Skip to content
1981
Foley Sound: New Theories and Approaches
  • ISSN: 1751-4193
  • E-ISSN: 1751-4207

Abstract

Foley sound effects – those sounds that are created in post-production through live performance and then added to the sound mix of films, television, video games and animation – are ubiquitous. But effective Foley should not be heard. It is one of those creative labours in the making of a film that, to be considered successful, must erase itself. While film studies has begun to redress theory and practice’s bias towards the visual, film sound studies has yet to sufficiently acknowledge this hidden body in the sound process and fully reckon with the individual contribution made by the Foley artist to cinematic expression and cinema’s capacity to represent the world in motion and the exertion of bodies on-screen. To the extent we consider sound cinematic, what does the Foley artist contribute when they supplement images of a rock, a chair, a phone with sound or pay attention to the way paper brushes wood, metal rattles against metal, sand pushes back against a finger? This introduction establishes how refocusing attention to Foley sound extends our understanding of cinema as a medium, as well as addressing the current cultural and scholarly ‘visibility’ of Foley sound. It outlines the way the issue seeks to open up new theoretical perspectives on Foley sound and explore its interdisciplinary potential for theories of the soundtrack and film theory more broadly.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1386/ts_00029_2
2024-09-17
2024-10-04
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/ts/16/1/ts.16.1.3_Talijan.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1386/ts_00029_2&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Abu Hamdan, Lawrence (2018–ongoing), Earwitness Inventory, installation, Chisenhale Gallery, London.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Abu Hamdan, Lawrence (2018), After SFX, audio-visual installation, Tate Modern, London, 1–7 October.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Altman, Rick (1992), Sound Theory, Sound Practice, London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Ament, Vanessa T. (2014), The Foley Grail: The Art of Performing Sound for Film, Games, and Animation, Burlington, MA: Focal Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Bell, Melanie (2017), ‘Learning to listen: Histories of women’s soundwork in the British film industry’, Screen, 58:4, pp. 43757, https://doi.org/10.1093/screen/hjx037.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Bozak, Nadia (2012), The Cinematic Footprint: Lights, Camera, Natural Resources, New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Chion, Michel (2019), Audio-Vision: Sound on Screen, New York: Columbia University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Coulthard, Lisa (2016),  ‘Acoustic disgust: Sound, affect, and cinematic violence’, in L. Greene and D. Kulezic-Wilson (eds), The Palgrave Handbook of Sound Design and Music in Screen Media, London: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 18393.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Doane, Mary A. (2002), The Emergence of Cinematic Time: Modernity, Contingency, the Archive, Cambridge, MA and London: Harvard University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Doane, Mary A. (2021), Bigger Than Life: The Close Up and Scale in the Cinema, Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Fang, Joanna (n.d.), ‘The other F word: What is Foley in the 21st century?’, Pro Sound Effects, https://blog.prosoundeffects.com/the-other-f-word-what-is-foley-in-the-21st-century. Accessed 28 March 2024.
  12. Fife Donaldson, Lucy (2014), ‘The work of an invisible body: The contribution of Foley artists to onscreen effort’, Alphaville, 7, pp. 115.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Flack, Marlene J. and Glotova, Elena (2022), ‘When heavy rain is frying bacon: Metaphor and Foley art’, The 8th Conference of the Scandinavian Association for Language and Cognition, Åbo Akademi University, Finland, 17–19 August, https://blogs2.abo.fi/salc8/2022/05/12/when-heavy-rain-is-frying-bacon-metaphor-and-foley-art/. Accessed 9 April 2024.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Hagood, Mack (2014), ‘Unpacking a punch: Transduction and the sound of combat Foley in Fight Club’, Cinema Journal, 53:4, pp. 98120.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Huvenne, Martine (2020), ‘Introduction to a phenomenological approach to sound and listening’, Documenta, 38:1, pp. 1121, https://doi.org/10.21825/documenta.85141.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Keathley, Christian (2005), Cinephilia and History, or the Wind in the Trees, Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Kracauer, Siegfried ([1960] 1997), Theory of Film: The Redemption of Physical Reality, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Kuennen, Joel (2019), ‘Lawrence Abu Hamdan: Earwitness Theatre: Reconstructing silence/the torture of silence’, The Brooklyn Rail, July, https://brooklynrail.org/2019/07/artseen/Lawrence-Abu-Hamdan-Reconstructing-SilenceThe-Torture-of-Silence. Accessed 9 April 2024.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Lewis, Matt (2015), ‘Ventriloquial acts: Critical reflections on the art of Foley’, The New Soundtrack, 5:2, pp. 10320, https://www.euppublishing.com/doi/abs/10.3366/sound.2015.0073?role=tab. Accessed 9 April 2024.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Lumière, Louis (1895), Le repas de bébéI, France: Lumière.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Maddin, Guy (2006), Brand Upon the Brain!, Canada: The Film Company.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Maddin, Guy (2008), Footsteps, Canada: The Criterion Collection.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Oren, Ann (2022), Piaffe, Germany: Schuldenberg Films.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Pauletto, Sandra (2022), ‘Foley performance and sonic implicit interactions: How Foley artists might hold the secret for the design of sonic implicit interactions’, in L. O Keeffe and I. Nogueira (eds), The Body in Sound, Music, and Performance, London: Focal Press, pp. 26578.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Pinheiro, Sara (2023), ‘Foley gesture: Towards a theory of acousmatic Foley’, New Sound, 61:1, pp. 6083, https://doi.org/10.5937/NEWSO23061060P.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Schonig, Jordan (2022), The Shape of Motion: Cinema and the Aesthetics of Movement, New York: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Shukin, Nicole (2009), Animal Capital: Rendering Life in Biopolitical Times, Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Sobchack, Vivian (2007), ‘Chasing The Maltese Falcon: On the fabrications of a film prop’, Journal of Visual Culture, 6:2, pp. 21946, https://doi.org/10.1177/1470412907078566.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Stranger Things (2022, USA: 21 Laps Entertainment and Monkey Massacre Productions).
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Stratman, Deborah (2014), Hacked Circuit, USA: Pythagorasfilm.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Strickland, Peter (2012), Berberian Sound Studio, UK: Warp Films, Illumination, UK Film Council, Film4 Productions, ITV Yorkshire and Warp X.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Talijan, Emilija (2022), Resonant Bodies in Contemporary European Art Cinema, Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Wright, Benjamin (2014), ‘Footsteps with character: The art and craft of Foley’, Screen, 55:2, pp. 20420.
    [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1386/ts_00029_2
Loading
  • Article Type: Editorial
Keyword(s): digital; embodiment; film theory; Foley; indexicality; labour; materiality
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a success
Invalid data
An error occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error