Boundary spanning and interconnectivity interrupters

References

1. Boisot, Max (1998), Knowledge Assets: Securing Competitive Advantage in the Information Economy, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Brewer, Thomas M. (2000), ‘The next phase: A report from the NAEA research commission’, Studies in Art Education, 41:3, pp. 197–201, https://doi.org/10.1080/00393541.2000.11651676.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Burton, David (1998), ‘Survey of current research in art education’, Studies in Art Education, 39:2, p. 183, https://doi.org/10.2307/1320468.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Carpenter, B. Stephen, II (2019), ‘How much does art education want?’, Studies in Art Education, 60:4, pp. 271–74, https://doi.org/10.1080/00393541.2019.1674009.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Dobbs, Stephen M. (1971), ‘The problem of communication in art education: The need for a theory of description’, Studies in Art Education, 12:2, p. 28, https://doi.org/10.2307/1319886.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Efland, Arthur (1964), ‘Theory and research in art education’, Studies in Art Education, 6:1, pp. 8–13, https://doi.org/10.2307/1319654.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Eisner, Elliot (1973), ‘Examining some myths in art education’, Studies in Art Education, 15:3, pp. 7–16, https://doi.org/10.2307/1319548.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Eisner, Elliot W. (1977), ‘An agenda for today for a field tomorrow’, Art Education, 30:5, pp. 1–18, https://doi.org/10.2307/3192237.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Grodoski, Chris (2009), ‘The emergent themes and research paradigms in Studies in Art Education (1959–2008)’, National Art Education Association National Conference, Minneapolis, MN, 17–21 April.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Grodoski, Chris (2016), ‘Unpacking & packing visual culture: Creative thinking strategies’, Art Education, 69:3, pp. 20–26, https://doi.org/10.1080/00043125.2016.1158588.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Grodoski, Chris (2019), ‘Exploring empathy and attention through illusions with middle level students’, in R. Garner (ed.), Exploring Digital Technologies for Art-Based Special Education: Models and Methods for the Inclusive K–12 Classroom, Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press, pp. 162–76.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Grodoski, Chris and Olson, Brad (2021), ‘Designing collaborating for excellence: A statewide digital professional learning community for collaboration, quality, and evaluation’, World Alliance for Art Education, online, 11 October, https://www.creative-generation.org/world-alliance-for-arts-education-virtual-world-summit-2021. Accessed 28 September 2025.
13. Grodoski, Chris, Wilcox, Libba and Goss, Samantha (2015), ‘Art education’s past: Studies in Art Education 1959–1968 and its relevance today’, Brushes with History: Imagination and Innovation in Art Education History, Teachers College, New York, 20 November.
    [Google Scholar]
14. Grodoski, Chris, Wilcox, Libba and Goss, Samantha (2017), ‘Visualizing historic networks in Studies in Art Education’, Studies in Art Education, 58:1, pp. 51–68, https://doi.org/10.1080/00393541.2016.1258531.
    [Google Scholar]
15. Grodoski, Chris, Dabelow, Carrie, Forbes, Crystal, Hammer, Margaret, Hoffmeyer, Michelle, Jim-Brundidge, Jennifer and Makaryk, Kurt (2020), ‘Instructional strategies for engagement: Cultivating emotional awareness and a challenge-skills imbalance’, in S. L. Stacki, M. M. Caskey and S. B. Mertens (eds), Curriculum, Instruction, and Assessment: Intersecting New Needs and New Approaches, Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing, pp. 249–77.
    [Google Scholar]
16. Hausman, Jerome J. (1959), ‘Editorial’, Studies in Art Education, 1:1, pp. 3–8, https://doi.org/10.2307/1319946.
    [Google Scholar]
17. Illinois Art Education Association (n.d.), Lessons’, https://lessons.ilaea.org. Accessed 14 July 2025.
18. King, Jules, Smith, Kennedy, Burleigh, L., Crossley, Scott, Demkin, Maggie and Reade, Walter (2025), ‘Map: Charting student math misunderstandings’, Kaggle, 16 October, https://www.kaggle.com/competitions/map-charting-student-math-misunderstandings. Accessed 19 July 2025.
19. Keel, John S. (1963), ‘Research review: The history of art education’, Studies in Art Education, 4:2, p. 45, https://doi.org/10.2307/1320026.
    [Google Scholar]
20. MacGregor, Ronald (1981), ‘Dialects and dialectics: Thoughts on the languages of research’, Studies in Art Education, 23:1, pp. 4–5, https://doi.org/10.1080/00393541.1981.11650296.
    [Google Scholar]
21. McFee, June King (1968), ‘Editorial’, Studies in Art Education, 10:1, p. 4, https://doi.org/10.1080/00393541.1968.11650631.
    [Google Scholar]
22. McKay, Sara Wilson (2020), ‘Moving a culture of research toward a research community’, NAEA News, 62:5, p. 6, https://doi.org/10.1080/01606395.2020.1730688.
    [Google Scholar]
23. Nonaka, Ikujiro and Takeuchi, Hirotaka (1995), The Knowledge-Creating Company: How Japanese Companies Create the Dynamics of Innovation, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
24. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) (2015), Frascati Manual 2015: Guidelines for Collecting and Reporting Data on Research and Experimental Development, Paris: OECD Publishing.
    [Google Scholar]
25. rateCreative (2024), ‘Promotion’, 15 March, https://ratecreative.com. Accessed 10 July 2015.
26. Shifman, Limor (2014), Memes in Digital Culture, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
27. Thompson, John (2015), Books in the Digital Age: The Transformation of Academic and Higher Education Publishing in Britain and the United States, Cambridge: Polity Press.
    [Google Scholar]
28. Colavizza, Giovanni and Romanello, Matteo (2019), ‘Citation mining of humanities journals: The progress to date and the challenges ahead’, Journal of European Periodical Studies, 4:1, pp. 36–53, https://doi.org/10.21825/jeps.v4i1.10120.
    [Google Scholar]
29. Grodoski, Chris (2018), ‘Visualizing data in art education: Research, practice, and advocacy’, Art Education, 71:2, pp. 36–45, https://doi.org/10.1080/00043125.2018.1414537.
    [Google Scholar]
30. Hafeli, Mary (2009), ‘Forget this article: On scholarly oblivion, institutional amnesia, and erasure of research history’, Studies in Art Education, 50:4, pp. 369–81, https://doi.org/10.1080/00393541.2009.11518782.
    [Google Scholar]