Scholar]
  44. United Nations (2021), The Sustainable Development Goals Report 2021, New York: United Nations Publications, https://unstats.un.org/sdgs/report/2021/The-Sustainable-Development-Goals-Report-2021.pdf. Accessed 8 November 2024.
    [Google Scholar]
  45. Wirtz, J., So, K. K. F., Mody, M. A., Liu, S. Q. and Chun, H. H. (2019), ‘Platforms in the peer-to-peer sharing economy’, Journal of Service Management, 30:4, pp. 45283.
    [Google Scholar]
  46. Yakup, A. (2019), ‘Structural equation modeling approaches to e-service adoption’, Semantic Scholar, https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-5225-8015-7.
    [Google Scholar]
  47. Zizic, M. C., Mladineo, M., Gjeldum, N. and Celent, L. (2022), ‘From Industry 4.0 towards Industry 5.0: A review and analysis of paradigm shift for the people, organization and technology’, Energies, 15:14, 5221, https://doi.org/10.3390/en15145221.
    [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1386/tmsd_00094_1
Loading
/content/journals/10.1386/tmsd_00094_1
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a success
Invalid data
An error occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error
Please enter a valid_number test