Skip to content
1981
Volume 25, Issue 1
  • ISSN: 1474-2748
  • E-ISSN: 2040-0551

Abstract

This study examines the strategic, operational, technological and environmental factors that contributed to the early discontinuation of the Airbus A380 amidst the rise of more sustainable twin-engine jets, such as the Airbus A350 and the Boeing 787. Using a qualitative, multi-lens case study design, it draws on comparative analysis of technical reports, regulatory documents, policy publications and performance data to show how the A380’s high acquisition and operating costs, limited airport compatibility, outdated propulsion systems and elevated emissions per seat-kilometre led to persistent misalignment with shifting industry priorities. By contrast, the A350 and B787 feature modular twin-engine designs, compatibility with sustainable aviation fuel (SAF) and adaptability for point-to-point operations. Beyond the aviation context, the research contributes to innovation, strategic management, engineering programme discontinuation and organizational learning literature. Integrating the Technology Life Cycle (TLC), Innovation Diffusion Theory (IDT) and the ‘learning from failure’ perspective, this approach extends the theoretical discourse from adoption to decline in large-scale, capital-intensive programmes. Addressing a gap in engineering disaster studies, it emphasizes long-term strategic, market and regulatory dynamics alongside technical factors. The findings offer transferable guidance: prioritize modularity and upgradeability, align life cycle management with sustainability targets and institutionalize adaptive learning to maintain relevance in an evolving economic and environmental landscape.

© 2026 Intellect Ltd
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1386/tmsd_00114_1
2026-03-18
2026-04-20

Metrics

Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Afonso, F., Sohst, M., Diogo, C. M., Rodrigues, S. S., Ferreira, A., Ribeiro, I., Marques, R., Rego, F. F., Sohouli, A., Portugal-Pereira, J., Policarpo, H., Soares, B., Ferreira, B., Fernandes, E. C., Lau, F. and Suleman, A. (2023), ‘Strategies towards a more sustainable aviation: A systematic review’, Progress in Aerospace Sciences, 137, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paerosci.2022.100878.
     [Google Scholar]
  2. Ahmad, I. A. I., Akagha, O. V., Dawodu, S. O., Obi, O. C., Anyanwu, A. C. and Onwusinkwue, S. (2024), ‘Innovation management in tech start-ups: A review of strategies for growth and sustainability’, International Journal of Science and Research Archive, 11:1, https://doi.org/10.30574/ijsra.2024.11.1.0150.
     [Google Scholar]
  3. Alrashed, M., Nikolaidis, T., Pilidis, P., Alrashed, W. and Jafari, S. (2020), ‘Economic and environmental viability assessment of NASA’s turboelectric distribution propulsion’, Energy Reports, 6, pp. 1685–95, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egyr.2020.06.019.
     [Google Scholar]
  4. Alshammari, K. H. and Alshammari, A. F. (2023), ‘Green innovation and its effects on innovation climate and environmental sustainability: The moderating influence of green abilities and strategies’, Sustainability, 15:22, https://doi.org/10.3390/su152215898.
     [Google Scholar]
  5. Anon. (2021), ‘AMC-20 Amendment 21: Extended range operation with two-engine aeroplanes (ETOPS) certification and operation (ED Decision 2021/006/R)’, 23 April, https://tinyurl.com/bddejere. Accessed 25 May 2025.
  6. Anon. (2022), ‘Twinjets vs. quadjets: How do the two aircraft types compare?’, 28 May, https://simpleflying.com/twinjets-vs-quadjets-how-do-the-two-aircraft-types-compare. Accessed 25 March 2025.
  7. Anon. (2023a), ‘Easy access rules for air operations: Revision 21, September 2023’, 29 September, https://tinyurl.com/y393mb2f. Accessed 17 March 2025.
  8. Anon. (2023b), ‘Final adoption of ReFuelEU Aviation completes “Fit for 55” legislation, putting EU on track to exceed 2030 targets’, https://tinyurl.com/34ucv6am. Accessed 25 March 2025.
  9. Anon. (2024a), ‘A350 family: Shaping the future of air travel: Facts and figures (Figures at end of March 2024)’, 25 April, https://tinyurl.com/mu2fbsax. Accessed 17 March 2025.
  10. Anon. (2024b), ‘Next-generation propulsion: Rolls-Royce UltraFan overview’, Global Aerospace, 27 January, https://www.global-aero.com. Accessed 17 March 2025.
  11. Anon. (2024c), ‘Fly net zero: Aviation’s commitment to climate action’, IATA, https://www.iata.org/en/programs/sustainability/flynetzero/. Accessed 25 March 2025.
  12. Anon. (2025), ‘Airbus A380’, 25 April, https://www.airbus.com/en/products-services/commercial-aircraft/passenger-aircraft/a380. Accessed 25 March 2025.
  13. Anon. (n.d.), ‘Commercial airplanes’, https://www.boeing.com/commercial. Accessed 25 May 2025.
  14. Ansell, P. J. (2023), ‘Review of sustainable energy carriers for aviation: Benefits, challenges, and future viability’, Progress in Aerospace Sciences, 141, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paerosci.2023.100919.
     [Google Scholar]
  15. Arpaci, I. (2019), ‘A theoretical framework for IT consumerization: Factors influencing the adoption of BYOD’, in E. Idemudia (ed.), Handbook of Research on Technology Integration in the Global World, IGI Global Scientific Publishing, pp. 114–29, https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-5225-6367-9.ch006.
     [Google Scholar]
  16. Chalk, A. (1985), ‘Market forces and aircraft safety: the case of the DC-10’, Economic Inquiry, 24:1, pp. 43–60, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1465-7295.1986.tb01796.x.
     [Google Scholar]
  17. Chen, L., Xu, L., Yang, Q. and Pan, X. (2021), ‘Innovative styling and structural design of new duplex wide-body passenger aircraft based on mobile edge computing’, Wireless Communications and Mobile Computing, 2021:1, https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/4628643.
     [Google Scholar]
  18. Davidson, G. G. and Labib, A. W. (2003), ‘Learning from failures: Design improvements using a multiple criteria decision-making process’, Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part B: Journal of Engineering Manufacture, 217:4, pp. 207–16, https://doi.org/10.1243/095441003769700762.
     [Google Scholar]
  19. Dhara, A. and Muruga Lal, J. (2021), ‘Sustainable technology on aircraft design: A review’, IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 889:1, https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/889/1/012068.
     [Google Scholar]
  20. Dhara, A. and Jeyan, M. (2024), ‘A novel sustainable wide-body aircraft using the modified TRIZ method’, in C. Prakash and H. Vasudev (eds), 3rd International Conference on Functional Materials, Manufacturing, and Performances (ICFMMP-2022), 29–30 July, Phagwara, India, AIP Publishing, Melville, NY, 030038, https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0192752.
     [Google Scholar]
  21. Dhara, A., Jeyan, J. V. M. L. and Majumder, A. (2023), ‘Modelling and design optimization of a novel wide-body transport aircraft to improve the structural integrity’, Mathematical Problems in Engineering, 2023, https://doi.org/10.1155/2023/5545000.
     [Google Scholar]
  22. Du, S., Bstieler, L. and Yalcinkaya, G. (2022), ‘Sustainability-focused innovation in the business-to-business context: Antecedents and managerial implications’, Journal of Business Research, 138, pp. 117–29, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.09.006.
     [Google Scholar]
  23. Elhmoud, E. R. and Kutty, A. A. (2020), ‘Sustainability assessment in the aviation industry: A mini-review on the tools, models, and methods of assessment’, in Proceedings of the 2nd African International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Operations Management, Harare, Zimbabwe, 7–10 December, Southfield, MI: IEOM Society International, pp. 1228–38, https://www.ieomsociety.org/harare2020/papers/324.pdf. Accessed 25 May 2025.
     [Google Scholar]
  24. Federal Aviation Administration (2024), ‘Economic values for FAA investment and regulatory decisions, a guide: 2024 update – Section 4: Aircraft operating costs’, U.S. Department of Transportation, November, https://tinyurl.com/3jnz6k4j. Accessed 17 March 2025.
  25. Ghassemi, M. and Saghafi, M. (2022), ‘Optimal electric power system architectures for wide-body all-electric aircraft’, in Proceedings of the 2022 IEEE Aerospace Conference (AERO), 5–12 March, IEEE, pp. 1–9, https://doi.org/10.1109/AERO53065.2022.9843195.
     [Google Scholar]
  26. Goyal, R. and Cohen, A. P. (2022), ‘Advanced air mobility: Opportunities and challenges deploying eVTOLs for air ambulance service’, Applied Sciences, 12:3, https://doi.org/10.3390/app12031183.
     [Google Scholar]
  27. Halaweh, M. (2019), ‘Model of Emerging Technology Adoption (META): Virtual reality as a case study’, Journal of Information & Knowledge Management, 18:2, https://doi.org/10.1142/s0219649219500205.
     [Google Scholar]
  28. Hasan, M. A., Mamun, A. A., Rahman, S. M., Malik, K., Uddin Al Amran, M. I., Khondaker, A. N., Reshi, O., Tiwari, S. P. and Alismail, F. S. (2021), ‘Climate change mitigation pathways for the aviation sector’, Sustainability, 13:7, https://doi.org/10.3390/su13073656.
     [Google Scholar]
  29. Hassan, M., Pfaender, H. and Mavris, D. (2020), ‘Design tools for conceptual analysis of future commercial supersonic aircraft’, in The AIAA AVIATION 2020 Forum, AIAA Paper 2020-2620, 8 June, American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2020-2620.
     [Google Scholar]
  30. Huang, Y., Li, R., Zou, F., Jiang, L., Porter, A. L. and Zhang, L. (2022), ‘Technology life cycle analysis: From the dynamic perspective of patent citation networks’, Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 181, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2022.121760.
     [Google Scholar]
  31. International Civil Aviation Organization (n.d.), Carbon Offsetting and Reduction Scheme for International Aviation (CORSIA), https://www.icao.int/CORSIA. Accessed 5 January 2026.
     [Google Scholar]
  32. Jamshidi, D. and Kazemi, F. (2019), ‘Innovation diffusion theory and customers’ behavioral intention for Islamic credit cards’, Journal of Islamic Marketing, 11:6, pp. 1245–75, https://doi.org/10.1108/jima-02-2018-0039.
     [Google Scholar]
  33. Kumar, V., Lin, C.-Y., Yang, W.-G., Lai, K.-K. and Chang, Y.-H. (2019), ‘Computing redundancy in complementary and supplementary technologies using TLC indicators: A theoretical framework’, in 2019, Portland International Conference on Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), IEEE, pp. 1–7, https://doi.org/10.23919/PICMET.2019.8893925.
     [Google Scholar]
  34. Lampo, A. (2022), ‘How is technology accepted? Fundamental works in user technology acceptance from diffusion of innovations to UTAUT-2’, in Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Industrial and Business Engineering (ICIBE 2022), Association for Computing Machinery, pp. 260–66, https://doi.org/10.1145/3568834.3568903.
     [Google Scholar]
  35. Learmount, D. (2000), ‘“Poor repair” to DC-10 was cause of Concorde crash’, FlightGlobal, 24 October, https://tinyurl.com/4bt8xkyd. Accessed 25 May 2025.
  36. Licht, J., O’Brien, J. and Schaffer, M. (2019), ‘Behind closed doors: The DC-10 and the demise of McDonnell Douglas’, The CASE Journal, 15:6, pp. 648–68, https://doi.org/10.1108/tcj-04-2019-0028.
     [Google Scholar]
  37. Liu, Y., Karpuk, S., Swamy, A. P. M. and Elham, A. (2020), ‘Multi-fidelity design optimization of a long-range blended wing body aircraft with new airframe technologies’, in AIAA SciTech 2020 Forum, paper no. AIAA 2020-0009, American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2020-0009.
     [Google Scholar]
  38. Lü, Z., Yuan, M., Lü, Y. and Wang, Z. (2020), ‘An overlapping architecture of large-size wide-body aircraft based on cloud sea computing in 5G OGCE’, in R. Kountchev, A. Mahanti, S. Chong, S. Patnaik and M. Favorskaya (eds), Advances in Wireless Communications and Applications: Smart Innovation, Systems and Technologies, vol. 191, Singapore: Springer, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-5879-5_2.
     [Google Scholar]
  39. Mofokeng, S., Chinomona, E. and Mafini, C. (2023), ‘Internal drivers of innovation and sustainability in South African manufacturing small and medium enterprises’, African Journal of Inter-Multidisciplinary Studies, 5:1, pp. 1–14, https://doi.org/10.51415/ajims.v5i1.1075.
     [Google Scholar]
  40. Mweetwa, L. and Mwange, A. (2023), ‘Major models and theories of cryptocurrency technology adoption: A theoretical review’, International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research and Growth Evaluation, 4:5, pp. 661–73, https://doi.org/10.54660/.ijmrge.2023.4.5.661-673.
     [Google Scholar]
  41. O’Callaghan, P., Adapa, L. and Buisman, C. (2020), ‘How can innovation theories be applied to water technology innovation?’, Journal of Cleaner Production, 276, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.122910.
     [Google Scholar]
  42. Parveez, B., Kittur, M. I., Badruddin, I. A., Kamangar, S., Hussien, M. and Umarfarooq, M. A. (2022), ‘Scientific advancements in composite materials for aircraft applications: A review’, Polymers, 14:22, https://doi.org/10.3390/polym14225007.
     [Google Scholar]
  43. Piccarozzi, M., Silvestri, C., Aquilani, B. and Silvestri, L. (2022), ‘Is this a new story of the “Two Giants”? A systematic literature review of the relationship between Industry 4.0, sustainability, and its pillars’, Technological Forecasting & Social Change, 177, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2022.121511.
     [Google Scholar]
  44. Rogers, E. M. (2003), Diffusion of Innovations, 5th ed., New York: Free Press, https://www.simonandschuster.com/books/Diffusion-of-Innovations-5th-Edition/Everett-M-Rogers/9780743222099. Accessed 6 January 2026.
     [Google Scholar]
  45. Rolls-Royce plc. (n.d.), ‘UltraFan’, https://www.rolls-royce.com/innovation/ultrafan.aspx. Accessed 6 January 2026.
  46. Scheelhaase, J. D., Müller, L., Ennen, D. and Grimme, W. (2022), ‘Economic and environmental aspects of aircraft recycling’, Transportation Research Procedia, 63, pp. 413–22, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trpro.2022.11.002.
     [Google Scholar]
  47. Schuh, G., Spangenberg, M., Zhang, Q., Dannbeck, B. and Stuerken, J. (2021), ‘Economic feasibility study of a hybrid-electric 19-passenger commuter aircraft’, Journal of Aviation Technology and Engineering, 10:2, https://doi.org/10.25967/530307.
     [Google Scholar]
  48. Subramanian, B. and Bhattacharyya, S. (2023), ‘Explicating the factors influencing the successful implementation and management of sustainable innovation practices in research-intensive organizations’, Journal of Science and Technology Policy Management, 15:4, pp. 1–23, https://doi.org/10.1108/jstpm-05-2023-0067.
     [Google Scholar]
  49. Trizotto, A. R. C., Nascimento, L., Testolin da Silva, J. P. and Zawislak, P. (2024), ‘Sustainability, business strategy and innovation: A thematic literature review’, Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal, 15:2, pp. 1–23, https://doi.org/10.1108/sampj-03-2023-0136.
     [Google Scholar]
  50. Troisi, R., Nese, A., Blanco-Gregory, R. and Giovanniello, M. A. (2023), ‘The effects of corruption and innovation on sustainability: A firm-level analysis’, Sustainability, 15:3, https://doi.org/10.3390/su15031848.
     [Google Scholar]
  51. Wehrspohn, J., Rahn, A., Papantoni, V., Silberhorn, D., Burschyk, T., Schröder, M., Linke, F., Dahlmann, K., Kühlen, M., Wicke, K. and Wende, G. (2022), ‘A detailed and comparative economic analysis of hybrid-electric aircraft concepts considering environmental assessment factors’, in The AIAA AVIATION 2022 Forum, Chicago, IL, Virtual, 27 June–1 July, American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2022-3882.
     [Google Scholar]
  52. Zhao, W., Zhang, W., Rao, J., Han, S., Jia, W., Song, J., Ma, M., Dong, Z., Yin, G., Zhu, Y. and An, J. (2025), ‘Current development status of key technologies for high-performance on-board interconnection buses: Analysis of TSN bus application prospects in aerospace’, Frontiers in Astronomy and Space Sciences, 12, https://doi.org/10.3389/fspas.2025.1676898.
     [Google Scholar]
  53. Dhara, A. and Jeyan, J. M. L. (2023), ‘Structural weight prediction modelling for a wide-body aircraft by implementing a real-time case study’, International Journal of Vehicle Structures and Systems, 15:1, pp. 7–11, https://doi.org/10.4273/ijvss.15.1.02.
     [Google Scholar]
  54. Ishalli (2023), ‘Reasons why the Concorde supersonic jet failed: Report’, InspireIP, 18 July, https://inspireip.com/reasons-why-the-concorde-supersonic-jet-failed-report/. Accessed 25 May 2025.
  55. Parsonage, B. and Maddock, C. (2023), ‘A multi-fidelity model management framework for multi-objective aerospace design optimisation’, Frontiers in Aerospace Engineering, 2, https://doi.org/10.3389/fpace.2023.1046177.
     [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1386/tmsd_00114_1
Loading
When giants fall: A multi-lens case study on the Airbus A380’s market exit amidst the rise of sustainable twinjets
International Journal of Technology Management & Sustainable Development 25, 3 (2026); https://doi.org/10.1386/tmsd_00114_1
/content/journals/10.1386/tmsd_00114_1
/content/journals/10.1386/tmsd_00114_1
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Article
Keyword(s): engineering programme discontinuation; Innovation Diffusion Theory (IDT); modular aircraft design; organizational learning in aerospace; strategic misalignment; sustainability in aviation; Technology Life Cycle (TLC)

Most Cited Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a success
Invalid data
An error occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error
Please enter a valid_number test