Skip to content
1981
Immersive Horizons: Blurring the Creative Frontiers Between Virtual and Material Worlds
  • ISSN: 2397-9704
  • E-ISSN: 2397-9712

Abstract

In recent years, a myriad of three-dimensional (3D) digital doubles of our cultural heritage have grown up around us. For dissemination and communication purposes, and for the creation of pedagogical tools, study, reconstruction, or preservation, various institutions – through specific projects or associated companies – have turned to virtualizing their collections. The digital world has been filled with models that, although technically advanced, in many cases fail to activate the cultural heritage on which they are based, thus increasing the number of abandoned digital objects. Given this context, it is relevant to research creative projects that approach 3D digitization in a critical and creative way. This article will review three of them: ‘Material Speculation: ISIS’ (2015–16), ‘Antes del Olvido’ (2019) and ‘Arts Santa Mònica Official Tour’ (2021). Through their studies, we will observe the renewal of the debate about what should be preserved, the divergent and creative tactics to do so and the social implications of these processes. Finally, these cases are useful to approach heritage’s duration. The techniques call it into question and make us face our choices. What do we make last and what we discard? If it was born to remain, why is it made ephemeral by circumstances? Or, on the contrary, why do fleeting works persist in the heart of digital culture?

Funding
This study was supported by the:
  • ANID/Fondecyt (Award 11230449)
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1386/vcr_00084_1
2024-07-18
2024-10-04
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Arts Santa Mónica (n.d.), Exponer – No exponerse – Exponerse – No exponer, Arts Santa Mónica, https://artssantamonica.gencat.cat/es/detall/Exposar-No-exposar-se-Exposar-se-No-exposar. Accessed 26 January 2023.
  2. BeTeVe (2021), ‘El nou Santa Mònica s’exposa políticament’, BeTeVe, 19 October, https://beteve.cat/artic/nou-santa-monica-exposa/. Accessed 26 January 2023.
  3. Cea, C. (2019), ‘Antes del Olvido: Fotogrametria Urbana Colectiva con Agisoft Metashape’, 19 November, YouTube, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BQvq5t4XmcI. Accessed 10 October 2022.
  4. Cea, C. (2022), interview by authors via Teams, 20 October.
  5. Centro Cultura Digital (2020), ‘Genealogías latinoamericanas Memoria digital, patrimonio y resistencia’, Centro Cultura Digital, 2 December, https://centroculturadigital.mx/actividad/Festival-Internacional-Inmersiva3-Dia-5-8IUJJCztA. Accessed 10 October 2022.
  6. Domínguez Rubio, F. (2016), ‘On the discrepancy between objects and things: An ecological approach’, Journal of Material Culture, 21:1, pp. 5986, https://doi.org/10.1177/1359183515624128.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. European Commission (2018), ‘Innovation in cultural heritage research’, European Commission, 6 March, https://op.europa.eu/en/publication-detail/-/publication/1dd62bd1-2216-11e8-ac73-01aa75ed71a1/language-en. Accessed 2 October 2023.
  8. Net Art Anthology (2015), ‘Material speculation: ISIS’, Net Art Anthology, https://anthology.rhizome.org/material-speculation-isis. Accessed 10 October 2022.
  9. Niccolucci, F., Felicetti, A. and Hermon, S. (2022), ‘Populating the data space for cultural heritage with heritage digital twins’, 7, p. 105, https://doi.org/10.3390/data7080105.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Pfaller, M. (2022), ‘Monuments of dissidence: 3D models of the social unrest in Chile by the artist collective Antes del Olvido’, H-ART: Revista de historia, teoría y crítica de arte, 11, pp. 185200, https://doi.org/10.25025/hart11.2022.08.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Santamaría, M. (2023), interview by authors via Teams, 7 February.
  12. Seligmann-Silva, M. (2020), ‘Antimonuments: Between memory and resistance’, Between, 10:20, pp. 14969, https://doi.org/10.13125/2039-6597/4283.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Shults, R. (2017), ‘New opportunities of low-cost photogrammetry for culture heritage preservation’, ISPRS Archives: International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, 42:5W1, pp. 48186, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-Archives-XLII-5-W1-481-2017.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Soulellis, P. (2016), ‘The “Distributed Monument”: New work from Morehshin Allahyari’s “Material Speculation” series’, Rhizome, 16 February, https://rhizome.org/editorial/2016/feb/16/morehshin-allahyari/. Accessed 10 October 2022.
  15. Stanley, J. (2019), ‘Anti-monuments to the immemorial. Exploring the how, why, and what next of our relationship to our environment’, The Journal of Public Space, 4:3, pp. 15570, https://doi.org/10.32891/jps.v4i3.1227.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Torres Barragan, C. A. and Delgado Rojas, C. (2017), ‘Patrimonio virtual y humanidades digitales: Debates y Puntos de Encuentro’, Observatorio del Patrimonio Cultural y Arqueológico, pp. 45–52.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. UNESCO (2009), ‘Charter on the preservation of the digital heritage (CL/3865)’, UNESCO, 16 January, https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000179529.page=2.
/content/journals/10.1386/vcr_00084_1
Loading
/content/journals/10.1386/vcr_00084_1
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a success
Invalid data
An error occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error