oa Urban experiments exhibited: Exploring practice-based design research and agency in urban space

References

1. Arnstein, S. R.. ( 1969;), ‘ A ladder of citizen participation. ’, Journal of the American Institute of Planners, 35:4, pp. 216–24.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Binder, T., and Brandt, E.. ( 2017;), ‘ Design (research) practice. ’, in L. Vaughan. (ed.), Practice-Based Design Research, London:: Bloomsbury;, pp. 101–10.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Binder, T.,, Brandt, E.,, Ehn, P., and Halse, J.. ( 2015;), ‘ Democratic design experiments: Between parliament and laboratory. ’, CoDesign, 11:3&4, pp. 152–65.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Borasi, G., and Zardini, M.. (eds) ( 2008), Actions: What You Can Do with the City, Montréal:: Canadian Centre for Architecture;.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Brandt, E., and Binder, T.. ( 2007;), ‘ Experimental design research: Genealogy, intervention, argument. ’, International Association of Societies of Design Research, Hong Kong, 10, Hong Kong, China, 12–15 November .
   [Google Scholar]
6. Brenner, N.,, Marcuse, P., and Mayer, M.. (eds) ( 2012), Cities for People, Not for Profit: Critical Urban Theory and the Right to the City, London:: Routledge;.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Chase, J. Leighton,, Crawford, M., and Kaliski, J.. ( 1999), Everyday Urbanism, New York:: Monacelli Press;.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Crawford, M.. ( 2016;), ‘ Public space update: Report from the United States. ’, The Journal of Public Space, 1:1, pp. 11–16.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Debord, Guy. ( [1961] 1989;), ‘ Perspectives for the conscious alteration of everyday life. ’, in K. Knabb. (ed.), Situationist International Anthology, , 2nd ed.., Berkeley, CA:: Bureau of Public Secrets;, pp. 68–76.
   [Google Scholar]
10. DiSalvo, C.. ( 2010;), ‘ Design, democracy and agonistic pluralism. ’, in Proceedings of the Design Research Society Conference, 7–9 July, Montreal:: Design Research Society;, pp. 366–71.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Florida, R.. ( 2002), The Rise of the Creative Class, vol. 9, New York:: Basic books;.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Fuad-Luke, A.. ( 2013), Design Activism: Beautiful Strangeness for a Sustainable World, London:: Routledge;.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Harvey, D.. ( 2003;), ‘ The Right to the City. ’, International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 27:4, pp. 939–41.
    [Google Scholar]
14. Harvey, D.. ( 2005), A Brief History of Neoliberalism, Oxford:: Oxford University Press;.
    [Google Scholar]
15. Harvey, D.. ( 2008;), ‘ The Right to the City. ’, The City Reader, 6:1, pp. 23–40.
    [Google Scholar]
16. Harvey, D.. ( 2012), Rebel Cities: From the Right to the City to the Urban Revolution, London:: Verso books;.
    [Google Scholar]
17. Iveson, K.. ( 2013;), ‘ Cities within the city: Do-it-yourself urbanism and The Right to the City. ’, International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 37:3, pp. 941–56.
    [Google Scholar]
18. Jönsson, L., and Lenskjold, T. U.. ( 2014;), ‘ A foray into not-quite companion species: Design experiments with urban animals as significant others. ’, Artifact: Journal of Design Practice, 3:2, pp. 7.1–7.13(1).
    [Google Scholar]
19. Knabb, K.. ( 1981), Situationist International Anthology, Berkeley, CA:: Bureau of Public Secrets;.
    [Google Scholar]
20. Knutz, E., and Dankl, K.. ( 2021;), ‘ Scaling experiments in urban space: An exploratory framework. ’, Nordes, 1:9, pp. 449–54.
    [Google Scholar]
21. Latour, B.. ( 2005), Reassembling the Social: An Introduction to Actor–Network-Theory, Oxford:: Oxford University Press;.
    [Google Scholar]
22. Lefebvre, H.. ( 1996;), ‘ The Right to the City. ’, in E. Kofman, and E. Lebas. (eds), Writings on Cities: Henri Lefebvre, Oxford:: Blackwell;, pp. 147–59.
    [Google Scholar]
23. Markussen, T.. ( 2013;), ‘ The disruptive aesthetics of design activism: Enacting design between art and politics. ’, Design Issues, 29:1, pp. 38–50.
    [Google Scholar]
24. Markussen, T.. ( 2020;), ‘ Politics of design activism: From impure politics to parapolitics. ’, in J. Traganou. (ed.), Design and Political Dissent: Spaces, Visuals, Materialities, London:: Routledge;, pp. 171–83.
    [Google Scholar]
25. Mayer, M.. ( 2009;), ‘ “The Right to the City” in the context of shifting mottos of urban social movements. ’, City, 13:2&3, pp. 362–74.
    [Google Scholar]
26. Munthe-Kaas, P.. ( 2015;), ‘ Agonism and co-design of urban spaces. ’, Urban Research & Practice, 8:2, pp. 218–37.
    [Google Scholar]
27. Park, R. E.. ( 1967), On Social Control and Collective Behavior: Selected Papers, vol. 275, Chicago, IL:: University of Chicago Press;.
    [Google Scholar]
28. Purcell, M.. ( 2008), Recapturing Democracy: Neoliberalization and the Struggle for Alternative Urban Futures, London:: Routledge;.
    [Google Scholar]
29. Sewell Jr., W. H.. ( 1992;), ‘ A theory of structure: Duality, agency, and transformation. ’, American Journal of Sociology, 98:1, pp. 1–2.
    [Google Scholar]
30. Woodward, Ian. ( 2007), Understanding Material Culture, Thousand Oaks, CA:: Sage Publications;.
    [Google Scholar]
31. Knutz, Eva, and Dankl, Kathrina. ( 2022;), ‘ Urban experiments exhibited: Exploring practice-based design research and agency in urban space. ’, Artifact: Journal of Design Practice, 9:1&2, pp. 26.1–26.26, https://doi.org/10.1386/art_00026_1
    [Google Scholar]