Art education needs a curriculum paradigm shift

References

1. Anderson, T., and Milbrandt, M. K.. ( 2005), Art for Life: Authentic Instruction in Art, New York:: McGraw Hill;.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Brooklyn Museum ( n.d.;), ‘ About the museum: Our vision. ’, Brooklyn Museum, https://www.brooklynmuseum.org/about. Accessed 29 January 2021.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Gude, O.. ( 2007;), ‘ Principles of possibility: Consideration for a twenty-first century art & culture curriculum. ’, Art Education, 60:1, pp. 6–17.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Kaphar, T.. ( 2017a), Shifting the Gaze, New York:: Brooklyn Museum;.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Kaphar, T.. ( 2017b;), ‘ Titus Kaphar: Can art amend history?. ’, TED, 1 August, https://www.ted.com/talks/titus_kaphar_can_art_amend_history?language=en. Accessed 5 March 2021.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Lawton, P. H.. ( 2021;), ‘ Theme 5: Power. ’, in J. Marshall,, C. Stewart, and A. Thulson., Teaching Contemporary Art with Young People: Themes in Art for K–12 Classrooms, New York:: Teachers College Press;, pp. 46–50.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Walker, S.. ( 2004;), ‘ Big ideas: Understanding the art making process – Reflective practice. ’, Art Education, 57:3, pp. 6–12.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Lawton, Pamela Harris. ( 2021;), ‘ Art education needs a curriculum paradigm shift. ’, Visual Inquiry: Learning & Teaching Art, 10:2, pp. 195–99, https://doi.org/10.1386/vi_00040_1
   [Google Scholar]