Allowing ourselves to follow our bodies: Cultivating student curiosity via sensorily-oriented modes of teaching | Intellect Skip to content
1981
  1. Home
  2. A-Z Publications
  3. Art & the Public Sphere
  4. Volume 10, Issue 2
  5. Article
Politicizing Artistic Pedagogies: Publics, Spaces, Teachings
  • ISSN: 2042-793X
  • E-ISSN: 2042-7948

Abstract

This article addresses the themes animating the Special Issue from the other side of the coin, namely the notion of aestheticizing political pedagogies. This reflects the direction of travel in some sections of politics and international relations scholarship, where there has been an upsurge of interest in aesthetics and especially popular culture. While there have been valuable contributions on teaching within such work, there has been a lack of sustained reflection on how, for example, a more aesthetically informed pedagogical practice can help us encourage students to think critically in creative ways. There has also been a rather bloodless account of aesthetics, diverting attention away from its visceral essence. Taking inspiration from the writings of Matt Davies on aesthetics, Jennifer Mason on the sensory and Cynthia Enloe on curiosity and surprise, the article explores the potential for aestheticizing political pedagogies to be mobilized in purposeful, strategic ways for enhancing the capacity of students to think critically and creatively. More specifically, I discuss how sensorily-oriented modes of teaching can disrupt entanglements between students’ ways of knowing and experiencing the world and their ‘objective’ understandings of politics, society, culture and so on. Three examples from my own teaching practice are discussed, all rooted in my utilization of extreme metal music with the aim of cultivating curiosity among students about their topics.

© 2021 Intellect Ltd
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1386/aps_00062_1
2021-11-01
2024-05-03
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Bleiker, R.. ( 2001;), ‘ The aesthetic turn in international political theory. ’, Millennium, 30:3, pp. 509–33.
     [Google Scholar]
  2. Bruff, I.. ( 2019;), ‘ Struggling for change. ’, IPPR Progressive Review, 26:1, pp. 8–18.
     [Google Scholar]
  3. Bruff, I.. ( 2021;), ‘ Moving to new generational beats: Lived experiences of capitalism, student-led (re)makings of knowledge, and the evolution of critical research agendas. ’, Capital & Class, article first , https://doi.org/10.1177/0309816821997119. Accessed 25 October 2021.
     [Google Scholar]
  4. Bruff, I.,, Ebenau, M., and May, C.. ( 2015;), ‘ Fault and fracture? The impact of new directions in comparative capitalisms research on the wider field. ’, in M. Ebenau,, I. Bruff, and C. May. (eds), New Directions in Comparative Capitalisms Research: Critical and Global Perspectives, London:: Palgrave Macmillan;, pp. 28–44.
     [Google Scholar]
  5. Buck-Morss, S.. ( 1992;), ‘ Aesthetics and anaesthetics: Walter Benjamin’s artwork essay reconsidered. ’, October, 62, pp. 3–41.
     [Google Scholar]
  6. Dashper, K.. ( 2015;), ‘ Revise, resubmit and reveal? An autoethnographer’s story of facing the challenges of revealing the self through publication. ’, Current Sociology, 63:4, pp. 511–27.
     [Google Scholar]
  7. Davies, M.. ( 2005;), ‘ Do it yourself: Punk rock and the disalienation of international relations. ’, in M. I. Franklin. (ed.), Resounding International Relations: On Music, Culture, and Politics, Basingstoke:: Palgrave Macmillan;, pp. 113–40.
     [Google Scholar]
  8. Davies, M.. ( 2012;), ‘ The aesthetics of the financial crisis: Work, culture, and politics. ’, Alternatives, 37:4, pp. 317–30.
     [Google Scholar]
  9. Davies, M., and Franklin, M. I.. ( 2015;), ‘ What does (the study of) world politics sound like?. ’, in F. Caso, and C. Hamilton. (eds), Popular Culture and World Politics: Theories, Methods, Pedagogies, Bristol:: E-International Relations Publishing;, pp. 120–47.
     [Google Scholar]
  10. Davies, M.,, Philpott, S.,, Grayson, K., and Creadick, A.. ( 2014;), ‘ Popular culture and world politics. ’, Transformations, 24:1&2, pp. 155–68.
     [Google Scholar]
  11. Enloe, C.. ( 2004), The Curious Feminist: Searching for Women in a New Age of Empire, Berkeley, CA:: University of California Press;.
     [Google Scholar]
  12. Grayson, K.,, Davies, M., and Philpott, S.. ( 2009;), ‘ Pop goes IR? Researching the popular culture-world politics continuum. ’, Politics, 29:3, pp. 155–63.
     [Google Scholar]
  13. Harman, S.. ( 2019), Seeing Politics: Film, Visual Method and International Relations, Montreal:: McGill-Queen’s University Press;.
     [Google Scholar]
  14. Horn, L.,, Rubin, O., and Schouenborg, L.. ( 2016;), ‘ Undead pedagogy: How a zombie simulation can contribute to teaching international relations. ’, International Studies Perspectives, 17:2, pp. 187–201.
     [Google Scholar]
  15. Hozić, A. A.. ( 2017;), ‘ Introduction: The aesthetic turn at 15 (legacies, limits and prospects). ’, Millennium, 45:2, pp. 201–05.
     [Google Scholar]
  16. Jordan, M.. ( 2017;), ‘ Art and the public sphere: From controversy to opinion formation in the making of contemporary art. ’, Art & the Public Sphere, 6:1&2, pp. 7–18.
     [Google Scholar]
  17. Kahn-Harris, K.. ( 2007), Extreme Metal: Music and Culture on the Edge, Oxford:: Berg;.
     [Google Scholar]
  18. Mason, J.. ( 2011;), ‘ Facet methodology: The case for an inventive research orientation. ’, Methodological Innovations Online, 6:3, pp. 75–92.
     [Google Scholar]
  19. Mason, J.. ( 2018), Affinities: Potent Connections in Personal Life, Cambridge:: Polity;.
     [Google Scholar]
  20. Mason, J., and Davies, K.. ( 2009;), ‘ Coming to our senses? A critical approach to sensory methodology. ’, Qualitative Research, 9:5, pp. 587–603.
     [Google Scholar]
  21. Ramel, F.. ( 2018;), ‘ Teaching international relations through arts: Some lessons learned. ’, International Studies Perspectives, 19:4, pp. 360–74.
     [Google Scholar]
  22. van Apeldoorn, B.,, Bruff, I., and Ryner, M.. ( 2010;), ‘ The richness and diversity of critical IPE perspectives: Moving beyond the debate on the “British School”. ’, in N. Phillips, and C. Weaver. (eds), International Political Economy: Debating the Past, Present and Future, New York:: Routledge;, pp. 215–22.
     [Google Scholar]
  23. Wendt, A.. ( 1999), Social Theory of International Politics, Cambridge:: Cambridge University Press;.
     [Google Scholar]
  24. Bruff, Ian. ( 2021;), ‘ Allowing ourselves to follow our bodies: Cultivating student curiosity via sensorily-oriented modes of teaching. ’, Art & the Public Sphere, 10:2, pp. 233–47, https://doi.org/10.1386/aps_00062_1
     [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1386/aps_00062_1
Loading
  • Article Type: Article
Keyword(s): aesthetics; curiosity; extreme metal; pedagogy; sensory; teaching

Most Cited Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a success
Invalid data
An error occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error