‘Insider news’ on Russian Telegram: Resembling truth, proximity and objectivity

References

1. Ahva, L., and Pantti, M.. ( 2014;), ‘ Proximity as a journalistic keyword in the digital era: A study on the “closeness” of amateur news images. ’, Digital Journalism, 2:3, pp. 322–33.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Akbari, A., and Gabdulhakov, R.. ( 2019;), ‘ Platform surveillance and resistance in Iran and Russia: The case of Telegram. ’, Surveillance & Society, 17:1&2, pp. 223–31.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Al-Rawi, A.. ( 2022;), ‘ News loopholing: Telegram news as portable alternative media. ’, Journal of Computational Social Science, 5:1, pp. 949–68.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Anon. ( 2017a;), ‘ Стали известны авторы анонимных Telegram-каналов “Мышь в овощном”, “338”, “Акитилоп” и “ОПЕР СЛИЛ”’ (‘Authors of anonymous Telegram channels “Mouse in Vegetable”, “338”, “Akitilop” and “Opera Slil” became known’). , Grazhdanskie Sily, 31 October, https://gr-sily.ru/obshestvo/stali-izvestny-avtory-anonimnyh-telegram-kanalov-mysh-v-ovoshnom-338-akitilop-i-oper-slil-25828.html. Accessed 8 April 2023.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Anon. ( 2017b;), ‘ Каналы распространения: Какие цели преследуют анонимные Telegram-каналы о политике’ (‘Channels of distribution: What are the goals of anonymous Telegram channels about politics’). , Kommersant, 30 January, https://www.kommersant.ru/doc/3205690. Accessed 8 April 2023.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Bazaco, Á.,, Redondo, M. and, Sánchez-García, P.. ( 2019;), ‘ Clickbait as a strategy of viral journalism: Conceptualisation and methods. ’, Revista Latina de Comunicación Social, 74, pp. 94–115, https://doi.org/10.4185/RLCS-2018-1323en.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Belinskaya, Y.. ( 2020;), ‘ Trollfabriken und das Protestnetzwerk der russischen Opposition auf YouTube’ (‘Troll factories and the protest network of the Russian opposition on YouTube’). , Kommunikation.medien, 12, pp. 1–28, https://www.doi.org/10.25598/JKM/2020-12.3.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Belinskaya, Y.. (forthcoming 2023;), ‘ Wie das Internet in Russland unschädlich gemacht wird: Ein Chronik der staatlichen „Versicherheitlichungs“-Maßnahmen’ (‘How the Internet is being tamed in Russia: Chronicle of state securitization measures’). Journalistik: Zeitschrift für Journalismusforschung, 1, pp. 97–122, https://www.doi.org/10.1453/2569-152X-12023-11505-de.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Beschastna, T.. ( 2013;), ‘ Freedom of expression in Russia as it relates to criticism of the government. ’, Emory International Law Review, 27:2, pp. 1105–44.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Bodrunova, S. S.. ( 2021;), ‘ Information disorder practices in/by contemporary Russia. ’, in H. Tumber, and S. Waisbord. (eds), The Routledge Companion to Media Disinformation and Populism, London and New York:: Routledge;, pp. 279–89.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Bourgeois, S.. ( 2020), ‘“Well, like, oh yeah …”: Non-dialogical functions of discourse markers in journalistic writing’, doctoral dissertation, Neuchâtel:: Université de Neuchâtel.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Brantner, C.,, Rodríguez-Amat, J. R., and Belinskaya, Y.. ( 2021;), ‘ Structures of the public sphere: Contested spaces as assembled interfaces. ’, Media and Communication, 9:3, pp. 16–27.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Chen, Y.,, Conroy, N. J., and Rubin, V. L.. ( 2015;), ‘ Misleading online content: Recognizing clickbait as “false news”. ’, in Proceedings of the 2015 ACM on Workshop on Multimodal Deception Detection, Seattle, WA, USA, 15 November, New York:: Association for Computing Machinery;, pp. 15–19.
    [Google Scholar]
14. Coleman, S., and Wright, S.. ( 2008;), ‘ Political blogs and representative democracy. ’, Information Polity, 13:1&2, p. 1.
    [Google Scholar]
15. The Copia Institute ( 2021;), ‘ Telegram gains users but struggles to remove violent content. ’, Trust and Safety Foundation, January, https://trustandsafetyfoundation.org/blog/telegram-gains-users-but-struggles-to-remove-violent-content-2021/. Accessed 8 April 2023.
    [Google Scholar]
16. Damstra, A.,, Boomgaarden, H. G.,, Broda, E.,, Lindgren, E.,, Strömbäck, J.,, Tsfati, Y., and Vliegenthart, R.. ( 2021;), ‘ What does fake look like? A review of the literature on intentional deception in the news and on social media. ’, Journalism Studies, 22:14, pp. 1947–63.
    [Google Scholar]
17. De Smaele, H.. ( 1999;), ‘ The applicability of western media models on the Russian media system. ’, European Journal of Communication, 14:2, pp. 173–89.
    [Google Scholar]
18. Edelman Trust Barometer ( 2022;), ‘ Global report: The cycle of distrust. ’, Edelman , https://www.edelman.com/trust/2022-trust-barometer. Accessed 8 April 2023.
19. Exlibris ( 2021;), ‘ Telegram 2021: аудитория, каналы, реклама’ (‘Telegram 2021: Audience, channels, advertising’). , Exlibris, 9 June, https://exlibris.ru/news/telegram-2021-auditoriya-kanaly-reklama/. Accessed 8 April 2023.
    [Google Scholar]
20. Filer, T., and Fredheim, R.. ( 2016;), ‘ Sparking debate? Political deaths and Twitter discourses in Argentina and Russia. ’, Information, Communication & Society, 19:11, pp. 1539–55.
    [Google Scholar]
21. Hameleers, M.. ( 2019;), ‘ Susceptibility to mis- and disinformation and the effectiveness of fact-checkers: Can misinformation be effectively combated?. ’, SCM Studies in Communication and Media, 8:4, pp. 523–46.
    [Google Scholar]
22. Gilmor, D.. ( 2003;), ‘ We the media: making our own news. ’, Authorama , http://www.authorama.com/wethe-media-13.html. Accessed 8 April 2023.
23. Heim, K.. ( 2013;), ‘ Framing the 2008 Iowa democratic caucuses: Political blogs and second-level intermedia agenda setting. ’, Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 90:3, pp. 500–19.
    [Google Scholar]
24. Hyland, K.. ( 2010;), ‘ Metadiscourse: Mapping interactions in academic writing. ’, Nordic Journal of English Studies, 9:2, pp. 125–43.
    [Google Scholar]
25. Kermani, H.. ( 2018;), ‘ Telegramming news: How have Telegram channels transformed journalism in Iran?. ’, Türkiye İletişim Araştırmaları Dergisi, 31, pp. 168–87.
    [Google Scholar]
26. Kiriya, I.. ( 2019;), ‘ New and old institutions within the Russian media system. ’, Russian Journal of Communication, 11:1, pp. 6–21.
    [Google Scholar]
27. Kouper, I.. ( 2022;), ‘ Information practices of resistance during the 2022 Russian invasion of Ukraine. ’, Proceedings of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 59:1, pp. 157–68.
    [Google Scholar]
28. Loosen, W., and Schmidt, J. H.. ( 2016;), ‘ Between proximity and distance: Including the audience in journalism. ’, in B. Franklin, and S. Eldridge II. (eds), The Routledge Companion to Digital Journalism Studies, London and New York:: Routledge,; pp. 354–63.
    [Google Scholar]
29. Majó-Vázquez, S.,, Zhao, J.,, Nurse, J., and Nielsen, R. K.. ( 2017), Digital-Born and Legacy News Media on Twitter during the UK General Election, Oxford:: Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism;.
    [Google Scholar]
30. Mediascope ( 2021;), ‘ Газета Коммерсантъ’ (‘Newspaper Kommersant’),. Kommersant, April, https://www.kommersant.ru/doc/4966189. Accessed 8 April 2023.
    [Google Scholar]
31. Meduza ( 2022;), ‘“ Би-би-си” приостановит работу своих журналистов в России. Они продолжат писать из-за рубежа’ (‘BBC will suspend the work of its journalists in Russia: They will continue to write from abroad’). , Meduza, 4 March, https://meduza.io/news/2022/03/04/bi-bi-si-priostanovit-rabotu-svoih-zhurnalistov-v-rossii-oni-prodolzhat-pisat-iz-za-rubezha. Accessed 8 April 2023.
    [Google Scholar]
32. Molyneux, L., and Coddington, M.. ( 2020;), ‘ Aggregation, clickbait and their effect on perceptions of journalistic credibility and quality. ’, Journalism Practice, 14:4, pp. 429–46.
    [Google Scholar]
33. Osho, S. A.. ( 2020;), ‘ Fake news as aberration in journalism practice: Examining truth and facts as basis of fourth estate of the realm. ’, in J. Višňovský, and J. Radošinská. (eds), Fake News Is Bad News-Hoaxes, Half-Truths and the Nature of Today’s Journalism, London:: IntechOpen;.
    [Google Scholar]
34. Papacharissi, Z.. ( 2015;), ‘ Toward new journalism(s) affective news, hybridity, and liminal spaces. ’, Journalism Studies, 16:1, pp. 27–40.
    [Google Scholar]
35. Petrov, N.,, Lipman, M., and Hale, H. E.. ( 2014;), ‘ Three dilemmas of hybrid regime governance: Russia from Putin to Putin. ’, Post-Soviet Affairs, 30:1, pp. 1–26.
    [Google Scholar]
36. Reut, O. Ch.. ( 2019;), ‘ Анонимные телеграм-каналы в системе политических коммуникаций’ (‘Anonymous Telegram channels in the system of political communications’),. in O. Golub. (ed.), Proceedings of the Conference Strategic Communication in the Modern World, Saratov:: Saratovskiy Istochnik;, pp. 314–22.
    [Google Scholar]
37. Rubin, M.. ( 2018;), ‘ Телега из Кремля. Рассказ о том, как власти превратили Telegram в телевизор’ (‘Telegram from the Kremlin: The story of how the authorities turned Telegram into a TV’). , The Project, 28 November, https://www.proekt.media/narrative/telegram-kanaly/. Accessed 8 April 2023.
    [Google Scholar]
38. Rubina, V. B.. ( 2020;), ‘ Telegram-каналы как основные слагаемые успеха мессенджера Telegram’ (‘Telegram channels as the main components of the success of the Telegram messenger’). , Ideas and Innovations, 8:1, p. 73.
    [Google Scholar]
39. Salaverría, R.. ( 2015;), ‘ Periodismo en 2014: Balance y tendencias. ’, Cuadernos de periodistas, 29, pp. 9–22.
    [Google Scholar]
40. Salikov, A.. ( 2019;), ‘ Telegram as a means of political communication and its use by Russia’s ruling elite. ’, Politologija, 3:95, pp. 83–110.
    [Google Scholar]
41. Sánchez-Villar, J. M.. ( 2019;), ‘ The use of blogs as social media tools of political communication: Citizen journalism and public opinion 2.0. ’, Communication & Society, 32:1, pp. 39–55.
    [Google Scholar]
42. Semin, G. R.. ( 2007;), ‘ Linguistic markers of social distance and proximity. ’, in K. Fiedler. (ed.), Social Communication, New York:: Psychology Press,; pp. 389–408.
    [Google Scholar]
43. Vu, H. T., and Saldaña, M.. ( 2021;), ‘ Chillin’ effects of fake news: Changes in practices related to accountability and transparency in American newsrooms under the influence of misinformation and accusations against the news media. ’, Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 98:3, pp. 769–89.
    [Google Scholar]
44. Wijermars, M., and Lokot, T.. ( 2022;), ‘ Is Telegram a “harbinger of freedom”? The performance, practices, and perception of platforms as political actors in authoritarian states. ’, Post-Soviet Affairs, 38:1&2, pp. 125–45.
    [Google Scholar]
45. Belinskaya, Yulia. ( 2023;), ‘“ Insider news” on Russian Telegram: Resembling truth, proximity and objectivity. ’, Journal of Applied Journalism & Media Studies, online first, https://doi.org/10.1386/ajms_00108_1
    [Google Scholar]