Skip to content
1981
1-2: Knowledge and Data Transparency across Creative Visual Education: Practice, Research, and Policy
  • ISSN: 2045-5879
  • E-ISSN: 2045-5887

Abstract

Between 1908 and 1917, Chicago city administrators and Chicago Public School (CPS) educators were rethinking how to best train workers for the city’s rapid expansion of manufacturing and industry. Following Murphy’s theory of social closure, which states that inequality is created by monopoly and exclusion, this article discusses how high-school students were differentiated and sorted according to their ability. This meant tracking working-class students primarily to vocational programmes, which also excluded from training that would advance them socially. Consequently, working-class students engaged in forms of art education based on ‘manual training’, while more privileged students entered commercial high school programmes where they often studied commercial and fine art, which were regarded as signifiers of prosperity. This article is developed in three aspects, as follows: (1) school buildings were designed to support curricula of social efficiency and social assimilation; (2) curricula differentiated and sorted students by ability; and (3) school administrators restricted social and recreational activities in high schools (including the fine arts and popular art forms), which resulted in student life going underground to create what came to be known as ‘the extracurricular’. These practices and social trends across the twentieth century were an informal art education in high-school popular culture; these extracurricular activities were also part of a culture of adolescence in public high schools, with art education and popular culture at the centre.

© 2025 Intellect Ltd
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1386/vi_00119_1
2025-12-31
2026-04-15

Metrics

Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Amburgy, P. M. (2002), ‘Fads, frills, and basic subjects: Special studies and social conflict in Chicago in 1893’, Studies in Art Education, 43:2, pp. 109–23, https://doi.org/10.2307/1320999.
     [Google Scholar]
  2. American Youth Congress (1936), The Declaration of the Rights of American Youth, Robert Cohen Personal Collection.
     [Google Scholar]
  3. Angus, D. L. and Mirel, J. E. (1999), The Failed Promise of the American High School: 1890–1995, New York: Teachers College Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  4. Anon. (1910), ‘Article about exhibit at Art Institute of Chicago’, The Tech Prep, 6:1, p. 14.
     [Google Scholar]
  5. Bailey, H. T. (2000), Art Education, La Vergne, TN: General Books.
     [Google Scholar]
  6. Barnard, H. (1848), School Architecture, Or Contributions to the Improvement of School-Houses in the United States, 2nd ed., New York: A. S. Barnes and Co.
     [Google Scholar]
  7. Barnum, O. S. (1908), Women’s Work in the Socialization of the Schools, Winona, MN: National Education Association.
     [Google Scholar]
  8. Blanchard, M. W. (1995), ‘Boundaries and the Victorian body: Aesthetic fashion in the gilded age America’, American Historical Review, 100:1, pp. 21–50, https://doi.org/10.1086/ahr/100.1.21.
     [Google Scholar]
  9. Bledstein, B. (1976), The Culture of Professionalism: The Middle Class and the Development of Higher Education in America, New York: Norton.
     [Google Scholar]
  10. Bogan, W. (1910), ‘The Albert G. Lane Technical High School: Its function and its justification’, extract from Dedicatory Address, 22 February 1909, in the Albert G. Lane Technical High School Yearbook, Chicago: The Albert G. Lane Technical High School.
     [Google Scholar]
  11. Chudacoff, H. P. (2007), Children at Play: An American History, New York: New York University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  12. Cohen, S. (1999), Challenging Orthodoxies: Toward a New Cultural History of Education, New York: Peter Lang.
     [Google Scholar]
  13. Collier, J. L. (1989), Benny Goodman and the Swing Era, New York: Oxford University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  14. Cremin, L. A. (1961), The Transformation of the School: Progressivism in American Education, 1876–1957, New York: Vintage Books.
     [Google Scholar]
  15. Cremin, L. A. (1988), American Education: The Metropolitan Experience, New York: Harper and Row.
     [Google Scholar]
  16. Dewey, J. (1899), The School and Society, Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  17. Dow, A. W. (1926), Composition: A Series of Exercises in Art Structure for the Use of Students and Teachers, Garden City, NY: Doubleday, Page & Company.
     [Google Scholar]
  18. Efland, A. (1990), A History of Art Education: Intellectual and Social Currents in Teaching the Visual Arts, New York: Teachers College Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  19. Funk, C. (2012), ‘The gaze across the aisle: Architecture, merchandising, and the social roles at Marshall Field and Company, 1892 to 1914’, Journal of Social Theory in Art Education, 32, pp. 145–59, https://doi.org/10.25892/3V8N-7D23.
     [Google Scholar]
  20. Gallup, G. (1958), ‘Teachers criticize training’, Los Angeles Times, 15 April, p. 13.
     [Google Scholar]
  21. Gutowski, T. W. (1978), ‘The high school as an adolescent-raising institution: An inner history of Chicago public secondary education, 1856–1940’, doctoral thesis, Chicago, IL: University of Chicago.
     [Google Scholar]
  22. Gyure, D. A. (2011), The Chicago Schoolhouse, Chicago, IL: Center for American Places at Columbia College, Chicago.
     [Google Scholar]
  23. Hall, G. S. (1916), Adolescence: Its Psychology and Its Relations to Physiology, Anthropology, Sociology, Sex, Crime, Religion and Education, New York: D. Appleton.
     [Google Scholar]
  24. Illinois State Federation of Labor (1924), ‘Labor analyses public school policy’, Weekly Newsletter, 26 July, p. 1.
     [Google Scholar]
  25. Industrial Revolution (2011), In the Columbia Electronic Encyclopedia, 6th ed., New York: Columbia University Press, http://web.ebscohost.com.proxy.lib.ohio-state.edu/ehost/detail?vid=6&hid=123&sid=98a8419a-b368-4fbd-b3f6-7d4f8033846c%40sessionmgr104&bdata=JnNpdGU9ZWhvc3QtbGl2ZQ%3d%3d#db=a9h&AN=39013214. Accessed 25 June 2025.
     [Google Scholar]
  26. Kliebard, H. M. (1995), The Struggle for the American Curriculum, 1893–1958, 2nd ed., New York: Routledge.
     [Google Scholar]
  27. Korzenik, D. (1985), Drawn to Art: A Nineteenth-Century Dream, Hanover, NH: University Press of New England.
     [Google Scholar]
  28. Krug, E. A. (1964), The Shaping of the American High School, New York: Harper and Row.
     [Google Scholar]
  29. Lagemann, E. C. (2000), An Elusive Science: The Troubling History of Education Research, Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  30. Lefebvre, H. (1991), The Production of Space (trans. D. Nicholson-Smith), Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing.
     [Google Scholar]
  31. Levine, A. (1980), When Dreams and Heroes Died: A Portrait of Today’s College Student, San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
     [Google Scholar]
  32. Logan, F. (1955), The Growth of Art in American Schools, New York: Harper.
     [Google Scholar]
  33. Lubar, S. (1996), ‘Learning from technological things’, in D. Kingery (ed.), Learning from Things: Methods and Theory of Material Culture Studies, Washington, DC: Smithsonian Institution Press, pp. 31–34.
     [Google Scholar]
  34. Luciani, E. (1930), Medill Scrapbook, 1928–1930, Chicago, IL: The Chicago Public School Archives.
     [Google Scholar]
  35. McClintock, R. and McClintock, J. (1970), Henry Barnard’s School Architecture, New York: Teachers College Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  36. Miller, D. (1996), City of the Century: The Epic of Chicago and the Making of America, New York: Simon and Schuster.
     [Google Scholar]
  37. Mumford, L. (1934), Technics and Civilization, New York: Harcourt, Brace and Co.
     [Google Scholar]
  38. Murphy, R. (1988), Social Closure: The Theory of Monopolization and Exclusion, New York: Oxford University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  39. Oakes, J., Selvin, M., Karoly, S. A. and Guiton, G. (1992), Educational Matchmaking: Academic and Vocational Tracking in Comprehensive High Schools, Santa Monica, CA: Rand Corporation.
     [Google Scholar]
  40. Prost, A. and Vincent, G. ([1987] 1991), A History of Private Life: Riddles of Identity in Modern Times (trans. A. Goldhammer), Cambridge, MA: The Belknap Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  41. Rhor, S. C. (2004), ‘Mural painting and public schools in Chicago, 1905–1941’, Ph.D. dissertation, Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh.
     [Google Scholar]
  42. Ross, D. (1907), A Theory of Pure Design: Harmony, Balance, Rhythm, Boston, MA: Houghton, Mifflin.
     [Google Scholar]
  43. Ryan, A. M. (2012), ‘From child study to efficiency: District administrators and the use of testing in Chicago Public Schools, 1899 to 1928’, Paedagogica Historica: International Journal of the History of Education, 47:3, pp. 341–54, https://doi.org/10.1080/00309230.2010.530284.
     [Google Scholar]
  44. Sabin, S. (1897), Echo, Chicago, IL: Medill High School.
     [Google Scholar]
  45. Saettler, P. (1990), The Evolution of American Educational Technology, Englewood, CO: Libraries Unlimited.
     [Google Scholar]
  46. Savage, J. (2007), Teenage: The Creation of Youth Culture, New York: Viking.
     [Google Scholar]
  47. Shepard, L. A. (2000), ‘The role of assessment in a learning culture’, Educational Researcher, 29:7, pp. 4–14, https://doi.org/10.3386/w12984.
     [Google Scholar]
  48. Snedden, D. (1917), ‘The waning powers of art’, The American Journal of Sociology, 22:6, pp. 801–21, https://doi.org/10.1086/212696.
     [Google Scholar]
  49. Spear, A. H. (1967), Black Chicago: Making of a Negro ghetto: 1890 to 1920, Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  50. Spring, J. (2005), The American School, 1642–2004, Boston, MA: McGraw Hill.
     [Google Scholar]
  51. Susman, W. I. (1984), Culture as History: The Transformation of American Society in the Twentieth Century, New York: Pantheon Books.
     [Google Scholar]
  52. Thiele, A. (1917), ‘Civic industrial club’, in The Flower Annual, Chicago, IL: Flower Technical High School, p. 47.
     [Google Scholar]
  53. Wrigley, J. (1982), Class Politics and Public School: Chicago, 1900–1950, New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  54. Wygant, F. (1983), Art in American Schools in the Nineteenth Century, Cincinnati, OH: Interwood Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  55. Wygant, F. (1993), School Art in American Culture, 1920–1970, Cincinnati, OH: Interwood Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  56. Anon. (1909), ‘Shops’, The Tech Prep, 5:2, pp. 10–12.
     [Google Scholar]
  57. Anon. (1910), ‘Student editorial’, Red and Black, 13, p. 11.
     [Google Scholar]
  58. Bailyn, B. (1960), Education in the Forming of American Society: Needs and Opportunities for Study, New York: Vintage Books.
     [Google Scholar]
  59. Benton, T. (2025), ‘Le Corbusier’, Grove Art Online, 11 August, https://doi.org/10.1093/gao/9781884446054.article.T049930.
     [Google Scholar]
  60. Chapman, L. H. (2005), ‘No child left behind in art?’, Art Education, 58:1, pp. 6–16, https://doi.org/10.1080/00043125.2005.11651523.
     [Google Scholar]
  61. DeVoe, J. F., Kaffenberger, S. and Chandler, K. (2005), Student Reports of Bullying: Results from the 2001 School Crime Supplement to the National Crime Victimization Survey: Statistical Analysis Report, Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics.
     [Google Scholar]
  62. Ekcmann, R. (1917), ‘Art club’, in Flower Annual, Chicago, IL: Flower Technical High School.
     [Google Scholar]
  63. Gould, S. J. (1996), The Mismeasure of Man, New York: W. W. Norton and Company.
     [Google Scholar]
  64. Gutowski, T. W. (1988), ‘Student initiative and origins of the high school extracurriculum: Chicago, 1880–1915’, History of Education Quarterly, 28:1, pp. 49–72, https://doi.org/10.2307/368283.
     [Google Scholar]
  65. Sturken, M. and Cartwright, L. (2009), Practices of Looking: An Introduction to Visual Culture, New York: Oxford University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1386/vi_00119_1
Loading
Art education as work or play? Vocational education and the extracurricular in Chicago at Lane Tech High School, 1908–17
Visual Inquiry 14, 201 (2025); https://doi.org/10.1386/vi_00119_1
/content/journals/10.1386/vi_00119_1
/content/journals/10.1386/vi_00119_1
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Article
Keyword(s): Chicago; high schools; history; industrial education; school architecture; student life

Most Cited Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a success
Invalid data
An error occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error
Please enter a valid_number test