Border Tuner and Teeter-Totter Wall: Two works of participatory public pedagogy | Intellect Skip to content
1981
  1. Home
  2. A-Z Publications
  3. Visual Inquiry
  4. Volume 10, Issue 1
  5. Article
Landscapes of Learning: Art and Culture across Cities
  • ISSN: 2045-5879
  • E-ISSN: 2045-5887

Abstract

This article looks at two socially engaged art works, by Ronald Rael and Virginia San Fratello and by Rafael Lozano-Hemmer that challenge dualistic notions of self and other, public and private, and national and multinational. Each work proffers a perspective of the US-Mexico border that counters those communicated through national political rhetoric and common in popular media reporting. This article not only recognizes these works as art but also as public pedagogy, or works accessible to the broader public and community that function to teach us something or to reframe or expand our understanding and to question or resist dominant narratives. In addition to questioning totalizing narratives, this article considers intersecting notions of the public on the border. Recognizing that the border occupies simultaneous and varied notions of the public in terms of being a site of local culture, a symbol of national debate, a firestorm of divisive rhetoric and an international marker of global politics and economics, this article considers how differing sites of public pedagogy function.

© 2021 Intellect Ltd
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1386/vi_00024_1
2021-06-01
2024-04-25
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Agresta, M.. ( 2019;), ‘ How a public art project in El Paso and Ciudad Juarez is spurring cross-border conversations. ’, Texas Monthly, 13 November, https://www.texasmonthly.com/the-culture/border-tuner-art-el-paso-juarez-rafael-lozano-hemmer/. Accessed 15 October 2020.
     [Google Scholar]
  2. Anzaldúa, G.. ( 2007), Borderlands/La Frontera: The New Mestizo, San Francisco:: Aunt Lute Books;.
     [Google Scholar]
  3. Arozqueta, C.. ( 2018;), ‘ Polysemous light: Light as contradictory material in Rafael Lozano-Hemmer’s work. ’, Artnodes, 21, pp. 146–53.
     [Google Scholar]
  4. Barajas, J.. ( 2019;), ‘ Why this artist used seesaws to protest at the border. ’, PBS, 16 August, https://www.pbs.org/newshour/arts/pink-seesaws-at-the-border-wall-showed-that-play-is-a-form-of-protest. Accessed 15 October 2020.
     [Google Scholar]
  5. Bishop, C.. ( 2006;), ‘ Introduction. ’, in C. Bishop. (ed.), Participation, Cambridge:: MIT Press;, pp. 10–17.
     [Google Scholar]
  6. Bishop, C.. ( 2012a), Artificial Hells, New York:: Verso;.
     [Google Scholar]
  7. Bishop, C.. ( 2012b;), ‘ Participation and spectacle: Where are we now?. ’, in N. Thompson. (ed.), Living as Form: Socially Engaged Art from 1991–2011, Cambridge:: MIT Press;, pp. 35–45.
     [Google Scholar]
  8. Bourriaud, N.. ( 2002), Relational Aesthetics, Dijon:: Les Press du Reel;.
     [Google Scholar]
  9. Brice, A.. ( 2019;), ‘ Teeter totters as activism: How the border wall became a playground. ’, Berkeley News, 8 October, https://news.berkeley.edu/2019/10/08/teeter-totters-as-activism-ronald-rael/. Accessed 21 March 2021.
     [Google Scholar]
  10. Carlson, M., and Schmidt, U.. ( 2012;), ‘ Pulse on pulse: Modulation and signification in Lozano-Hemmer’s Pulse Room. ’, Journal of Aesthetics and Culture, 4, pp. 1–7.
     [Google Scholar]
  11. Cruz, T.. ( 2017;), ‘ Foreword: Borderwalls as public space?. ’, in R. Rael. (ed.), Borderwall as Architecture: A Manifesto for the U.S.–Mexico Boundary, Berkeley, CA:: University of California Press;, pp. viii–xiv.
     [Google Scholar]
  12. Dorado Romo, D.. ( 2019;), ‘ Artist Rafael Lozano-Hemmer on the importance of telling complex, nuance border stories. ’, Texas Observer, 25 November, https://www.texasobserver.org/rafael-lozano-hemmer-border-tuner/. Accessed 21 March 2021.
     [Google Scholar]
  13. Finkelpearl, T.. ( 2013), What We Made: Conversations on Art and Social Cooperation, Durham:: Duke University Press;.
     [Google Scholar]
  14. Giroux, H. A.. ( 2004;), ‘ Cultural studies, public pedagogy, and the responsibility of intellectuals. ’, Communication and Critical/Cultural Studies, 1:1, pp. 59–79.
     [Google Scholar]
  15. Giroux, H. A.. ( 2005), Border Crossings: Cultural Workers and the Politics of Education, , 2nd ed.., New York:: Routledge;.
     [Google Scholar]
  16. Giroux, H. A.. ( 2007;), ‘ Beyond neoliberal common sense: Cultural politics and public pedagogy. ’, JAC, 27:1, pp. 11–61.
     [Google Scholar]
  17. Giroux, H. A.. ( 2010;), ‘ Neoliberalism as public pedagogy. ’, in J. A. Sandlin,, B. D. Schultz, and J. Burdick. (eds), Handbook of Public Pedagogy: Education and Learning Beyond Schooling, New York:: Routledge;, pp. 486–99.
     [Google Scholar]
  18. Green, G. L.. ( 1998;), ‘ Tear down these walls: New genre public art and art education. ’, Journal of Social Theory in Art Education, 18, pp. 77–82.
     [Google Scholar]
  19. Green, G. L.. ( 1999;), ‘ New genre public art education. ’, Art Journal, 58:1, pp. 80–83.
     [Google Scholar]
  20. Helguera, P.. ( 2011), Education for Socially Engaged Art: A Materials and Techniques Handbook, New York:: Jorge Pinto Books;.
     [Google Scholar]
  21. Huizinga, J.. ( 1950), Homo Ludens: A Study of the Play Element in Culture, Boston:: Routledge & Kegan Paul;.
     [Google Scholar]
  22. Kalin, N. M.. ( 2012;), ‘ (De)fending art education through the pedagogical turn. ’, Journal of Social Theory in Art Education, 32, pp. 42–55.
     [Google Scholar]
  23. Kester, G. H.. ( 2004), Conversation Pieces: Community and Communication in Modern Art, Oakland:: University of California Press;.
     [Google Scholar]
  24. Kester, G. H.. ( 2011), The One and the Many: Contemporary Collaborative Art in a Global Context, Durham:: Duke University Press;.
     [Google Scholar]
  25. King, M.. ( 2020;), ‘ “It’s not enough”: Activists say Black Lives Matter murals are empty gesture. ’, Politico, 19 July, https://www.politico.com/news/2020/07/19/black-lives-matter-murals-369091. Accessed 15 October 2020.
     [Google Scholar]
  26. Lacy, S.. ( 1994), Mapping the Terrain: New Genre Public Art, Seattle:: Seattle Bay Press;.
     [Google Scholar]
  27. Latour, B.. ( 2005), Reassembling the Social: An Introduction to Actor-Network-Theory, Oxford:: Oxford University Press;.
     [Google Scholar]
  28. Lozano-Hemmer, R.. ( 2020a;), ‘ Border Tuner/Sintonizador Fronterizo. ’, Rafael Lozano-Hemmer, 30 August, http://www.lozano-hemmer.com/border_tuner__sintonizador_fronterizo.php. Accessed 15 October 2020.
     [Google Scholar]
  29. Lozano-Hemmer, R.. ( 2020b), videocall with author , 12 August.
  30. Lyotard, J.. ( [1979] 1984), The Postmodern Condition: A Report on Knowledge (trans. G. Bennington, and B. Massumi.), Minneapolis:: University of Minnesota Press;.
     [Google Scholar]
  31. Mayo, P.. ( 2015;), ‘ Antonio Gramsci’s impact on critical pedagogy. ’, Critical Sociology, 41:7&8, pp. 1121–36.
     [Google Scholar]
  32. Rael, R.. ( 2017), Borderwall as Architecture: A Manifesto for the U.S.–Mexico Boundary, Berkeley:: University of California Press;.
     [Google Scholar]
  33. Rael, R.. ( 2020), video interview with author , 10 August.
  34. Sutton, D., and Martin-Jones, D.. ( 2008), Deleuze: Reframed, London:: I.B. Tauris;.
     [Google Scholar]
  35. Tavin, K., and Erdman, L.. ( 2015;), ‘ Arts-based interventions into normative practices: What it is and what should never be. ’, Conference on Arts-Based Research and Artistic Research, Porto, Portugal, 28–30 January.
     [Google Scholar]
  36. Thompson, R.,, Martinez, J. A.,, Marañon, D., and Sanchez, J. A.. ( 2019;), ‘ Surveillance en la frontera: The subversive installations of Mexican digital artists Rafael Lozano-Hemmer and Alfredo Salomon. ’, Rupkatha Journal on Interdisciplinary Studies in Humanity, 11:3, pp. 1–10.
     [Google Scholar]
  37. Turner, V.. ( [1967] 2007), The Ritual Process: Structure and Anti-Structure, Chicago:: Aldine Transaction;.
     [Google Scholar]
  38. Kaplan, Heather G.. ( 2021;), ‘ Border Tuner and Teeter-Totter Wall: Two works of participatory public pedagogy. ’, Visual Inquiry: Learning & Teaching Art, 10:1, pp. 31–48, doi: https://doi.org/10.1386/vi_00024_1
     [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1386/vi_00024_1
Loading
Border Tuner and Teeter-Totter Wall: Two works of participatory public pedagogy
Visual Inquiry 10, 31 (2021); https://doi.org/10.1386/vi_00024_1
/content/journals/10.1386/vi_00024_1
/content/journals/10.1386/vi_00024_1
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Article
Keyword(s): border; public; public pedagogy; Rafael Lozano-Hemmer; Ronald Rael; socially engaged art

Most Cited Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a success
Invalid data
An error occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error