Skip to content
1981
Volume 24, Issue 2
  • ISSN: 1474-2748
  • E-ISSN: 2040-0551

Abstract

The study examines how the antecedents in the antecedents-decisions-outcomes (ADO) model support sustainable business model innovation (SBMI) in furniture-manufacturing firms. The research team conducted in-depth interviews with six furniture manufacturers and generated themes from the responses using thematic analysis. To achieve data saturation, the present study conducted two member-check meetings. The findings indicated three main themes from the thematic analysis, which include: design thinking as the strategic driver, waste recycling adoption as the microenvironmental driver and engagement with stakeholders as human perspective. The most important antecedent is the involvement of stakeholders, who were able to holistically impact ecological, social, financial and organizational performance. This study adds compelling empirical support and enhancement to the ADO model towards a robust model in understanding how SBMI can be effectively implemented in furniture-manufacturing firms. Thus, furniture manufacturers need to leverage these three drivers as antecedents in the ADO model.

Funding
This study was supported by the:
  • Universiti Malaysia Pahang Al-Sultan Abdullah (Award RDU230307)
© 2025 Intellect Ltd
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1386/tmsd_00103_1
2025-06-20
2026-04-15

Metrics

Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Ali, A., Liem, A., Isa, S. S. and Jamaludin, N. L. (2024), ‘Challenges in Malaysian design industry: Managing design and decision-making processes’, FormAkademisk, 17:1, pp. 2–32.
     [Google Scholar]
  2. Arcese, G., Valeri, M., Poponi, S. and Elmo, G. C. (2020), ‘Innovative drivers for family business models in tourism’, Journal of Family Business Management, 11:4, pp. 402–22, https://doi.org/10.1108/jfbm-05-2020-0043.
     [Google Scholar]
  3. Baldassarre, B., Bocken, N., Calabretta, G., Diehl, J. and Keskin, D. (2019), ‘Track 4.f introduction: Strategic design of sustainable business models’, in Conference Proceedings of the Academy for Design Innovation Management, vol. 2, no. 1, London, UK, London: Academy for Design Innovation Management, pp. 803–06, https://doi.org/10.33114/adim.2019.4f.
     [Google Scholar]
  4. Barth, H., Ulvenblad, P.-O. and Ulvenblad, P. (2017), ‘Towards a conceptual framework of sustainable business model innovation in the agri-food sector: A systematic literature review’, Sustainability, 9:9, pp. 1–15, https://doi.org/10.3390/su9091620.
     [Google Scholar]
  5. Batat, W. and Addis, M. (2021), ‘Guest editorial’, European Journal of Marketing, 55:9, pp. 2389–91, https://doi.org/10.1108/ejm-09-2021-978.
     [Google Scholar]
  6. Beckman, S. and Barry, M. (2009), ‘Design and innovation through storytelling’, International Journal of Innovation Science, 1:4, pp. 151–60, https://doi.org/10.1260/1757-2223.1.4.151.
     [Google Scholar]
  7. Bierwisch, A., Huter, L., Pattermann, J. and Som, O. (2021), ‘Taking eco-innovation to the road: A design-based workshop concept for the development of eco-innovative business models’, Sustainability, 13:16, pp. 1–26, https://doi.org/10.3390/su13168811.
     [Google Scholar]
  8. Birkin, F., Cashman, A., Koh, S. L. and Liu, Z. (2007), ‘New sustainable business models in China’, Business Strategy and the Environment, 18:1, pp. 64–77, https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.568.
     [Google Scholar]
  9. Bocken, N. M. and Geradts, T. H. (2020), ‘Barriers and drivers to sustainable business model innovation: Organization design and dynamic capabilities’, Long Range Plan, 53:4, pp. 1–23, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2019.101950.
     [Google Scholar]
  10. Boke Furniture | Premier Office & Commercial Furniture (2024), ‘Top 20 furniture suppliers in Malaysia: 2024 comprehensive guide’, Boke Furniture | Premier Office & Commercial Furniture, 13 April https://bokefurniture.com/top-20-furniture-suppliers-in-malaysia/. Accessed 7 October 2024.
  11. Boons, F. and Lüdeke-Freund, F. (2013), ‘Business models for sustainable innovation: State-of-the-art and steps towards a research agenda’, Journal of Cleaner Production, 45, pp. 9–19, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.07.007.
     [Google Scholar]
  12. Calabretta, G. and Gemser, G. (2015), ‘Integrating design into the fuzzy front end of the innovation process’, in M. G. Luchs, K. S. Swan and A. Griffin (eds), Design Thinking, Minneapolis, MN: Product Development and Management Association, pp. 105–24, https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119154273.ch8.
     [Google Scholar]
  13. Candi, M. (2010), ‘Where does design contribute? The contribution of design to the phases of new product development (Paper presentation)’, in 17th International Product Development Management Conference, Universidad de Murcia, 13–15 June, Murcia: European Institute for Advanced Studies in Management EIASM.
     [Google Scholar]
  14. Casadesus-Masanell, R. and Ricart, J. E. (2010), ‘From strategy to business models and tactics’, Long Range Planning, 43:2–3, pp. 195–215, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2010.01.004.
     [Google Scholar]
  15. Cavico, F. J. and Mujtaba, B. G. (2016a), ‘Volkswagen emissions scandal: A global case study of legal, ethical, and practical consequences and recommendations for sustainable management’, Global Journal of Research in Business & Management, 4:2, pp. 433–11.
     [Google Scholar]
  16. Cavico, F. J. and Mujtaba, B. G. (2016b), Developing a Legal, Ethical, and Socially Responsible Mindset for Sustainable Leadership, Davie, FL: ILEAD Academy.
     [Google Scholar]
  17. Clarke, V. and Braun, V. (2017), ‘Thematic analysis’, The Journal of Positive Psychology, 12:3, pp. 297–98, https://doi.org/10.1080/17439760.2016.1262613.
     [Google Scholar]
  18. Doherty, R., Wrigley, C., Matthews, J. and Bucolo, S. (2014), ‘Climbing the design ladder: Step by step’, in Proceedings of the 19th DMI: Academic Design Management Conference, Design Management Institute, Cambridge, MA: Design Management Institute, pp. 2578–99, https://eprints.qut.edu.au/74853/. Accessed 7 October 2024.
     [Google Scholar]
  19. Dyck, B. and Silvestre, B. S. (2018), ‘Enhancing socio-ecological value creation through sustainable innovation 20: Moving away from maximizing financial value capture’, Journal of Cleaner Production, 171, pp. 1593–604, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.09.209.
     [Google Scholar]
  20. Evans, S., Vladimirova, D., Holgado, M., Fossen, K. Van, Yang, M., Silva, E. A. and Barlow, C. Y. (2017), ‘Business model innovation for sustainability: Towards a unified perspective for creation of sustainable business models’, Business Strategy and the Environment, 26:5, pp. 597–608, https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.1939.
     [Google Scholar]
  21. Foss, N. J. and Saebi, T. (2017), ‘Fifteen years of research on business model innovation: How far have we come, and where should we go?’, Journal of Management, 43:1, pp. 200–27, https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206316675927.
     [Google Scholar]
  22. Geissdoerfer, M., Bocken, N. and Hultink, E. (2016), ‘Design thinking to enhance the sustainable business modelling process: A workshop based on a value mapping process’, Journal of Cleaner Production, 135, pp. 1218–32, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.07.020.
     [Google Scholar]
  23. Geissdoerfer, M., Vladimirova, D. and Evans, S. (2018), ‘Sustainable business model innovation: A review’, Journal of Cleaner Production, 198:2, pp. 401–16, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.06.240.
     [Google Scholar]
  24. Gill, M. (2014), ‘The possibilities of phenomenology for organizational research’, Organizational Research Methods, 17:2, pp. 118–37, https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428113518348.
     [Google Scholar]
  25. Hashim, M. A., Tlemsani, I. and El-Temtamy, O. (2024), ‘The impact of platform business models on organizational performance in the era of industry 5.0: A strategic agility and innovation approach’, International Journal of Technology Management and Sustainable Development, 23:3, pp. 299–320, https://doi.org/10.1386/tmsd_00094_1.
     [Google Scholar]
  26. Hira, A. and Hynes, M. (2021), ‘How do designers and engineers practice design while making? A narrative inquiry of designers who make’, Information and Learning Sciences, 122:11–12, pp. 749–73, https://doi.org/10.1108/ils-08-2020-0195.
     [Google Scholar]
  27. Isa, S. S. and Liem, A. (2014), ‘Classifying physical models and prototypes in the design process: A study on the economical and usability impact of adopting models and prototypes in the design process’, in DS 77: Proceedings of the DESIGN 2014 13th International Design Conference, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering and Naval Architecture, Zagreb, Croatia, pp. 1–2187.
     [Google Scholar]
  28. Jia, Y., Su, J., Cui, L., Wu, L. and Hua Tan, K. (2023), ‘Platform business model innovation in the digitalization era: A “driver-process-result” perspective’, Journal of Business Research, 160, pp. 1–14, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2023.113818.
     [Google Scholar]
  29. Joyce, A. and Paquin, R. L. (2016), ‘The triple layered business model canvas: A tool to design more sustainable business models’, Journal of Cleaner Production, 135, pp. 1474–86, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.06.067.
     [Google Scholar]
  30. Kalkbrenner, B. J. and Roosen, J. (2016), ‘Citizens’ willingness to participate in local renewable energy projects: The role of community and trust in Germany’, Energy Research & Social Science, 13, pp. 60–70, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2015.12.006.
     [Google Scholar]
  31. Khan, I. S., Ahmad, M. O. and Majava, J. (2021), ‘Industry 40 and sustainable development: A systematic mapping of triple bottom line, circular economy and sustainable business models perspectives’, Journal of Cleaner Production, 297, 126655, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.126655.
     [Google Scholar]
  32. Kondoh, S., Komoto, H., Kishita, Y. and Fukushige, S. (2014), ‘Toward a sustainable business design: A survey’, Procedia CIRP, 15, pp. 367–72, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2014.06.094.
     [Google Scholar]
  33. Lafon, M. B. and Mackay, W. E. (2000), ‘Reification, polymorphism and reuse: Three principles for designing visual interfaces’, in Proceeding AVI ‘00 Proceedings of the Working Conference on Advanced Visual Interfaces, International Conference on Advanced Visual Interfaces, Gallipoli, Italy, New York: Association for Computing Machinery, pp. 102–09.
     [Google Scholar]
  34. Leavy, B. (2010), ‘Design thinking: A new mental model of value innovation’, Strategy & Leadership, 38:3, pp. 5–14, https://doi.org/10.1108/10878571011042050.
     [Google Scholar]
  35. Li, S., Chen, M. and Lyu, J. (2016), ‘User-based furniture recycling system innovation and its implementation’, in 2016 5th International Conference on Sustainable Energy and Environment Engineering (ICSEEE 2016), Zhuhai, China, 12–13 November, Dordrecht: Atlantis Press, pp. 830–36.
     [Google Scholar]
  36. Lincoln, Y. S. and Guba, E. G. (1985), Naturalistic Inquiry, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
     [Google Scholar]
  37. Lindseth, A. and Norberg, A. (2004), ‘A phenomenological hermeneutical method for researching lived experience’, Scandinavian Journal of Caring Sciences, 18:2, pp. 145–53, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6712.2004.00258.x.
     [Google Scholar]
  38. Lumpkin, G. T., Cogliser, C. C. and Schneider, D. R. (2019), ‘Understanding and measuring autonomy in entrepreneurship: A review, synthesis, and extension’, Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 45:1, pp. 96–120.
     [Google Scholar]
  39. Markides, C. (2006), ‘Disruptive innovation: In need of better theory’, Journal of Product Innovation Management, 23:1, pp. 19–25, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5885.2005.00177.x.
     [Google Scholar]
  40. Mendoza, J. M. F., Gallego-Schmid, A. and Azapagic, A. (2019), ‘Building a business case for implementation of a circular economy in higher education institutions’, Journal of Cleaner Production, 220, pp. 553–67, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.02.045.
     [Google Scholar]
  41. Mujtaba, B. G. (2024), ‘Clarifying ethical dilemmas in sharpening students’ artificial intelligence proficiency: Dispelling myths about using AI tools in higher education’, Business Ethics and Leadership, 8:2, pp. 107–27, https://doi.org/10.61093/bel.8(2).107-127.2024.
     [Google Scholar]
  42. Nessler, D. (2016), ‘How to apply design thinking, HCD, UX or any creative process from scratch’, Medium, 19 May, https://medium.com/digital-experience-design/how-to-apply-a-design-thinking-hcd-ux-or-any-creative-process-from-scratch-b8786efbf812. Accessed 12 September 2024.
  43. Nguyen, L. D., Mujtaba, B. G., Tran, C. N. and Tran, Q. H. M. (2013), ‘Sustainable growth and ethics: A study of business ethics in Vietnam between business students and working adults’, The Southeast Asian Journal of Management, 7:1, pp. 41–56.
     [Google Scholar]
  44. Omar, Z. F. and Rasid, S. Z. A. (2019), ‘The value of industrial design in Malaysian SMEs’, Open International Journal of Informatics, 7:2, pp. 77–88, https://oiji.utm.my/index.php/oiji/article/view/66. Accessed 12 September 2024.
     [Google Scholar]
  45. Pan, L., Xu, Z. and Skare, M. (2022), ‘Sustainable business model innovation literature: Bibliometrics analysis’, Review of Managerial Science, 17:3, pp. 757–85, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11846-022-00548-2.
     [Google Scholar]
  46. Paul, J. and Benito, G. R. (2018), ‘A review of research on outward foreign direct investment from emerging countries, including China: What do we know, how do we know and where should we be heading?’, Asia Pacific Business Review, 24:1, pp. 90–115, https://doi.org/10.1080/13602381.2017.1357316.
     [Google Scholar]
  47. Peng, F., Altieri, B., Hutchinson, T., Harris, A. and McLean, D. (2022), ‘Design for social innovation: A systemic design approach in creative higher education toward sustainability’, Sustainability, 14:13, pp. 1–20, https://doi.org/10.3390/su14138075.
     [Google Scholar]
  48. Ratnasingam, J., Ark, C. K., Latib, A., Subramaniam, H. and Khoo, A. (2018), ‘Innovation in the Malaysian furniture industry: Drivers and challenges’, BioResources, 13:3, pp. 5254–70, https://doi.org/10.15376/biores.13.3.5254-5270.
     [Google Scholar]
  49. Ratnasingam, J., Yi, L. Y., Azim, A. A. A., Halis, R., Liat, L. C., Khoo, A., Mat Daud, M., Senin, A. L., Ab Latib, H., Bueno, M. V., Zbiec, M., Garrido, J., Ortega, J., Gómez, M. V., Hashim, R., Zakaria, S., Zainal Abidin, S. and Amin, M. N. Z. M. (2020), ‘Assessing the awareness and readiness of the Malaysian furniture industry for Industry 4.0’, BioResources, 15:3, pp. 4866–85, https://doi.org/10.15376/biores.15.3.4866-4885.
     [Google Scholar]
  50. Ratnasingam, J., Ab Latib, H., Liat, L. C., Jegatheswaran, N., Othman, K. and Amir, M. A. (2023), ‘Environmental, social, and governance adoption in the Malaysian wood products and furniture industries: Awareness, adoption, and challenges’, BioResources, 18:1, pp. 1–14.
     [Google Scholar]
  51. Rohn, D., Bican, P. M., Brem, A., Kraus, S. and Clauss, T. (2021), ‘Digital platform-based business models: An exploration of critical success factors’, Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 60, 101625, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jengtecman.2021.101625.
     [Google Scholar]
  52. Sana, S. S. (2022), ‘A structural mathematical model on a two-echelon supply chain system’, Annals of Operations Research, 315:2, pp. 1997–2025.
     [Google Scholar]
  53. Senathip, T., Mujtaba, B. G. and Cavico, F. J. (2017), ‘Policy-making considerations for ethical and sustainable economic development’, Economy, 4:1, pp. 7–14, https://doi.org/10.20448/journal.502.2017.41.7.14.
     [Google Scholar]
  54. Shakeel, J., Mardani, A., Chofreh, A. G., Goni, F. A. and Klemeš, J. J. (2020), ‘Anatomy of sustainable business model innovation’, Journal of Cleaner Production, 261, pp. 2–14, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.121201.
     [Google Scholar]
  55. Skorupińska, E., Hitka, M. and Sydor, M. (2024), ‘Surveying quality management methodologies in wooden furniture production’, Systems, 12:2, pp. 1–17, https://doi.org/10.3390/systems12020051.
     [Google Scholar]
  56. Sun, W., Cai, H. and Wang, Y. (2018), ‘Refined Laspeyres decomposition-based analysis of the relationship between economy and electric carbon productivity from the provincial perspective: Development mode and policy’, Energies, 11:12, pp. 3–20, https://doi.org/10.3390/en11123426.
     [Google Scholar]
  57. Täuscher, K. and Laudien, S. M. (2018), ‘Understanding platform business models: A mixed methods study of marketplaces’, European Management Journal, 36:3, pp. 319–29.
     [Google Scholar]
  58. Tong, Z., Li, P. and Yang, L. (2022), ‘The impact of the matching of business model innovation and technology innovation on the performance of latecomer enterprise: An empirical study of text analysis of annual report’, Scientific and Technological Progress and Countermeasures, 39:11, pp. 84–93.
     [Google Scholar]
  59. Ulvenblad, P., Ulvenblad, P. and Tell, J. (2018), ‘An overview of sustainable business models for innovation in Swedish agri-food production’, Journal of Integrative Environmental Sciences, 16:1, pp. 1–22, https://doi.org/10.1080/1943815x.2018.1554590.
     [Google Scholar]
  60. Wang, W., Lin, C. and Chu, Y. (2011), ‘Types of competitive advantage and analysis’, International Journal of Business and Management, 6:5, pp. 100–04.
     [Google Scholar]
  61. Wu, K., Liao, C., Tseng, M. and Chou, P. (2015), ‘Understanding innovation for sustainable business management capabilities and competencies under uncertainty’, Sustainability, 7:10, pp. 13726–60, https://doi.org/10.3390/su71013726.
     [Google Scholar]
  62. Yang, D. and Zhu, J. (2021), ‘Recycling and value-added design of discarded wooden furniture’, BioResources, 16:4, pp. 6954–64, https://doi.org/10.15376/biores.16.4.6954-6964.
     [Google Scholar]
  63. Yang, C., Zhang, L. and Wei, W. (2022), ‘The influence of introducing the concept of sustainable system design thinking on consumer cognition: A designer’s perspective’, Systems, 10:4, pp. 1–23, https://doi.org/10.3390/systems10040085.
     [Google Scholar]
  64. Yüksel, P. and Yıldırım, S. (2015), ‘Theoretical frameworks, methods, and procedures for conducting phenomenological studies’, Turkish Online Journal of Qualitative Inquiry, 6:1, pp. 1–20, https://doi.org/10.17569/tojqi.59813.
     [Google Scholar]
  65. Aimkij, N., Mujtaba, B. G. and Kaweevisultrakul, T. (2013), ‘Green management sustainability and its economic impact’, Journal of Economics and Sustainable Development, 4:6, pp. 104–15, https://www.iiste.org/Journals/index.php/JEDS/index. Accessed 14 September 2024.
     [Google Scholar]
  66. Ali, A., Liem, A., Isa, S. S. and Isa, S. S. (2020), ‘Investigating meaning-making process in design collaboration activities: Designers’ interaction with objects’, Environment-Behaviour Proceedings Journal, 5:SI3, pp. 109–16, https://doi.org/10.21834/ebpj.v5isi3.2540.
     [Google Scholar]
  67. Baldassarre, B., Calabretta, G., Bocken, N. and Jaśkiewicz, T. (2017), ‘Bridging sustainable business model innovation and user-driven innovation: A process for sustainable value proposition design’, Journal of Cleaner Production, 147, pp. 175–86, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.01.081.
     [Google Scholar]
  68. Björklund, J. C. (2018), ‘Barriers to sustainable business model innovation in Swedish agriculture’, Journal of Entrepreneurship, Management, and Innovation, 14:1, pp. 65–90, https://doi.org/10.7341/20181414.
     [Google Scholar]
  69. Claudy, M., Peterson, M. and Pagell, M. (2016), ‘The roles of sustainability orientation and market knowledge competence in new product development success’, Journal of Product Innovation Management, 33:S1, pp. 72–85, https://doi.org/10.1111/jpim.12343.
     [Google Scholar]
  70. Farahmand, S. and Rahimiaghdas, N. (2024), ‘Circular economy and business transformation in European furniture industry’, Proceedings of the International Conference on Business, Management and Economics, 1:1, pp. 1–15, https://doi.org/10.33422/icbmeconf.v1i1.207.
     [Google Scholar]
  71. Isa, S. S. and Liem, A. (2014), ‘Enhancing design sensitivity and creativity in the detailing and materialisation stages of the design process through specific models and prototypes’, in DS 81: Proceedings of NordDesign 2014, Espoo, 27–29 August, Espoo: The Design Society, pp. 570–79.
     [Google Scholar]
  72. Isa, S. S. and Liem, A. (2015), ‘A comparative study on the role of models and prototypes in human-centred design versus design-driven innovation approaches’, in DS 80-11 Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on Engineering Design (ICED 15), Vol 11: Human Behaviour in Design, Design Education, Milan, 27–30 July, Espoo: The Design Society, pp. 203–14.
     [Google Scholar]
  73. Isa, S. S. and Liem, A. (2021), ‘Exploring the role of physical prototypes during co-creation activities at LEGO company using case study validation’, CoDesign, 17:3, pp. 330–54, https://doi.org/10.1080/15710882.2020.1715443.
     [Google Scholar]
  74. Isa, S. S., Isa, S. S. and Ali, A. (2011), ‘The development of the creative economy in Malaysia is experienced in two different case studies’, in 2011 IEEE Symposium on Business, Engineering and Industrial Applications (ISBEIA), Langkawi, Malaysia, 25–28 September, New York: IEEE, pp. 521–26.
     [Google Scholar]
  75. Isa, S. S., Liem, A. and Steinert, M. (2015), ‘The value of prototypes in the early design and development process’, in DS 80-5 Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on Engineering Design (ICED 15), Vol 5: Design Methods and Tools-Part 1, Milan, 27–30 July, The Design Society, pp. 235–42.
     [Google Scholar]
  76. Rösch, N., Tiberius, V. and Kraus, S. (2023), ‘Design thinking for innovation: Context factors, process, and outcomes’, European Journal of Innovation Management, 26:7, pp. 160–76, https://doi.org/10.1108/ejim-03-2022-0164.
     [Google Scholar]
  77. Tong, X., Tao, D. and Lifset, R. (2018), ‘Varieties of business models for post-consumer recycling in China’, Journal of Cleaner Production, 170, pp. 665–73, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.09.032.
     [Google Scholar]
  78. Yip, A. W. and Bocken, N. M. (2018), ‘Sustainable business model archetypes for the banking industry’, Journal of Cleaner Production, 174, pp. 150–69, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.10.190.
     [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1386/tmsd_00103_1
Loading
Design-driven sustainable business model innovation: The case of the Malaysian furniture industry
International Journal of Technology Management & Sustainable Development 24, 209 (2025); https://doi.org/10.1386/tmsd_00103_1
/content/journals/10.1386/tmsd_00103_1
/content/journals/10.1386/tmsd_00103_1
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Article
Keyword(s): antecedents-decisions-outcomes framework; design thinking; human perspective; macroenviromental driver; qualitative research; strategic driver; sustainable development goals

Most Cited Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a success
Invalid data
An error occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error
Please enter a valid_number test