Is Snapchat Discover really a news platform? News snacking from social media and users’ knowledge of current affairs | Intellect Skip to content
1981
Volume 12, Issue 1
  • ISSN: 2001-0818
  • E-ISSN:

Abstract

The role of the media in informing the public has long been a central topic in journalism studies. Given that social media platforms have become today’s major source of news, it is important to understand the impact of social media use on citizens’ knowledge of current affairs. While people get news from multiple platforms throughout the day, most research treats social media as a single entity or examines only one or two major platforms ignoring newer social media platforms. Drawing on news snacking framework, this study investigates how using some of today’s most popular social media platforms predicts users’ current affairs knowledge, with particular attention to Snapchat and its news section Discover. A survey conducted in the United States (=417) demonstrated that each of the platforms is distinct: Twitter is a strongly positive predictor of knowledge, Facebook a marginally significant negative predictor, Reddit a significantly negative predictor and Instagram not a significant predictor. Overall Snapchat use has no significant association with users’ knowledge of current affairs, whereas Discover use has a negative relationship. Further analysis revealed that mere exposure to Snapchat is positively related to soft-news knowledge and attention to Discover is negatively related to hard-news knowledge.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1386/ajms_00047_1
2023-03-01
2024-05-02
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Alexa ( 2020;), ‘ Top sites in United States. ’, https://www.alexa.com/topsites/countries/US. Accessed 17 May 2020.
  2. Althaus, S. L.. ( 1998;), ‘ Information effects in collective preferences. ’, American Political Science Review, 92:3, pp. 54558.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. An, J.,, Quercia, D., and Crowcroft, J.. ( 2014;), ‘ Partisan sharing: Facebook evidence and societal consequences. ’, The 2nd ACM Conference on Online Social Networks, Dublin, Ireland, 1–2 October, pp. 1324.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Ancu, M., and Cozma, R.. ( 2009;), ‘ MySpace politics: Uses and gratifications of befriending candidates. ’, Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 53:4, pp. 56783.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Bakshy, E.,, Messing, S., and Adamic, L. A.. ( 2015;), ‘ Exposure to ideologically diverse news and opinion on Facebook. ’, Science, 348:6239, pp. 113032.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Barabas, J., and Jerit, J.. ( 2009;), ‘ Estimating the causal effects of media coverage on policy-specific knowledge. ’, American Journal of Political Science, 53:1, pp. 7389.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Bartels, L.. ( 1996;), ‘ Uninformed votes: Information effects in presidential elections. ’, American Journal of Political Science, 40:1, pp. 194230.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Baym, G.. ( 2009;), ‘ Real news/fake news: Beyond the news/entertainment divide. ’, in Allan, S.. (ed.), The Routledge Companion to News and Journalism, Abington:: Routledge;, pp. 374416.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. BBC ( 2012;), ‘ Reddit will not ban “distasteful” content, chief executive says. ’, 17 October, https://www.bbc.com/news/technology-19975375. Accessed 17 May 2020.
  10. Benner, K.. ( 2017;), ‘ In Discover, Snap sees a bright spot as it tries to fend off Facebook. ’, The New York Times, 7 May, https://www.nytimes.com/2017/05/11/technology/snap-public-company-start-ups.html. Accessed 17 May 2020.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Bennett, S. E.. ( 1989;), ‘ Trends in Americans’ political information, 1967–1987. ’, American Politics Quarterly, 17:4, pp. 42245.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Benton, J.. ( 2020;), ‘ Twitter, the most news-friendly social platform, is getting a little bit less so with Stories-like “fleets”. ’, Nieman Lab, 4 March, https://www.niemanlab.org/2020/03/twitter-the-most-news-friendly-social-platform-is-getting-a-little-bit-less-so-with-stories-like-fleets. Accessed 7 July 2020.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Bode, L.. ( 2016;), ‘ Political news in the news feed: Learning politics from social media. ’, Mass Communication and Society, 19:1, pp. 2448.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Boukes, M.. ( 2018;), ‘ Social network sites and learning about current affairs: The impact of Twitter and Facebook usage on the knowledge gap. ’, in 68th International Communication Association, Prague, Czech Republic, 24–28 May.:
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Chyi, H. I.. ( 2009;), ‘ Information surplus and news consumption in the digital age: Impact and implications. ’, in Z. Papacharissi. (ed.), Journalism and Citizenship: New Agendas, New York:: Taylor & Francis;, pp. 97107.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Delli Carpini, M. X., and Keeter, S.. ( 1996), What Americans Know About Politics and Why It Matters, New Haven, CT:: Yale University Press;.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Diehl, T.,, Barnidge, M., and Gil de Zuniga, H.. ( 2019;), ‘ Multi-platform news use and political participation across age groups: Toward a valid metric of platform diversity and its effects. ’, Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 96:2, pp. 42851.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Dimitrova, D. V.,, Shehata, A.,, Strömbäck, J., and Nord, L. W.. ( 2014;), ‘ The effects of digital media on political knowledge and participation in election campaigns: Evidence from panel data. ’, Communication Research, 41:1, pp. 95118.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Eveland Jr, W. P.. ( 2001;), ‘ The cognitive mediation model of learning from the news: Evidence from nonelection, off-year election, and presidential election contexts. ’, Communication Research, 28:5, pp. 571601.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Eveland Jr, W. P., and Scheufele, D. A.. ( 2000;), ‘ Connecting news media use with gaps in knowledge and participation. ’, Political Communication, 17:3, pp. 21537.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Gil de Zúñiga, H.,, Jung, N., and Valenzuela, S.. ( 2012;), ‘ Social media use for news and individuals’ social capital, civic engagement and political participation. ’, Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 17:3, pp. 31936.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Gil de Zúñiga, H.,, Weeks, B., and Ardèvol-Abreu, A.. ( 2017;), ‘ Effects of the news-finds-me perception in communication: Social media use implications for news seeking and learning about politics. ’, Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 22:3, pp. 10523.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Graber, D. A.. ( 2012), Processing Politics: Learning from Television in the Internet Age, Chicago, IL:: University of Chicago Press;.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Ha, L.,, Xu, Y.,, Yang, C.,, Wang, F.,, Yang, L.,, Abuljadail, M.,, Hu, X.,, Jiang, W., and Gabay, I.. ( 2018;), ‘ Decline in news content engagement or news medium engagement? A longitudinal analysis of news engagement since the rise of social and mobile media 2009–2012. ’, Journalism, 19:5, pp. 71839.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Harrison, T. M., and Falvey, L.. ( 2001;), ‘ Democracy and new communication technologies. ’, Annals of the International Communication Association, 25:1, pp. 143.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Hermida, A.. ( 2010;), ‘ From TV to Twitter: How ambient news became ambient journalism. ’, Media/Culture Journal, 13:2, https://doi.org/10.5204/mcj.220. Accessed 17 May 2020.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Hollenbaugh, E. E.. ( 2019;), ‘ Privacy management among social media natives: An exploratory study of Facebook and Snapchat. ’, Social Media+Society, 5:3, https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/2056305119855144. Accessed 17 May 2020.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Huckfeldt, R.,, Mendez, J. M., and Osborn, T.. ( 2004;), ‘ Disagreement, ambivalence, and engagement: The political consequences of heterogeneous networks. ’, Political Psychology, 25:1, pp. 6595.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Hughes, D. J.,, Rowe, M.,, Batey, M., and Lee, A.. ( 2012;), ‘ A tale of two sites: Twitter vs. Facebook and the personality predictors of social media usage. ’, Computers in Human Behavior, 28:2, pp. 56169.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Hutchinson, A.. ( 2017;), ‘ Instagram reaches 800 million users, 2 million advertisers. ’, SocialMediaToday, 26 September, https://www.socialmediatoday.com/social-business/instagram-reaches-800-million-users-2-million-advertisers. Accessed 17 May 2020.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Hutchinson, A.. ( 2018;), ‘ Reddit now has as many users as Twitter, and far higher engagement rates. ’, SocialMediaToday, 20 April, https://www.socialmediatoday.com/news/reddit-now-has-as-many-users-as-twitter-and-far-higher-engagement-rates/521789. Accessed 17 May 2020.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Kenski, K., and Stroud, N. J.. ( 2006;), ‘ Connections between internet use and political efficacy, knowledge, and participation. ’, Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 50:2, pp. 17392.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Kim, Y.,, Chen, H., and Gil de Zúñiga, H.. ( 2013;), ‘ Stumbling upon news on the internet: Effect of incidental news exposure and relative entertainment use on political participation. ’, Computers in Human Behavior, 29:6, pp. 260714.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Kreis, R.. ( 2017;), ‘ The “tweet politics” of President Trump. ’, Journal of Language and Politics, 16:4, pp. 60718.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Kushin, M. J., and Yamamoto, M.. ( 2010;), ‘ Did social media really matter? College students’ use of online media and political decision making in the 2008 election. ’, Mass Communication and Society, 13:5, pp. 60830.
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Kwak, H.,, Lee, C.,, Park, H., and Moon, S.. ( 2010;), ‘ What is Twitter, a social network or a news media?. ’, 19th International Conference on World Wide Web, Raleigh, NC, April 2010, pp. 591600.
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Kwok, I., and Wang, Y.. ( 2013;), ‘ Locate the hate: Detecting Tweets against Blacks. ’, 27th AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Bellevue, Washington, USA, 14–18 July.
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Lee, E.,, Lee, J. A.,, Moon, J. H., and Sung, Y.. ( 2015;), ‘ Pictures speak louder than words: Motivations for using Instagram. ’, Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 18:9, pp. 55256.
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Lee, E., and Oh, S. Y.. ( 2013;), ‘ Seek and you shall find? How need for orientation moderates knowledge gain from Twitter use. ’, Journal of Communication, 63:4, pp. 74565.
    [Google Scholar]
  40. Lee, J.. ( 2015;), ‘ The double-edged sword: The effects of journalists’ social media activities on audience perceptions of journalists and their news products. ’, Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 20:3, pp. 31229.
    [Google Scholar]
  41. Lee, S. K.,, Lindsey, N. J., and Kim, K. S.. ( 2017;), ‘ The effects of news consumption via social media and news information overload on perceptions of journalistic norms and practices. ’, Computers in Human Behavior, 75, pp. 25463.
    [Google Scholar]
  42. Marantz, A.. ( 2018;), ‘ Reddit and the struggle to detoxify the Internet. ’, The New Yorker, 19 March, p. 18.
    [Google Scholar]
  43. McLeod, J. M., and McDonald, D. G.. ( 1985;), ‘ Beyond simple exposure: Media orientations and their impact on political processes. ’, Communication Research, 12:1, pp. 333.
    [Google Scholar]
  44. Mindich, D. T.. ( 2005), Tuned Out: Why Americans Under 40 Don’t Follow the News, Oxford:: Oxford University Press;.
    [Google Scholar]
  45. Molyneux, L.. ( 2018;), ‘ Mobile news consumption: A habit of snacking. ’, Digital Journalism, 6:5, pp. 63450.
    [Google Scholar]
  46. Müller, P.,, Schneiders, P., and Schäfer, S.. ( 2016;), ‘ Appetizer or main dish? Explaining the use of Facebook news posts as a substitute for other news sources. ’, Computers in Human Behavior, 65, pp. 43141.
    [Google Scholar]
  47. Nie, N. H.,, Junn, J., and Stehlik-Barry, K.. ( 1996), Education and Democratic Citizenship in America, Chicago, IL:: University of Chicago Press;.
    [Google Scholar]
  48. Park, C. S.. ( 2017;), ‘ Do social media facilitate political learning? Social media use for news, reasoning and political knowledge. ’, The Journal of Social Media in Society, 6:2, pp. 20638.
    [Google Scholar]
  49. Pew Research Center ( 2015;), ‘ What the public knows – in pictures, words, maps and graphics. ’, https://www.pewresearch.org/politics/2015/04/28/what-the-public-knows-in-pictures-words-maps-and-graphs. Accessed 17 May 2020.
  50. Pew Research Center ( 2018;), ‘ News use across social media platforms 2018. ’, https://www.journalism.org/2018/09/10/news-use-across-social-media-platforms-2018. Accessed 17 May 2020.
  51. Pew Research Center ( 2019;), ‘ Americans are wary of the role social media sites play in delivering the news. ’, https://www.journalism.org/2019/10/02/americans-are-wary-of-the-role-social-media-sites-play-in-delivering-the-news. Accessed 17 May 2020.
  52. Pingree, R. J.. ( 2007;), ‘ How messages affect their senders: A more general model of message effects and implications for deliberation. ’, Communication Theory, 17:4, pp. 43961.
    [Google Scholar]
  53. Poell, T., and Borra, E.. ( 2012;), ‘ Twitter, YouTube, and Flickr as platforms of alternative journalism: The social media account of the 2010 Toronto G20 protests. ’, Journalism, 13:6, pp. 695713.
    [Google Scholar]
  54. Putnam, R. D.. ( 2000;), ‘ Bowling alone: America’s declining social capital. ’, in L. Crothers, and C. Lockhart. (eds), Culture and Politics, New York:: Palgrave Macmillan;, pp. 22334.
    [Google Scholar]
  55. Ran, W.,, Yamamoto, M., and Xu, S.. ( 2016;), ‘ Media multitasking during political news consumption: A relationship with factual and subjective political knowledge. ’, Computers in Human Behavior, 56, pp. 35259.
    [Google Scholar]
  56. Sauvageau, F.. ( 2012;), ‘ The uncertain future of news. ’, in D. Taras, and C. R. Waddell. (eds), How Canadians Communicate IV: Media and Politics, Edmonton, Alberta:: Athabasca University Press;, pp. 2943.
    [Google Scholar]
  57. Schäfer, S.. ( 2020;), ‘ Illusion of knowledge through Facebook news? Effects of snack news in a news feed on perceived knowledge, attitude strength, and willingness for discussions. ’, Computers in Human Behavior, 103, pp. 112.
    [Google Scholar]
  58. Schäfer, S.,, Sülflow, M., and Müller, P.. ( 2017;), ‘ The special taste of snack news: An application of niche theory to understand the appeal of Facebook as a news source. ’, First Monday, 22:4, https://journals.uic.edu/ojs/index.php/fm/article/download/7431/6088. Accessed 17 May 2020.
    [Google Scholar]
  59. Statista ( 2019;), ‘ Percentages of U.S. Internet users who use Snapchat as of 3rd quarter 2019, by age group. ’, https://www.statista.com/statistics/814300/snapchat-users-in-the-united-states-by-age. Accessed in 15 October 2019.
  60. Statista ( 2020;), ‘ Most popular social networks worldwide as of January 2020, ranked by number of active users. ’, https://www.statista.com/statistics/272014/global-social-networks-ranked-by-number-of-users. Accessed 1 March 2020.
  61. Vitak, J.,, Crouse, J., and LaRose, R.. ( 2011;), ‘ Personal Internet use at work: Understanding cyberslacking. ’, Computers in Human Behavior, 27:5, pp. 175159.
    [Google Scholar]
  62. Walker, M.. ( 2019;), ‘ Americans favor mobile devices over desktops and laptops for getting news. ’, https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2019/11/19/americans-favor-mobile-devices-over-desktops-and-laptops-for-getting-news/. Accessed 1 December 2019.
  63. Willnat, L., and Weaver, D. H.. ( 2018;), ‘ Social media and US journalists: Uses and perceived effects on perceived norms and values. ’, Digital Journalism, 6:7, pp. 889909.
    [Google Scholar]
  64. Zaller, J. R.. ( 1992), The Nature and Origins of Mass Opinion, Los Angeles, CA:: Cambridge University Press;.
    [Google Scholar]
  65. Lee, Jayeon. ( 2023;), ‘ Is Snapchat Discover really a news platform? News snacking from social media and users’ knowledge of current affairs. ’, Journal of Applied Journalism & Media Studies, 12:1, pp. 3153, https://doi.org/10.1386/ajms_00047_1
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1386/ajms_00047_1
Loading
/content/journals/10.1386/ajms_00047_1
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Article
Keyword(s): Facebook; knowledge; news; Reddit; Snapchat; Twitter
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a success
Invalid data
An error occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error