Introduction

References

1. Braidotti, R. (2011), Nomadic Theory: The Portable Rosi Braidotti, New York: Columbia University Press.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Morella-Pozzi, D. (2014). ‘The (dis)ability of double life: Exploring legitimacy, illegitimacy and the terrible dichotomy of (dis)ability in higher education’, in R. M. Boylorn and M. P. Orbe (eds), Critical Autoethnography: Intersecting Cultural Identities in Everyday Life, New York: Routledge, pp. 176–88.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Siebers, T. (2019), ‘Returning the social to the social model’, in D. T. Mitchel , S. Antebi and S. L. Snyder (eds), The Matter of Disability: Materiality, Biopolitics, Crip Affect, Michigan: University of Michigan Press, pp. 39–47.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Sontag, S. (1991), Illness as Metaphor, London: Penguin.
   [Google Scholar]

References

1. Braidotti, R. (2011), Nomadic Theory: The Portable Rosi Braidotti, New York: Columbia University Press.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Morella-Pozzi, D. (2014). ‘The (dis)ability of double life: Exploring legitimacy, illegitimacy and the terrible dichotomy of (dis)ability in higher education’, in R. M. Boylorn and M. P. Orbe (eds), Critical Autoethnography: Intersecting Cultural Identities in Everyday Life, New York: Routledge, pp. 176–88.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Siebers, T. (2019), ‘Returning the social to the social model’, in D. T. Mitchel , S. Antebi and S. L. Snyder (eds), The Matter of Disability: Materiality, Biopolitics, Crip Affect, Michigan: University of Michigan Press, pp. 39–47.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Sontag, S. (1991), Illness as Metaphor, London: Penguin.
   [Google Scholar]