Festivity and the contemporary: Worldly affinities in Southeast Asian art1 | Intellect Skip to content
1981
  1. Home
  2. A-Z Publications
  3. Art & the Public Sphere
  4. Volume 8, Issue 2
  5. Article
Volume 8, Issue 2
  • ISSN: 2042-793X
  • E-ISSN: 2042-7948

Abstract

What is the place of the festival in the global system of contemporary art, and in that system’s history? Can the large, recurring surveys that are its most prominent exhibitions today even be considered festivals? Such questions become more pressing as sites newly embraced by that system take their place on a global event calendar, and as the events increasingly resemble those held elsewhere or merge with the market in the form of art fairs. What becomes of community and locality, of spontaneity and participation, as that market – and art history – takes up the uncommodified fringes and untold stories of contemporary art’s ever widening geography? This article stems from my research for a recent volume entitled , concerning a series of artist-initiated festivals held in northern Thailand in the 1990s known as the Chiang Mai Social Installation. These gatherings, and others like them, suggest that while national representation was the usual ticket to participation on a global circuit, the agencies and currency of national representation were not essential determinants of contemporaneity; and that it was localism, rather than any internationalism, that underpinned the worldly affinities discovered amongst artists in Southeast Asia at that time. The sites of this becoming contemporary were festive, sites of celebration and expenditure rather than work and accumulation. What does this mean for contemporary art’s history and theory, and how might it change our understanding of the region’s art and its international currency today?

© 2019 Intellect Ltd
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1386/aps_00012_7
2019-12-01
2024-05-01
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Antoinette, Michelle. ( 2014), Reworlding Art History: Encounters with Contemporary Southeast Asian Art after 1990, Amsterdam and New York:: Rodopi;.
     [Google Scholar]
  2. Bataille, Georges. ( 1997;), ‘ The psychological structure of fascism. ’, in F. Botting, and S. Wilson. (eds), The Bataille Reader, Cambridge, MA and London:: Blackwell;, pp. 122–46.
     [Google Scholar]
  3. Baudrillard, Jean. ( 1993), The Transparency of Evil: Essays on Extreme Phenomena (trans. J. Benedict.), London and New York:: Verso;.
     [Google Scholar]
  4. Becker, Howard. ( 1982), Art Worlds, Berkeley, CA:: University of California Press;.
     [Google Scholar]
  5. Blanchot, Maurice. ( 1997;), ‘ Museum sickness. ’, in M. Blanchot. (ed.), Friendship (trans. E. Rottenberg), Stanford:: Stanford University Press;, pp. 41–49.
     [Google Scholar]
  6. Bourdieu, Pierre. ( [1979] 1984), Distinction: A Social Critique of the Judgement of Taste (trans. R. Nice.), Cambridge, MA:: Harvard University Press;.
     [Google Scholar]
  7. Chikiamco, Clarissa,, Storer, Russell, and Tan, Adele. (eds) ( 2016), A Fact Has No Appearance: Art beyond the Object, Singapore:: National Gallery Singapore;.
     [Google Scholar]
  8. Clark, John. ( 2006;), ‘ Contemporary Asian art at Biennales and Triennales. ’, caa.reviews, 7 September, http://www.caareviews.org/reviews/884#.XmcS85Mzan4. Accessed 10 March 2020.
     [Google Scholar]
  9. Flores, Patrick D.. ( 2008), Past Peripheral: Curation in Southeast Asia, Singapore:: NUS Museum Press;.
     [Google Scholar]
  10. Flores, Patrick D.. ( 2012;), ‘ Turns in tropics: Artist-curator. ’, in N. Taylor, and L. Boreth. (eds), Modern and Contemporary Southeast Asian Art: An Anthology, Ithaca, NY:: Cornell Southeast Asia Program Publications;, pp. 171–88.
     [Google Scholar]
  11. Green, Charles, and Gardner, Anthony. ( 2016), Biennials, Triennials and Documenta: The Exhibitions that Created Contemporary Art, Chichester:: Wiley-Blackwell;.
     [Google Scholar]
  12. Ingawanij, May Adadol. ( 2018;), ‘ Art’s potentiality revisited: Araya Rasdjarmrearnsook’s late style and Chiang Mai Social Installation. ’, in D. Teh, and D. Morris. (eds), Artist-to-Artist: Independent Art Festivals in Chiang Mai 1992–98, London:: Afterall Books;, pp. 252–63.
     [Google Scholar]
  13. Mashadi, Ahmad. ( 2011;), ‘ Framing the 1970s. ’, Third Text, 25:4, pp. 409–17.
     [Google Scholar]
  14. Mashadi, Ahmad. ( [2004] 2017;), ‘ Moments of regionality: Negotiating Southeast Asia. ’, in F. Yasuko. (ed.), Art Studies 03: Shaping the History of Art in Southeast Asia, Tokyo:: Japan Foundation Asia Centre;, pp. 57–62.
     [Google Scholar]
  15. Pemberton, John. ( 1986;), ‘ Notes on the 1982 General Election in Solo. ’, Indonesia, 41 (April), pp. 1–22.
     [Google Scholar]
  16. Poshyananda, Apinan, and Kunavichayanont, Sutee. (eds) ( 2005), Death before Dying: The Return of Montien Boonma, Bangkok:: Office of Contemporary Art and Culture;.
     [Google Scholar]
  17. Raiji, Kuroda. ( 2013;), ‘ Performance collectives in 1960s Japan: With a focus on the “ritual school”. ’, Positions: East Asia Cultures Critique, 21:2, pp. 417–47.
     [Google Scholar]
  18. Sabapathy, Thiagarajan Kanaga. ( [1985] 2018;), ‘ Thoughts on ASEAN art. ’, in A. Mashadi,, S. Lingham,, P. Schoppert, and J. Toh. (eds), Writing the Modern: Selected Texts on Art and Art History in Singapore, Malaysia and Southeast Asia, 1973–2015, Singapore:: Singapore Art Museum;, pp. 236–38.
     [Google Scholar]
  19. Scott, James. ( 2009), The Art of Not Being Governed: An Anarchist History of Upland Southeast Asia, New Haven:: Yale University Press;.
     [Google Scholar]
  20. Shimazu, Naoko. ( 2014;), ‘ Diplomacy as theatre: Staging the Bandung Conference of 1955. ’, Modern Asian Studies, 48:1, pp. 225–52.
     [Google Scholar]
  21. Teh, David. ( forthcoming 2020;), ‘ Regionality and contemporaneity. ’, World Art, 10:3.
     [Google Scholar]
  22. Teh, David, and Morris, David. (eds) ( 2018), Artist-to-Artist: Independent Art Festivals in Chiang Mai 1992–98, London:: Afterall Books;.
     [Google Scholar]
  23. Tomii, Reiko. ( 2018), Radicalism in the Wilderness: International Contemporaneity and 1960s Art in Japan, Cambridge, MA and London:: MIT Press;.
     [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1386/aps_00012_7
Loading
Festivity and the contemporary: Worldly affinities in Southeast Asian art1
Art & the Public Sphere 8, 131 (2019); https://doi.org/10.1386/aps_00012_7
/content/journals/10.1386/aps_00012_7
/content/journals/10.1386/aps_00012_7
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Article
Keyword(s): art festivals; contemporaneity; contemporary art; festivity; Southeast Asia; Thai art

Most Cited Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a success
Invalid data
An error occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error