Class matters: Dialogue and dialogics in the work of Condé and Beveridge

References

1. Bakhtin, M. M. ([1919–24] 1990), Art and Answerability: Early Philosophical Essays (ed. M. Holquist and V. Liapunov, trans. V.Liapunov), Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Bakhtin, M. M. ([1929] 1984), Problems of Dostoevksy’s Poetics (ed. and trans. C. Emerson), Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Bennett, T. (1995), The Birth of the Museum: History, Theory, Politics, London: Routledge.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Bishop, C. (2012), Artificial Hells: Participatory Art and the Politics of Spectatorship, London: Verso.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Bourdieu, P. and Darbel, A. ([1969] 1991), The Love of Art: European Art Museums and Their Public (trans. C.Beattie and N.Merriman), Cambridge, MA: Polity Press.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Bourriaud, N. ([1998] 2002), Relational Aesthetics (trans. S.Pleasance and F.Woods), Paris: Les presses du réel.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Critical Art Ensemble (2012), Disturbances, London: Four Corners Books.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Downey, A. (2009), ‘An ethics of engagement: Collaborative art practices and the return of the ethnographer’, Third Text, 23:5, pp. 593–603.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Duncan, C. (1995), Civilizing Rituals: Inside Public Art Museums, London: Routledge.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Freire, P. (1970), Pedagogy of the Oppressed, New York: Seabury Press.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Haynes, D. J. (2002), ‘Bakhtin and the visual arts’, in P. Smith and C. Wilde (eds), A Companion to Art Theory, London: Blackwell, pp. 292–302.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Holmes, B. (2009), Escape the Overcode: Activist Art in the Control Society, Zagreb: Eindhoven, Van Abbemuseum and WHW.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Hutchison, M. and Collins, L. (2009), ‘Translations: Experiments in dialogic representation of cultural diversity in three museum sound installations’, Museum and Society, 7:2, pp. 92–109.
    [Google Scholar]
14. Kemmis, S. and McTaggart, R. (2005), ‘Participatory action research: Communicative action and the public sphere’, in N. Denzin and Y. S. Lincoln (eds), The Sage Handbook of Qualitative Research, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, pp. 559–603.
    [Google Scholar]
15. Kester, G. (ed.) (2001), ‘Conversation pieces: Collaboration and artistic identity’, Unlimited Partnerships: Collaborations in Contemporary Art, Buffalo, NY: CEPA Gallery, pp. 2–8.
    [Google Scholar]
16. Kester, G. (2004), Conversation Pieces: Community and Communication in Modern Art, Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
    [Google Scholar]
17. Kester, G. (2006), ‘Crowds and connoisseurs: Art and the public sphere in America’, in A. Jones (ed.), A Companion to Contemporary Art since 1945, Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 249–68.
    [Google Scholar]
18. Kester, G. (2011), The One and the Many: Contemporary Collaborative Art in a Global Context, Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
19. Lippard, L. (1985), ‘Introduction’, in D. Kahn and D. Neumaier (eds), Cultures in Contention, Seattle, WA: Real Comet Press, pp. 8–13.
    [Google Scholar]
20. Lippard, L. (1995), ‘Looking around: Where we are, where we could be’, in S. Lacy (ed.), Mapping the Terrain: New Genre Public Art, Seattle, WA: Bay Press, pp. 114–30.
    [Google Scholar]
21. McKee, Y. (2016), Strike Art: Contemporary Art and the Post-Occupy Condition, London: Verso.
    [Google Scholar]
22. Raunig, G. (2007), Art and Revolution: Transversal Activism in the Long Twentieth Century (trans. A.Derieg), Los Angeles, CA: Semiotext(e).
    [Google Scholar]
23. Sholette, G. (2011), Dark Matter: Art and Politics in the Age of Enterprise Culture, London: Pluto Press.
    [Google Scholar]
24. Thompson, N. (2015), Seeing Power: Art and Activism in the 21st Century, Brooklyn, NY: Melville House.
    [Google Scholar]