Introduction | Intellect Skip to content
1981
  1. Home
  2. Books
  3. LIFE
  4. Chapter

Introduction

image of Introduction
Preview this chapter:
Preview Magnify
Hardback ISBN: 9781789387926
Paperback ISBN: 9781789387933
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Allaby, Michael (ed.) (2015), A Dictionary of Ecology (5th ed.), Oxford: Oxford University Press, https://www.oxfordreference.com/view/10.1093/acref/9780191793158.001.0001/acref-9780191793158-e-3220. Accessed 17 April 2022 .
     [Google Scholar]
  2. Anten, Niels P. R. and Chen, Bin J. W. (2021), ‘Detect thy family: Mechanisms, ecology and agricultural aspects of kin recognition in plants’, Plant, Cell & Environment, 44:4, pp. 1059–71.
  3. Atapattu, Sumudu A. , Gonzalez, Carmen G. and Seck, Sara L. (eds) (2021), The Cambridge Handbook of Environmental Justice and Sustainable Development, Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  4. Bar-Yam, Yaneer (2011), ‘Concepts: Patterns’, Cambridge, MA: New England Complex Systems Institute, https://necsi.edu/patterns. Accessed 18 January 2019 .
     [Google Scholar]
  5. Bateson, Gregory ([1972] 2000], Steps to an Ecology of Mind, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  6. Bauer, Ute Meta (ed.) (2022), Climates. Habitats. Environments, Cambridge: MIT Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  7. Beatty, Michael James , McCroskey, James C. and Floyd, Kory (2009), Biological Dimensions of Communication: Perspectives, Methods, and Research, Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  8. Bedau, Mark A. and Cleland, Carol E. (eds) (2010), The Nature of Life: Classical and Contemporary Perspectives from Philosophy and Science, Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  9. Bich, Leonardo and Green, Sara (2018), ‘Is defining life pointless? Operational definitions at the frontiers of biology’, Synthese, 195:9, pp. 3919–46.
     [Google Scholar]
  10. Boren, Justin P. and Veksler, Alice E. (2011), ‘A decade of research exploring biology and communication: The brain, nervous, endocrine, cardiovascular and immune systems’, Communication Research Trends, 30:4, pp. 4–31.
     [Google Scholar]
  11. Boren, Justin P. and Veksler, Alice E. (2016), ‘Biology’, in K. B. Jensen and R. T. Craig (eds), The International Encyclopedia of Communication Theory and Philosophy, Volume I, Malden, MA: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.17
     [Google Scholar]
  12. Braidotti, Rosi and Bignall, Simone (eds) (2018), Posthuman Ecologies: Complexity and Process After Deleuze, Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
     [Google Scholar]
  13. Braman, Sandra (2004), ‘The meta-technologies of information’, in S. Braman (ed.), Biotechnology and Communication: The Meta-Technologies of Information, Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers, pp. 3–38.
     [Google Scholar]
  14. Brevini, Benedetta and Murdock, Graham (eds) (2017), Carbon Capitalism and Communication: Confronting Climate Crisis, Cham: Palgrave Macmillan.
     [Google Scholar]
  15. Caniglia, Beth Schaefer , Jorgenson, Andrew , Malin, Stephanie A. , Peek, Lori , Pellow, David N. and Huang, Xiaorui (eds) (2021), Handbook of Environmental Sociology, Cham: Springer.
     [Google Scholar]
  16. Cappella, Joseph N. (1991), ‘The biological origins of automated patterns of human interaction’, Communication Theory, 1:1, pp. 4–35 .
  17. Cappella, Joseph N (2020), ‘Building communication science through blueprints of D. C. Dennett and Robert Pirsig’, in K. Floyd and R. Weber (eds), The Handbook of Communication Science and Biology, New York: Routledge, pp. 10–18.
  18. Capra, Fritjof and Luisi, Pier Luigi ([2014] 2020), Vita e Natura: Una Visione Sistemica, Sansepolcro: Aboca.
     [Google Scholar]
  19. Carvalho, Anabela , Doyle, Julie and Russill, Chris (eds) (2021), ‘Critical approaches to climate change and civic action,’ Frontiers in Communication, 6, https://doi.org/10.3389/fcomm.2021.711897. Accessed 18 April 2023.
     [Google Scholar]
  20. Cassin, Barbara (ed.) (2014), ‘LIFE/LEBEN,’ Dictionary of Untranslatables: A Philosophical Lexicon, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  21. Christensen, Miyase and Nilsson, Annika E. (2018), ‘Media, communication, and the environment in precarious times,’ Journal of Communication, 68:2, pp. 267–77.
     [Google Scholar]
  22. Condit, Celeste Michelle (2000), ‘Culture and biology in human communication: Toward a multi-causal model’, Communication Education, 49, pp. 7–24.
     [Google Scholar]
  23. Cook, Sarah (ed.) (2016), Information, Documents of Contemporary Art, London and Cambridge, MA: Whitechapel Gallery and MIT Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  24. Corvellec, Hervé , Stowell, Alison F. and Johansson, Nils (2022), ‘Critiques of the circular economy’, Journal of Industrial Ecology, 26:2, pp. 421–32.
     [Google Scholar]
  25. Côté, Raymond P. (2009), ‘Industrial ecology’, in D. J. Cuff and A. Goudie (eds), The Oxford Companion to Global Change, 1st ed., Oxford: Oxford University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  26. Cox, Robert (ed.) (2015), Environmental Communication, Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications.
     [Google Scholar]
  27. Craig, Robert T. (2020), ‘Series editor's foreword’, in K. Floyd and R. Weber (eds), The Handbook of Communication Science and Biology, New York: Routledge, pp. xvii–xviii.
  28. Craig, Robert T. and Muller, Heidi L. (2007), ‘Concluding reflections’, in Theorizing Communication: Readings Across Traditions, Thousand Oaks, MA: Sage, pp. 495–502.
  29. Craig, Robert T. and Xiong, Bingjuan (2022), ‘Traditions of communication theory and the potential for multicultural dialogue’, Journal of Multicultural Discourses, 17:1, pp. 1–25.18
     [Google Scholar]
  30. Dewey, John (2012), Unmodern Philosophy and Modern Philosophy, P. Deen (ed.), Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  31. Dewey, John and Bentley, Arthur ([1949] 2008), Knowing and the Known, in J. A. Boydston (ed.), The Later Works: 1925–1953, vol. 16, Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press, p. 143. [First published by Boston, MA: Beacon Press, 1949.]
     [Google Scholar]
  32. Deuze, Mark (2012), Media Life, Cambridge: Polity Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Deuze, Mark (2023), Life in Media: A Global Introduction to Media Studies, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  34. Floridi, Luciano (2010), Information: A Very Short Introduction, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  35. Floyd, Kory and Webeŕ, René (eds) (2020), The Handbook of Communication Science and Biology, New York: Routledge.
     [Google Scholar]
  36. Fuchs, Christian and Qiu, Jack Linchuan (2018), ‘Ferments in the field: Introductory reflections on the past, present and future of communication studies’, Journal of Communication , 68:2, pp. 219–32.
     [Google Scholar]
  37. Fuller, Matthew (2005), Media Ecologies: Materialist Energies in Art and Technoculture, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  38. Gánti, Tibor (2003), The Principles of Life, New York: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Godfrey-Smith, Peter and Sterelny, Kim (2016), ‘Biological information’, in E. N. Zalta (ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Summer ed., Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University, https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2016/entries/information-biological/. Accessed 4 January 2023 .
     [Google Scholar]
  40. Granata, Paolo (2017), ‘Medium as “metaform”: An inquiry into the life of forms’, in C. Anton , R. K. Logan and L. Strate (eds), Taking up McLuhan's Cause: Perspectives on Media and Formal Causality, Bristol: Intellect.
     [Google Scholar]
  41. Grasso, Maria Teresa and Giugni, Marco (eds) (2022), The Routledge Handbook of Environmental Movements, New York: Routledge.
     [Google Scholar]
  42. Green, Sara (2022), ‘Philosophy of systems and synthetic biology’, in E. N. Zalta (ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Summer ed., Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University, https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/systems-synthetic-biology/. Accessed 4 January 2023 .
     [Google Scholar]
  43. Guattari, Félix ([1989] 2000), The Three Ecologies (trans. I. Pindar and P. Sutton), New Brunswick, NJ: The Athlone Press. [First published Les trois écologies, Editions Galilée in French in 1989].
     [Google Scholar]
  44. Gunaratne, Shelton A. and Gunaratne, Yoke-Sim (2017), ‘A new vision of reality for communication research: Call for a paradigm shift to systems view of life’, Journal of Multicultural Discourses, 12:1, pp. 1–22.
     [Google Scholar]
  45. Gunaratne, Shelton A. and Gunaratne, Yoke-Sim (2021), ‘Resolving East-West rifts in Craig's metamodel’, in M. H. Rich and J. S. Robles (eds), Practicing Communication Theory, San Diego, CA: Cognella.
     [Google Scholar]
  46. Hansen, Anders and Cox, Robert (eds) (2015), Routledge Companion of Environment and Communication, London: Routledge.19
     [Google Scholar]
  47. Harris, Kathleen Mullan and McDade, Thomas W. (2018), ‘The biosocial approach to human development, behavior, and health across the life course’, RSF: The Russell Sage Foundation Journal of the Social Sciences, 4:4, pp. 2–26.
  48. Heise, Ursula K. (2019), ‘Environmentalism, eco-cosmopolitanism, and premodern thought’, in V. Nardizzi and T. J. Werth (eds), Premodern Ecologies in the Modern Literary Imagination, Toronto: University of Toronto Press, pp. 282–88.
     [Google Scholar]
  49. Hickman, Larry A. (2013), ‘John Dewey's critique of our “unmodern” philosophy’, European Journal of Pragmatism and American Philosophy, V-1, http://journals.openedition.org/ejpap/599. Accessed 3 March 2022 .
     [Google Scholar]
  50. Hickson III, Mark and Stacks, Don W. (2010), ‘Biological views of communication’, The Review of Communication, 10:4, pp. 263–75.
  51. Hoffman, Joshua and Rosenkrantz, Gary (1999), ‘life’, in R. Audi (ed.), The Cambridge Dictionary of Philosophy, 2nd ed., New York: Cambridge University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  52. Hogan, Mél (2018), ‘Big data ecologies’, ephemera, 18.3, pp. 631–65.
     [Google Scholar]
  53. Horn, Eva and Bergthaller, Hannes (2020), The Anthropocene: Key Issues for the Humanities, New York: Routledge.
     [Google Scholar]
  54. Huhtamo, Erkki and Galili, Doron (2020), ‘The pasts and prospects of media archaeology’, Early Popular Visual Culture, 18:4, pp. 333–39.
     [Google Scholar]
  55. Iheka, Cajetan (2021), African Ecomedia: Network Forms, Planetary Politics, Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  56. Johnson, Mark (2017), Embodied Mind, Meaning, and Reason: How Our Bodies Give Rise to Understanding, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  57. Jones, Emily (2023), Feminist Theory and International Law: Posthuman Perspectives, New York: Taylor & Francis.
     [Google Scholar]
  58. Kauffman, Stuart A. (2019), A World Beyond Physics: The Emergence and Evolution of Life, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  59. Keller, Evelyn Fox (2003), Making Sense of Life: Explaining Biological Development with Models, Metaphors and Machines, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  60. Kittler, Friedrich (2007), ‘Ontologie der Medien’, Bochumer Kolloquiums Medienwissenschaft, Bochum: Ruhr-Universtität Bochum, 11 November, https://doi.org/10.25969/mediarep/13855. Accessed 10 February 2023 .
     [Google Scholar]
  61. Knapp, Mark L. (2009), ‘Epilogue: A ‘‘new’’ frontier for communication studies’, in M. J. Beatty, J. C. McCroskey and K. Floyd (eds), Biological Dimensions of Communication: Perspectives, Methods, and Research, Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press, Inc., pp. 267–80.
  62. Krcmar, Marina , Ewoldsen , David R. and Koerner, Ascan (2016), ‘The future of communication’, in Communication Science Theory and Research: An Advanced Introduction, New York: Routledge, pp. 336–47.
     [Google Scholar]
  63. Krippendorff, Klaus (2008), ‘Generalizability’, in W. Donsbach (ed.), The International Encyclopedia of Communication, 1st ed., Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing, pp. 1951–54.20
     [Google Scholar]
  64. Lanigan, Richard L. (2021), ‘Communicology, cybernetics, and chiasm: A synergism of logic, linguistics, and semiotics’, in C. Vidales and S. Brier (eds), Introduction to Cybersemiotics: A Transdisciplinary Perspective, Cham: Springer, pp. 161–91.
     [Google Scholar]
  65. Lehman-Wilzig, Sam and Cohen-Avigdor, Nava (2004), ‘The natural life cycle of new media evolution: Inter-media struggle for survival in the internet age’, New Media & Society, 6:6, pp. 707–30.
     [Google Scholar]
  66. Liddell, Henry George and Scott, Robert (1940a), ‘βίος’, in A Greek-English Lexicon (rev. and augmented by H. S. Jones and R. McKenzie), Oxford: Clarendon Press, http://www.perseus.tufts.edu/hopper/text?doc=Perseus:text:1999.04.0057:entry=bi/os1. Accessed 23 January 2021 .
     [Google Scholar]
  67. Liddell, Henry George and Scott, Robert (1940b), ‘οἶκος’, in A Greek-English Lexicon (rev. and augmented by H. S. Jones and R. McKenzie), Oxford: Clarendon Press, http://www.perseus.tufts.edu/hopper/text?doc=Perseus:text:1999.04.0057:entry=oi)%3Dkos1. Accessed 23 January 2021 .
     [Google Scholar]
  68. Lievrouw, Leah A. (2014), ‘Materiality and media in communication and technology studies: An unfinished project’, in T. Gillespie, P. J. Boczkowski and K. A. Foot (eds.), Media Technologies: Essays on Communication, Materiality, and Society, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 21–51.
     [Google Scholar]
  69. ‘life’ (2022), Oxford Dictionaries, Oxford: Oxford University Press, http://www.oxforddictionaries.com/us/definition/american_english/life. Accessed 15 April 2022 .
     [Google Scholar]
  70. ‘life, n.’ (2023), OED Online, Oxford: Oxford University Press, https://www.oed.com/dictionary/life_n. Accessed 24 July 2023 .
     [Google Scholar]
  71. Logan, Robert K. (2014), ‘What is information? Why is it relativistic? & What is its relationship to materiality, meaning & organization?’ in What is Information?: Propagating Organization in the Biosphere, Symbolosphere, Technosphere and Econosphere, Toronto: DEMO Publishing, pp. 25–51.
     [Google Scholar]
  72. Logan, Robert K. (2021), ‘Biological dimensions of media ecology and its relationship to biosemiotics’, in J. Swartz and J. Wasko (eds), MEDIA: A Transdisciplinary Inquiry, Bristol: Intellect Books.
     [Google Scholar]
  73. López, Antonio , Ivakhiv, Adrian , Rust, Stephen , Tola, Miriam , Chang, Alenda Y. and Chu, Kiu-wai (eds) (2024), The Routledge Handbook of Ecomedia Studies, London: Routledge.
     [Google Scholar]
  74. Luisi, Pier Luigi (2016), ‘Systems thinking and its implications: The principle of interdependence’, Wall Street International, 29 January, https://www.wsimag.com/en/19190-systems-thinking-and-its-implications. Accessed 28 May 2019 .
     [Google Scholar]
  75. Lupinacci, John , Happel-Parkins, Alison and Turner, Rita (eds) (2022), Ecocritical Perspectives in Teacher Education, Boston: Brill.
     [Google Scholar]
  76. Magin, Richard L. (2017), ‘Bioengineering and cybernetics: A modern caduceus’, IEEE (Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers) Pulse, 8:1, pp. 44–47.
    [Google Scholar]
  77. Malaterre, Christophe and Chartier, Jean-François (2019), ‘Beyond categorical definitions of life: A data-driven approach to assessing lifeness’, Synthese, 198, pp. 4543–72.
     [Google Scholar]
  78. Mariscal, Carlos (2021), ‘Life’, in E. N. Zalta (ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Winter ed., Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University, https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2021/entries/life/. Accessed 12 January 2022 .
     [Google Scholar]
  79. Mattelart, Armand (1996), ‘Epilogue: New organic totalities’, in The Invention of Communication (trans. S. Emanuel), Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  80. Maxwell, Richard and Miller, Toby (2012), Greening the Media, Cambridge: Oxford University Press.21
     [Google Scholar]
  81. Miike, Yoshitaka and Yin, Jing (eds) (2022), The Handbook of Global Interventions in Communication Theory, New York: Routledge.
     [Google Scholar]
  82. Miller, Toby and Maxwell, Richard (2017), Greenwashing Culture, London: Routledge.
     [Google Scholar]
  83. Mitchell, Robert E. (2015), Bioart and the Vitality of Media, Seattle, WA: University of Washington Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  84. Mitchell, W. J. T. (ed.) (2023), ‘Keywords’, The Chicago School of Media Theory, Division of the Humanities, University of Chicago, https://web.archive.org/web/20230127202040/https://lucian.uchicago.edu/blogs/mediatheory/keywords/. Accessed 27 January 2023 .
     [Google Scholar]
  85. Mitchell, W. J. T. and Hansen, Mark B. N. (eds) (2010), Critical Terms for Media Studies, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  86. Mitman, Gregg (1992), The State of Nature: Ecology, Community, and American Social Thought, 1900–1950, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  87. Murdock, Esme G. (2020), ‘A history of environmental justice: Foundations, narratives, and perspectives’, in B. Coolsaet (ed.), Environmental Justice: Key Issues, New York: Routledge, pp. 6–17.
     [Google Scholar]
  88. Murdock, Graham (2021), ‘Dark materials: Media, machines, markets’, in J. Swartz and J. Wasko (eds), MEDIA: A Transdisciplinary Inquiry, Bristol: Intellect Books.
     [Google Scholar]
  89. Nail, Thomas (2023), ‘Metabolism and metabolic drift’, in J. Swartz and J. Wasko (eds), LIFE: A Transdisciplinary Inquiry, Bristol: Intellect, pp. 185–97.
  90. Newell, Joshua P. and Cousins, Joshua J. (2015), ‘The boundaries of urban metabolism: Towards a political–industrial ecology’, Progress in Human Geography, 39:6, pp. 702–28.
     [Google Scholar]
  91. NIH (National Institutes of Health) (2021), ‘Science education: Glossary of terms’, National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering (NIBIB), Department of Health & Human Services, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, https://www.nibib.nih.gov/science-education/glossary/b. Accessed 29 April 2022 .
  92. Parikka, Jussi (2014), The Anthrobscene, Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
  93. Park, Chris and Allaby, Michael (2017), ‘Industrial ecology’, in C. Park and M. Allaby (eds), A Dictionary of Environment and Conservation, 3rd ed., Oxford: Oxford University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  94. Parks, Lisa (2020), ‘Field mapping: What is the “media” of media studies?’, Television & New Media, 21:6, pp. 642–49.
     [Google Scholar]
  95. Parks, Lisa and Walker, Janet (2020), ‘Disaster media: Bending the curve of ecological disruption and moving toward social justice’, Media + Environment, 2:1, https://doi.org/10.1525/001c.13474. Accessed 18 October 2021 .
     [Google Scholar]
  96. Peekhaus, Wilhelm (2016), ‘Biotechnology’, in K. B. Jensen and R. T. Craig (eds), The International Encyclopedia of Communication Theory and Philosophy, Volume I, Malden, MA: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
  97. Pezzullo, Phaedra C. and Cox, Robert J. (2021), Environmental Communication and the Public Sphere, 6th ed., Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications.
     [Google Scholar]
  98. Phillips, Whitney and Milner, Ryan M. (2021), You Are Here: A Field Guide for Navigating Polarized Speech, Conspiracy Theories, and Our Polluted Media Landscape, Cambridge: MIT Press.22
     [Google Scholar]
  99. Popa, Radu (2004), Between Necessity and Probability: Searching for the Definition and Origin of Life, Dordrecht: Springer Science & Business Media.
     [Google Scholar]
  100. Rajan, Kaushik Sunder (2006), Biocapital: The Constitution of Postgenomic Life, Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
  101. Raymond, Richard C . (1950), ‘Communication, entropy, and life’, American Scientist, 38:2, pp. 273–278.
     [Google Scholar]
  102. Rust, Stephen , Monani, Salma and Cubitt, Sean (eds) (2016), Ecomedia: Key Issues, New York: Routledge.
     [Google Scholar]
  103. Sagan, Carl (1970), ‘Life’, Encyclopedia Britannica, Chicago: Encyclopædia Britannica Incorporated, pp. 1083–1083A.
     [Google Scholar]
  104. Sagan, Dorion , Sagan, Carl and Margulis, Lynn (n.d.), ‘life’, Encyclopædia Britannica, Chicago: Encyclopædia Britannica, Inc., https://www.britannica.com/science/life. Accessed 15 April 2022 .
     [Google Scholar]
  105. Schiller, Dan (1988), ‘How to think about information’, in V. Mosco and J. Wasko (eds), The Political Economy of Information, Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press, pp. 27–43.
     [Google Scholar]
  106. Scolari, Carlos A. (2012), ‘Media ecology: Exploring the metaphor to expand the theory’, Communication Theory, 22, pp. 204–25.
     [Google Scholar]
  107. Scolari, Carlos A. (2022), ‘Evolución de los medios: Mapa de una disciplina en construcción: Una revisión’, El Profesional de la Información, 31:2, https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/articulo?codigo=8402668. Accessed 5 April 2023.
     [Google Scholar]
  108. Sharifi, Rouhallah and Ryu, Choong-Min (2021), ‘Social networking in crop plants: Wired and wireless cross-plant communications’, Plant, Cell & Environment, 44:4, pp. 1095–110.
  109. Sharma, Sarah and Singh, Rianka (eds) (2022), Re-understanding Media: Feminist Extensions of Marshall McLuhan, Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  110. Slovic, Scott , Rangarajan, Swarnalatha and Sarveswaran, Vidya (eds) (2019), Routledge Handbook of Ecocriticism and Environmental Communication, London: Routledge.
     [Google Scholar]
  111. Starosielski, Nicole (2021), Media Hot and Cold, Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  112. Starosielski, Nicole and Walker, Janet (eds) (2016), Sustainable Media: Critical Approaches to Media and Environment, New York: Routledge.
     [Google Scholar]
  113. Stumpf, Michael P. H. (2022), ‘More is different with a vengeance’, Cell Systems, 13:8, pp. 594–97.
  114. Takahashi, Bruno , Metag, Julia , Thaker, Jagadish and Comfort, Suzannah Evans (eds) (2021), The Handbook of International Trends in Environmental Communication, New York: Routledge.
     [Google Scholar]
  115. Thacker, Eugene (2004), Biomedia, Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  116. Thacker, Eugene (2010), ‘Biomedia’, in W. J. T. Mitchell and M. B. N. Hansen (eds), Critical Terms for Media Studies, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  117. Trifonov, Edward N. (2011), ‘Vocabulary of definitions of life suggests a definition’, Journal of Biomolecular Structure and Dynamics, 29:2, pp. 259–66.
     [Google Scholar]
  118. Turner, Fred (2006), From Counterculture to Cyberculture: Stewart Brand, the Whole Earth Network, and the Rise of Digital Utopianism, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.23
     [Google Scholar]
  119. Veksler, Alice E., Boren, Justin P. and Priem, Jennifer (2020), ‘Social support and physiology: Current trends and future directions’, in K. Floyd and R. Weber (eds), The Handbook of Communication Science and Biology, New York: Routledge, pp. 319–31.
  120. Vettel, Eric J. (2013), Biotech: The Countercultural Origins of an Industry, Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  121. Vint, Sherryl (ed.) (2020), After the Human: Culture, Theory and Criticism in the 21st Century, vol. 6, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  122. von Bertalanffy, Ludwig ([1968] 2015), General System Theory: Foundations, Development, Applications, rev. ed., New York: George Braziller.
     [Google Scholar]
  123. Wachsmuth, David (2012), ‘Three ecologies: Urban metabolism and the society-nature opposition’, The Sociological Quarterly, 53:4, pp. 506–23.
     [Google Scholar]
  124. Wagner, Andeas (2014), The Arrival of the Fittest: How Nature Innovates, New York: Penguin Random House.
     [Google Scholar]
  125. Wagner, Andeas (2019), Life Finds a Way: What Evolution Teaches Us About Creativity, New York: Basic Books.
     [Google Scholar]
  126. Weber, Bruce (2018), ‘Life’, in E. N. Zalta (ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Summer ed., Stanford, CA: Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University, https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2018/entries/life/. Accessed 11 July 2020 .
     [Google Scholar]
  127. Weibel, Peter (ed.) (2023), BioMedia: The Age of Media with Life-like Behavior, Leipzig: ZKM | Center for Art and Media Karlsruhe and Spector Books.
     [Google Scholar]
  128. Wickberg, Adam and Gärdebo, Johan (eds) (2022), Environing Media, New York: Taylor & Francis.
     [Google Scholar]
  129. Witzany, Guenther (2019), ‘Communication as the main characteristic of life’, in V. M. Kolb (ed.), Handbook of Astrobiology, Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press, pp. 91–105.
     [Google Scholar]
  130. Witzany, Guenther (2020), ‘What is Life?’, Frontiers in Astronomy and Space Science, 7:7, pp. 1–20.
     [Google Scholar]
  131. Yegiyan, Narine S. (2017), ‘Communication and human biology’, in M. Allen (ed.), The SAGE Encyclopedia of Communication Research Methods, Los Angeles, CA: Sage Publishing.
     [Google Scholar]

References

  1. Allaby, Michael (ed.) (2015), A Dictionary of Ecology (5th ed.), Oxford: Oxford University Press, https://www.oxfordreference.com/view/10.1093/acref/9780191793158.001.0001/acref-9780191793158-e-3220. Accessed 17 April 2022 .
     [Google Scholar]
  2. Anten, Niels P. R. and Chen, Bin J. W. (2021), ‘Detect thy family: Mechanisms, ecology and agricultural aspects of kin recognition in plants’, Plant, Cell & Environment, 44:4, pp. 1059–71.
  3. Atapattu, Sumudu A. , Gonzalez, Carmen G. and Seck, Sara L. (eds) (2021), The Cambridge Handbook of Environmental Justice and Sustainable Development, Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  4. Bar-Yam, Yaneer (2011), ‘Concepts: Patterns’, Cambridge, MA: New England Complex Systems Institute, https://necsi.edu/patterns. Accessed 18 January 2019 .
     [Google Scholar]
  5. Bateson, Gregory ([1972] 2000], Steps to an Ecology of Mind, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  6. Bauer, Ute Meta (ed.) (2022), Climates. Habitats. Environments, Cambridge: MIT Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  7. Beatty, Michael James , McCroskey, James C. and Floyd, Kory (2009), Biological Dimensions of Communication: Perspectives, Methods, and Research, Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  8. Bedau, Mark A. and Cleland, Carol E. (eds) (2010), The Nature of Life: Classical and Contemporary Perspectives from Philosophy and Science, Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  9. Bich, Leonardo and Green, Sara (2018), ‘Is defining life pointless? Operational definitions at the frontiers of biology’, Synthese, 195:9, pp. 3919–46.
     [Google Scholar]
  10. Boren, Justin P. and Veksler, Alice E. (2011), ‘A decade of research exploring biology and communication: The brain, nervous, endocrine, cardiovascular and immune systems’, Communication Research Trends, 30:4, pp. 4–31.
     [Google Scholar]
  11. Boren, Justin P. and Veksler, Alice E. (2016), ‘Biology’, in K. B. Jensen and R. T. Craig (eds), The International Encyclopedia of Communication Theory and Philosophy, Volume I, Malden, MA: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.17
     [Google Scholar]
  12. Braidotti, Rosi and Bignall, Simone (eds) (2018), Posthuman Ecologies: Complexity and Process After Deleuze, Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
     [Google Scholar]
  13. Braman, Sandra (2004), ‘The meta-technologies of information’, in S. Braman (ed.), Biotechnology and Communication: The Meta-Technologies of Information, Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers, pp. 3–38.
     [Google Scholar]
  14. Brevini, Benedetta and Murdock, Graham (eds) (2017), Carbon Capitalism and Communication: Confronting Climate Crisis, Cham: Palgrave Macmillan.
     [Google Scholar]
  15. Caniglia, Beth Schaefer , Jorgenson, Andrew , Malin, Stephanie A. , Peek, Lori , Pellow, David N. and Huang, Xiaorui (eds) (2021), Handbook of Environmental Sociology, Cham: Springer.
     [Google Scholar]
  16. Cappella, Joseph N. (1991), ‘The biological origins of automated patterns of human interaction’, Communication Theory, 1:1, pp. 4–35 .
  17. Cappella, Joseph N (2020), ‘Building communication science through blueprints of D. C. Dennett and Robert Pirsig’, in K. Floyd and R. Weber (eds), The Handbook of Communication Science and Biology, New York: Routledge, pp. 10–18.
  18. Capra, Fritjof and Luisi, Pier Luigi ([2014] 2020), Vita e Natura: Una Visione Sistemica, Sansepolcro: Aboca.
     [Google Scholar]
  19. Carvalho, Anabela , Doyle, Julie and Russill, Chris (eds) (2021), ‘Critical approaches to climate change and civic action,’ Frontiers in Communication, 6, https://doi.org/10.3389/fcomm.2021.711897. Accessed 18 April 2023.
     [Google Scholar]
  20. Cassin, Barbara (ed.) (2014), ‘LIFE/LEBEN,’ Dictionary of Untranslatables: A Philosophical Lexicon, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  21. Christensen, Miyase and Nilsson, Annika E. (2018), ‘Media, communication, and the environment in precarious times,’ Journal of Communication, 68:2, pp. 267–77.
     [Google Scholar]
  22. Condit, Celeste Michelle (2000), ‘Culture and biology in human communication: Toward a multi-causal model’, Communication Education, 49, pp. 7–24.
     [Google Scholar]
  23. Cook, Sarah (ed.) (2016), Information, Documents of Contemporary Art, London and Cambridge, MA: Whitechapel Gallery and MIT Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  24. Corvellec, Hervé , Stowell, Alison F. and Johansson, Nils (2022), ‘Critiques of the circular economy’, Journal of Industrial Ecology, 26:2, pp. 421–32.
     [Google Scholar]
  25. Côté, Raymond P. (2009), ‘Industrial ecology’, in D. J. Cuff and A. Goudie (eds), The Oxford Companion to Global Change, 1st ed., Oxford: Oxford University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  26. Cox, Robert (ed.) (2015), Environmental Communication, Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications.
     [Google Scholar]
  27. Craig, Robert T. (2020), ‘Series editor's foreword’, in K. Floyd and R. Weber (eds), The Handbook of Communication Science and Biology, New York: Routledge, pp. xvii–xviii.
  28. Craig, Robert T. and Muller, Heidi L. (2007), ‘Concluding reflections’, in Theorizing Communication: Readings Across Traditions, Thousand Oaks, MA: Sage, pp. 495–502.
  29. Craig, Robert T. and Xiong, Bingjuan (2022), ‘Traditions of communication theory and the potential for multicultural dialogue’, Journal of Multicultural Discourses, 17:1, pp. 1–25.18
     [Google Scholar]
  30. Dewey, John (2012), Unmodern Philosophy and Modern Philosophy, P. Deen (ed.), Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  31. Dewey, John and Bentley, Arthur ([1949] 2008), Knowing and the Known, in J. A. Boydston (ed.), The Later Works: 1925–1953, vol. 16, Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press, p. 143. [First published by Boston, MA: Beacon Press, 1949.]
     [Google Scholar]
  32. Deuze, Mark (2012), Media Life, Cambridge: Polity Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Deuze, Mark (2023), Life in Media: A Global Introduction to Media Studies, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  34. Floridi, Luciano (2010), Information: A Very Short Introduction, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  35. Floyd, Kory and Webeŕ, René (eds) (2020), The Handbook of Communication Science and Biology, New York: Routledge.
     [Google Scholar]
  36. Fuchs, Christian and Qiu, Jack Linchuan (2018), ‘Ferments in the field: Introductory reflections on the past, present and future of communication studies’, Journal of Communication , 68:2, pp. 219–32.
     [Google Scholar]
  37. Fuller, Matthew (2005), Media Ecologies: Materialist Energies in Art and Technoculture, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  38. Gánti, Tibor (2003), The Principles of Life, New York: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Godfrey-Smith, Peter and Sterelny, Kim (2016), ‘Biological information’, in E. N. Zalta (ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Summer ed., Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University, https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2016/entries/information-biological/. Accessed 4 January 2023 .
     [Google Scholar]
  40. Granata, Paolo (2017), ‘Medium as “metaform”: An inquiry into the life of forms’, in C. Anton , R. K. Logan and L. Strate (eds), Taking up McLuhan's Cause: Perspectives on Media and Formal Causality, Bristol: Intellect.
     [Google Scholar]
  41. Grasso, Maria Teresa and Giugni, Marco (eds) (2022), The Routledge Handbook of Environmental Movements, New York: Routledge.
     [Google Scholar]
  42. Green, Sara (2022), ‘Philosophy of systems and synthetic biology’, in E. N. Zalta (ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Summer ed., Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University, https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/systems-synthetic-biology/. Accessed 4 January 2023 .
     [Google Scholar]
  43. Guattari, Félix ([1989] 2000), The Three Ecologies (trans. I. Pindar and P. Sutton), New Brunswick, NJ: The Athlone Press. [First published Les trois écologies, Editions Galilée in French in 1989].
     [Google Scholar]
  44. Gunaratne, Shelton A. and Gunaratne, Yoke-Sim (2017), ‘A new vision of reality for communication research: Call for a paradigm shift to systems view of life’, Journal of Multicultural Discourses, 12:1, pp. 1–22.
     [Google Scholar]
  45. Gunaratne, Shelton A. and Gunaratne, Yoke-Sim (2021), ‘Resolving East-West rifts in Craig's metamodel’, in M. H. Rich and J. S. Robles (eds), Practicing Communication Theory, San Diego, CA: Cognella.
     [Google Scholar]
  46. Hansen, Anders and Cox, Robert (eds) (2015), Routledge Companion of Environment and Communication, London: Routledge.19
     [Google Scholar]
  47. Harris, Kathleen Mullan and McDade, Thomas W. (2018), ‘The biosocial approach to human development, behavior, and health across the life course’, RSF: The Russell Sage Foundation Journal of the Social Sciences, 4:4, pp. 2–26.
  48. Heise, Ursula K. (2019), ‘Environmentalism, eco-cosmopolitanism, and premodern thought’, in V. Nardizzi and T. J. Werth (eds), Premodern Ecologies in the Modern Literary Imagination, Toronto: University of Toronto Press, pp. 282–88.
     [Google Scholar]
  49. Hickman, Larry A. (2013), ‘John Dewey's critique of our “unmodern” philosophy’, European Journal of Pragmatism and American Philosophy, V-1, http://journals.openedition.org/ejpap/599. Accessed 3 March 2022 .
     [Google Scholar]
  50. Hickson III, Mark and Stacks, Don W. (2010), ‘Biological views of communication’, The Review of Communication, 10:4, pp. 263–75.
  51. Hoffman, Joshua and Rosenkrantz, Gary (1999), ‘life’, in R. Audi (ed.), The Cambridge Dictionary of Philosophy, 2nd ed., New York: Cambridge University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  52. Hogan, Mél (2018), ‘Big data ecologies’, ephemera, 18.3, pp. 631–65.
     [Google Scholar]
  53. Horn, Eva and Bergthaller, Hannes (2020), The Anthropocene: Key Issues for the Humanities, New York: Routledge.
     [Google Scholar]
  54. Huhtamo, Erkki and Galili, Doron (2020), ‘The pasts and prospects of media archaeology’, Early Popular Visual Culture, 18:4, pp. 333–39.
     [Google Scholar]
  55. Iheka, Cajetan (2021), African Ecomedia: Network Forms, Planetary Politics, Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  56. Johnson, Mark (2017), Embodied Mind, Meaning, and Reason: How Our Bodies Give Rise to Understanding, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  57. Jones, Emily (2023), Feminist Theory and International Law: Posthuman Perspectives, New York: Taylor & Francis.
     [Google Scholar]
  58. Kauffman, Stuart A. (2019), A World Beyond Physics: The Emergence and Evolution of Life, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  59. Keller, Evelyn Fox (2003), Making Sense of Life: Explaining Biological Development with Models, Metaphors and Machines, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  60. Kittler, Friedrich (2007), ‘Ontologie der Medien’, Bochumer Kolloquiums Medienwissenschaft, Bochum: Ruhr-Universtität Bochum, 11 November, https://doi.org/10.25969/mediarep/13855. Accessed 10 February 2023 .
     [Google Scholar]
  61. Knapp, Mark L. (2009), ‘Epilogue: A ‘‘new’’ frontier for communication studies’, in M. J. Beatty, J. C. McCroskey and K. Floyd (eds), Biological Dimensions of Communication: Perspectives, Methods, and Research, Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press, Inc., pp. 267–80.
  62. Krcmar, Marina , Ewoldsen , David R. and Koerner, Ascan (2016), ‘The future of communication’, in Communication Science Theory and Research: An Advanced Introduction, New York: Routledge, pp. 336–47.
     [Google Scholar]
  63. Krippendorff, Klaus (2008), ‘Generalizability’, in W. Donsbach (ed.), The International Encyclopedia of Communication, 1st ed., Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing, pp. 1951–54.20
     [Google Scholar]
  64. Lanigan, Richard L. (2021), ‘Communicology, cybernetics, and chiasm: A synergism of logic, linguistics, and semiotics’, in C. Vidales and S. Brier (eds), Introduction to Cybersemiotics: A Transdisciplinary Perspective, Cham: Springer, pp. 161–91.
     [Google Scholar]
  65. Lehman-Wilzig, Sam and Cohen-Avigdor, Nava (2004), ‘The natural life cycle of new media evolution: Inter-media struggle for survival in the internet age’, New Media & Society, 6:6, pp. 707–30.
     [Google Scholar]
  66. Liddell, Henry George and Scott, Robert (1940a), ‘βίος’, in A Greek-English Lexicon (rev. and augmented by H. S. Jones and R. McKenzie), Oxford: Clarendon Press, http://www.perseus.tufts.edu/hopper/text?doc=Perseus:text:1999.04.0057:entry=bi/os1. Accessed 23 January 2021 .
     [Google Scholar]
  67. Liddell, Henry George and Scott, Robert (1940b), ‘οἶκος’, in A Greek-English Lexicon (rev. and augmented by H. S. Jones and R. McKenzie), Oxford: Clarendon Press, http://www.perseus.tufts.edu/hopper/text?doc=Perseus:text:1999.04.0057:entry=oi)%3Dkos1. Accessed 23 January 2021 .
     [Google Scholar]
  68. Lievrouw, Leah A. (2014), ‘Materiality and media in communication and technology studies: An unfinished project’, in T. Gillespie, P. J. Boczkowski and K. A. Foot (eds.), Media Technologies: Essays on Communication, Materiality, and Society, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 21–51.
     [Google Scholar]
  69. ‘life’ (2022), Oxford Dictionaries, Oxford: Oxford University Press, http://www.oxforddictionaries.com/us/definition/american_english/life. Accessed 15 April 2022 .
     [Google Scholar]
  70. ‘life, n.’ (2023), OED Online, Oxford: Oxford University Press, https://www.oed.com/dictionary/life_n. Accessed 24 July 2023 .
     [Google Scholar]
  71. Logan, Robert K. (2014), ‘What is information? Why is it relativistic? & What is its relationship to materiality, meaning & organization?’ in What is Information?: Propagating Organization in the Biosphere, Symbolosphere, Technosphere and Econosphere, Toronto: DEMO Publishing, pp. 25–51.
     [Google Scholar]
  72. Logan, Robert K. (2021), ‘Biological dimensions of media ecology and its relationship to biosemiotics’, in J. Swartz and J. Wasko (eds), MEDIA: A Transdisciplinary Inquiry, Bristol: Intellect Books.
     [Google Scholar]
  73. López, Antonio , Ivakhiv, Adrian , Rust, Stephen , Tola, Miriam , Chang, Alenda Y. and Chu, Kiu-wai (eds) (2024), The Routledge Handbook of Ecomedia Studies, London: Routledge.
     [Google Scholar]
  74. Luisi, Pier Luigi (2016), ‘Systems thinking and its implications: The principle of interdependence’, Wall Street International, 29 January, https://www.wsimag.com/en/19190-systems-thinking-and-its-implications. Accessed 28 May 2019 .
     [Google Scholar]
  75. Lupinacci, John , Happel-Parkins, Alison and Turner, Rita (eds) (2022), Ecocritical Perspectives in Teacher Education, Boston: Brill.
     [Google Scholar]
  76. Magin, Richard L. (2017), ‘Bioengineering and cybernetics: A modern caduceus’, IEEE (Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers) Pulse, 8:1, pp. 44–47.
    [Google Scholar]
  77. Malaterre, Christophe and Chartier, Jean-François (2019), ‘Beyond categorical definitions of life: A data-driven approach to assessing lifeness’, Synthese, 198, pp. 4543–72.
     [Google Scholar]
  78. Mariscal, Carlos (2021), ‘Life’, in E. N. Zalta (ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Winter ed., Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University, https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2021/entries/life/. Accessed 12 January 2022 .
     [Google Scholar]
  79. Mattelart, Armand (1996), ‘Epilogue: New organic totalities’, in The Invention of Communication (trans. S. Emanuel), Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  80. Maxwell, Richard and Miller, Toby (2012), Greening the Media, Cambridge: Oxford University Press.21
     [Google Scholar]
  81. Miike, Yoshitaka and Yin, Jing (eds) (2022), The Handbook of Global Interventions in Communication Theory, New York: Routledge.
     [Google Scholar]
  82. Miller, Toby and Maxwell, Richard (2017), Greenwashing Culture, London: Routledge.
     [Google Scholar]
  83. Mitchell, Robert E. (2015), Bioart and the Vitality of Media, Seattle, WA: University of Washington Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  84. Mitchell, W. J. T. (ed.) (2023), ‘Keywords’, The Chicago School of Media Theory, Division of the Humanities, University of Chicago, https://web.archive.org/web/20230127202040/https://lucian.uchicago.edu/blogs/mediatheory/keywords/. Accessed 27 January 2023 .
     [Google Scholar]
  85. Mitchell, W. J. T. and Hansen, Mark B. N. (eds) (2010), Critical Terms for Media Studies, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  86. Mitman, Gregg (1992), The State of Nature: Ecology, Community, and American Social Thought, 1900–1950, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  87. Murdock, Esme G. (2020), ‘A history of environmental justice: Foundations, narratives, and perspectives’, in B. Coolsaet (ed.), Environmental Justice: Key Issues, New York: Routledge, pp. 6–17.
     [Google Scholar]
  88. Murdock, Graham (2021), ‘Dark materials: Media, machines, markets’, in J. Swartz and J. Wasko (eds), MEDIA: A Transdisciplinary Inquiry, Bristol: Intellect Books.
     [Google Scholar]
  89. Nail, Thomas (2023), ‘Metabolism and metabolic drift’, in J. Swartz and J. Wasko (eds), LIFE: A Transdisciplinary Inquiry, Bristol: Intellect, pp. 185–97.
  90. Newell, Joshua P. and Cousins, Joshua J. (2015), ‘The boundaries of urban metabolism: Towards a political–industrial ecology’, Progress in Human Geography, 39:6, pp. 702–28.
     [Google Scholar]
  91. NIH (National Institutes of Health) (2021), ‘Science education: Glossary of terms’, National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering (NIBIB), Department of Health & Human Services, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, https://www.nibib.nih.gov/science-education/glossary/b. Accessed 29 April 2022 .
  92. Parikka, Jussi (2014), The Anthrobscene, Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
  93. Park, Chris and Allaby, Michael (2017), ‘Industrial ecology’, in C. Park and M. Allaby (eds), A Dictionary of Environment and Conservation, 3rd ed., Oxford: Oxford University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  94. Parks, Lisa (2020), ‘Field mapping: What is the “media” of media studies?’, Television & New Media, 21:6, pp. 642–49.
     [Google Scholar]
  95. Parks, Lisa and Walker, Janet (2020), ‘Disaster media: Bending the curve of ecological disruption and moving toward social justice’, Media + Environment, 2:1, https://doi.org/10.1525/001c.13474. Accessed 18 October 2021 .
     [Google Scholar]
  96. Peekhaus, Wilhelm (2016), ‘Biotechnology’, in K. B. Jensen and R. T. Craig (eds), The International Encyclopedia of Communication Theory and Philosophy, Volume I, Malden, MA: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
  97. Pezzullo, Phaedra C. and Cox, Robert J. (2021), Environmental Communication and the Public Sphere, 6th ed., Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications.
     [Google Scholar]
  98. Phillips, Whitney and Milner, Ryan M. (2021), You Are Here: A Field Guide for Navigating Polarized Speech, Conspiracy Theories, and Our Polluted Media Landscape, Cambridge: MIT Press.22
     [Google Scholar]
  99. Popa, Radu (2004), Between Necessity and Probability: Searching for the Definition and Origin of Life, Dordrecht: Springer Science & Business Media.
     [Google Scholar]
  100. Rajan, Kaushik Sunder (2006), Biocapital: The Constitution of Postgenomic Life, Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
  101. Raymond, Richard C . (1950), ‘Communication, entropy, and life’, American Scientist, 38:2, pp. 273–278.
     [Google Scholar]
  102. Rust, Stephen , Monani, Salma and Cubitt, Sean (eds) (2016), Ecomedia: Key Issues, New York: Routledge.
     [Google Scholar]
  103. Sagan, Carl (1970), ‘Life’, Encyclopedia Britannica, Chicago: Encyclopædia Britannica Incorporated, pp. 1083–1083A.
     [Google Scholar]
  104. Sagan, Dorion , Sagan, Carl and Margulis, Lynn (n.d.), ‘life’, Encyclopædia Britannica, Chicago: Encyclopædia Britannica, Inc., https://www.britannica.com/science/life. Accessed 15 April 2022 .
     [Google Scholar]
  105. Schiller, Dan (1988), ‘How to think about information’, in V. Mosco and J. Wasko (eds), The Political Economy of Information, Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press, pp. 27–43.
     [Google Scholar]
  106. Scolari, Carlos A. (2012), ‘Media ecology: Exploring the metaphor to expand the theory’, Communication Theory, 22, pp. 204–25.
     [Google Scholar]
  107. Scolari, Carlos A. (2022), ‘Evolución de los medios: Mapa de una disciplina en construcción: Una revisión’, El Profesional de la Información, 31:2, https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/articulo?codigo=8402668. Accessed 5 April 2023.
     [Google Scholar]
  108. Sharifi, Rouhallah and Ryu, Choong-Min (2021), ‘Social networking in crop plants: Wired and wireless cross-plant communications’, Plant, Cell & Environment, 44:4, pp. 1095–110.
  109. Sharma, Sarah and Singh, Rianka (eds) (2022), Re-understanding Media: Feminist Extensions of Marshall McLuhan, Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  110. Slovic, Scott , Rangarajan, Swarnalatha and Sarveswaran, Vidya (eds) (2019), Routledge Handbook of Ecocriticism and Environmental Communication, London: Routledge.
     [Google Scholar]
  111. Starosielski, Nicole (2021), Media Hot and Cold, Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  112. Starosielski, Nicole and Walker, Janet (eds) (2016), Sustainable Media: Critical Approaches to Media and Environment, New York: Routledge.
     [Google Scholar]
  113. Stumpf, Michael P. H. (2022), ‘More is different with a vengeance’, Cell Systems, 13:8, pp. 594–97.
  114. Takahashi, Bruno , Metag, Julia , Thaker, Jagadish and Comfort, Suzannah Evans (eds) (2021), The Handbook of International Trends in Environmental Communication, New York: Routledge.
     [Google Scholar]
  115. Thacker, Eugene (2004), Biomedia, Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  116. Thacker, Eugene (2010), ‘Biomedia’, in W. J. T. Mitchell and M. B. N. Hansen (eds), Critical Terms for Media Studies, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  117. Trifonov, Edward N. (2011), ‘Vocabulary of definitions of life suggests a definition’, Journal of Biomolecular Structure and Dynamics, 29:2, pp. 259–66.
     [Google Scholar]
  118. Turner, Fred (2006), From Counterculture to Cyberculture: Stewart Brand, the Whole Earth Network, and the Rise of Digital Utopianism, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.23
     [Google Scholar]
  119. Veksler, Alice E., Boren, Justin P. and Priem, Jennifer (2020), ‘Social support and physiology: Current trends and future directions’, in K. Floyd and R. Weber (eds), The Handbook of Communication Science and Biology, New York: Routledge, pp. 319–31.
  120. Vettel, Eric J. (2013), Biotech: The Countercultural Origins of an Industry, Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  121. Vint, Sherryl (ed.) (2020), After the Human: Culture, Theory and Criticism in the 21st Century, vol. 6, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  122. von Bertalanffy, Ludwig ([1968] 2015), General System Theory: Foundations, Development, Applications, rev. ed., New York: George Braziller.
     [Google Scholar]
  123. Wachsmuth, David (2012), ‘Three ecologies: Urban metabolism and the society-nature opposition’, The Sociological Quarterly, 53:4, pp. 506–23.
     [Google Scholar]
  124. Wagner, Andeas (2014), The Arrival of the Fittest: How Nature Innovates, New York: Penguin Random House.
     [Google Scholar]
  125. Wagner, Andeas (2019), Life Finds a Way: What Evolution Teaches Us About Creativity, New York: Basic Books.
     [Google Scholar]
  126. Weber, Bruce (2018), ‘Life’, in E. N. Zalta (ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Summer ed., Stanford, CA: Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University, https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2018/entries/life/. Accessed 11 July 2020 .
     [Google Scholar]
  127. Weibel, Peter (ed.) (2023), BioMedia: The Age of Media with Life-like Behavior, Leipzig: ZKM | Center for Art and Media Karlsruhe and Spector Books.
     [Google Scholar]
  128. Wickberg, Adam and Gärdebo, Johan (eds) (2022), Environing Media, New York: Taylor & Francis.
     [Google Scholar]
  129. Witzany, Guenther (2019), ‘Communication as the main characteristic of life’, in V. M. Kolb (ed.), Handbook of Astrobiology, Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press, pp. 91–105.
     [Google Scholar]
  130. Witzany, Guenther (2020), ‘What is Life?’, Frontiers in Astronomy and Space Science, 7:7, pp. 1–20.
     [Google Scholar]
  131. Yegiyan, Narine S. (2017), ‘Communication and human biology’, in M. Allen (ed.), The SAGE Encyclopedia of Communication Research Methods, Los Angeles, CA: Sage Publishing.
     [Google Scholar]

  • From This Site

    /content/books/9781789387926.c00
    dcterms_title,dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
    -contentType:Contributor -contentType:Concept -contentType:Institution
    10
    5
/content/books/9781789387926.c00
dcterms_title,dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
-contentType:Contributor -contentType:Concept -contentType:Institution
10
5
Chapter
content/books/9781789387926
Book
false
en
Loading
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a success
Invalid data
An error occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error